/film/
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
Film General Thread, aka FGT.
>just posting in the FGT doesn't make you gay, unless you shoot zenit
This is the thread for all of your stupid film questions, and to post your film snapshits without flushing them down the RPToilet.
It's OK to ask about film gear in this thread.
>sorry kids, cbf making an oc image this week
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2015:12:09 13:50:35 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/9.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/9.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1081 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Custom Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
Which is the most affordable film right now? I mean the one you can go to a shop and just buy. I've been using Fujicolor c200
>>2820365
That's such a regional-specific question. There's no point in asking that unless you provide more details. Last place I lived had a store that sold bulk rolled Kodak 200 stuff for $2/roll. Place I live now has a store that sell some Lomo c41 for $2.50 a roll.
>>2819920
I am v. jelly of your Sensia.
Provia 400 is pretty amazing film for snapshitting as well.
Would love to shoot it in MF.
I hope your E100VS has held up better than mine though.
Pic related.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 550 Image Height 800
>>2820365
As far as new film, at full price, in retail stores, you're pretty much there, bb.
Only HP5 has come close in my experience.
Buying Slovenian shit like Foma online may be cheaper, but who cares.
>>2820363
>that filesize
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 600 Image Height 899 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2820371
Felm is dope af niqqa.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software GIMP 2.8.6 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2014:08:08 10:27:55 Exposure Time 0.3 sec F-Number f/8.0 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 1200 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
Is the Nikon f1 better suited for hiking then the Olympus om1? I have both in mint condition and I plan on hiking in new mexico this summer
>>2820376
>I have both in mint condition
I tried DSLR scanning and the amount of detail I got is so much better than what I got from the expensive lab scans.
However I am struggling with the color correction part. I have done this a couple other times and I got ok results. I think one of the problems in this case might be that the backlight was uneven (thus the color gradient from yellow to blue in the 3rd pic.), and that I probably underexposed when scanning the negative.
How can you tell while you're scanning that you are properly exposing the negative?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Illustrator CS6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 Vertical Resolution 72 Image Created 2016:04:20 12:06:08 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1500 Image Height 749
>>2820369
There's no way the slide looks like that?? You microwaving your film or something?
E100VS was super dope stuff. Pic related: 30 minute exposure.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Nikon Camera Model Nikon SUPER COOLSCAN 9000 ED Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1927 Image Height 1959 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2008:12:01 19:02:24 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 999 Image Height 999
>>2820363
>buy a Zenit
>pay extra for a brand new one to be on the safe side
>after one use the film advance sprocket no longer unlocks to allow rewinding
>all rolls have a matching thick streak across the entire surface
Should have just done pic related from the beginning.
>>2820365
agfaphoto vista 200
>>2820388
I feel like I'm being trolled.
You know the last OP said menelta was gay, right?
>>2820387
I just think it wasn't kept in the fridge. However it only cost me 100yen, and I developed it myself, so no harm no foul.
>>2820385
Check yo histogram. Expose to the right. Scanning colour negs is easy because they're not contrasty.
What's most important though is ensuring perfectly even illumination across the frame.
>>2820395
That was the last OP.
What's wrong with Minolta anyway? I always hear these remarks yet nobody bothers explaining their reasoning.
Agfaphoto Vista 200
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:20 15:13:32 Exposure Time 1/15 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Brightness -113/1280 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Daylight Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 982 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2820460
I don't know how you somehow made this look so awful.
>ILCE-7
Oh, that's how you made it look so awful.
Just scored 7 rolls Provia 100f and 5 rolls Velveeta 100 for the RB67. Going to stock up on my Tri-X too I'm out of 400 speed 120
Aw yiss.
>>2820460
I've got hundreds of rolls of Agfa Vista 200 i've shot some but had none developed yet. I hoped they would look cleaner than picture related. Can you please elaborate on your equipment and prosecute.
>>2820762
why'd you get hundreds of rolls of a film you haven't used already?
>>2820762
I have an awful scanning technique at the moment using a homemade rig. And thats pretty substantial crop from the whole negative so the grain is much more visible.
different example, just a snapshot, but I suppose a better scan.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5054 Image Height 3361 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:20 21:02:59 Exposure Time 0.6 sec Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Brightness -3.6 EV Exposure Bias 1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Daylight Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1600 Image Height 1064 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
Is there still people who use disposable camera ?
>>2820385
can you post set up or at least describe? I'm having struggle finding a working rig without investing hundreds of bucks into some ridiculous lighting or flash setup
>>2820807
see
>>2820374
and pic related
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software Digital Photo Professional Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2014:08:07 12:22:34 Exposure Time 0.3 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 533 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Evaluative Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Custom Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>2820813
Not him, but pic related is mine.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:10:28 08:08:19 Exposure Time 1/40 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 320 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 1.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2138 Image Height 795 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
>>2820861
yeah I know that one, was just wondering what he used
>>2820885
Terrible setup I guess but it gave me some okay results a couple times. I obviously need to work on it and get more consistent on the scanning process.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ST21i Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi ISO Speed Rating 0 Focal Length 1.15 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 600 Image Height 800
>>2820861
could you please show what results you get with this setup?
>>2820920
>I use a Canon 550D and a 100mm Macro pointed downward at a pane of glass on which the film sits.
>I use a remote flash to illuminate the film from underneath, with plenty of diffusion material in between.
>I convert the raw files from the camera with the Canon software, and edit the jpegs using GIMP. I stitch several shots for medium format film
Ah okay just as I thought, I'm the one who asked you in that thread too. Great results.
