File: image.jpg (147 KB, 800x640) Image search: [Google]

147 KB, 800x640

>>2848888
>just posting in the FGT doesn't make you gay, unless you shoot 110

Guess I'm a little bitchboi then. Would really rather have an Auto 110 over this though.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	640
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Canon_110_ED (1).jpg (182 KB, 704x340) Image search: [Google]

182 KB, 704x340

>just posting in the FGT doesn't make you gay, unless you shoot 110

I've had a canon 110ed for months that I picked up mint in box at goodwill and I've been debating whether or not to throw a test roll through it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot G7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	704
Image Height	340
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2012:01:12 21:43:40
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.03 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	704
Image Height	340
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Retro80S120001-8mini.jpg (128 KB, 557x800) Image search: [Google]

128 KB, 557x800

>>2848908
>having to tell your family you were just experimenting
Forget that, assert your masculinity with patrician 6x9.

>>2848912
I wish I had a Fuji GW690II thanks for reminding me

>having to tell your family you were just experimenting

They'd probably be ok with it

sup guys. my photos come 2morrow. : )

File: beach sunset.jpg (179 KB, 1415x1024) Image search: [Google]

179 KB, 1415x1024

Is the Nikon f3 a good investment for a hiking cam? I'm stuck between buying the titanium version or the press version. What do y'all recommend?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1536
Image Height	1024
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:01 17:05:00
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1415
Image Height	1024

>>2848956
The titanium and press versions are cool and all, but those are collector cameras. Just get a regular F3 if you're going to actually use it, they're much cheaper and there's millions of them floating around. It's a truly excellent camera, I love mine and I would really recommend it.

File: 20160521-_DSC8001.jpg (579 KB, 1000x667) Image search: [Google]

579 KB, 1000x667

>>2848964
OK thanks! What lenses do you recommend for it? I'll be hiking in New Mexico so I plan on carrying a 28mm and a 50mm. Is there anything I need to look out for when I buy it, because I don't want to get a lemon!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	1000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1000 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:26 10:37:47
Exposure Time	1/3200 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	5.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: EMsandAISNikkors.jpg (275 KB, 688x800) Image search: [Google]

275 KB, 688x800

>>2848967
The 28 and 50 are great, go for it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SIGMA
Camera Model	SIGMA DP1 Merrill
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Focal Length Range	19
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:27 10:20:40
Exposure Time	0.3 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	19.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	688
Image Height	800
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	3030333132323837DB9FA85634334238
Resolution	HI
Exposure Mode	A
Metering Mode	A
Exposure	5/15467
Contrast	-1.0
Shadow	1
Highlight	-1.1
Saturation	0.9
Sharpness	1.0
Fill Light	1.0
Color Adjustment	12601/1296517459
Adjustment Mode	0.2752

File: 20160503-_DSC7350.jpg (326 KB, 1000x671) Image search: [Google]

326 KB, 1000x671

>>2848973
What films would you recommend for landscapes? I'm not too much of a fan of ektar, and I keep hearing portra is really good. I'm on a limit of 24 rolls for 2 weeks. Sorry if I sound way too enthusiastic about this.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	1000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1000 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:03 19:19:22
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-0.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2848967
The usual stuff with buying any old camera, make sure the shutter blades aren't damaged, the lightseals around the film door aren't rotted away, the viewfinder is clean and clear, no corrosion in the battery compartment, and the shutter fires when you put a fresh battery in it.

Just buy it from KEH and it'll be in good working condition. If you buy it from ebay or something like that it'll probably be fine anyway, it's a legendarily reliable camera. You can spend more to get one in good cosmetic shape, but you can save a lot by getting a beater as long as it isn't one where the previous owner clearly didn't take care of it and beat the shit out of it.

>>2848974
35mm film isn't really for landscapes, you can try it if you want but you'd be better suited with medium format at least.

File: 20160521-_DSC8040.jpg (649 KB, 1000x667) Image search: [Google]

649 KB, 1000x667

>>2848977
I'd love to carry a Pentax 6x7 but I have a weight limit and I can't have like 40% of my carry weight be a camera,
>>2848976
Do I need any precautions for X-ray machines? I keep on hearing how the x-rays can cause foggy photos

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	1000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1000 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:26 10:42:20
Exposure Time	1/2500 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	5.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: IMG_8544mini.jpg (312 KB, 1199x800) Image search: [Google]

312 KB, 1199x800

>>2848974
Agfa Precisa.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1199
Image Height	800

File: img196.jpg (659 KB, 1002x1240) Image search: [Google]

659 KB, 1002x1240

Who here uses Delta or TMAX? I've been sticking to Tri-X lately, but I want to see how tgrain films can look when printed, would love to hear opinions on exposure/development.

Here's a shot from my most recent outing.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6807
Image Height	5429
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:05:25 10:33:42
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1002
Image Height	1240

>>2848956

stop posting this picture bro

Any advice on choosing between 6x4.5, 6x6, and 6x7? Looking to get into a reflex system, so no tlrs or rangefinders (as cool as they are). Not really interested in in-body metering or fancy electronics, i have a handheld meter for finding exposure. All mechanical and rugged is a plus.

I was thinking about the a Pentacon Six kit, partly because it's reasonable to try out MF and the Zeiss lenses are gorgeous. Also curious about RB67, or Bronica systems. Not sure about 6x4.5 being a huge difference from 35mm.

Any suggestions welcome !

