What does pol think of IQ?
>>72231221
overvalued.
People with low IQs or nigger lovers don't value it. People with high IQs and racists love it. I love it since I am a high IQ racist
>>72231221
useful and highly predictive of general outcomes in many ways; however, individually, willpower and discipline trump everything.
>>72231221
It only estimates how fast someone can learn. It is not an end-all be-all test.
How long before IQ tests are banned because niggers don't do well in them?
>>72231221
A metric which measures cognitive abilities
>>72231923
It's already the case. In the USA, it's illegal to administer an IQ test when you hire someone. Wanna know why? Because blacks perform more poorly on IQ tests than whites. Which falls under a law which prohibits hiring practices which discriminates against blacks.
>>72231589
>>72231852
niggers detected
>>72231221
/pol/ hates them when you apply them to jews and gooks being smarter than whites.
/pol/ loves them when it shows whites being superior to niggers and spics.
People seem to conveniently forget the 'quotient' part a lot.
If someone doesn't do any better a year later does that mean they became less intelligent?
IQ tests are only valuable when administered to children.
I think IQ tests are bullshit.
I did an online test once and I scored 85%, but I dont feel like im smarter than 85% of the population.
>>72232222
so it's irrelevant?
>>72232222
Everyone knows that kikes are smart. I mean, niggers don't run the world.
>>72232345
No one but self absorbed assholes "feel smart." I excel in my classes with ease, and I still do retarded shit.
>>72232222
It's the opposite really
>haha this IQ study shows that the IQ of conservatives is lower than the IQ of liberals. HAHA /pol/ btfo bunch of racist rednecks
>this study shows that blacks have a lower average IQ? Well you know, IQ doesn't measure anything. Blacks are just as smart as anyone else, I mean look at Barack Obama, he's smart right?
>>72231221
It's useful but it's also overrated by autists, who delude themselves into thinking that the fact they have high IQ means anything on it's own. It just shows highly intelligent people can be stupid as fuck.
>b-but all successful people have high IQ!
And shitload of those with high IQ aren't successful.
You can't quantify life so easily.
>>72232345
Online IQ tests are bullshit
>>72232234
I don't think you understand how IQ tests work.
>>72232222
>tfw going to make babies with my 130 IQ Korean gf
All of my happa friends are insanely smart. European creativity+Asian insect mind=ubermensch
This be my ticket outta da ghetto senpai
I scored 140 on a test with a psychologist when I was a kid. I don't feel smarter than most people, I just pick things up quicker.
I also remember tons of useless bullshit. I was on a tv quiz show when I was 17 lol.
>>72232676
>I also remember tons of useless bullshit. I was on a tv quiz show when I was 17 lol.
That's the definition of being smart.
I recommend you live in Detroit for 1 year to realize what it is like living amongst people with double digit IQs.
ITT: everyone claims their IQ is 120+
>>72232222
Not really. I can admit that slants and kikes are smarter.
>>72231221
its been proven that iq is hereditary, by measuring adopted babies to their biological parents
so if you took a baby from parents with an average iq of 80, the baby when grown up will have an average iq of 80, same as its biological parents, even though its been raised by non biological parents with an average iq of 100
this is disturbing for people fighting for human equality, as it enhances the notion that certain human races are dumber than others
so "obviously" it is faulty because of the environment, poverty ect. the "solution" would be to throw money at less intelligent poor people, and then they would be like the rest. the only thing one can do is to make the best of a bad situation
the source of this is a study made by robert plomin
>>72232222
Checked, btw
I've never done an IQ test, is there a reliable app or website for doing one?
>>72231221
overrated desu
>>72232652
>Online IQ tests are bullshit
There are some good ones, however real IQ test also includes verbal test done by a trained psychologist.
>>72231221
Its alright, tells you how good your brain hardware is, but nothing more than that.
How you use it is totally up to you, there are some people with sub 80 IQ who do well in life because of their sheet hard work, and some people with 140+ IQ who just loaf around and waste their lives
>>72232222
Only Ashkenazis. Mizrahis and Sephardics are below Whites
I like intelligence and personality tests.