Just got this yesterday, most of it's sold already, sorta regret :|
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Apple Camera Model iPhone 5c Camera Software 9.2.1 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 33 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:04:19 14:01:12 Exposure Time 1/24 sec F-Number f/2.4 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 50 Lens Aperture f/2.4 Brightness 3.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.12 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3264 Image Height 2448 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2820937
Was cold-stored so hopefully won't end up like that, even if it does I personally like the look c:
paid a decent amount, made a good profit
kept 5 rolls of each, still got some sensia left to sell
>>2820937
also lol didnt realize that was a reply to my post in the dead thread, I hope it ends up better too
>>2820774
was this also scanned 35mm? very detailed, beautiful
Asked this in the gear thread, but how does anyone with a big MF SLR kit carry their gear around? My generic camera bag couldn't really handle the body/lenses/backs/tripod loadout when I visited a garden recently.
Pic related - RZ67 Pro II, 65mm, Velvia 50, basic lab scan.
![amazon-basics-camera-backpack-review[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/RTnP7sQ.jpg "amazon-basics-camera-backpack-review[1].jpg")
>>2820986
I use a cheap amazon basics camera backpack. It holds my rz67 with a 90mm, a 180mm, metered prism, polaroid back, filters, a meter, and a few rolls, plus I strap an over sized L-grip on the outside in the bungees. it's 20 bucks, pic related.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make LG Electronics Camera Model LG-H812 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Sensing Method Not Defined Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5312 Image Height 2988 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:11:05 20:52:33 Exposure Time 1/24 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.8 Brightness 0.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.42 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 600 Image Height 450 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Altitude 0.00 m
First time shooting on film bought a canon AV-1 for £15 How bad am I P?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1545 Image Height 1024 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:04:21 01:27:11 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 861 Image Height 1229
>>2820988
Thx! I wasnt sure if the Amazon ones were big/sturdy enough compared to the lowepros of the world, and since everything is described in DSLR capacity I was second guessing everything
>>2820992
They aren't exceptionally sturdy, or big, but it holds enough stuff for going to and from places. otherwise I just take it out, mount it on the tripod or the L-grip, and just walk around. I'll slip the spare lens and the meter into my shoulder bag, along with my digital.
why has everyone stopped selling Tmax developer (not RS) ?
is it gone discontinued ?
>>2821066
I got a bottle :3
Picked it up in JPY.
Can only imagine how 2 x 1 Litre bottles of fix and dev, as well as a stainless dev tank and reels must have looked on the X-ray, but I got through...
I think there have been a lot of issues with shipping these concentrated devs, related to their strongly alkaline nature and a change in regulations with some big carriers, so some work is going into repackaging them to be compliant.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1191 Image Height 800
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 4800 dpi Vertical Resolution 4800 dpi Image Width 1338 Image Height 841
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 4800 dpi Vertical Resolution 4800 dpi Image Width 1341 Image Height 835
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 4800 dpi Vertical Resolution 4800 dpi Image Width 1321 Image Height 838
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 4800 dpi Vertical Resolution 4800 dpi Image Width 1334 Image Height 845
I just shot, developed, and scanned my first roll of film. Developing and scanning went well, but I fucked up the exposure on a lot of them. I'm using a Yashica-Mat, but for some reason it doesn't focus to infinity. Should I take it in for servicing or try to fix it myself?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4762 Image Height 3169 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:20 21:41:21 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/5.7 Exposure Bias 2 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 85.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 988 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2821119
fucked up the exposure on this one, but it was somewhat salvageable.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4762 Image Height 3169 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:20 21:41:53 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 500 Lens Aperture f/5.7 Exposure Bias 2 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 85.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 986 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2821120
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2579 Image Height 2545 Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:20 21:42:49 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 500 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 2 EV Subject Distance 0.32 m Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 85.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 987 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2821121
I think this is my favorite shot, but I did lose a whole roll when the clasp that closes camera back came undone. I tried winding the film through and then back again, but that failed. What should I do if that happens again? just trash the roll?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4762 Image Height 3169 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:20 21:42:27 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 500 Lens Aperture f/5.7 Exposure Bias 2 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 85.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 986 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2820365
Regional specific
But what I can tell you, if you want stuff from the drug store I've mostly been picking up Kodak Ultramax 400, there's also Fuji Superia 400 but I had a bad experience with it.
>>2821123
if you're developing yourself, might as well see if you can salvage any shots.
Make sure to close asap though
So I got a Canoscan LIDE 600f with a 35mm adapter and Vue Scan.
Vue Scan wont make previews or scans ONLY in transparency mode.
Halp me /p/ please cause I would rather not DSLR scan 325 negatives.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 7D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 609 dpi Vertical Resolution 609 dpi Image Created 2016:03:21 22:04:14 Exposure Time 1/4 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 60.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2820978
Thank you It was yes, I found agfaphoto vista is variable, so no two rolls are exactly alike.
>>2821166
DSLR scanning is faster, noob.
Again, re: Japan thread, I scanned all of my 35mm B&W at the same time; I just checked the exif and scans No:34 and No. 361 are less than 2 hours apart, and I'm pretty sure that included a break for dinner.
>>2821185
I do prefer DSLR scanning but it personally takes me less that a minute per frame on the canon for low res, good for posting online straight outta the scanner.
I eventually figured out canons shitty software so I don't need vuescan now.
Also, those pics from a the ja/p/an thread are sick, thanks for sharing
Melbourne 2016
PAN 400 pushed to 3200
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Nikon Camera Model FM Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Color Space Information Uncalibrated
>>2820996
In practice thats what I ended up doing as well. The body remained on the tripod, and I swapped lenses and backs as needed, but that required me using areas in my bag that weren't protected/padded. Luckily the gardens weren't massive. Thanks for the input.
>http://photo-analogue.blogspot.com.au/
This blog is fucking deluxe.
