Prove that being gay isn't part of your DNA
>>80484899
Has anyone found the genetic markers that determine homosexuality? No? Burden of proof is on you, faggotron.
just think for a second anon, how does DNA and genes get passed on? heterosexual behavior. if it IS part of your DNA it would have been bred out thousands of years ago
>>80484899
>>80485178 has stated the truth. Homosexuality is genetically unhealthy. In the natural world Homosexuality prevents you from passing your genes into the next generation meaning that on a genetic level you would be disposed to commit biological suicide. If we are to believe that homosexuality is genetic then it would have bred itself naturally. The only factors would be people on the "Down Low", Bisexuals, or the usage of invitro-feritlazation (which circumvents the concepts of natural selection/breeding). Also even with the concept with homosexuality being genetic then you would have to admit that it is a completely negative gene trait to have for genetic health of passing your genes into the next generation. Even schloars that believe in homosexuality being genetic show that the only reason for it to be a naturally occuring gene is to prevent you from breeding and let others have better chances of procreating.
Memes aside being genetically gay means that you were predisposed not to pass your genes into the pool. If anything it would be that nature has defined you and your genes degenerate and does not want them in her at all costs so it made you go waste your seed somewhere far from even the most barren wombs just to make sure that you go not spread your genetics. It would be similar to nature calling you degenerate from birth and made you genetically self-destructive to purge you from her domain.
>>80487109
>>80485178
Why do so many people on this board have such a boner towards passing on their genetics?
>>80487236
huh? do you not understand how evolution works? it makes logical sense
>>80487236
The purpose of life is to propagate. It's been done since the dawn of life. If you don't want your genes passed on you're a failure on a biological and social order
>>80485178
The thread is now over, go home.
>>80484899
the fact that faggots will say that sexuality can be fluid is all the proof i need straight out of the sodomites
>>80484899
are those the lyrics to one direction's newest song?
If not, it will be soon
>>80487109
There is such a thing as recessive genes, as well as genes that are only expressed when certain environmental factors are present (i.e. epigenetics). Homoesxuality also has a greater chance of occuring in males that have older siblings, with the more older siblings, the greater the chance of homosexual behavior being displayed. Homoswxuality then becomes part of a greater evolutionary strategy, in that thr gene stays dormant in the first few children born, while the later children are effectively prevented from procreating to provide familial support
>>80484899
Being a faggot is part of your dna
>>80484899
Racial differences in faggotry. Jews say race is a social construct therefore faggotry is not determined by genes
>>80487236
Why are all leafs retarded?
>>80484899
Burden of proof fallacy.
>>80487109
no wonder most blacks are gay
>>80487632
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraternal_birth_order_and_male_sexual_orientation
>>80484899
Only Canadians have the gay gene
>>80484899
There is no gay gene.
Homosexuality is congenital, it's develpomental. We all have the genetic capacity to be gay.
Either way, it's a mental illness.
>>80487632
Exactly but this would mean that homosexuals would have to admit that the mere concept of a homosexual gene was to make them genetically inferior to their heterosexual siblings to they can spread their genes. This means that nature did not want them to have children naturally and only through subverting it through invitro or fighting their instincts and having at least one heterosexual encounter could they hope to have a child and even then the trend would make them more likely to be heterosexual. For as much as I like to discuss this topic we have to admit that the LGBT+ community does not want a "gay gene" for the sake of scientific discovery, but for OP ed pieces and the agenda of "Born This Way". Sadly these people want their cake, want everyone to praise them and put sprinkles on it, and then eat it. In the end they would still be unhappy because in the power of memes,
"God hates Fags" because he didn't want you to spread your seed across the earth and would rather see your kind die out from natural selection.
>>80484899
There have been twin studies that shows faggotry is not genetic.
Showing that it's all mental.
>>80485178
>Around half of all heterosexual men and women potentially carry so-called homosexuality genes that are passed on from one generation to the next.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160412132621.htm
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-10/13/content_381937.htm
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19125584.900-boys-with-older-brothers-born-to-be-gay/
>>80484899
Nice logic fallacy. Burden of proof is on you, leaf.