My IQ = 116
Personality type = ESTP (basically Farage/Mussolini)
>>72232652
IQ tests were originally developed to measure a child's learning capacity. They would solve problems, earn an arbitrary score, and the score would be divided by their age. Thus Intelligence Quotient. Regardless if they tweaked them for adults, it's a test designed for kids, with a result for measuring kids.
self esteem crutch
>>72232899
If I had to guess I'd say /pol/ is around 110 average.
>>72232776
>That's the definition of being smart.
That's just means someone has good memory. Good memory doesn't necessarily mean high IQ.
>>72232967
IQ is mostly hereditary but also influenced by external factors.
How do you explain Flynn effect?
>>72232899
I've never taken an IQ test but according to the table I looked up my IQ is probably around 144 based on my SAT score
Sound accurate brosephs?
>>72231221
Meaningless Jewish trick to keep the goyim guessing.
>>72231221
Mensa member here with an IQ of 140.
Didn't do me much good...
>>72233119
ESTP herd too. Want to do a proper IQ test but multiple ones online say 130+
>>72233150
That's what they were originally developed for but they've taken off quite a bit since then as a diagnostic tool for all sorts of stuff.
Most notably the military in WW1 used early IQ tests; eventually this morphed into the ASVAB.
We make highschoolers take the SAT (not an IQ test inofitself but there is a very high correlation) and it's commonly used in the social sciences to study how behavioral differences breakdown along cognitive lines (among other things).
>>72231221
most people highly over estimate their IQ, and most test people take are not accurate enough
Not perfect but useful.
Useless to measure IQ below 80 and above 150, but in between it's nice. As most 150+ IQ people agree, they aren't smarter or dumber than eachother, it's just irrelevant to test it at the highest levels.
A good predictor of ability to function in western civilization.
>>72233319
>how do you explain Flynn effect
It actually varies depending on what part of the IQ test. People aren't actually that much smarter.
>>72233111
dubdubtrips
IQ tests are designed to test these things and IQ tests do that very well:
>Logic
>Pattern Recognition
>Ability to adapt to new ways of thinking
>Learning capability
>Memory
>Innovative thinking
>Ability to address several problems simultaneously
If you have an average IQ score then that means that you're bad at all of the things I mentioned above because they all go hand in hand. You can't be good at one of those things and bad at another, the only exception is if you're a retarded savant with nothing but a good memory.
Don't fall for the "IQ doesn't matter" meme. IQ scores are always accurate and having a high IQ is something that should be valued above all else.
>>72232577
That's just /pol/'s copout. Nobody on the left ever talks about IQ, they bring up "education" levels, where the left destroys the right.
>>72232652
Oh man just fuck off Shlomo
>>72231221
I was iq tested when I was younger as I was having trouble at school, it came back inconclusive, some sections I ranked genius level, some legit retard level thanks to muh dyslexia,
>>72231221
IMO it doesn't really mean a lot, since it doesn't take into account the amazing neuroplasticityvof the human brain. Specific skills e.g. pattern regognition, mathematical skill, memory can be trained and will significantly influence the outcome of an IQ test.
That's likely the reason, why physicists who spend their entire day solving complex equations score higher than niggers who spend their day listening to rap music.
>>72234420
But it's true.
Elliot was an autistic hapa aberration.
Hapas are the coming masterrace. Western ingenuity+Eastern discipline=unbeatable
I just did an online iq test But it was only 20 questions, so I'm guessing it isn't very accurate
>>72234270
You can do great in some and be average in some.
Your IQ score will be adjusted accordingly.
>should be valued above all else
That makes no sense, because high IQ doesn't guarantee anything.
>IQ scores are always accurate
They are accurate in the sense they can measure IQ accurately.
>>72233119
>116
118
>>72234585
>whites create the tallest, strongest, best looking people with the best civilizations
>somehow a good is supposed to improve your genetic heritage
I mean, MAYBE you could argue that mixing with Ashkenazi Jews is ok but there is no advantage a half-gook has over a white man/woman.
>>72233150
goodbye is short for god be with you, so everyone who says it is christian. atheists instead say "see you again"
>>72231221
>tumbnail pic
>>72231221
Great way to find out if someone is retarded or autistic.