>>2848986
this photo does things for me that i didnt know were possible

>>2849001
>Not sure about 6x4.5 being a huge difference from 35mm.
it is. cleaner images, more color depth. but it wont look "medium format", even with the faster lenses, something will be missing.

>I was thinking about the a Pentacon Six kit, partly because it's reasonable to try out MF
nope, they are somewhat unreliable, prone to fail, mirror slap fucks sharpness, lenses not that good.

>and the Zeiss lenses are gorgeous.
they are Jena, poor QC. sometimes okay, lots of times trash.

>All mechanical and rugged is a plus.
id say go for a Pentax 67. a literal beast, gorgeous IQ, excellent lenses, a huge ass solid MF system. yes it uses a battery, not a big deal.

with 6x7 you can crop to 6x6 too.

>>2849001

6x7 master race reporting in.
If you're set on all mechanical, then you should definitely try the RB with KL lenses, original pentax 67, or one of the earlier bronicas. Personally I never liked the rendering of bronica lenses. The Pentax lenses are pretty great honestly. The Mamiya lenses are very clean, and maybe a bit sterile, sometimes.

Pick 645 if you need/want super portability compared to larger neg SLR's,

Pick 6x6 if you can afford a Hasselblad.

>>2849004
An photo can't give u AIDS bae, it's not possible.
>sucking tripcocks can tho

>>2849005
>>2849005
Thanks anon! any feelings about Pentax 67 vs the Mamiya RB/RZ67s? Are parts pretty available for both systems and all? Any repairability issues?

>>2849008
Can not afford a Hasselblad, haha. I like the idea of a big neg, might as well go all the way for 6x7, right?


Appreciate the input, all. Thanks.

File: img186 copy.jpg (409 KB, 968x1250) Image search: [Google]

409 KB, 968x1250

>>2849013
The negs are great. I've made some great prints from 6x7 stuff, plus you can print 8x10 without any cropping or not using the whole area.

I use an RZ67, and I really like it. The lenses are all good and very inexpensive. It does use a battery but the one battery lasts forever. Treat it right and you'll never have a problem with it. Lots of accessories are available and low price as well.

Don't pass up on the 110 2.8. I didn't get it when I first bought my RZ and I've been regretting it ever since.

Pic related is from the Sekor 90 3.5, Tri-X plus a red filter. It's a bit of a test shot bc I hadn't used the red filter before, but the cloud detail is awesome.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7695
Image Height	5974
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:05:23 00:21:20
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	968
Image Height	1250

>>2849013
>Are parts pretty available for both systems and all? Any repairability issues?
Be real buddy, the only spare parts you need for these are "just buy another one for $300 on ebay".

The practical differences are whether you prefer the form factor of a camera or a toaster, and whether you're anal enough about your pictures that you'll notice the sharpness loss of a focal plane shutter versus a fucking leaf.
Honestly though, you sound so green that the Pentacks is the only choice for you. You'll be able to work it without failing at bellows calculations, darkslides, M. Up, etc.

>>2849013
>any feelings about Pentax 67 vs the Mamiya RB/RZ67s?

yes, i love my P67. i like how it renders stuff, i like how it looks and feels in the hands. also its a fast performer, i can picture myself doing street with it, focusing is pretty easy. never cared about the RB line, i dont like the looks or the images they produce.

oh the 67 has a 45mm that is holy fuck so great, check on flickriver some velvia shots+that 45mm, its some large format tier level stuff.

get one already CLA'd from a japan seller.

File: lmaoooo.jpg (77 KB, 654x352) Image search: [Google]

77 KB, 654x352

>>2849013
>the 67 has a 45mm that is holy fuck so great

>>2849013 anon, get this: just after posting about the 45mm i started salivating at the thought of it, so i went to ebay to see how bloated were the current prices. then i found an auction with 10 minutes left that was at like $90 (normally these go for $250 and up). so i said fuck it and snip bidded at 2 seconds. and i won lol.

ty anon for making me talk about grorious pentax glass.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:27 01:19:28
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	654
Image Height	352

File: FUCKpaterson-developing-tanks-487-b.jpg (96 KB, 857x474) Image search: [Google]

96 KB, 857x474

Anon, I keep getting half moon shapes in one or two frames of my negatives. How do you load film on these fuckers? or rather: does anyone have any tips on how to prevent film from bending or how do you load them more easily onto the spools.

It's not a light leak, color film (which I don't develop myself) comes back without them. I think it's the way I load film.

>The film has been kinked in those areas. Be careful not to bend the film too much when loading on to the reel.

>>2849103
I had the same problem before I realised you spool the film into those paterson reels by turning the wheels against each other to pull the film in. Once I started doing that the film loaded with equal spacing.

The shapes you are getting do sound like film is getting stuck together in the tank, are you stand developing everything or do you shake the drum?

>>2849106
You're wrong
>>2849103
You're right. It's your film being bent by a shitty tank reel or shitty tank reel loading skills. I needed to replace my reel after it started snagging film and making those exact same half-moon shapes.

Practice spooling film in daylight or get a better dev tank. Sometimes it doesn't pay to be stubborn and stick by shitty reels that'll ruin your film, it's all commonsense stuff.

>>2848974
Portra is absolutely killer for landscapes.

>>2848977
Don't listen to this fool

>>2849103
This guy is correct in how to load the film onto the reel but incorrect about what is causing those half moon shapes. Also if you're shooting 35mm cut off the leader so you have a nice, straight edge to put into the reel.

>>2848982
>Precisa
Got a couple of rolls in the fridge that I acquired. Any tips for shooting it?

