Number one - trioplan!
Nah. Fuck that hard-edge shit.
>>2814739
Im literally barfing
>>2814739
>>2814739
I don't even know shit about photography and that pic gives me AIDS. Please post some real bokeh..
Someone posted a pic from a high test Leica or Zeiss lens that almost made me piss myself.
I can't find it right now.
>>2814785
B-But it's wonderfull!
What is bokeh? Is it those circles?
>>2815440
"bokeh" is the look and quality of the out of focus areas caused by having a thin depth of field as an effect of using a wide aperture, or being very close to your subject.
>>2815445
>quality
Not even once.
>>2815508
what
>1499 Euros
No thank you.
h-hey guise, I made sum bohkay, am I a cool tog now??/
>>2814739
>annoying bubbles
>>2815394
its distracting and a crutch for people who dont know how to compose or light a shot interestingly
>>2815560
Puberty is a rough time, but don't worry you will come out of it.
>>2814739
If there was a $20 filter that gave me that effect, I'd pick one up, have a little fun with it, then stick it on the shelf with my Holga lens.
There's no fucking way I'd want a lens that did that all the time.
>>2815567
Every lens does it in those conditions, only those circles will be slightly different. just shoot something close and put individual sharp highlights into the background...
>>2815567
There are many cheap alternatives:
-Diaplan / Pentacon AV projector lenses as closest copies.
-Other lenses based on "triplet" scheme ( Dukane for example ). And cheapest russian "Tpиплeт"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiKy2tVquHE
thoughts?
>>2815567
>There's no fucking way I'd want a lens that did that all the time.
Same here.
But for that one time you actually want the effect, that's pretty neat-o
I might buy a second hand lens with interesting bokeh, shoot it for a couple of weeks, and then sell it again at the same price.
>>2815560
>Bokeh is a crutch
>Here let me show you my boring creepshots that are soft as hell and claim they're "art" and can't be criticized
>I'm going to keep talking about how shit it is and ignore anybody who asks me how to take a good shot
>>2815680
>Took a boring shot with boring bokeh "L00K AT ME, VSCO EDIT!"
>>2815680
show me one fucking great photograph by an acclaimed photographer that uses bokeh interestingly.
Its a good tool to separate out distracting elements, but bokeh as an end in itself has never done anything but producing terribly lazy flickr photos of some cristmas ornament with bokeh balls in the background.
buying your lens for how it looks when the image is OOF is a pretty stupid approach. Best case scenario the bokeh is creamy and no one looks at it, as its not distracting from the subject, or worst case it does exactly that because some dumb fat european photographer saw a digital rev article about swirly bokeh and thought Maybe thats what'll make my chubby wife with crooked teeth finally look beautiful -- because no one has to look at her, they can look at the pretty bokeh balls.
Love it or hate it. This is what you get with a wide open Nikon 50/1.4 AF-D
>>2816247
>I can't afford fast lens so I'm just hating everyone who shoot open wide!
>>2816247
Bokeh can be useful at times to pull out the subject and help put the focus on the subject rather than the surroundings of the photo.
It shouldn't be used all the time, but it does look good especially for portraits.
case in point
>>2816253
I like this shot of the dog and the bokeh helps put the animal into focus. Without the Bokeh, the background might have been distracting.
>>2816276
Yes, it does look good for portraits, but can also be a lazy way of removing the background, without trying to place the subject in an enviroment, removing the whole subject vs enviroment dynamic. not to mention, youre cutting off a whole axis of the 3d enviroment with narrow depth of field.
As for the dog. Its mainly just frustrating, because your eyes are shoehorned to look at one spot in the photo. Humans interpret stills by flickering their eyes around, and all you do in this photo is look at the dogs face, flicker about, not finding anything in focus to look at, returning to the dogs face, instead of creating a composition that naturally guides your eye in an pleasing loop.
bokeh is a natural solution in an forest enviroment, but with this amount youre not even trying. i think there wouldve been tons of more dynamic and creative solutions to be done with a slightly wider depth of field in that photo,
Not saying that this is the only approach, in a professional headshot photographer situation for ex. bokeh is making your job tons easier, and why shouldnt it? but when doing "art photography" its just a technical solution to what should be a creative problem.
>>2816259
Good one. Way to refute any of his thinking, or shoot down any of the points he made. You're doing a great job defending your position.
>>2816276
>Bokeh can be useful at times to pull out the subject and help put the focus on the subject rather than the surroundings of the photo.
It can be, yes, but there are much better ways to do that. With light, with color, with texture, with distance. Just saying "I want you to look at this one thing, so I'm going to completely throw away the entire rest of the photo to force you to look here" is the very lazy way of doing things.
I shoot primarily Konica legacy glass with my Sony A7. I think this one was done with the 57mm 1.4.
>>2816347
Same lens. Most of these were to test the bokeh out.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Capture One 8 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:12:19 23:53:20 Image Created 2015:12:19 23:53:20 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1000 Brightness -4.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Image Width 1874 Image Height 2624 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
The Steinheil Cassarit 2.8/50mm
>>2816348
50mm 1.7.