>>72234777
>118
142
>>72231221
IQ is a meme. It has absolutely no practical value.
If academics really think it's important they would take the highest IQ kids and mold them into the best scientists and leaders.
Instead, they just go "hurp he's gifted" and let them fend for them self in shitty public school, stupid tests, and paying for college by themselves.
>>72234765
You can score differently on different parts of the test but my points still stands, you're either good at all of the things I mentioned or you're bad at all of them
>That makes no sense, because high IQ doesn't guarantee anything.
It does though. It guarantees that you're good at all the things I mentioned, which are pretty damn important qualities in a society.
>>72234983
results from elementary school don't count
>>72234420
> Nobody on the left ever talks about IQ, they bring up "education" levels, where the left destroys the right.
Christopher Michael Langan (born c. 1952) is an American whose IQ was reported to be between 195 and 210
He allegedly earned a perfect score on the SAT (pre-1995 scale) despite taking a nap during the test.[10] Langan attended Reed College and later Montana State University, but faced with financial and transportation problems, and believing that he could teach his professors more than they could teach him, he dropped out.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Langan
"Education" is the "copout" of the left, where a liberal arts degree can be flaunted around and assumed that the person holding the degree is intelligent. Being able to memorize and regurgitate what your professors tell you doesn't make you intelligent. With that being said, having a degree in something like engineering with a high IQ is the best of both worlds in many cases.
>>72232345
I was going to post the same, but I took mine in person, not online
I got something like 140.
I believe it is bullshit, because I think I'm average at best
IQ measures how well you perform on IQ tests. That's pretty much it.
>>72231221
there is no IQ.
>You have an IQ of 211, because our worthless test says so.
>>72233119
>>72233609
>MBTI
Wow why am I not surprised that people who "like IQs" also believe the MBTI is a reliable measurement of personality.
/pol/ is fucking retarded.
>>72235306
Isn't that the guy who worked as a bouncer at a bar and scribbled a bunch of 'advanced equations solving the problems of the universe' on a piece of paper which always got stolen by someone after he left it on the bar desk
>>72232076
Correct. The ruling you speak of which makes giving IQ tests illegal is Duke vs Power Briggs
>>72235306
Okay so he's basically an arrogant meme fuck who never accomplished anything tangible in his life. How is this something we should be striving for?
Master race reporting in. You mad, brainlets?
>>72235710
Yes, he was a bouncer but I can't confirm the rest. I honestly don't know much about his life.
>>72235854
>online test
>not even MENSA level
GTFO pleb
>>72235187
No, it doesn't guarantee anything.
It's nothing absolute, as in "you have high IQ-you're automatically good at this/that/citizen/person".
It's an okay indicator, that's all. Implications of IQ on real life aren't so clear as you make them out to be. As I said, you can't quantify life so easily.
>>72235846
Wow your angst is showing.
Chris Longan came up with his own theory which describes how scientific theory needs to focus on mind besides the reality, in the process to make it a comprehensive theory. He thinks that mind and reality are linked to each other. This is, to him, is the Theory of Everything. He worked on the theory for about two decades.
The guy is contributing more to humanity than you ever will.
>>72231923
In the U.S., this is already partially true. You can't use them in employment situations outside of very specific circumstances, per the Supreme Court's 'disparate impact' doctrine.
>>72236450
>that is his theory of everything
Yeah, so what? Any moron who thinks they're the next Einstein can produce "his own theory of everything." That proves absolutely nothing, and if it were even a legitimate "theory of everything," then it would be a huge deal.
Nobody takes this guy seriously. He's a bum who scored high on an IQ test, decided it made him superior to everyone else, and then started coming up with halfbaked ideas about the world. That's not impressive.
>>72236083
I watched some 60 minutes documentary about him and the whole thing is just sad as fuck. He's the smartest man in the world and he turned in to your average 60 year old alcoholic degenerate.
He was born in the wrong millennium, he was born in the wrong world. He should've been a great philosopher, artist or general. He was not meant to live in this Jewniverse that we're all forced to live in.
Actual high IQ reporting in.