>>2849001
>>2849013
I'm a 6x4.5 and 6x6 fag.

If you're looking for detail but don't need the weight then go for the RB67. Unless you really want a pentax then the different backs will probably be more useful. I'm not sure if the Pentax 67 takes any film that isn't 120/220 and 135 with a rigged adapter.
The Mamiya 645 Pro TL is very reliable as an SLR and has a decent amount of glass available for it. I'd also check out the Bronica E series.
For 6x6, I don't have any experience with the pentacon six since I went down the Bronica road, but I'd recommend the SQ-Ai the most out of the range, but it is the only SQ body that requires batteries to fire the shutter. However it is built like a brick shithouse.
>>2849018
>You'll be able to work it without failing at bellows calculations, darkslides, M. Up, etc.
It's not like it's THAT hard. Darkslides are only a slight pain and it's obvious why it's not taking a shot with one in place. Mirror up is really not a problem either, the biggest confusion is on Bronica systems If you're using the lens for a time exposure.

>>2849103
It's the way you load film, like another anon said, cut off the film leader, sometimes it helps to snip off the edges too as they often get caught on the reel. If the film snags while loading then either knock the reel or gently pull it apart to unsnag the film. Don't be afraid to start again and make sure the reel is always dry before loading.
Having clean reels helps. Wash them thoroughly and leave them overnight if you have to.

>>2849113
>You're right. It's your film being bent by a shitty tank reel or shitty tank reel loading skills. I needed to replace my reel after it started snagging film and making those exact same half-moon shapes.

can that happen if the reels are old?

>>2849103
Also thanks for the replies guys.

>>2849150
>can that happen if the reels are old?
Only if they're warped/deformed. Cleaning the real thoroughly, scrubbing, leaving it overnight in bleach and thoroughly drying should do the trick. If you only have one reel and you process more than one roll in a short space of time then it may be worth your while buying another couple of reels. The kaiser reels are pretty good and I've had less snagging with them than on my paterson reels.

The rest of it is in the loading.

>>2849144
>Any tips for shooting it?
Put it in a camera, point it at things, press the shutter.
I meter at 80 to get brighter slides that scan better, but suit yourself.
I don't consider a filter necessary for it.
Prepare to be dismayed when they look just like DSLR pictures once you've scanned them.

>>2849150
It can happen if they are somehow misshapen, damaged or dirty. Go figure. Age is irrelevant unless it affects the physical structure of the material. My reel was cracked and badly molded so it snagged the film leader. Get some sacrificial film and put it through the reel in daylight, see where/how it snags. Or just get a new fancy teflon reel and never have this problem again. I'm a stingy cunt so I put up with mine till it almost tore a roll of film. Up to you.

>>2849157
oh I see what you mean
sorry didn't read properly.

>Cleaning the real thoroughly, scrubbing, leaving it overnight in bleach and thoroughly drying should do the trick.

I'll give this a shot
thanks

a bit of a noob question, but if I am using sunny 16, for every stop I open up my aperture I also have to use a stop faster shutter speed, correct?

>>2849180
yes
Aperature +1 stop and then faster shutter speed is -1 stop
and then you are back to the 'correct' exposure

>>2849185
*assuming sunny 16 gives you the correct exposure


If you open up the aperture you will let in more light, so you don't have to expose as long.

File: 20160521-_DSC7979.jpg (511 KB, 1000x667) Image search: [Google]

511 KB, 1000x667

>>2849158
How would you post process? I'm trying to DSLR scan and I keep getting shit scans . I'm using macro filters and a a6k

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	1000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1000 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:26 10:38:50
Exposure Time	1/4000 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	5.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2849195
What's wrong with that scan exactly

File: 20160503-_DSC7332-1.jpg (145 KB, 471x800) Image search: [Google]

145 KB, 471x800

>>2849196
That wasn't a scan. This is what I tried scanning earlier.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	1000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1000 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:03 19:18:54
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: IMG_8547.jpg (4 MB, 5031x3361) Image search: [Google]

4 MB, 5031x3361

>>2849195
Precisa is slide film, so processing the scans is straightforward, you basically treat them like any ordinary photo.
>>2849197
"macro filters" are pleb tier trash.
If you can afford a Nex6000 Electric Boogaloo you can afford a real macro lense. And don't ask for recommendations. ANY dedicated macro lense. Mount doesn't matter, because there is no penalty for having an all manual adapted lense when scanning.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5031
Image Height	3361

>>2849195
Don't use Macro filters. If you can't focus close enough, and don't want to get a macro lens, get extension tubes.

Dropping off 7 rolls of 35mm, 3 rolls of 220, and 3 rolls of 120 tomorrow. Guess I need to get a macro lens for my A7 since I don't have a scanner anymore. I can't for the life of me find a Canon FD 50mm 3.5 macro in stores. Might have to grab one off KEH and pay for international shipping...

File: FP450macro058.jpg (134 KB, 547x800) Image search: [Google]

134 KB, 547x800

>>2849244
Also recommend the Pentax M 50/4.
>like really sharp.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.6
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number	1132529712
Lens Name	EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2015:06:01 13:59:17
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/11.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	547
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Center-Weighted
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Timed
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Self-Timer Length	10 sec
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Daylight
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	129

>>2849219
OK, I think instead of buying the 50mm f1.2 I'll go with a 50mm f3.5 macro. My biggest problem is just getting the colours right. This one has too much of a bluish tint

File: minolta.jpg (744 KB, 2000x1289) Image search: [Google]

744 KB, 2000x1289

some recent pictures took with a XD5 Minolta

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:27 20:31:31
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2000
Image Height	1289

i thrifted a Canon AE-1 with a FD 50mm 1:1.8 lens, but it doesn't have a lens cap. what size/style of cap does it need?
sorry if this is the wrong thread

>>2849512
Check the size of the front element and find a cap for that size. I would not bother because it's not that valuable

>>2849512
Any 52mm lense cap in the world will work fine.
A guy in the last thread asked about cheap ebay colour filters for black and white?
I suggest buying a set of those, because they come with a good Nikon-style cap too.
52mm is a very common size, most manual focus Nikon and Canon lenses use it.

