So there's this swedish nature photographer who claims he took this photo yesterday and that it's not a shop. A lot of people are falling for it but I mean, this is a shop right? It's just so freaking obvious. At the moment the photo has 6.2K likes and 783 shares. Could you guys make some sense of this? It can't be real right?
>>2875172
He later posted this in the comment section to prove it's real.
>>2875175
and this
>>2875172
Gee. Really hard to say.
I mean the first picture looks shopped but the later ones kinda support
Who the hell knows
>>2875172
The haloing around the animals is because he did a bad job at brightening them in post.
They're shops. Full grown moose do not run away from bears. Moose will fuck a bears day up, especially defending their young.
>that watermark
OP here. I'm not that sure it is a shop anymore considering the 3 other pictures. But they sure look weird. The first picture looks horrible. Don't understand why he posted that one as the best one.
First pic looks more like bad post than photoshop.
OP, click here
>>>/x/
and never fucking come back
as others have said this looks more like bad post combined with a lot of compression from the tele lens. Looks legit to me
>>2875378
How would a shopped (or not shopped) nature photography be paranormal? Or do you mean that bears are paranromal beings?
>>2875243
This. Bear can't be so stupid to chase that moose with a baby.
