Why are we not seeing sensors this size? They can be used with normal 'full-frame' lenses as the image circle would still cover the whole sensor. It would surely be a way to bring semi-medium format to the masses, and cheaply?
>>2838800
>>2838800
While we're at it, circular sensors!!!11!
>>2838800
The 3:2 area that can be cropped from that is significantly smaller than the standard 35mm frame.
The 1:1 aspect ratio have never been popular in art, until photography arrived in the 1900. But still then the 2:3 aspect ratio was dominating.
The last few years 1:1 have been exploding though, much thanks to Instagram and hipster culture (old "hipster" cameras used 1:1).
Wouldn't surprise me if we see start seeing with square sensors within a year or two. But then not because the larger sensor (17% is too little to matter), but for aesthetics.
>>2838816
>The 1:1 aspect ratio have never been popular in art
And for good reasons:
In the vast majority of cases it's shit for composition.
I seriously don't understand why smartphone sensors aren't sized sized something like this.
Main advantage: allows for horizontal video without loss of quality, even when the retards hold their phones vertically.
But also allow different aspect ratio's at their optimal size.
Main disadvantage: it will cost $0.10 more.
>>2838846
>corners of every image ever are just black
Thank god you're not an engineer. I don't understand how you can be that retarded.
>>2838861
Hipsters would eat that shit up
>>2838800
Maybe some room is needed for the autofocus and light sensors. Maybe.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 282 dpi Vertical Resolution 282 dpi
>>2838800
Because photo aspect ratios are a hold-over from the film days, where the size of your image was maxed out on one dimension by the width of the film, and yet people wanted a larger image than a square would have provided.
Because most subjects and scenes frame better with more space on one dimension than the other, which leads to cropping on a square format.
>>2838800
bc people are already used to 3:2
that could change someday though, just as it already changed from oval to 4:5 to 1:1 to 3:2...
>>2838805
3:2 is a maymay
>>2838800
Nice idea, I've thought about it before.
But it would cost a lot more to make an oversize sensor that would cover these esoteric formats - not just because the chip yield from wafers would be even lower and therefore cost a premium, but that demand would very likely be lower thus demanding even more of a premium.
6*6 Medium format is 3136mm sq, so still 3 times more area. So not really MF at all.
Maybe Sony will bring out some kind of mirrorless 645 MF camera soon-ish. If so, then happy times - that kind of sensor is already in production.
Probably because 1x1 is niche. Most professional MF cameras allowed a swappable back and it was normally fitted with 6x7 not 6x6. Square format a shit basically, how many paintings do you see that are square? It's a bad frame for complex composition, your eye is always drawn to the centre
Why don't you fags just crop your snaps to whatever shape you like?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon PowerShot A800 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Lens Size 6.60 - 21.60 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.00 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 180 dpi Vertical Resolution 180 dpi Image Created 2016:05:19 10:53:17 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/3.0 ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/3.0 Exposure Bias -1/3 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 6.60 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 960 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Program Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Evaluative Sharpness Normal Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Large Focus Mode Single Drive Mode Single Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Macro Mode Normal Subject Distance 65.530 m White Balance Unknown Exposure Compensation 2 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Image Number 118-1084