IQ is a valid measurement of mental capacity, i.e., how much information a person can hold at the forefront of thought and validly parse at the same time.
That's why nearly all IQ test questions are puzzles.
What IQ doesn't take into account is actual knowledge, and motivation. So a person can certainly have a high IQ and still be a failure at life - in fact it's not uncommon at all. What I've discovered in my encounters with other high-IQ people is, the tendency to live life within a self-defined paradigm of contempt for the rest of mankind is pretty strong.
But to the point, the only people who regularly say that IQ is irrelevant are people with low IQ's. Most of them feel they were cheated somehow, or that the test was the problem, not themselves. Some of those people can be found ITT, and I say that without having read the thread.
>>72233334
Seems a bit inflated. Mine says I should have a 150, but I took a test and got somewhere around 130? Honestly IQ is worthless f a m p a i
IQ tests are very accurate. Lefties are trying to get rid of IQ tests because they show that we aren't all the same genetically.
I wish it was acceptable to brag about your IQ.
>>72235602
I don't recall saying it was accurate. I enjoy doing tests like that and it is interesting to me.
>>72231221
>take IQ test
>145
>don't have to study because my already high IQ
>can just put my IQ in my resume and get hired anywhere
This is what Mensa fags actually believe
>>72236913
Your own post contradicts you.
You admit that people with high IQ aren't necessarily successful.
That's the point people usually try to make, not ''IQ is bullshit''.
High IQ should be thought of as a tool of sorts. How you use that tool is up to you, and depends on many factors which can't be easily quantified.
>>72237078
When you say "I am ESTP," you are vouching for the reliability and accuracy of the result. The truth is that the MBTI is not an accurate or reliable measurement of anything. It is a horoscope for nerds, or a feel-good test like we used to post on our livejournals in the early 2000's. It's shit.
>>72237186
>Your own post contradicts you.
No, it doesn't. Also, don't bother with a retest, as long as you did your best on the first one, it was accurate.
>>72236770
It's only a theory, nothing more. You missed the point completely. He had more original thought with his theory than most people who go through the revolving door of education ever will.
You should make up a theory on why borderline trisomy 21 victims like you get butthurt over the internet. I'm sure it will be spectacular.
>>72236913
I got 125 IQ from swedish military testings when I was 16 or whatever. And despite my shit condition then I was offered for training for officer if I wanted. It's the most valid test I've taken, other internet tests are similar.
I honestly hate life desu and I'm somewhat of a failure. I kinda dislike others too so I think your comment is pretty spot on. Not that 125 is crazy or something.
>>72233111
Ashkenazi jews are pretty much white
>>72237044
>IQ tests are very accurate
...at measuring IQ.
>Lefties are trying to get rid of IQ tests
And frustrated idiots are trying to make them into most relevant thing.
>we aren't same genetically
Who claims that?
>I wish it was acceptable to brag about your IQ.
So if someone is a total failure in life, it makes sense for him to brag about his IQ?
You're as bad as ''leftists''.
>>72232222
>Israel
>>72237487
>So a person can certainly have a high IQ and still be a failure at life
>the only people who regularly say that IQ is irrelevant are people with low IQ's
High IQ alone means nothing. That's the point people are usually trying to make.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE I WANNA BE SMART I WANNA BE SMART I WANNA BE SMART
>>72237621
>why
do
>you
talk
>like this
retard?
Fucking stop it. That's Sargon of Akkad level's of ''lol, I'll just pause every 2 sec so I can add my witty zinger in there, man I am so smart''. Can't you respond to people like a normal person?
IQ tests are accurate at predicting how well a person is going to perform at other tasks. People with high IQs on average make more money than people with low IQs, they are also better at learning, they do better in school, they have better verbal skills and they are better at learning instruments/understanding music theory.
>>72231221
>IQ doesn't matter
Try hanging around people with two digit IQ and you'll change your mind.
>>72232646
>>72233087
>>72233319
>>72234765
>>72236435
>>72237186
>>72237621
Butthurt low IQ bush nigger detected.
>Monte = Bush
>Negro = Nigger
>>72233334
All the free internet ones say I have 144, so I usually go with 130-135
I would take an official one but I'm cheap.