Best films for street photography?

>>2849664
Your favourite emulsion

Just got my Nokton 40mm f/1.4. I noticed that the aperture handle-thing on the left side wiggles by less than a millimeter but it makes an audible noise when it does. It doesn't really bother me, but I'm concerned that it might be a sign of bad things to come and I should return it. What are your thoughts on this?

>>2849702
I think you're an idiot.
I think I'm glad I don't work in the camera shop you use.

>>2849705
Why?

>>2849702
ive got the same lens. mine doesnt wiggle at all

File: scan_010.jpg (436 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]

436 KB, 1000x1000

>>2849259
I prefer to stick with one mount so I don't need to fiddle with adapters.

Here's a photo that I never bothered editing until now. Pretty sure it's Acros 100 developed in Rodinal.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5008
Image Height	4983
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:27 21:45:36
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000

File: img202.jpg (624 KB, 1200x1007) Image search: [Google]

624 KB, 1200x1007

Mini contacts from today. Usually I cut one neg from the roll of 10 that's meh and use it to test out contact exposure, plus an 8x10 sheet only fits 9 negs, so it helps to cut one off and print it separate.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3870
Image Height	3248
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:05:28 03:14:14
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1200
Image Height	1007

File: img203.jpg (655 KB, 957x1200) Image search: [Google]

655 KB, 957x1200

>>2849804
I've got two full contact sheets as well, but I'll post them another time.

Tmax is really quite sharp but the tones are meh. Definitely need to slap a yellow filter on it. Tri-X handles better at full speed without a filter, in my opinion.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3369
Image Height	4225
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:05:28 03:14:29
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	957
Image Height	1200

File: sakura.jpg (738 KB, 800x533) Image search: [Google]

738 KB, 800x533

>>2849244
They had same day turn-around for 35mm. Picking up the medium format in a week or so. No means to scan atm so here's some super half-assed A7 scans with improper improper lighting and lens.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:28 23:12:23
Exposure Time	1/5 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-4.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	533
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: school.jpg (620 KB, 800x533) Image search: [Google]

620 KB, 800x533

>>2849937

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:28 23:16:13
Exposure Time	1/3 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-4.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	533
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2849804
>>2849805
Don't be a gimmick. Crop out your frames.

>>2849937
>>2849938
wtf, this is digusting

>>2849941
Looks like scans of low quality schoolbook prints.
That dot pattern is a telltale sign.

File: negs.jpg (570 KB, 1600x900) Image search: [Google]

570 KB, 1600x900

How do you get your negatives out of this shit without fingerprints.

>>2849941
No shit did you not see the "half-assed A7 scans with improper lighting and lens" statement?

>>2849948
Use stamp tweezers. Or regular tweezers but only by the borders

>>2849950
then don't bother posting them, fucktard

I've already got a Leica M9 and two older Summicrons (35 and 50) and I was wondering if I should go for an M3 or an M6 for a film Leica.

>>2849965
Contax G2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56CP0D_JKtw

>>2849955
oh, yes, it's way easier than I thought.

>>2849948
Seriously invest in some cotton gloves for negative handling. Don't buy the shitty "Photo Handling" gloves from photo places, they are way too thin, and rip very easily. Find a website that sells marching band gloves, be sure to get the best quality cotton ones in a style you like, you can order like a pack of 5 for 3 dollars or some shit.

I've got a whole bunch of ilford delta 400/3200 that expired in 2013, and I don't want to just throw it away. Any tips for how I should expose/develop it? I read that you can get good results shooting expired 400 at 200 or 100, but not sure what to do with the 3200...

>>2850021
Don't worry about it

>expired 400 at 200
Rule of thumb is 1 stop for every ten years
http://www.popphoto.com/guide-to-shooting-expired-film

>>2850021
ilford delta 3200 is actually iso1000, you're just meant to natively push it. High speed film decays faster so consider overexposing the 3200 at least one stop even though it's only been 3 years. Or don't. It's not like its grain can get any worse.

File: img206.jpg (981 KB, 1688x2000) Image search: [Google]

981 KB, 1688x2000

Here's the other contacts from last night.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	9357
Image Height	11086
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:05:28 14:04:22
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1688
Image Height	2000

File: img204 small.jpg (988 KB, 1592x2000) Image search: [Google]

988 KB, 1592x2000

>>2850043

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	9403
Image Height	11813
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:05:28 14:05:05
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1592
Image Height	2000

File: tumblr_o7wdnaVgj21s08d72o1_540.jpg (168 KB, 540x810) Image search: [Google]

168 KB, 540x810

some peektors

1/ ?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.3.9600.17415
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2016:05:28 11:11:11

>>2850045
>>2850043
are these all tri-x?

File: tumblr_o7wdnaVgj21s08d72o2_500.jpg (164 KB, 500x750) Image search: [Google]

164 KB, 500x750

>>2850167

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.3.9600.17415
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2016:05:28 11:11:15

>>2849387
all nice
did you do the multiple exposures in camera?