If you find yourself contemplating an obscure camera or film, I highly suggest checking whether this guy has used it first.
Found this Minolta x300 with sigma zoom lens in a thrift store yesterday for 5 euro.
I have never shot on film before and I wasn't planning too either but the camera looked nice.
So any advice for a complete beginner? I will begin with buying some batteries and check if it still works, kek.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-6000 Camera Software ILCE-6000 v2.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.6 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:04:20 21:48:53 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 6400 Brightness 0.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2821280
>So any advice for a complete beginner?
Set the ISO dial to match the speed of the film you're using. DON'T "PUSH" YOUR FILM.
When you're loading the film, make sure you wind on at least one full crank of the lever's worth of film before you close the back, so you know it's started. Then, take up the slack inside the film canister by turning the rewin crank in the direction of the arrow until you start to feel some tension.
Close the back.
Now, as you fire the shutter and advance the film to frame 1, you should see the rewind crank turn at the same time, giving you positive confirmation that the film is being drawn out of the canister.
Finally if the camera has automatic exposure modes, USE THEM.
When you're up to frame 37/8/9, you will encounter resistance when you try to wind on the next frame. DON'T FORCE IT. You're done. Rewind the film all the way, and take the film to get developed.
>congrats you avoided every rookie error
>>2821280
First test to see the camera works. Might want to shoot a test roll too to check for stuff like possibly misaligned back plate (properly focused photos are out of focus). Then toss the zoom into the junk pile and get a Minolta standard lens, f/1.7 50mm and f/2 45mm MD Rokkors are good, the former also has the spinning bokeh effect when wide open if you're into that sort of stuff, the latter is somewhat sharper. Commonly found on Ebay for around 50 bucks. Start out with Kodak Gold/Ultramax or Fuji Superia 200/400, move on to more expensive films like Portra only once you sort of know what you're doing.
>>2821297
Ain't nothing wrong with pushing your film mate
I recently order a few things and a couple of films on top to get free shipping.
They are Superia X-Tra 800 and Superia 1600.
The thing is I don't plan on using them until June/July, so I stored them in the fridge.
Now the problem is that relative humidity in the fridge varies from 70% to 90%. Will this negatively affect the negatives if they will only be stored for 2 to 2 and a half months?
Got an old roll of colour fuji film from a friend. Its at least 15 years old, and haven't been refrigerated. Is it a waste to shoot it? Any tips with expired film?
>>2821371
You can use sealable plastic bags like those airport security-approved ones if you want to be sure to keep the moisture out. That said, I just keep the rolls in their containers and stash them in an old ice cream box, and it seems to be working just fine, the containers are fairly airtight (an old scout trick for keeping matches dry was stashing them in film roll containers).
Superia 800 and 1600 are mushy as fuck anyway, not much you can do to make them any worse.
>>2821371
Shit, misread, thought you were using a freezer. I don't recommend keeping film in the fridge, and besides what's the point when you might as well use a freezer? Thawing frozen film takes very little time either way. Also, if you bought fresh rolls, they should have more than enough use by date to last in room temperature for just a couple months. >>2821395
>>2821336
die in a fire
>>2821371
you can seal it in a plastic bag or container so the fridge's humidity is irrelevant, unless you plan on keeping it next to your breakfast, duh
>>2821379
overexpose 2 stops, 1 if you want a "old family photos" vibe to your images. rule of thumb is overexpose 1 stop (box iso/2)for every 10 years, none if it's been frozen/refridgerated. More if kept in warm places/climates/the higher the film's base iso (low iso films keep better, b/w films keep better, c41 colour films keep worse). Not a waste to shoot it, expect bigger grain, wonky colour balance (the latter fixable in post). Don't forget to post results on /p/ and don't be a snapshitter.
>>2821401
>die in a fire
Wow.
>>2820914
what lens is that? Also it's hard to see but the setup is PC Monitor -> glass -> duct tape thingy -> film negative right?
>>2821597
That's a 50mm 1.8 attached to an extension tube.
Basically a source of light as even as possible, the monitor is the only thing that comes as close to this right now.
Then in that picture the film is taped to a piece of glass, but I plan on buying a film holder for scanners so the film will be easier to handle.
Also make sure the film is a couple inches away from the screen so the pixels are out of focus.
Captcha: Select all images with trees
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D5100 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:03 22:26:23 Exposure Time 1/10 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Comment Una foto muyVINTAGE Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 661 Image Height 988 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2820914
lol thats so ghetto
im just gonna post my recent photos here. some of these scans look pretty shitty, i dont know why. I dont know if the meter on my OM-2n is kaput, desu it probs is. These are all on kodak gold
Is it really necessary to keep moisture out when storing film in the fridge?
I usually just chuck the film in my fridge door, some of it without canisters, and it's seemed to hold up fine.
>>2821682
>>2821684
>>2821686
i can't tell if i like this. i definitely wasn't trying to be out of focus, but i like it
>>2821687
oops forgot pic
>>2821688
obligatory spring shit
>>2821689
& thats it
>>2821683
>High humidity can promote mold growth and ferrotyping. Low humidity can create static marks when printing or cause buckling due to uneven moisture loss. Exposed film, particularly color film, deteriorates more rapidly than unexposed film.
https://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/tib/tib5202.shtml
I guess it depends on how long you have it stored and other factors such as extreme humidity.
Hi /p/ I saw a couple of used cameras and am wondering which one should I buy?
>Ricoh Xr-5 with a Riconar 55mm f2 ($65)
or
>Pentax p30t with a vivitar 35-70mm ($50)
I have a DSLR but wanted a good ol' film camera to start. What do you guys think?