>>72238358
>All the free internet ones say I have 144, so I usually go with 130-135
>>72238162
On average yes. But that means nothing on individual level.
On average Latvians are less prone to crime than Albanians. But that doesn't mean there are no criminals among Latvians, or that all Albanians are criminals.
You're talking about bragging on individual level but you make points about group. If you achieved no success bragging about your IQ makes zero sense.
>>72231221
i scored an 56 on mine IQ test im 12 btw
>>72238298
>Swedish banter
>>72238358
wew
>>72238631
This picture made me laugh.
What are you implying though?
>believing online tests at all
or
>Not believing them enough
>>72231221
they take too long for me to care enough to complete them just to get a number that comes out different for each test
>>72237547
Just carry on, bro, that's all you can really do. 125 is pretty high, you're smart. I don't mind anonymously telling you that mine is 139. The upshot of that is, I can do most math in my head, and I remember a lot.
For example, I had a 5th-grade English teacher who taught high school level composition to the smarter kids. He was a damn good teacher, and over the course of a year he touched on every rule of English grammar. Since that time, I have always known every rule of English grammar.
To get along better with others, my suggestion is to never let yourself be the center of attention, and never, EVER talk about how smart you are. Think of yourself as a special helper for mankind. But don't step into people's problems and solve them, wait for them to ask.
Also, if you can put yourself into a position around other high-IQ people, you'll be happier. What brings me down the most is contending with people of lesser intelligence but greater desire for dominance. These people are also known as "middle management." If you let yourself become just another worker bee in life, you will spend it at the mercy of these people, and they will go out of their way to make you miserable. It's the intellectual equivalent of a Napoleon Complex.
>>72233334
Here's a chart with ACT and SAT and IQ
I never took the SAT but I got a 33 on the ACT overall.
143 IQ according to this chart.
On this chart it equates a 33 to 1420 on the SAT so pretty much on par with you buddy.
>>72231221
It's a great predictor of someone's potential success.
>>72231923
It kinda is already, mentioning races being superior to others get your IQ research shut down.
>>72232222
I see no trouble in admitting those races have higher IQ, as long as you have high IQ as race you belong to the superior races.
>>72239295
I just noticed if you look at the average it shows the average ACT at below 19.
The national average is currently 21.
If you shift the scores to match that up, it puts me at a 141 IQ. Still "Poetic Genius"
>>72239158
I would assume the first.
I took the official Mensa practice and it said I have "a chance" at passing.
That really worried me. Isn't "passing" like 100? Or is it 120 or 150 or something (Im not getting my hopes up)
either way fuck Mensa they're a bunch of circle jerking faggots
>>72239295
Shieet, this chart puts me at 128-130.
>>72231221
i think it is proof that most people are beneath me
>>72239295
this can't be accurate, right?
>>72231221
not sure. Something about niggers and Jews.
/pol/ told me.
>>72237826
israel isnt just Ashkenazi.
Ashkenazi are not real jews and they are the ones with the high IQ.
Middle eastern jews are genetically like arabs.
So the vast majority is arab (jew,muslim,christian..)
>>72238715
No one said that having high IQ makes you magically successful. Your chances of performing well are higher. If you don't achieve the projected success expected from having a high IQ it says nothing about the accuracy of IQs. Do you not know how averages work? Some people will have more success, some people will have more success. That's how averages work.
If I have an IQ of 150 and I am expected to make 1 million dollars a year, and I make 200k a year it doesn't mean that IQ means nothing on the individual level. It means that I am a data point on the lower end. It doesn't make your argument any stronger. If the person who has an IQ of 150 and earns 200k had an IQ of 100 he'd probably wouldn't be making that much money.
I hate these autistic ''averages don't matter for the individual'' debates. Fucking stop, you autistic fag.
The reason I want to brag about my IQ is because people (rightfully) expect high IQ people to be smarter. When someone thinks you're smart they give you more respect. People usually look at my body build and think I am a stupid meathead.
>>72239295
>AVERAGE 90
see whites and blacks are all the same
>>72239836
Why not?
