[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Just got out of surgery, sold some vital organs to be able to
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography

Thread replies: 38
Thread images: 10
File: gear.jpg (247 KB, 1324x948) Image search: [Google]
gear.jpg
247 KB, 1324x948
Just got out of surgery, sold some vital organs to be able to afford this setup. Now i can finally take those family portraits i've always wanted.

but in all seriousness, why the fuck would anyone drop this much money on this shit
>>
Because they probably don't own it unless they are very rich. You would either rent the camera when you needed it for a shoot or it would belong to the agency/company which you work for and which would provide it to you.

And that lens is a cine lens, it's not for photographers it's for movie studios which rent those lenses from rental companies that stock and maintain all that type of equipment.

And why don't you just shitpost in the gear thread instead of making more threads?
>>
>>2854117
"people" don't buy them. Major studios, agencies, and rental houses buy them and then spend the rest of the gear's lifetime renting them out to artists who will use them.
>>
The fujinon is a cinema lens, so it would be a rental house or a movie studio that would buy a lens like that and make its money back very quickly.

The hasselblad is a top-tier commercial product that will deliver unrivaled images and blows anything you'd produce from your shitty consumer dslr out of the water. It's something you'd use to shoot a 4 million dollar ad campaign, not the senior photos down in Fuxacousin, Alabama.
>>
>>2854129
>>2854130
these

OP is a dumbass poorfag
>>
>>2854130
Hassy v d810 or something similar pls
>>
>>2854280

Spoiler alert: The Hassy (or Phase one) win for everything except low light. More dynamic range, more color depth, higher resolution with a bigger pixel pitch, the hasselblad is 16-bit while the d810 is only 14-bit, hasselblad has leaf shutters in every lens, compared to a d810's slow, hard-to-sync focal plane shutter.
>>
File: m,rk255.jpg (1 MB, 3598x2268) Image search: [Google]
m,rk255.jpg
1 MB, 3598x2268
How should i shift from film photography to dslrs? Please help me. i got a low budget and i don't want the ,,sharp and real,, meme to happen. Also i don;t have dust on my lens or camera, just underneath my scanner's glass frame.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.3.9600.16384
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2016:04:19 12:56:37
>>
>>2854280
Never seen that.

But they did H4D-40 vs D800
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UBTE4xpvpk

tl;dw: Differences are small, and mostly subjective.
>>
>>2854294
>How should i shift from film photography to dslrs?
I keep seeing somebody spam this shit in every thread. Please take your dusty artsy fartsy homeless campfire scans back to reddirt/tumblr
>>
>>2854311

>don't worry kids, you can get nearly the same medium format quality that the pros expect with a very reasonable purchase of a D800! Link to our store in the description. ;^)
>>
>>2854117
I've got 2 h5ds, who wouldn't?

>>2854311
yuuge difference between cmos and ccd blads
>>
>>2854129

/thread
>>
>>2854127
I would be way, way, waaaay to scared to every rent or "borrow" this in fear is breaking it. What happens when you break it? Do you pay for it?
>>
>>2855060

Insurance... come on, now.
>>
>>2855064
I'd still be too scared. Maybe it's irrational but it's still a big nope for me. Not messing around with that kind of money.
>>
>>2855066
Grow a pair.
>>
File: sponsor_thecamerastore_lg.gif (5 KB, 360x220) Image search: [Google]
sponsor_thecamerastore_lg.gif
5 KB, 360x220
>>2854338
Chris Niccolls is a Hasselblad fan.

And his store doesn't just sell Hasselblads.
They even put one in their logo.
>>
>>2854291
The bit depth of MF cameras has been long debated and there isn't much evidence that 16-bit makes a difference, also the ADC units are still 14-bit at the sensor.

In terms of low light, those MF cameras with the Sony CMOS sensors are actually incredibly good, the actual problem is that you typically have a max aperture of f/2.8 on "fast" lenses, which counters the benefit of having such clean high-ISO.
>>
>>2855441
Barring the glorious 100 2.2
>>
File: 85 f1.2 on medium format.jpg (225 KB, 747x1000) Image search: [Google]
85 f1.2 on medium format.jpg
225 KB, 747x1000
>>2855441
There's very little point in going faster than f/2.8 on MF, since super-fast lenses trade quality for speed, and the whole point of MF is quality. Also, the depth of field gets too thin for most uses.