>>2821704
none, go in a thrift store and pick a good camera up for about 5$ no joke
>>2821715
I think those are the best prices I can get regardless of he model (I'm not in the US) I'll keep searching then, but IF those were the options is any better than the other? Or they are really complete garbage?
>>2821727
If you really have to ask, go for the pentax with zoom. If you know you want to be stuck with one focal length sure, go for the ricoh.
>>2821704
Don't know about the Ricoh, but the first thing you need to do with the Pentax is to throw that piece of shit zoom into the trash bin and buy a decent prime, or at least a zoom that isn't Vivitar. So you might as well double the price for it, you'll be wasting film on a horrible cheap zoom lens.
>>2821704
The Ricoh KR-5 is a very barebones camera with limited functionality (limited selection of shutter speeds) and a crude match-needle metering display. It's definitely not worth anywhere near $65, if you really insist on a full manual camera with uncoupled match needle metering, get a Praktica MTL. The Pentax comes with a crappy 3rd party zoom lens.
>>2821766
I don't know why you keep doing it, but please stop recommending people buy Prakticas.
They are fucking awful cameras.
>>2821090
cozy
>>2821881
Where did you see them?
>go to shop
>put ricoh 50mm on pentecks
>take up to counter
????
>don't really profit, but get a useful first SLR setup
Looking for a good flash for my Nikon FE. I've seen the SB-22 for a really affordable price but it doesn't swivel (though I guess I can just use it off camera) and ken says you have to shoot a frame to wake it up.
I would also like to use it on a D5100 off camera.
How about the SB-24 or the SB-25?
Any suggestions? I would like to keep the price under 50€.
>>2822126
The SB-24 is a boss flash. Buy it.
>>2821704
I have a kr-10 and it's quite basic. I like it although the light sealing foam is shot and I need to redo it.
The rikonar 50mm f2 on it is divine. I'm using it on my k10d and it's so bloody sharp.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX Corporation Camera Model PENTAX K10D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 540 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:21 00:37:15 Exposure Time 1/90 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Hard Saturation High Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Distant View
>>2820374
Very nice work.
what to expect from a sealed disposable expired in 07/2002?
specifically a kodak fun saver 35
no results at all?
>>2821881
Get a Pentax me super, do not get a practika they are trash.
>>2822600
Thanks, that's what I thought. I'll read the thread.
>>2822226
but that shot is massively out of focus, queen moronius?
>>2822611
I really don't know what that shot's purpose was desu but I guess he tried to focus on the mountains in the background.
Newish to film - all my negs have been sleeves by the lab, but now I'm putting them all in organized binders. The sheets I bought say "inswrt emulsion side down" - how can you tell?
I've been putting them in so they "read" correctly on the page - the film data is legible and oriented the way I remember taking the shot (if I can). Is that right? What's the danger if they go in emulsion side up?
Pic related, me squinting at negatives.
RZ67 pro II, 65mm, tmax 100
>>2822684
The emulsion side is the one that doesn't shine, the matte one.
>I've been putting them in so they "read" correctly on the page [...] Is that right?
It is right.
>>2822126
I've read more on this and I think I'll opt for the SB-22 due to it's size and >20€
Also I said it doesn't swivel but it actually rotates although not like the SB-24.
For the price I guess it seems to be a good flash to start.
>>2822708
The SB 24 is much more powerful and versatile, with full zoom and swivel functions, has a very useful led scale on the back that shows your range for a given aperture and ISO when using manual flash, and offers rear curtain sync and strobe functions. It can also be triggered with a PC cable, for use with older or larger format cameras.
All that said though, if you're just using it to blast head on flash at people with a 35-50mm lense on a normal camera, smaller is usually more convenient.
If you live in the UK go down to your local sainsbury's. All fujicolor film reduced to 50p, wide range of expiration dates. (if by some chance you are in Edinburgh don't go to Meadowbank as I just cleaned it out)
what's your guys thoughts on the Kodak Colorplus 200?
it's the only 35mm film I can get my hands on where I live without being thoroughly ripped off
>>2820914
Why do people insist on these hilarious solutions for DSLR scanning? You already own an expensive digital camera, just fork up the 20 dollars for a small light table if you are going to DSLR scan.
>>2822696
Thx!
>>2823089
Honestly hilarious solutions for DSLR scanning is what came to my mind while I was doing this. Anyway I only scanned a roll that way, it's obviously a temporary thing and it was fun the first time but I don't think I'll be doing this again.
I am now looking for a flash unit since the light table seemed a good a idea but I'd rather get something that could serve multiple purposes and DSLR scanning with flash seems to be working flawlessly for >>2820861
>>2823113
Get one of the Lithium Ion battery ones.
Super fast recycle, and you don't need to keep buying batteries.
>>2823017
Only shot it once out of novelty, since it's not very common around here. Soft and grainy for its speed, with a strangely yellow tone, which gave the photos a comfy retro-ish feel. Pic related.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2822924
>implying my local Sainsbury's sells 35mm film
>>2823149
C O M F Y
Discussion: What's your favorite film to use and why?
I personally really like Lomo CN 800. It has a reasonable amount of grain and very warm tones. Their 400 is pretty egh, it's very easy to saturate the tones on 400, although I'm not sure why it is.
Runner up would be Ultramax 400.
Pic is 800, I really like it even though it's trash.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Noritsu Koki Camera Model QSS Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3045 Image Height 2048
>>2820363
>Mfw coming to /p/ for the first time and seeing the OP image.
>Green and purple.
Wow, Doc. I didn't know you gave out doses around these parts.
hey guys, i made this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kj7Em7VNHfU
and took a photo of a neg and can't make it look good in ps/lr
am i just retarded or is this "scan" just bad?