>>72239563
Yeah, I can agree with you. I never really cared before, but a couple days ago I got curious and took one. First one came out 144,
>pffff figures It's an online test
Took some more and they said 130-144
eh, cool.
It is anecdotal but I occasionally can't stand how slowly some other people I talk to think. And others, when their greatest interest of the moment is "finding some good 5$ deals", and that being all they want to talk about for a few hours on either side of noon.
>>72233502
nice
>>72239836
It's not. The SAT and IQ are completely unrelated. The SAT measures general knowledge, IQ does not measure knowledge at all.
Also, internet IQ tests are...well, internet IQ tests. They are the testing equivalent of a listicle.
There is serious science behind the measurement of IQ Each IQ question contains a certain number of information blocks. The more difficult questions contain many information blocks, and each must be considered in conjunction with the others in order to submit a correct answer.
No learned formula will help you on an IQ test, but the SAT requires that you know all the formulae you've been taught.
Having a high IQ might very well help you on an SAT test. But having a high SAT score will not help you on an IQ test.
tl;dr - the correlation between IQ score and SAT score is not altogether coincidental, but also not inherently intertwined.
>>72240312
It doesn't really mesh with my experience. It feels like those higher SAT scores appear more frequently than IQ would suggest.
>>72234753
Definitely not accurate my friend
>>72231221
If you have high IQ and you're a failure then you don't have high IQ. Just sayin.
>>72240698
nice bait
>>72240668
Do you have any data besides you "experience"?
I know that in raw numbers there are probably more SAT/ACT scores, as a vast number of highschool students take/are required to take these tests.
>>72240927
Well statistically it isn't at all likely that I would know so many people who have scored perfect on the SAT.
don't real.
it is a relevant attribute with caveats.
>>72240698
>If you have high IQ and you're a failure then you don't have the passion or opportunity to make good use of it.
Fixed that for you.
>>72240099
Given your posts, you are a stupid meathead.
>>72241224
I'll put it in a language you can understand
>Given
Not an argument
>your
Not an argument
>posts,
Not an argument
>you
Not an argument
>are
Not an argument
>a
Not an argument
>stupid
Not an argument
>meathead.
Not an argument
>>72240698
When asked what his IQ was, Stephen Hawking said "I have no idea. People who boast about their IQ are losers"
>>72232646
>>72233087
>>72233319
>>72234765
>>72236435
>>72237186
>>72237621
>>72238095
>>72238715
>>72238849
>>72241224
not an argument
>>72239295
>Niggers get 200 points inflated SAT score because they perform so poorly.
>Companies know this and raise the standard by 200 points.
>More Asians and whites get hired because they generally score higher.
Anyway, got some red pill IQ videos here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lsa_97KIlc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTdMY9RI-7E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zsh_b70NSFQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6WS-O9jw5M
>>72233319
>How do you explain Flynn effect?
Lack of nutrition, unstable environments and stimulus can harm an individuals cognitive development. When those things get better you see a small gain in intelligence. It means they got the proper development. But you can't increase the IQ beyond that.
>>72241734
ONE
>>72241596
no he didn't it takes him 2 hours to write a single word
IQ is subjective based on your cohort.
We are smarter than our parent's generation, but it doesn't matter because everyone is smarter than the previous generation.
So your IQ score is probably similar to your parents', even though you are smarter.
>>72231923
Already happened here. Basically if anything goes against the leftist narrative they make up reasons why it's bad and try to ban it.
>>72241974
Do not take that for a fact, i just think i've heard that from some legit sources. It sounds plausible at least
But its a bit strange to think that IQ levels haven't been roughly the same as they are now when we see what things the older civilizations achieved.
>>72231221
Kind of crap because you can get good at them through practice,
A better test is a reaction speed test which correlates with IQ but can not be studied or trained for.
High IQ here
>>72232345
Smart people feel dumber than they are, dumb people feel smarter than they are.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
>>72242365
>hispanics_and_blacks.png
>>72231221
My IQ = 140
>>72241458
I'll put it in a language you understand: you're a frustrated autist who believes he should be respected for something that is totally irrelevant when not followed by something else and that wasn't a product of hard work or ability (if we take for a fact you have high IQ).