>>2816352
Now that is a little much. Cant imagine that any lower than 2.8.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4000 Image Height 6000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:15 14:44:49 Image Created 2016:04:09 21:25:21 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Brightness -4.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 1500 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2816253
Why does your dog look like costanza?
It's supposed to be creamy and blend, not fuckin onion ring shit. The Trioplan is ugly, maybe for super abstract stuff it could be neat, but for a portrait it's godawful.
>>2816537
>incidentally her name is George
>>2816307
>>2816310
I agree that it is pretty lazy at times, but I was just saying that to dismiss using bokeh entirely isn't correct. There are places where it can be used to help guide the focus on the subject, but if your skilled in composition you can use other methods as mentioned to bring the focus to the subject.
Just seemed like >>2816247 was dismissing the use of bokeh entirely.
Voigtlander 125mm
I remember the good times when its borkeh wasn't a meme and it cost less than 9000 dollarydoos.
>>2816965
awful
>>2814739
Giving a try to Helios f2 44m-2 myself. Cheap as shit atleast here, 60€. Just waiting for my m4/3 frame to arrive to be able to adapt it in... liking sort of its unique swirly thing in bokeh.
>>2817001
You're not gonna get a whole lotta swirl on that small of a sensor with a full frame lens.
>He mistakes meme bubbles with beautiful buttery bokeh!
>>2817001
>60 Euro Helios
Was it gold plated?
>>2817098
Hipster tax is making those fuckers hella more expensive than they were even two years ago.
>>2817001
I have a 44nonM and it does not produce any kind of swirliness on m43. Get one of those rubbish 25mm/35mm C-mount Chinese CCTV lenses instead.
>>2817091
>buttery
He describes the out of focus parts of a photograph as greasy, calorie laden, heart attack gloop
>>2817278
smearing grease on a lens was a legitimate photography technique btw.
Bokeh gets boring really fast. Literally the only picture I've done experimenting with it
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3200 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 906 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6016 Image Height 4000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:17 02:33:24 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/1.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Fine Weather Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1200 Image Height 798 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2817278
>He doesn't include dairy products in his fapping sessions.
>>2817290
Probably cuz ur shit at bokeh bruh, try harder next time
>>2817280
>smearing grease on a lens was a legitimate photography technique btw.
Smearing Vaseline on a lens was a legitimate photography technique but hey, maybe you should try daubing half-a-pound of Kerrygold on your primes to see what a real buttery bokeh looks like. You could wipe it off with a slice of bread after
>>2817392
Being pedantic and purposefully interpreting people incorrectly for the sake of starting an argument must be fucking exhausting. No wonder nobody on this board has the energy to ever leave the house and take photos.
>>2816965
now that's nice and creamy. but a bad example
>>2817444
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpbdGnJbneE
>>2817044
trying it first on m4/3 since bought about 3 of m44-4's with nikon f mount but didnt really give out any swirls, getting nikon adapter after trying out this first (yeah i know its sad to have nikon dslr nowadays, just got very good deal when i got df...)
>>2817098
well, everything i would get from ebay ect, goes to about same price when added expenses
>>2817276
well the helioses usually vary like shit , the 2 series is most quarandeed to produce swirls, while 7 series are most sharp, wich dosent really mean much when being ussr lense
how yall like my bow-key?
>>2817539
what lens?
>>2817539
:) I see what you did there.
>>2817539
that physically hurts to look at
>>2817539
This is most accurate to the human eye
>>2817276
I have helios-77m. Swirly as fuck on crop body.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 50D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:07:18 19:58:30 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/1.4 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/1.4 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2814739
It's piece of shit, not a good bokeh
And something like this from zeiss is more pleasant :З
Zenitar-m 50/1.7
>>2817819
who is this cummy mummy
>>2817534
>the helioses usually vary like shit
That variance affects sharpness, because it's dependent on manufacturing precision. The borkeh is pretty much the same - unless you really fuck up the assembly or coatings, two lenses with the same optical construction (as all 44s are) will give indistinguishable borkeh.
>>2817770
That's because you're shooting APS-C. Now crop it further to m43 size and the effect will be far less noticeable.
>>2817991
>crop it further
Why? Why would someone intentionally destroy their photos?
Creamy bokeh >>>> ALL
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D7100 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 974 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 127 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 4801 dpi Vertical Resolution 4801 dpi Image Created 2016:04:08 18:39:50 Exposure Time 1/20 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 85.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1418 Image Height 945 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
How about comet shape?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:07:22 22:26:11 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 1328
>>2818100
dat color fuzz
Is my borkeh any good on my old-ass preset Tokina?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model PENTAX K-3 Camera Software GIMP 2.8.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 202 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:17 21:59:04 Exposure Time 1/400 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Exposure Bias 5 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 135.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 851 Image Height 1280 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Distant View
>>2814739
Sorry, but Minolta has the best bokeh. Hands down.
what shitty meme lens is this
>>2816247
this man. this man is correct.
bokeh-emphasis is a shibboleth of shitty bad photographers.
