How will Trump create jobs?
How will the jobs Trump creates provide better benefits, higher pay and better hours?
How will Trump fix the backwards health care system?
How will Trump put economy, health and science above gender rights, race rights and feelings?
How will Trump increase the strength of the US dollar?
How will Trump fix the massive debt of 19 trillion?
How will Trump help advance science and technology?
How will Trump solve the income gap?
How will Trump make my dollar buy more?
How will Trump drop outlandish prices across the country?
How will Trump solve the obesity problem?
/pol/, you have to answer these if we're going to win. Can you?
I honestly don't see how his policies are going to correct the massive financial and economic issues of this nation, not to mention the backwards, retarded health care system which seems to be causing more problems than it's helping.
I want to believe, I do. But no one's providing any answers on his policies. Why vote for him (assuming my vote even matters)?
Can anyone answers these questions?
YOU CAN PINPOINT THE EXACT MOMENT HE DECIDED TO RUN FOR PRESIDENCY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiJYGV8faZw
They usually don't ask questions like that, they just call him Hitler.
>>72207265
Throwing tantrums and calling him Hitler isn't working, it even gives him more power, so now they're forced to grow up and get serious.
>>72207409
Eh. I agree. I'm trying to research to see if any of these questions have actually been answer. Not seeing much so far.
>>72207409
Yeah, the answers to a lot of OP's questions can already be found here
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions
It's actually quite a bit of reading, I've been lazy, time to brush up.
Rate my OC /pol/
Do you think it's possible for Kasich to go to the convention still having fewer delegates than Rubio?
To all the gun bros, been thinking about buying a Tikka T3, probably Hunter. Any thoughts? Anyone own or have any insights on these guns?
>>72207035
All valid questions.
Sad thing is if he were to answer them, you'd see Rato and Whodat parroting his points not 5 minutes later. Just like immigration reform.
He won't nourish the competition. I expect him to become more specific if/or when he gets the nomination.
SHUT THE FUCK UP
THIS ISN'T YOUR PERSONAL BLOG
>>72207531
>implying I didn't go to the US and bought myself one
Pleb pls.
>>72207641
The rule is that you need to win 8 states to get a shot at the convention. The GOP was going to change the rules but Trump beating Cruz with the CO incident scared them from changing it.
>>72207650
Never heard of it. Go with a Remington?
what scope are you going to get?
>>72207671
YES< thanks for posting Russia.
>>72207650
get a remington 700 30-06
It doesn't matter how. What is important is that he is going to do it.
>>72207559
>Treat every gun as if it was loaded
>it isn't loaded
>rule 1 broken
>Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.
>firing a loaded gun inside a closed room where you may not be aware of who's outside
>rule 2 broken
>Never point a gun at anything you are not willing to destroy
>we cleared the gun so there's no bullets
>justifying breaking rule 3 by breaking rule 1
>Keep your booger-hook off the bang switch until ready to fire
>the gun would be completely safe to dry fire
>justifying breaking rule 4 by breaking rules 1 and 3
And this is how negligent discharges happen, anon. Once you break one rule, you break the others with abandon, and eventually you make a mistake, and kill somebody.
It's a shame, really. If NY let this guy have guns when he was younger he'd know the rules better than this. But no, now he's a noguns sperg dreaming about dry-firing a gun in his office all day.
Do everybody a favor and stay away from guns.
>>72207650
Anon, the traditional rifle is a 6.5mm Carcano.
>>72207671
who's that under the Sweden flag, looks like Jimmy Carr
>>72207875
You mean Traditional American voting rifle.
>>72207035
Does anyone have a link to his victory speech last night in HD?
>>72208093
it was poor quality sound even on tv live. why are our IDs so strange?
>>72208184
They're high energy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMLd6Ob2bOw
rekTED
>>72207035
Creating jobs: Stop importing so many goods from Mexico and China and produce them in the USA.
Debt: Cut spending so much (less welfare for anyone)
Income gap: Is non-existent
>>72208234
if the victory speech isnt in /MAGA/ linked here >>72207772 not sure where else it could be.
>>72207035
>How will Trump create jobs?
By activating WTO rules on currency manipulation, or applying other tariffs, to China and Mexico the US under Trump can leverage an economic benefit to US home production of goods, providing incentive to produce in the home market using the US pool of labour.
Further job growth relies on the combination of tax cuts and reforms, as well as federal regulatory reform.
The organisation that calculated a $10 trillion revenue loss over 10 years from Trump's tax cuts also estimated an approximate 5 million Full Time Equivalent (FTE) jobs would created from the cuts, as the new amount cut back to the tax payer allows them to go and spend. The estimations did not take into account business plans regarding staying in, or expanding operations in, the US, as a result of changes to corporation tax and the end of red tape tax code. (There's a lot of damage to the economy and tax revenues wrought solely by the fact that the tax code is shitty, as it restricts growth due to uncertainty and strangulation when overlooked tax codes come around to bite you in the ass. Equally high but simpler tax regimes earn more revenues and have higher growth, because it makes planning simpler and tax collection cheaper for all parties).
Stepping somewhat away from tax and towards regulatory and capital based abroad - the federal regulatory agencies, like the FDA and the EPA, are largely ineffectual and just as with the red-tape tax code, much regulation exists for power aggrandizement purposes, and not for real use, and can be slimmed down without damage to the people or environment. It's analogous to the situation with the EU - the regulations they hold on the UK (and we don't even apply all of them), drags our economy down by 4-12%.