File: tumblr_o7wdnaVgj21s08d72o4_500.jpg (196 KB, 500x750) Image search: [Google]

196 KB, 500x750

>>2850170

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.3.9600.17415
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2016:05:28 11:11:30

File: tumblr_o7wdnaVgj21s08d72o5_500.jpg (176 KB, 500x750) Image search: [Google]

176 KB, 500x750

>>2850173

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.3.9600.17415
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2016:05:28 11:11:54

File: tumblr_o7wdnaVgj21s08d72o7_500.jpg (66 KB, 500x333) Image search: [Google]

66 KB, 500x333

>>2850175

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: tumblr_o7wdnaVgj21s08d72o3_500.jpg (211 KB, 500x750) Image search: [Google]

211 KB, 500x750

>>2850176

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.3.9600.17415
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2016:05:28 11:12:00

File: tumblr_o7wdnaVgj21s08d72o6_500.jpg (210 KB, 500x750) Image search: [Google]

210 KB, 500x750

>>2850179

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.3.9600.17415
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2016:05:28 11:11:51

>>2850176
>>2850179
>>2850181

>snapshits for ants

what the fuck, pal.

>>2850176
green

>>2850186

cmon bro they're not that small !

>>2850186
filesize too big, anon gets mad
filesize too small, anon gets mad too

Best get that image exactly 1000 pixels wide

>>2850195
they are small as fuck.

>>2850204
>filesize

>>2849979
>recommending the G2
Now, I feel you buddy. I fucking love Contax and I love Yashica but I would never recommend anyone buys a Contax G/T or even MF body. They're not the most reliable and are mostly unrepairable nowadays. For the price you can usually find something that suits your needs better.
>>2849965
I'd go for an M6, but that's just my preference for the lightmeter, form factor and rewind knob. Both cameras are a good choice though.

>>2850168
can you not read?

>>2850249
i put "kodak 400tmy-2" into google and it came back as Kodak T-max

>>2850168
The first one is Tmax 400, the second is Tri-X.

>>2850250
TMY-2 is the ID code for "New" TMAX 400. It differs from the original emulsion which was coded TMY.

TMAX 100 is TMX and 3200 is TMZ, for your future reference.

>>2850239
What if I get both for £1200?
I know a lot of people own both but I was wondering if it would be worth buying the M6 first and using that for a bit before I go for the M3 since if I get both I may not be able to get a good amount of use out of either.
Also, would getting a 2.8 50mm elmar be worth it?

A guy is selling a Nikon f3(good condition) with 50mm 1.2 ais for 350$.
Should I accept this deal?

File: 3119-03.jpg (3 MB, 1816x1816) Image search: [Google]

3 MB, 1816x1816

>went to Japan
>took my Hasselblad
>forgot my glasses
>a lot of my shots are slightly out of focus

Such is life.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2079
Image Height	2048
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:24 20:48:44
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1816
Image Height	1816

>>2850718
>problems of an slr user

>>2850172
Yep everywthing is done in camera , scanned with plustek 7200 and added a bit contrast ,that's all

>>2850698
yes.

>>2850204
>board devoted to photography and analyzing pictures
>hurr durr guys make sure your photos are smaller than those posted on all other boards durr

I'm looking for a very small M39/LTM camera. Any suggestions?
(full frame and with the correct flange distance of course, so the Chaika doesn't count)

>tfw want to go out with my Nikon F2 everyday but it's heavy af and i probably won't even shot with it most of the days because i'm a fag for not wasting film on shit

being glasses wearer is truly suffering. can't even see the metering on my r3m normally

>>2851204
Get a diopter?

>>2851168
>F2
>heavy af
Puh-lease

File: sku_15088_3.jpg (82 KB, 600x600) Image search: [Google]

82 KB, 600x600

I only shoot colored film so I don't really need a filter. However I want to protect the front element of my rangefinder especially since it is fixed lens. What filter should I get?
Does the cheap Chinese brands really negatively affect the quality? Should I go go for a lens cap instead?

>>2851210
b-b-b-but it is
specially with the DP-2 and heavy glass

>>2851230
If you want a filter to use as transparent lens cap, get UV0 or protective non-filter. Chinese "multi-coated" filters do the job as well as mid-priced western ones.

All filters do negatively affect image quality. If you are shooting without tripod it's irrelevant in practice. And when you shoot with a tripod, take the filter off.

>>2851300
>If you are shooting without tripod it's irrelevant in practice. And when you shoot with a tripod, take the filter off.

wut

>>2851302
A filter will reduce contrast and sharpness a bit.

Shooting handheld will significantly reduce sharpness, depending of the exposure time, how shaky one is and how good is the image stabilization.

File: img208.jpg (602 KB, 1008x1250) Image search: [Google]

602 KB, 1008x1250

My current series is coming along nicely. Just ordered more XTOL, some ilford rapid fixer and more 8x10's. Gonna shoot for maybe another month or so and try to gather at least 15-20 nice shots. Probably will make a thread soon with my progress so far.

Pic related, this is from Friday.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	13933
Image Height	17459
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	6400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	6400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:05:30 02:05:17
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1008
Image Height	1250

>>2851321

what is this series about?

File: dude.jpg (466 KB, 939x1190) Image search: [Google]

466 KB, 939x1190

>>2851321

dont flatten the tonality like that. if the shirt got blown to fuck, fuck it. priority is the guys face.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:30 02:34:01
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	939
Image Height	1190

>>2851321
weird bokeh, what lens/camera combo?