>>2823269
it's probably the paper, also using a P&S for scanning is not necessarily optimal
>>2823089
can you recommend any light table in particular? Amazon is only giving me really expensive ones and I don't really know what to search for desu
>>2823277
sure but i can use it or a phone
i loose a lot of detail and color is so deformed i think it's a lost cause but i kinda like this effect
>>2823283
well you should certainly replace the paper if you want clearer scans, those weird dots are the texture of the paper
try some white plastic or something that doesn't have a texture and will the light through
>>2823174
I have no idea what you're talking about?
If you came from reddit and there's some poster there called Doc, I'm not them.
>>2823293
I think it's some sort of /a/ meme
What's the best compact film camera so I can take trendy pictures for my photoblog? I'm looking st something like the Canonet QL17, have heard good things.
Is there anything else (relatively inexpensive) I should consider? I would prefer it to have some manual controls rather than something like an Olympus Trip.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH Camera Model GR DIGITAL 3 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.4 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2012:05:12 16:33:21 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/1.9 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 64 Lens Aperture f/1.9 Brightness 3.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 6.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3648 Image Height 2736 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
E200
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
>>2823517
Olympus did some compact rangefinders which were quite popular, 35 RC SP RD. Not sure which one was the best.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
>>2823563
this
how does a negative straight from the scanner look like? can somebody post a sample? just a file from the scanner with no alterations.
i'm wondering if i should get a film scanner and i would like to check if i'd be able to edit it
>>2823517
GL19 is similar and often found a bit cheaper
>>2820363
my father gave me a Contax T
I have here a roll of color negative film expired some 30 years ago
I've seen expired film results but how will 30y hold up?
it stayed in a refrigerator for 5 years or so tho when it was still good
and how much sensitivity can I expect it to have lost?
I want to make the flowers really pop. What film should I use?
>>2823837
nah its not worth it
get a roll of portra or even some cheap shit
save expired film for shitty cameras
>>2823517
save yourself the time, money and hassle of shit parallax/shit fixed lenses by buying a cl (pretty fucking compact) or bessa with a voight. if you dont like it you can flip it.
or just buy a luxury compact or an xa
>>2823883
velvia
>>2823923
what about a hexar rf?
>>2823951
Because no one cares about your snapshits
>>2823923
uhh the ql has paralax correction and a great lens
>>2820385
I think I got the negative better exposed now.
This is from my first roll which I had a cheap lab make me 10x15 prints of.
I tried two different methods for processing the negatives so I could compare them to the original print.
From left to right: Negative > Original print > Photoshop (Invert+auto color and playing with other adjustments) > Lightroom (Inverting RGB curves one by one and playing with other adjustments)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:04:24 23:09:33 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1826 Image Height 700
I still have to get consistent on the processing part and improving some aspects of my scanning setup but so far I'm happy with the results although they can vary depending on your method but I guess this proves that it's not that hard to get fairly acceptable results with little practice.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1790 Image Height 700 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:04:24 23:27:47 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1790 Image Height 700
>>2824070
What part of dedicated macro lense eludes you people?
Think about the nature of the photographic task you're trying to achieve.
You want precise rendition of microscopic particles of silver on a flat plane at 1:1 magnification. That's something you need a specialised lense for.
>>2824090
but that anon is using extension tubes
>>2823150
Maybe not Sainsbury's Local, maybe the big stores do, it's hard to believe. The Sainsbury's supermarket by me has a Jesse's in side of it.
Can anyone recommend me a C41 developer for all my pound shop Agfa Vista 200 please?
>>2824104
https://www.macodirect.de/en/chemistry/color-chemistry/c-41/4538/tetenal-colortecc-c-41-kit-for-5l
>>2824105
Any good?
>>2824105
Is it worth buying this if you shoot 2 to 3 rolls a month?
>>2824139
Sure. Just save that shit up.
In a couple of years you'll have enough film to justify mixing up one litre of solution.
Finally got around to busting the plastic mount obstruction off the back of my EF-S 10-22mm and trying it on a film EOS.
Just took some snapshits to see what it would do.
Worked perfectly.
This is at about 13 mm, which is as wide as it will go before the mirror comes into contact with the rear element.
No vignetting at other focal lengths or focusing distances.
Gets a bit smeary towards the absolute corners if you're not stopped down, but f/16 clears it up.
If you have this lense, you should definitely do this.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1194 Image Height 800
>>2824267
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 541 Image Height 800
>>2824287
A 1L liquid kit is the best way to start.
Don't be too concerned about the 'working life' of your chemicals, just keep them in the dark in appropriately sized sealed containers and you'll be fine.
I use Mocconna jars.
Once you take control of the dev process, you'll be a little more likely to shoot film anyway, as it makes it so much cheaper and easier when you cut out the middle man, so you'll get through the film you need to use it up.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1192 Image Height 800
>>2821799
Not that guy but I use a Praktica BC1 and like it a lot, cost me £1.
How difficult is it to process colour negative film?
I've been shooting Ilford HP5 because I've heard black and white is easier to process but really I prefer shooting in colour.. don't want to spend an assload having a roll of film developed every time just for colour though.
>>2824424
I never developed B&W myself but I started doing c41 this month and it's really piss easy. Just follow the instructions that come with your developing kit and maybe watch a YouTube video or two about the process and you'll be fine
>>2822924
You're a fucking prick btw.
>>2824523
A prick with a stash of cheap film to shoot
>>2824531
>Have over 200 rolls of 135 to shoot
>just like buying cheap film
Maybe I'll try Cameron Toll or something.
>>2820400
Nothing. Its just a runing gag.
They've made worse and better cameras and some good, bright glass that you can get stupidly cheap.