Bragging about your IQ is totally idiotic, because if you achieved success, then success is what matters and you can brag about that.
If you haven't achieved success, bragging about IQ is basically saying ''I had the tools to make something great but I didn't do shit with it''.
>>72235846
No, he basically got chewed up and spit out by a system that cares more about the regurgitation of memorized information than about actual thinking.
kek try this guise: http://www.free-iqtest.net/
valid only the first try duh
>>72242558
True the is some correlation involving general pop intellect into the mental development of a person,
So the nigs in the north than would have not higher IQs but better psychological constructs in their minds than southern ones.
>>72241974
I agree with you, I'm just saying that you can't say ''environment plays no role''.
>>72242859
>valid only the first try
it's not even valid on the first try.
>>72232076
lmao you probably got 140+ and try to devalue every other opinion because of your insecurity. no wonder you gooks are lonely and giving up your birthrate and women for weeaboo wives
>>72243103
jff man
>>72242668
In other words you are admitting that having a high IQ does mean that someone has the tools, which goes against everything you said earlier.
That's all I want.
I am successful and I have a lot of money, but I don't want to be seen as a walking bag of money.
You went from spazing out like a tard to completely agreeing with me. You're saying that I have the tools and I did use them. That's enough for me.
>>72242410
I've said this to myself before. Someone thought i was smart and i said "I'm so smart i've realised how stupid i am"
To self proclaim smartness you've got to be suffering from some sort of sophomania.
>>72242859
this is some strange wording they use
>>72243518
But I said that already >>72237186
You failed to express yourself properly, your point could only be understood as ''I have a high IQ so people should respect me just because of that''.
>>72241145
No you didn't fix shit, if you are a useless fuck with high iq then you don't have high iq. There is no inbetween. People with high iq go on to become doctors, laywers, authors etc.
>>72243663
You're bringing up a completely unrelated conversation you had with someone else.
Keep up, low IQ Mountain Negro.
You're completely misconstruing what I said based on what someone else said.
What I said is that I would like to brag about my IQ because I want to be seen as smart. What I value is different from what other people value, and I want to put out what's important for me up front. Someone like Trump likes to go around saying that he has billions of dollars. I want to state my IQ with the same kind of confidence one has when they state their net worth.
I don't just want respect. I want people to acknowledge what's important for me and respect that part of me. If someone respects me because of my money or because I lift that has no value for me.
>>72231730
This t b h f a m
>>72241734
Can you please stop shillin Stefan's racist falsehoods, thanks.
>>72244776
Not trying to, just getting some facts out about IQ. Thankfully Stefan has backup from experts in those fields.
>>72244565
>I wish it was acceptable to brag about your IQ.
>IQ tests are accurate at predicting how well a person is going to perform at other tasks. People with high IQs on average make more money than people with low IQs, they are also better at learning, they do better in school, they have better verbal skills and they are better at learning instruments/understanding music theory.
>The reason I want to brag about my IQ is because people (rightfully) expect high IQ people to be smarter.
I couldn't have constructed any other meaning but that from your posts.
And I'm just telling you I said what you finally said earlier.
And reason why people can't respect your IQ is because IQ means nothing if it's not followed by something else. That is worthy of respect, not IQ alone.
Anyway, you sound like someone who has problems with self-esteem. Seek help.
>>72232222
I have no problem knowing Jews and Asians are smarter in general. I also have no problem knowing niggers are a few point above retarded in general. That's why Jews and Asians are generally wealthier. I like stuff that makes sense.
>Why are niggers poor?
Because they're stupid.
>>72245240
>IQ means nothing if it's not followed by something else
IQ means a lot because it's followed by a lot of things. For instance I make better arguments and make more sense than you. You contradict yourself and attribute old posts someone else made to me, while I have conversations with different people without losing track of who I am talking to. I am not even going to read what you quoted because I know you will not find a contradiction there.
You also assume that just because I am here I must not be successful, but I am very successful. That makes me believe that you aren't successful, that you're just projecting and assuming everyone else is in your position.