Cont.
>>72210497
With capital abroad, there's an intense amount of capital that is held in foreign countries, simply because bringing it back to the US incurs a massive charge and the threat of double taxation (Bernouts often refer to this as hiding money in foreign banks just because the evil rich people can, and would like to confiscate it all). Allowing a one-time return of the capital would allow US companies and corporations to invest that capital in operations in the US, and act as funds for innovations in technology and practice that help companies over the hump of a higher-wage labour supply.
>How will the jobs Trump creates provide better benefits, higher pay and better hours?
Currently, the US economy runs on one part manufacturing, one part services and a tiny bit extra from construction and finance.
Service industry jobs don't really create wealth or artefacts of any permanence (as say, items of consumption do), but on the whole grease the wheels of society and other industries. So jobs in service industries are on the whole split into two categories; low wage, low hours, low stability, low skill work, and high wage, high specialisation, high competition jobs.
Neither of these categories provides much knock on effect in terms of how many more jobs they support; coffee shops and lawyers don't require a great productive input. On the other hand, manufacturing jobs offer a variety of positions for low to high skill labour, with good wages, high stability and job security and most importantly, for each FTE job supports 3 more FTE jobs in the production pipeline.
Cont.
>>72210518
Many people assume that only slave-wage nations can utilise manufacturing based economies for growth and wealth but this just isn't true. The clearest example to the contrary would be Germany, prior to the Great Recession and Merkel's turnabout, their economy was mostly manufacturing based, and their manufacturing sector was incredibly diversified, with jobs for all skill levels, with a market that had lower tariffs to outside goods than the US has on chinese goods now (Chinese steel has a 266% tariff in the US, the general tariff in the EU is 9%). It worked out so well that during the recession, not only did Germany never have to go into "austerity", but they actually provided a tax cut for ordinary citizens.
>How will Trump fix the backwards health care system?
Opening state lines to allow for companies to compete in several states at once. Read the positions page for this, it'll do a better job. Health savings accounts are a great idea too.
There's also the motion to end the FDA practice of only allowing US developed, produced and FDA certified pharmaceuticals on the market - this is the largest and most unnecessary piece of anti-competition regulation about, which causes the big pharma prices that Bernouts bitch about and want to put companies over a barrel to change.
The reality is that low pharma prices in Europe is because most countries in Europe recognise the certifications and testing processes of each other, allowing them to import and export a much larger array of pharmaceuticals to each other, which the US doesn't do with many, if any other countries.
>>72210912
>How will Trump put economy, health and science above gender rights, race rights and feelings?
Just refusing to respond to it, keeping a level face and leaving it to the states (and thus, the people) is a good start.
>How will Trump increase the strength of the US dollar?
Most don't realise it, but the strength of the US dollar isn't actually that important, and is actually pretty damaging for exporting, while good for importing (hence why China has a devalued currency and has a trade imbalance with the US).
It won't significantly affect you unless you rely on imports.
>How will Trump fix the massive debt of 19 trillion?
The plan is to grow the economy, while leveraging federally owned assets and rights to pay off the debt - the US Federal government and its various agencies own a vast majority of most of the western states, and the proportion is growing (being the underlying reason for Bundy ranch and the sequel), while the survival of those lands depends on the public pocket and an effective agency. And that doesn't usually end amazingly great compared to private ownership.
With rights, think mineral rights - oil, shale gas, metals and other minerals. It would be possible to use the revenue from licensing these rights, and/or taking a proportion from revenues (as the UK, Norway and the Sauds do with their Sovereign Wealth Funds) and putting them into reducing the federal debt.
After responsible asset sales and the leveraging of federally own mineral rights, it would be possible to much reduce the federal debt, without having to significantly cut the federal budget or major tax rises.
>>72207244
>>72207035
Presidents don't create jobs. The private sector does
We're not google you fucktard, look it up yourself
>>72207035
Most of those overlap, besides, do you know what the president even does?
>>72211427
>How will Trump help advance science and technology?
No specifics, but a strong economy helps.
>How will Trump solve the income gap?
For women?
More FTE jobs and the upward trend of women filtering through the economy.
For blacks?
Stable jobs with good income for low skilled workers, which've mostly been affected by the vast supply of illegal migrant labour, the foundation of civil black society before niggerism post MLK - the sort of work that the original black civil rights figures, like James Medgar and Charles Evers (the latter of whom supports Trump and believes his brother would have) arose from.
>How will Trump make my dollar buy more?
Trump won't really affect this except in the sense that you'll have a more stable supply of dollar to pay for your needs. A flourishing of American industry will help in this case however.
>How will Trump drop outlandish prices across the country?
See above, though growth of US industry would possibly lead to the establishment of new prosperous industrial zones, drawing people out of the overpopulated metropolitan areas where enormous prices are usually the problem, evening out the demand for food, water and accommodation.
>How will Trump solve the obesity problem
Other than massive changes to education and spending habits, to teach people to cook and purchase better, cheaper foods? Not much.
Getting people into work helps by getting people into labour and something to do on their feet instead of sat down with access to snacks and food, usually used to alleviate boredom.
>>72212486
And finished.
Tl;dr it's all possible, vote Trump, invest in Eastern Polan- I mean, America