>>2851329
what about some of the old dodge and burn in the darkroom?

>>2851333
>It's a series of portraits revolving around a popular park in my city. It's not groundbreaking but I love the park and I'd like to maybe have it displayed in the city hall gallery.

cool stuff. cities need that for once. it helps the community life.

>Thanks for the nudge in the right direction.
np bro.

>>2851331
yeah thatll work too. i dunno what he is going to do, he talked about prints and displaying it big, so darkroom printing seems to be the option here.

File: img207.jpg (683 KB, 1012x1250) Image search: [Google]

683 KB, 1012x1250

>>2851329
I do like your edit a bit more. Thanks for the nudge in the right direction.

>>2851325
It's a series of portraits revolving around a popular park in my city. It's not groundbreaking but I love the park and I'd like to maybe have it displayed in the city hall gallery.

>>2851330
t b h the bokeh is more a product of the scan than anything else. This is from an RZ67 with the Z 90 3.5. When printed the bokeh is very smooth, but my scanner seems to read the negative a little more harshly.

I'm switching to the 110 2.8 this week, so hopefully that won't be a problem anymore.

>>2851331
That's most likely what I'll do when I print this. The image on the contact actually looks way closer to anon's edit, the print should be similar as well. I'm honestly more skilled at enlargements than scanning, so I'm still fine tuning my editing technique.

Have one more, if you like. Don't complain about reposts come thread time tho.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	13941
Image Height	17388
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	6400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	6400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:05:30 02:11:37
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1012
Image Height	1250

I'm curious, for those who shot film and digital, do you carry around both? How do you decide which to use? Do they share lenses?

>>2851336

i shoot both.

digital is for my work, stills and short videos. also for peeking into others appartments with my tele lens. i never take it to the streets. also i use it to preview long exposures i end doing with film.

film for street, travels and fun shooting. my dslr shares lenses with my spotmatic.

>>2851336
That's a bit of a loaded question, in my case.

If I'm using medium format, I probably don't have my digital. But I will often carry my digital and a 35mm. I keep different lenses on each. usually 35mm on digi and 50 on film.

If I'm going on a trip, I'll use my digital some, switch to 35mm, switch back. I might use film specifically for a shot I think will look good with it, and vice versa.

I do not use 35mm for anything serious. Just travel and street snaps.

Do y'all develop your own color film or send them off? Nobody around where I live develops film anymore.

>>2851336
Always carry either a ricoh gr or film compact on me at all times. I'll take the film camera if I want to prioritize on making a cohesive set of shots at once around the same time

I'll carry the gr most of the time because if I run across something that's interesting even if I cannot get a good shot of it then I can take a quick snap to take note of it to come back and look at how I can compose a better shot after the fact

File: tester.jpg (362 KB, 784x584) Image search: [Google]

362 KB, 784x584

wow would you look at this. i didnt know it even existed until today. get a load of this patrician pack. its like those top grade parfum testers of like 10ml each.

File: T3HP534.jpg (681 KB, 1493x1000) Image search: [Google]

681 KB, 1493x1000

>>2851351
Patricians know what they shoot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>2851351
New Portra 400 is all you need. You can shoot it at 100 and develop as normal or shoot it all the way up to 1600 with a little dev compensation. It doesn't give a single fuck.

>>2851355
They should know how to not fuck up their film during development.

>>2851357

it tends towards a stabilized exposure?

>>2851355

you dont know shit about being a patrician.

>>2851321
why on earth are you shooting 6x7 if you're printing on 8x10s?

File: 140717233006.jpg (558 KB, 1359x900) Image search: [Google]

558 KB, 1359x900

>>2851359
>>2851361
:^)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>2851369

oh more rolls to waste in camera testing. cool i guess.

File: F1HP5097.jpg (167 KB, 1186x800) Image search: [Google]

167 KB, 1186x800

>>2851373
<8-)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number	1132529712
Lens Name	EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2016:02:09 15:14:27
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1186
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Partial
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Timed
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Self-Timer Length	10 sec
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Daylight
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	129

>>2851374
>remember, at f/1.2 at this distance, depth of field is only a few millimetres; only the screws are in focus

File: 12345678.jpg (299 KB, 1000x806) Image search: [Google]

299 KB, 1000x806

JUST

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5040
Image Height	3365
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:30 10:34:11
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-1.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	806
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: IMG_20160528_123222.jpg (5 MB, 2999x2999) Image search: [Google]

5 MB, 2999x2999

Posting some Hp5+ snaps.

>>2851336
Fuck no I don't shoot both. One camera at a time. I MAY take my Stylus Epic to keep in my pocket if it's a multi-day trip.

File: IMG_20160528_123414.jpg (4 MB, 2977x2977) Image search: [Google]

4 MB, 2977x2977

Filesize is huge. Sorry

>>2851406
Man I cant find a stylus epic anywhere. I have an XA but it's in immaculate condition and I'd rather it not get banged up

>>2851407
>Filesize is huge
Then fucking resize?

>>2851365
Actually the end goal size for this series is 11x14 or larger, possibly. I just don't have the money to buy a shit ton of large paper right now, and my scanner only accepts up to 8.5x11. Basically my only output is to web right now so I make 8x10 prints (which look amazing) and then scan them in, because I get sharper results with better tones, as compared to negative scanning on the flatbed.

Also, what exactly would I be doing with a bunch of gallery sized snap shits? I also make a lot 35mm prints on 5x7, and sometimes I print 6x7 negs that way too. They make lovely little post cards.