The armchair psychologist bit at the end is very weak. You use words like ''you sound'' to say something that you don't have to back up with an argument, and then you end that with an epik zinger. Saying ''I feel that'' or ''you sound like'', or ''I get the impression that'' doesn't make what you say any more valid. It only shows that you don't have anything to say. You only get emotional because you can't address what I am saying. I don't care for your emotions.
>>72232899
Never taken an IQ test but have a 4.0 GPA in a pre-doctorate undergrad. I don't consider myself smart; I just think I know how to buckle down and study when I have to. My ability to retain information is pretty bad, but I've been working on it. And like >>72232676
said, I've noticed I'm remembering a whole lot of useless shit now that surprisingly comes up a lot in conversations that I can contribute to factually.
>>72246446
>IQ means a lot because it's followed by a lot of things.
Not necessarily, that's my point. So alone it means nothing.
Even if there's 99% of chance you will achieve something, unless you achieve it it doesn't matter.
>You contradict yourself and attribute old posts someone else made to me, while I have conversations with different people without losing track of who I am talking to.
And now you assume a position of superiority in an internet discussion. My IQ doesn't matter.
>You also assume that just because I am here I must not be successful
I never even implied that in my posts.
>That makes me believe that you aren't successful
As with my IQ, totally irrelevant to this discussion.
>Saying ''I feel that'' or ''you sound like''
Because I can't be absolutely certain. But from my interactions with people I have learned to recognize certain patterns.
>That makes me believe that you aren't successful, that you're just projecting and assuming everyone else is in your position.
See? You're doing the exact same thing here.
>>72247681
Oh and I forgot: I didn't lose track, I simply pointed out I said that earlier, to clarify my position.
>>72247681
>And now you assume a position of superiority in an internet discussion.
If anything its you that do that.
>>72247908
And where did I do that?
I never stated whether my IQ is high or low and whether I'm ripped or successful.
Because that's irrelevant to discussion. He pointed that out in every post, and now he proceeded to assume my IQ is low in order to assume some superiority.
>>72247681
Again with this posting format. I am not reading this shit. If you have to comment after every sentence you don't have a point. Just because I use a period doesn't mean that's where the thought ends. I use paragraphs for that.
Just because you see idiots on /v/ posting like this doesn't mean that's how you should format your posts. This is garbage. Do you ever see presidential debates where they record each word a person says, play a sentence, stop and make a comment on it before playing the next sentence? This is not how conversations work.
I've gotten upwards of 150 in online tests.
When I actually had a test done at a shrink, I scored 130. This was three years ago; I'm currently 18.
I don't know what to do of this. I have a great documented IQ, but I'm a lazy cunt who spends his time getting mad over shit happening halfway across the planet.
>>72248822
You're autistic. I never even posted on /v/. I just like that format. We aren't having a presidential debate.
Oh, and since I'm bored of this, my IQ is 144, measured. You assumed wrong buddy.
You do have mental issues, I don't know enough to know why, but it's obvious from your posting. Seek help, you'll be happier. Bye now, take care.
A useful measurement of pattern recognition that unfortunately, cannot truly measure human intelligence. While there is a correlation between IQ and "success" in life, there are intelligent outliers that do not perform better than average on standardized IQ tests and are still what one would call intelligent and successful. Human intelligence is still too abstract to reliably measure with standardized test
>>72249622
>You do have mental issues, I don't know enough to know why,
What a great argument.
At least when I said you have a low IQ I backed it up with something.
Should have just said ''you do have low IQ, I don't know why u just do lol''.
>>72231221
I cant read sorry
>>72231589
this, IQ is a pretty poor measure of success.
family + friends (e.g. not being a social retard) gets you 1000x further than a high IQ ever will.
It's correct about niggers but its a conspiracy and tilted when analyzing nonjewish whites vs jews and asians
>>72238849
> bushnigger
>>72231221
They're not a bad general indicator of aptitude; it's all pattern recognition, which basically is how people learn.
On a smaller, individual scale, it's less useful.
>>72232652
THAT PIC
KEK
>>72237576
>REEEEEEEEEEEE
Kid in school tells me his IQ is 130. He's failing science. I guess IQ isn't all it's cracked up to be.