>>2824536
Poundland in Meadowbank generally forget to separate their bricks of film meaning you get 10 for a pound as long as you go to a younger cashier
>>2824304
is it now? i dont shoot color anyhow so....otherwise id recommend hc110 and tf4
Have some horribly scanned snaps. Fuji Superia 400@iso 200.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2768 Image Height 4448 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:25 14:41:29 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 797 Image Height 1250
>>2824710
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2781 Image Height 4477 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:25 14:41:37 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 795 Image Height 1250
>>2824712
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4403 Image Height 2771 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:25 14:41:43 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1250 Image Height 805
>>2824715
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4435 Image Height 2760 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:25 14:41:58 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1250 Image Height 797
>>2824717
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4435 Image Height 2760 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:25 14:42:19 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 797 Image Height 1250
>>2824719
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4469 Image Height 2794 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:25 14:42:24 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 1250
>>2824721
that's all really. maybe next time I'll try to into "dslr" scanning with my xpro1, rokkor 50, and some extension tubes.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4480 Image Height 2773 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:25 14:42:39 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1250 Image Height 793
>>2824723
"honey, there is a childrapist taking photos of our girls"
"I know babe I can see him in the reflection of my sunglasses"
"Shouldn't you go stop him?"
"No he'll go away"
>>2824727
10/10
>>2824441
Which brand of kit did you start with?
>>2824539
You lucky Fuck! The I went to poundland a few times and bought the lot. It's Agfa Vista 200 and comes indavidualy boxed but they lay them in their packaging box so theres 100 in a card box. Sometimes it's got a girl on the individual boxes sometimes not. Sometimes it's branded AGFA on the actual canister sometimes it's a unbranded magenta roll that reminds m of boots brand film,
So today I shot three rolls of some "Kodacolor VR Plus 200" that I got for the support of 0.75$ each, the expiry date for the three rolls is 12/2007 so I shot it as ISO 100 film, should I specify this when getting the film developed in a local lab?
>>2824772
The magenta ones are the new kind. The old ones come in bricks of ten, sucks if the new ones only come in 100s as it would take one hell of a mongo to scan that for £1
>>2824070
>damn those are sharp
This is a 100% crop. In this case I used a 35-70mm 3.3 nikkor zoom lens for convenience that Ken lists as one of the worst lenses made by nikon. This and a 27.5mm extension tube, although I'd usually use my 50mm 1.8 instead of the zoom for better results.
In my opinion even using a lens like this produces relatively acceptable results.
I'm just posting these as a complete beginner in DSLR scanning (this is literally the third time I've done it) to encourage other anons that may be thinking about trying this, and that with little equipment you can produce ok results to post your snaps in 4chan.
>>2824774
No.
f100 kodak ektar 100
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Plustek Camera Model OpticFilm 8200i Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 78 dpcm Vertical Resolution 78 dpcm Image Created 2016:04:20 12:29:24
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP-3000 Camera Software FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:04:26 12:32:07 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1523 Image Height 1228
>>2825278
>posting inferior test shots
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:02:09 15:14:27 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1186 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Daylight Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>2820388
I made the decision to start shooting film a few weeks ago, asked the guy at the camera store what he had under $50, and got the Zenit EM. I love it, but the shutter curtain doesn't always close all the way, leading to stuff like this.
I brought it back to the store and they said since I hadn't had it more than a week, I could return it for something else, but I like how it feels in my hands. Is there something I could lubricate to make the shutter close more easily?
>>2825404
>but I like how it feels in my hands
Your hands have turned gay, cut them off.
But seriously, have you never even touched another camera before?
They are literally all better then the Zenit.
Get a refund, or throw it in the trash; either option is better than continuing to waste film in it.
Ebay any working Japanese SLR younger than you are with a 50mm. Success
>>2825404
https://www.lomography.com/magazine/189403-zenit-e-shutter-curtain-repairs
http://cameras.alfredklomp.com/zenite/repair/
>>2824981
Ok thanks.
>>2825409
Maybe there's better options, but I already feel attached to it. It's old and temperamental, but that's part of why I wanted to start playing with film. Once the shutter's working properly, I think it'll be great. Especially because the camera is helping me become a better photographer by forcing me to carefully think about what I'm doing before every single shot. Years of digital photography have made me lazy (case in point). If the photography itself isn't good, why bother spending money on a nicer camera? Better to keep it simple until I master the basics.
>>2825412
Thank you! I'll be working on this this weekend.
>>2825420
What anons are probably advising is getting a better manual SLR - you don't have to jump the gun and go straight for something electronic. Look, I get you, deeply so - first shot a roll through a Zenit (model irrelevant, they're all virtually identical in every way), but then got a Praktica for more shutter speeds (1s-1/1000) and even though I still love and adore the blocky brickish Zenit there is absolutely no reason to put film it it anymore, given how inferior in every way it is to the praktica. Heavier, with a smaller, worse focusing screen, less shutter speeds, terribad viewfinder coverage (something you should look into when composing your shots, btw).
If you've the chance to get a m42 SLR with a metal shutter, do it. The cloth courtains in Zenits are a ticking timebomb of failure and sadness.
>>2825018
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Plustek Camera Model OpticFilm 8200i Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 78 dpcm Vertical Resolution 78 dpcm Image Created 2016:04:20 12:36:45
>>2825441
>when you find out the anon recommending prakticas was just the inbred slovenian tripfag all along
I have about 50 cameras, including a Zenit EM, a Praktica IV and an MTL5. The only reason I haven't thrown them in the bin is my fear that a crosseyed dirt-farmer like you would dig them out of the trash and return them into circulation to hurt more people.
