The a6000 is okay for sissies but it's not a serious camera

good value/price

>>2878370
I got it used for 365 usd body only
It's a fine camera, i prefer apsc
After testing out an a6300 in store it made me regret getting the a6000 and i'll likely move up to a63000 by the end of the year
Thats not to say the a6000 is bad, it's just that the a6300 is such a notably better camera.
I use mine for commercial photo work, it's great as long as you're not some sport photographer or something

>>2878470
Where did you pick up a used body? Where should i look for a used body?

>>2878565
I got it on ebay actually
The seller was some mid west american business that resells used electronics
It was kind of a new listing when i grabbed it and i think i just got lucky from how low the price was.
The body was in great shape, just a tiny scratch on the corner of the LCD screen
I would just check ebay every day to look for some outlet selling one at a low price

For use with MF lenses it's currently the best bang for the buck imo. I use it in combo with a 7dmk2. a6000 for MF primes (portraits/landscape/architecture/etc. and the 7d for sports/animals/birds (anything that needs fast Servo AF and tele lenses)

>>2878834
Which MF lenses are you using? I got Canon FD 24mm 2.8, want the 35mm.

>>2878672
so 340$ is a good deal then?

>>2878872
340 usd is a great deal bb

GEAR THREAD REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

>>2878470
>use mine for commercial photo work
what kind of work? When you show up on a job with A6000, do clients look and mutter out loud, "Is this fucking guy really a photographer with that little thing?"