>>2851336
I don't carry both at the same time, I hate carrying a bunch of gear. I decide if I want to shoot film or digital just based on my mood. I have a single pool of manual focus and autofocus Nikon lenses with a manual focus film SLR, an autofocus SLR, and a digital SLR to choose from.

I used to have an m43 kit for digital and also some Leica film stuff but I'm slowly selling all of it because having a single kit is a lot more convenient and I don't have as much gear sitting around.

>>2851563
He said sorry

File: BW.jpg (479 KB, 757x988) Image search: [Google]

479 KB, 757x988

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	GT-X770
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4656
Image Height	3525
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1600 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:05:30 15:06:26
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	757
Image Height	988

I don't think I should've gone so quickly into film. I feel like I still got a lot stuff to learn and try out and it's really difficult to experiment with just film. I should've gotten a proper digital camera first.

What happened to the challenge of editing a digital picture to look like a film picture? Someone wanted to take a film and digital picture of the same scene from the same angle and someone else wanted to edit it. I don't remember what thread that was in.

>>2852209

Thats not a good way to prove anything. To imitate a pre-existing film shot is very different to predict it.

>>2851405
nice one. Is this a film scan? I guess a wet print would look much better.

File: img184.jpg (456 KB, 1072x1080) Image search: [Google]

456 KB, 1072x1080

Found a roll of fuji 400h, critique my scans

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:30 11:13:00

File: img200.jpg (434 KB, 1080x1080) Image search: [Google]

434 KB, 1080x1080

>>2852357

all shot on a Yashica LM btw

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:29 21:49:34

File: img189.jpg (859 KB, 1076x1080) Image search: [Google]

859 KB, 1076x1080

>>2852359

and scanned on a flatbed scanner, sharpened in lightroom.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:29 20:05:28

File: img188.jpg (780 KB, 1072x1080) Image search: [Google]

780 KB, 1072x1080

>>2852360

I didn't see much difference in files between this and my X-T1 with film emulation.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:30 10:59:11

File: img182.jpg (406 KB, 1052x1080) Image search: [Google]

406 KB, 1052x1080

>>2852361

MF slide film is amazing to look at but I had a lot of trouble scanning it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:30 11:12:54

Are there any any rangefinder recommendations for a newby to rangefinders? I'm hoping to spend like less than £50.
I mainly just want to make sure I'm comfortable with rangefinder focusing before I get something more expensive.

File: oly_xa-06_900.jpg (74 KB, 900x636) Image search: [Google]

74 KB, 900x636

>>2852501
O L Y M P U S X A

>>2852503
How does the focusing work on this beast?
I'm thinking about dropping £600 on a Leica M6 and would like to try my hand at focusing method similar to a Leica.

>>2852550
>How does the focusing work on this beast?

there's a yellow patch that you match up with the rest of the frame to focus with that little white lever on the bottom

above the lens under the viewfinder is a little range dial too

File: IMG_20160312_175015.jpg (1 MB, 2304x2485) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 2304x2485

I guess its better to post here than gear thread.

I have a Minolta x-700, and I would like to acquire a flash. I have never used one before (on a film camera), how to chose one? Any that fit the hotshoe?

>>2852563
Well what do you want it for? Do you want a manual flash where you have to calculate guide numbers and stuff, do you want TTL automatic flash (if that camera even supports that), do you want to use it off-camera?

If you want any automated features then you'll need some sort of Minolta flash, probably. If you're doing it manually then any flash with a hotshoe should work.

>>2852582
I'd say TTL would quite help as I have no experience with, except if manual isn't that hard to learn?

Newfag to film cameras.

Is there any benefit in getting something new, such as a Nikon FM10, over an older, used camera such as a Canon EOS 3 or Nikon F3?

>>2853838
Which lenses you can use

There's a ton of nikon lenses that work on lots of bodies but canon has a bunch that are a bit fiddly i.e. them dropping fd for fl and then ef, etc lol

>>2852357
>>2852359
>>2852360
>>2852361
>>2852362

The colors are amazing but besides that your pictures don't make feel anything special about them.
Your model doesn't draw sensuality, nor that comfy feel.
There is not really any guiding lines, nor something eye-catching.

>>2853843
Carl Zeiss 50mm 1.4 at the moment...

whats the difference between a 28, 35 and 50mm?

>>2853869
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_length#In_photography

Canon AE 1 vs Nikon F3 vs Nikon FM10?

>>2853875
Fuck you

>>2853876
Thanks Leafy

>>2853875
How about you do your own research and figure out which body has the lenses and features you want

Do yourself a favor and hold each one in your hand and cycle through everything and I mean everything because on paper they might look similar but as someone who's used all three of those cameras they've definitely got some differences worth comparing

>>2853883
No.
I know that there are old fags on this with fucktons of experience and knowledge. Why don't they tell me?
Your fucktons of knowledge is worthless.

File: IMG_9089.jpg (158 KB, 1166x800) Image search: [Google]

158 KB, 1166x800

>>2853885
>Your fucktons of knowledge is worthless.
For you.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>2853875
Well the AE-1 is cut-rate budget garbage from a second rate brand, it's only popular and overpriced now because the camera was produced in such huge numbers and because Canon today is a much better brand and people who don't know think that applies to the older cameras too.

And the FM-10 is Cosina rebranded garbage and it's a scam aimed at photo 101 students who don't know any better and want to buy a brand new camera thinking it will be better than buying a used camera when in fact it is a plastic piece of shit.