If you must use M42 lenses, at least shoot them on a Pentacks or Fuji.
>>2825404
>Better to keep it simple until I master the basics.
Then toss the Zenit and get a Praktica MTL, it's basically the same thing except better at everything. Aside from being mechanically faulty, Zenits have the problem of very limited shutter speeds and shitty viewfinder, which place a limit on what you can actually do with them. Especially in the slower end - no shutter speeds below 1/30 aside from bulb is just bullshit, which will lead you into situations where you actually cannot get an exposure because you don't have speeds slow enough, and you're out of aperture options. Meanwhile the MTL goes all the way down to 1 second setting while also having 1/1000 maximum to Zenit's 1/500.
>>2825582
Funny how this guy always jumps out of the woodwork when someone mentions a Praktica.
>>2825609
>Funny how this guy always jumps out of the woodwork when someone mentions a Praktica.
I wonder if you or the guy you're replying to that goes full autist whenever Peterson's Understanding Exposure is mentioned.
>>2825614
Stupid question, I am a beginner to film and I use a Minolta X-700. I plan on using the Aperture Priority setting because Manual is spooky. That being said I am looking for good Black and White film to shoot on overcast days, any ones you guys suggest?
Also general tips would be helpful, thank you!
>>2825797
Tri-x is life
Tri-x is love
So I happened to be in the Brisbane CBD the other day and decided to take a peek in the Ted's Camera Store on Adelaide St.
Much to my surprise, they had some film for sale, including 3pks of Superia 200, which I quite liked.
Asked the salesgirl how much.
>$32.95, really good value that one
Holy fucking shit. She got pretty snippy when I literally scoffed at that.
I said that's about double the price of the last place I bought them, went home and checked the price tag on the box and it was $18.95.
It really makes me sad to think that noobs see these ripoff merchant prices and think that's how much it really costs to shoot film; and then when they pay someone $20 for a dev and scan, and get Noritsu scans back, they think that garbage is the sort of quality you get.
>greedy shopkeepers kill the film
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.6 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2015:08:26 09:16:39 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/9.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/9.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 557 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Custom Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>2825781
Damn. Forgot to, sorry.
>>2825799
my local shop does 6 dollars for a dev and scan
>>2825801
Good for you, lil buddy!
The situation in Brisbane is pretty grim though.
I'm thinking I'll probably start up a dev enterprise of my own at some stage though.
$20 dev plus DLSR scans, $7 bulk rolled film ($25 incl. dev&scan), $13 dev only or scan only, all processes, all formats.
It would be less of a money-making enterprise than a way of funding my own expenses.
>>2825808
I could pay around 6 bucks for development of BW film and another 6 for a shitty scan with bad, digitall looking grain (pretty sharp thou).
I just bought a 500ml bottle of Rodinal for 13 bucks and decided to develop and scan my own shit. Quality I get with my crappy Nex is still much better than a lab stuff.
This was taken on fp4+ at 125 iso, I'm really pleased with this film so far.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model NEX-3N Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:27 02:07:46 Exposure Time 1/30 sec Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Brightness -2.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 678 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2825609
>>2825582
>>2825441
Welp. Just got my roll from Saturday back. Another set ruined in new and exciting ways. And now the lens cover is falling off.
I WILL PERSEVERE.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 29 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Exposure Time 1/20 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 1.1 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Auto Focal Length 4.15 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4032 Image Height 3024 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2823517
I recently bough this and It's one of the best, most pleasant and satysfing thing I've ever bought. Sometimes I just touch it when I feel bad about myself.
Might be something wrong with me....
It takes photos, too.
>>2825822
>buying zenit
>>2825822
I also recently had a bad experience with my local retards
>>2823278
Something like the Artograph LightTracer Light Box 10 in. by 12 in on Amazon is about is cheap as light boxes get new and at the very least you'll be able to lay film directly on it without getting a grid of pixels like you would get with a monitor. Or maybe something like the Logan Electric 5.5 x 9.5" Light Box #501 on B&H. If you have about $100 to spare there are some more pricey ones that might provide brighter or more even light but it might not be necessary for your purposes.
>>2823171
>cn film
gross
mine are tmax for beauty, tri-x for bite. all I've ever wanted to use. both push amazingly well too, especially in TMAX dev
Hey guy's I've recently started shooting film (Nikon F2) and as somebody who started with DSLR (Nikon 5500D? I think) I complain that I have to use a whole roll to switch into a different ISO or black and white
So i was thinking why not have two film cameras?
What cheap film camera thats not battery dependent would you recommend to me?
>>2825527
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Plustek Camera Model OpticFilm 8200i Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 78 dpcm Vertical Resolution 78 dpcm Image Created 2016:04:20 12:39:27
>>2825822
If you really want to go out of your way to make your life difficult and frustrating, then I'm not going to stop you. I don't have the money to waste of results like that. The only good thing that came out of pic related was the Helios, which is admittedly very nice on my Praktica.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Jolla Camera Model Jolla Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 Vertical Resolution 72 Exposure Time 0.2 sec F-Number f/2.4 ISO Speed Rating 640 Lens Aperture f/2.4 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Flash No Flash Focal Length 4.22 mm White Balance Auto
>>2825881
K-1000
>>2825797
It displays the suggested exposure time, not so spooky now.
>>2825797
There's nothing wrong with shooting auto, just remember that the camera's opinion isn't necessarily the correct one. You'll need to apply compensation or use the auto exposure lock when appropriate to get the best exposure, but that's one thing you learn as you go. Manual mode has its uses but it's not the "pro" mode you seem to believe it is.
Also be sure to always carry extra batteries, the X-700 is a power hog for what is is.
