![north korea people[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/g0NF8iW.jpg "north korea people[1].jpg")
If national socialism is so great, then why does North Korea suck so hard?
>>78217981
>If national socialism is so great, then why does North Korea suck so hard?
Authoritarianism introduces a single point of failure. If it fails, it fails H A R D.
>>78218429
It's actually getting better and better, slowly. Look at satellite images from 2009 and 2016
They're free of international bank debts and are racially homogeneous
>>78217981
Everyone else hates National Socialism, but they realize that keeping NK chained up in public, declawed and starving, is a more effective deterrent to national socialism than just killing it outright.
So two pluses for globalists:
>NK is always able to be seen as the enemy if no one else is
>NK can be used as a counter argument to why NS doesn't work
If the scheme wasn't so obviously Jewish I'd give it mad props. They got this figured out left right and center
>>78218592
There's usually some good among the bad. Anyone who isn't hard right or hard left is capable of acknowledging that.
>>78218429
This is a very reasonable argument.
Their Natl. weightlifting team isn't half bad though.
>>78217981
>North Korea
>National Socialist country
of course, it had to be an American poster.
The level of sheer stupidity that's spawned from the USA is unbelievable.
>>78218592
>every year asks for monies for food because hungry
>all that propaganda is actually russian kgb style reverse propaganda so west thinks they are poor
>has actually shitton of food because rural drones everrywhere
>uses all the monies from all the nations to build up country
asians are poor mans jews but damn they are getting better, absolutely genious.
>>78218861
>This is a very reasonable argument.
I try. NatSoc isn't per se ''''evil'''' or whatever, but you're basically handing over the entire thing to pure chance rather than multiple factors.
It's combining the bullshit of Democracy (weird processes controlled behind closed doors) with the bullshit of absolutism (single point of failure, low number of checks and balances) into one package without the plusses of democracy (nominal ability to change your mind) with the plusses of absolutism (dynasties that practice eugenics and raise kids to rule, auxiliary elite that can advise without being easily gotten rid of), which is just the kind of gamble I consider utterly asinine when considering modern technology.
Personally I consider monarchy in which the monarch is chosen by a council and an elected government runs the day to day business one of the better ideas.
There needs to be strength in a country's leadership, but just rolling a die EACH SINGLE TIME the leader dies is just not practicable if you want any sort of stability.
Feudalism is nice too, but that is just illusory for modern times due to the difference in jobs that matter in a society in which most fundamental jobs are done automatically.
>>78219350
Just because it say's "Democratic Republic" in the title of their nation doesn't make them Democratic or a Republic.
Just like Brazilians may look like regular people, but are actually just apes that shit in their own beds. You fucking Macaco.
>Best Korea
>sucks
You're delusional
>>78218429
fbpb
>>78218592
2nd post pretty good post.
>>78219926
Japan backing up Best Korea? What????
I thought Juche != NatSoc. Could be wrong tho
>>78217981
THAT'S FUCKING COMMUNISM YOU RETARD. NATIONAL SOCIALISM ALLOWS FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, AND SECURES YOUR RELATIVE RIGHTS.
>>78217981
If Classic Liberalismmis so great, why does Saudi Arabia suck?
If Islamic Statism is so great, why does Brazil suck so hard?
If Applied Fascism is so great, why does Sweden suck so hard?
If a Federative Democracy is so great, why does Cuba suck so hard?