And then there is the F3 which is a legendary camera and in my objective opinion the best camera ever made.

>>2853885
>I know that there are old fags on this with fucktons of experience and knowledge. Why don't they tell me?
Because we don't come here to personal shop you, you lazy motherfucker.

>>2852563
If you can't be bothered with manual settings and want a TTL auto flash, there's a ton of Minolta ones around. I use Minolta 2800 AF on my X-700, it was intended for AF cameras, but works with the X-700 just fine.

>>2852361
Your fuckbuddy looks like a human being.

>>2853885
>Why don't they tell me?

Because they don't know what you're using it for and why

>Your fucktons of knowledge is worthless

Says the person asking for advice

>>2853885
>Your fucktons of knowledge is worthless.
I didn't gain my fucktons of knowledge so that I could work at best buy and help you make an informed purchase, I did it so that I can take photos and have a tool that's right for me.

Do your fucking googling, you ass

>>2853925
The a-1 and f-1 are pretty great though

>>2851984
It's not difficult to experiment with film, it just takes more patience and risk-taking. Especially patience.

But it's always good to dabble in both modes of photography, film and digital.

>>2853875
The best thing you'll get from an AE-1 is compatibility with all of the FD lenses that were made. Other than that, there's nothing special about this camera at all. I don't know much about the FM10, but it doesn't look too bad. But you can get it for a price similar to the F3 which is much more robust (and of course, legendary as one anon put it), it looks like. Never had one. For affordability, go with the AE1. It works well. For quality (which isn't necessary if you're just starting out with film photography), go with the F3.

>>2853921
>>2853931
>>2853949
>>2853951
Woah, woah look at these old big dick butthurt filmfags.
Fact 101 about these fag:
They have tons of extra minutes to insult you, and at the same time they don't have time to answer your question.

You egoistic motherfuckers, because of /p/ am I trying my best to get in film, but look at your film community, fucking no respect for new guys.
Keep shaking your big dicks in darkrooms, keep competing in dick waving contests on /p/ and don't share you knowledge with anybody.
No doubt you guys have tons and tons of knowledge but I don't give a fuck if you don't respect me.
If you guys licked some balls for your success then why the fuck you guys are doing the same thing with new guys?
We are digitalgen and still some fags are trying to get in and you guys are treating him like savage that's why FILM IS DEAD, fags. You guys are same from local old dicks to social madcucks.

>>2854031
>fucking no respect for new guys.
It's having no respect for someone who won't google his own fucking basic shit, and who doesn't respect us enough to not waste our fucking time.

Know why I have time to insult you? Because it's fun, and makes an idiot mad, which is always worthwhile. If I take that same amount of time to in stead spoon feed you information like a fucking toddler, then I am mad, you have learned nothing, and you'll be back in a week asking why your shit sucks, since you didn't put in any effort to learn what you needed, or how to fucking use it, and we've just signed ourselves up for a part time volunteer job teaching you every fucking thing when there are already thousands of resources out there that you could quietly consume on your own.

Contribute to the fucking board, or get the fuck out. We don't work here, we're here to have fun, and holding your fucking remedial hand isn't fun.

>>2854031
Stay mad Omichan ^.^

>>2854031
In the time you've been having a temper tantrum you could have googled everything on those cameras

>>2854031
is this pasta tho?

>>2854031
>being this mad
hahaha o boy

>>2853925
>>2853990
Thanks anons.

>>2854035
>when there are already thousands of resources out there that you could quietly consume on your own.
B..but isn't the 4chan experts are the best?

I'm going to be going to NYC soon and want to shoot some color film while I'm there. I've been shooting and developing B&W for a little over 2 years now but want to give color a try. What films would you recommend and what would be a good place to get it processed? I'm not interested in having a place print and scan for me, just process. Thanks.

>>2854108
ektar

>>2853952
Yes, but the AE-1 and AE-1P are the rabals of their day and they shit the bed all the time and yet people pay more for those than they do for actual proper high end SLRs from the same era, solely because they see lots of other people also owning AE-1s.

>>2854113
>unironically pitching kektar

>>2854108
portra 400 famalämÖ.

>>2854131
>they shit the bed all the time

Their biggest issue is the cough which can be fixed with a needle full of lubricant and a screwdriver in 15 minutes

>and yet people pay more for those than they do for actual proper high end SLRs from the same era

You can get ae-1's all day at goodwill for 5 bucks. That's where I got mine. I've since swapped to using an a-1 since I mostly bought that one because it had that nice 24mm 2.8 on it

They're hardly bad cameras it's just comparing an ae-1 to an F3 is no contest. It's like comparing apples to apple pie

>>2853875
>>2853885
>>2854031
Nobody wants to help you because the very idea of anyone cross-shopping those 3 cameras is ludicrous, and completely reveals how little energy and thought you put into choosing a camera for yourself before you came here asking to be spoonfed.

You've come here and asked us what you should choose between a 20 year old Camry, a brand new Civic or an NSX.
>why don't you go to >>>/int/ and ask in your native tongue, you ignorant slavic piece of shit

File: img220.jpg (836 KB, 1250x1021) Image search: [Google]

836 KB, 1250x1021

Back with one more sample from the series. Been scanning mostly lately, gonna eventually get in the darkroom and knock out some larger prints soon.

Got the 110/2.8 for my RZ, holy fuck this thing is great.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	10445
Image Height	12912
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	4800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	4800 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:06:03 01:59:33
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1250
Image Height	1021