<--- basically why would you want this

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNikon
Camera ModelNikon SUPER COOLSCAN 9000 ED
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width6696
Image Height8964
Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution4000 dpi
Vertical Resolution4000 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2009:05:25 21:47:19
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height747
>>
>>2856228
lol, that's just a broken lens nooblet.

https://www.flickr.com/groups/652427@N20/pool/tb303/

Hassy 110 f2 is a grewat example of why you need fast mf in your life
>>
>>2856229

>you need to go wide open
>posts a bunch of shots @ f/4
>>
File: Capture.jpg (107 KB, 756x763) Image search: [Google]
Capture.jpg
107 KB, 756x763
>>2856229
That's not a broken lens, that's a FD 85/1.2 hacked onto a Mamiya.

>https://www.flickr.com/groups/652427@N20/pool/tb303/
Ugh, 95% of wide-open ones are the same kind of pointless wankery I see from 85L and Noctilux owners. Higher quality borkeh doesn't really make them better.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographermozgj
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
File: IMG_2359.jpg (295 KB, 1203x800) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2359.jpg
295 KB, 1203x800
>>2856254
>>2856229
>>2856228
It really does look broken though.
My 85L is sharp wide open.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 550D
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.14
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number1132529712
Lens NameEF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2015:09:25 14:11:39
Exposure Time1/90 sec
F-Numberf/11.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/11.3
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1203
Image Height800
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeCenter-Weighted
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeUnknown
Focus ModeOne-Shot
Drive ModeTimed
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Self-Timer Length10 sec
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceDaylight
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed160
Color Matrix129
>>
>>2856260
You're using a 25mm image circle, not a 70mm one, and you're able to focus it properly because DoF isn't razor thin.
>>
File: IMG_4355.jpg (326 KB, 1205x800) Image search: [Google]
IMG_4355.jpg
326 KB, 1205x800
>>2856262
Ignoring those numbers you just pulled out of your ass for a second, the central section should be just as sharp and contrasty on any format you like.
The image you posted doesn't look anything like an FD 85L wide open.
Using a bigger piece of film doesn't magically add a shitload of coma and spherical abberation and fuck the bokeh in the ass.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>2856273
>Using a bigger piece of film doesn't magically add a shitload of coma and spherical abberation

Not saying that the guy did a proper job on the mount conversion, but using a larger piece of film, especially larger than the lens is designed for, does add aberrations in the corners. They shouldn't happen in the middle of the image, though, so he also seems to have fucked up the focus and chose a particularly poor background.
>>
>>2856273
>Ignoring those numbers you just pulled out of your ass
I didn't. If you want precise numbers, that would be 70.00 mm for a 645 film frame and 26.82 mm for your 550D.
>>
>>2856299
>>2856299
>every tiem
It's a film scan moron.
>>
File: d3.jpg (243 KB, 485x730) Image search: [Google]
d3.jpg
243 KB, 485x730
>>2856302
>"""""""""""""""scanning"""""""""""""""" film with a 550D

and then he tells us something about coma and sharpness
>>
>>2856307
Good point. Way to debate.
>>
File: 160606-p-0001.jpg (99 KB, 1000x750) Image search: [Google]
160606-p-0001.jpg
99 KB, 1000x750
>>2856228

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeHasselblad
Camera ModelHasselblad H5D-50c
PhotographerJake Reeder
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.3
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)78 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionRGB
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Subject Distance1.09 m
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height750
>>
File: pixel for pixel.jpg (147 KB, 992x744) Image search: [Google]
pixel for pixel.jpg
147 KB, 992x744
>>2856799
and the peep

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeHasselblad
Camera ModelHasselblad H5D-50c
PhotographerJake Reeder
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.3
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)78 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionRGB
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Subject Distance1.09 m
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width992
Image Height744
>>
where did you sell organs? starving in this hell hole country and need to gtfo willing to sell both testicles and one good shoulder. only half kidding. struggle is too real.
>>
>>2856923
I'll buy them, as I'm a sony shooter i appear to be lacking both my testicles
>>
>>2854117
>super35 lens
>medium format body
should have traded your kidney for a new brain.
>>
>>2854130
>It's something you'd use to shoot a 4 million dollar ad campaign

which unfortunately looks the same to the final consumers as one shot from a dslr
Thread replies: 38
Thread images: 10

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.