>>2835068
Because those things only matter when you actually take photos. /p/ talks about the photos they COULD take, if the situation ever came up. But it rarely does, sitting in your living room arguing about scanning techniques.

>>2835084
that is also my understanding

>>2835084
>arguing about scanning techniques
Who would argue about scanning techniques on /p/? Sony doesn't make films and literally nobody uses film cameras.

>>2835236
A good portion of /p/ shoots 35mm because it's so cheap.

>autofocus
Sorry, pets, planes and cars are too basic for p.
Stay pleb
>framerate
Sorry, i time my photos well instead of frame picking like a wedding tog newbie.
Stay unskilled
>lens selection
Name a camera eco system that doesn't support decent glass in any form.
Stay uninformed
>value
Lol, you're poor.
Stay povvo

>sensors
Determine the image quality of everything your camera does, it's relevant to everyone.
Stay mad that you're too povvo to upgrade your rabal and its worse out of every camera available sensor.

>>2835386
>i can frame pick sports and birds
?

>>2835386
but the 5ds has the best sensor on the market
>muh iso invariance
enjoy your shit pixel pitch

>>2835424
>but the 5ds has the best sensor on the market
Just no, here's another article explaining how bad the canon sensor is
https://fstoppers.com/originals/fstoppers-reviews-canon-5dsr-sony-a7rii-and-nikon-d810-89896

>enjoy your shit pixel pitch
Please explain how iso invariance has a direct effect on pixel pitch. sounds fascinating ;^)

>>2835531
pixel pitch = less diffraction loss = improves every photo = important
iso variance = meme = only maybe useful in a handful of niche cases = not important

>>2835563
Doesn't;
>explain how iso invariance has a direct effect on pixel pitch

>>2835563
But larger pixel pitch = less pixels.
And if you look at the a7sii, a7rii and a7ii in tests, the densest sensor comes out on top pretty much every time