[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Gearfaggotry (Gear thread)
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography

Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 1
File: images.jpg (23 KB, 440x334) Image search: [Google]
images.jpg
23 KB, 440x334
I hate myself for starting this thread, but need some advice. I need a wide to normal zoom. Canon fag, have tok 11-16, 70-200f4, 18-55kit lens, 100l. Had a 17-85 that I absolutely hated, so I sold it. I'm need of something to replace this and the 18-55, as that feels cheap and horrible.

Don't care about brand. Constant aperture very much preferred, internal focus preferred, internal zoom would be great but unlikely. Obviously good image quality is necessary.
>>
Use the gear thread you stupid prick

>>2851645
>>
I am using this older version of Tamron 17-50/2.8 and I like it. http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/289-tamron-af-17-50mm-f28-sp-xr-di-ii-ld-aspherical-if-canon-test-report--review
New version seems to have much worse optical quality.
>>
>>2853813
Either Canon 15-85mm, which is a great lens, or
>Constant aperture very much preferred
Canon 16-35 f4 is/ f2.8
Sigma 18-35 f1.8
>>
>>2853818
Over 300 replies you gimp
>>
>>2853839
It's still bumping you spastic
>>
>>2853839
Yeah, it's almost as if people actually reply to questions posted in the gear threads......
>>
>>2853844
What is bump limit?
>>
>>2853813
Assuming you're on a crop, I would recommend the Sigma 18-50mm 2.8
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-18-50mm-f-2.8-EX-DC-Lens-Review.aspx

I had one for several years. It was great!
>>
Use the gear thread you stupid prick

>>2853865
>>
>>2853886
Might want to look at the thread creation times you retarded /p/rick
>>
>>2853887
The old gear thread is nearly fucking full anyway what's the problem bitch
>>
only film, f0ck anything else. f0ck you faggets. Film king. only fuji.
>>
>>2853882
>It was great!
>was

what happened?
>>
>>2853813
Well I shoot 5d2, not sure if you're on ff or crop. Just bought a 17-40 and 70-200. Alongside my 40 which honestly is still gonna be the sharpest I have. But those are gonna be for versatility. I'm off on a road trip down south, which is pretty mountainous and I'm pretty sure I'll have the 17-40 on majority of the time anyway.

17-40 is good. If you're on crop it makes a decent kit lens, on ff makes a really good UWA. So consider that.
Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.