>>2820363
Semi stupid question - If i have 35mm colour film that expires in 2018, I dont need to freeze it after using/exposing the roll, correct?
>>2820363
Is Ilford Pan 400 THAT grainy?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2975 Image Height 5086 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3600 dpi Vertical Resolution 3600 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:27 13:59:01 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 1400
>>2826128
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5038 Image Height 3071 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3600 dpi Vertical Resolution 3600 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:27 14:00:51 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 714
>>2825955
Yeah, you're right. I guess I'm being a little foolish. I'll keep an eye out for cameras this weekend. Some estate sales have nice little collections.
>>2826107
film will continue to degrade until it gets developed, maybe even a little faster after it's exposed. but no you don't need to freeze it, just get it developed after you shoot it like a normal person. freezing is for long term storage when you're not planning to shoot it for a few months/years.
>>2826128
>>2826133
I don't think it shoul be THAT grainy. I developed mine in rodinal and it looks like this.
Yes cause its 400 !
>>2826160
Thanks :)
Just been sick, so havent been able to get it developed. Would you say a month or so wont make much of a difference?
>>2826172
If it expires in 2018 then no, it won't.
>>2826175
Thank you
>>2826128
>>2826133
This is Ilford Pan 400 (exp. april '18) overexposed 1 or 2 stops, developed in kodak's D-76, scanned at 3100dpi. You can see the scan's too low res to discern the grain.
What dev/dilution/time did you use and how old was your film stock/how was it kept?
>>2826201
You might be a shitposting slav sometimes, but you have a heart after all.
Seeing this picture gives me the feels for some reason.
>>2826201
O KURWA, ale malutko ziarna.
My film wasn't expired, and it was 1 stop underexposed. It was developed and scanned by a "professional lab".
Do you have any tips for developing bw at home?
>>2826250
If you're underexposing and pushing film then ofc it's gonna get grainier.
What tips do you need? Just develop stuff at home, it's easy and cheap.
>>2825920
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Plustek Camera Model OpticFilm 8200i Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 78 dpcm Vertical Resolution 78 dpcm Image Created 2016:04:20 15:19:24
Does anyone have a good manual exposure guideline that gives some basic idea for weather? I've been told for ISO100 and sunny weather you'd shoot 8/125 (or a variation with the same ratio), then if you're in shadows you'd go one up in aperture or down in speed, same for clouds or being inside. And then each step of ISO moves the base line by one.
>>2826370
Google: Sunny 16
>>2826374
It's kinda funny. When I started taking photos with film and had no light meter, I used this rule.
What I got was a roll of underexposed photos, I live too far up north for sunlight to reach me.
>>2826250
I wish I had but alas I use a universal PZO tank that, although taking both 35mm and 120, snags the film a lot. Also, being that humongous faggot I am I develop in caffenol (kawa z Auchan najtańsza rozpuszczalna) and although entirely satisfactory, the results feel sacreligious (also foma's rodinal knockoff gets you cheaper dev cost per roll if you're doing high dilution stand development, though I've read rodinal is quite generous with grain size, sth id like to avoid) - I dev too rarely to invest in a proper, but ultimately unstable due to limited shelflife, developer.
Pic is same batch of ilford pan 400 in "delta-std" caffenol mix. My ghetto scan doesnt give it justice, though, grain/quality-wise. Tint added because it felt more vibrant than grayscale.
>>2825808
Where are you getting chems? Last time I got them it was from Photo Continental, obviously that's no longer an option as they closed while I've been overseas for two years.
>>2826328
what film tho
>>2826441
the internet breh
I'll be ordering a 5L C-41 kit and a litre of rodinal from Macodirect tomorrow.
whats a good beginner camera for someone just starting to get into film?
>>2826567
find one for cheap that comes with a 50mm on it or one that works with the lenses of the digital system you shoot.
I did my first cross processing today with some old ass ektachrome 100 (expired 2000) that sat in the drawer exposed since last summer and I finally managed to throw it in some c41
I kinda like that, the tint isn't even half as bad as I thought on most of the shots
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows) Photographer PA Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:28 01:04:44 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/9.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/9.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2820388
i have that minolta
i love it, the viewfinder is perfect. makes me hate using my d3200, such a wimpy view
>>2825822
>ruined
more like you have an experimental camera now. looks rad as fuck. ill take it from you if you want
>>2826594
That looks nice.
Could you do me a solid and show a picture of the processed film itself, just held up to a window?
Just interested to know what colour it is.
How hard is it to start developing C-41 film at home? I've been developing black and white for a little over a year now and have gotten pretty good at the process.
>>2826659
I would honestly say easier than black and white. You can buy those kits off Freestyle Photographics or Film Photography Project. There are only 3 chemical baths and each batch takes like ~10 mins to develop. You just need to control the temperature +/- 5 deg. F or so. Everything else is exactly the same as black and white, no safelight.
>>2826670
The temperature is the biggest issue I've had with developing color at home. My water only gets to about 110 degrees Fahrenheit and I don't know if that's too cold to do it.
what are the best archival pages for 35mm negatives?
PrintFile are fucking hard to get in and out, because they make the damn slips so tight. struggling and forcing them in/out scratches them all up.
35-Kive is also shit, thin and flimsy and the plastic is so cheap it literally starts falling apart and getting all scratched and beaten up
>>2826675
110 is too hot. Stores have the PDF directions posted, go read them. What you can do is just have hot and cold water running and the temperature should equalize and stay the same for a long time. You can otherwise buy aquarium heaters for cheap to warm up water.
>>2826250
Ah, there it is. I've had the honour of coming across a sagely compatriot of ours on /p/ and he handed down his stingy slav film shooting tips, all invaluable, all precious. Knew I had this screengrab somewhere.