>>2816965
Why are the pictures i threw in the garbage showing up on /p/?
>>2817539
photography this bad should be a crime
>>2818100
>animeNEET with a DSLR
>>2818237
Eeehh I have a job anon.
>>2818259
why are you watching animeNEET cartoons then
whats your job anon
>>2818138
What lens was used for this?
Just got my Pentacon AV lens. Ready to conquer C&C!
>>2819880
>>2819948
this is an example of bad
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D7100 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.6 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 974 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 157 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:19 20:34:58 Exposure Time 1.3 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 105.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1500 Image Height 1000 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2814739
critique appreciated
>>2820035
bokeh is crap. Looks like vomit.
>>2820035
Is this that one phone's shitty bokeh mode?
>>2820035
Too washed-out. Flower should be the first thing my eye gets drawn to, but instead it's the person/path because they're the brightest things in the scene. The flower in the foreground melts into the background flowers, again pulling attention away from the subject.
If you were going to reshoot it, try to do so when the sun is lower in the sky, or partially dimmed by clouds. Try to get it so that the light is perfectly highlighting the flower, so it's the brightest, most colorful, and most vivid thing in the scene. Also, make sure to compose the shot so that the flower is distinct from similarly-colored objects.
I want to have best bokeh. Please recommend me a lens which I have to buy. Is LEICA lens good? I have Canon camera.
>>2820231
mmm is that rosem'ry
According to /p/, what's a good use of bokeh ? I'm not really at a point where I can fully include something like DOF into a composition, and really justify it, I tried different things but I'm very much an amateur.
I guess it helps to isolate a subject, and I understand that a blured background still has to have something of its own, and not just be a trashbin for what you don't want to show, but I don't feel like I have a full definition of what it can and can't be used for.
Like for example, with B/W, at first it was really dificult for me to make the switch to B/W on a particular shot, because for me it seemed like most people just used it as an "artsy on/off". Now I understand a little more the concept of abstraction, and the fact that colors sometimes aren't a positive component of a shot, I'd like to find the same kind of definition and boudaries for bokeh, if possible.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 760D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:04:20 19:40:53 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/2.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/2.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2820627
To most people who are putting a lot of effort into every aspect of their scenes (picking a perspective, getting a good environment, and therefore a good background) a thin depth of field is a negative side effect of having to open your aperture up to get enough light. It blurs out your background that you put so much effort into finding and arranging.
Since more and more people have become cell-phone photographers (previously, people only using disposable cameras with fixed small apertures), the general populace is taking photos on devices that are not able to create photos with dramatically thin depths of field, so when they see photos that DO utilize it, they're impressed and wowed by it (regardless of whether it improves the photo or in most cases, ruins it)
If you'd like to find a middle ground between always shooting for everything in your shot being in focus, and straight up bokeh whoring (as most of us do) then you can choose to try to use it as a way to help guide your viewer's eye to where you want them to look, and to help to simplify a busy scene that you can't rearrange or alter.
For instance, if you're in the woods, doing a portrait: If you were to shoot at f/22 on a 50mm lens, you're going to get a LOT of the scene in focus. If the scene is well built for it, that can be great, but in most forest scenes, that's going to leave you with tons of twigs and little rocks and bark and leaves all in sharp focus with tons of very distracting detail making the whole image seem busy and noisy. Now, an f/1.2 whore will just blow the whole background away and be happy to have done so, but then why did he bother taking his model out into the woods in the first place? In stead, one can shoot at f/5.6, to remove the most dramatic levels of distracting detail, while still letting the subject live in the scene, and giving her room to interact and belong.
>>2820644
cont
If you DO decide to blow everything away, it becomes a game of arranging blobs in a way that doesn't distract or throw off the balance of the scene. If you have a lot of dark blobs on one side, but only light blobs on the other, that's going to affect your composition, so you need to either minimize your blob variety, or at least spread it around the scene in a way that isn't detrimental to the outlines of the subject (brown blob in the background right against a brown shirt on your model, making it look like they have a big brown growth on the side of their shoulder) or the balance of the overall composition.
Really, everyone goes through a phase where they want as thin a DOF as possible, and as little background as possible (much like a man who's forced to sit in a little box for years and years wants to run and run as he's let out) and many people stay in that phase, but most of the talented photographers out there (read: Talented, not necessarily commercially succesful) grow out of this phase and into that middle ground.
>>2820596
85 1.8
>>2820648
nah, 85 1.2 nigga
>>2820644
>To most people who are putting a lot of effort into every aspect of their scenes (picking a perspective, getting a good environment, and therefore a good background) a thin depth of field is a negative side effect of having to open your aperture up to get enough light. It blurs out your background that you put so much effort into finding and arranging.
This doesn't exist and if it does exist it's only because the photographer is a literal retard who has no fucking clue how his camera works.
>>2820651
I assumed the poster wouldn't have that kind of budget.
>>2820654
Please elaborate. Many photographers shoot for very wide depth of field, to include the entire scene they've worked hard to put their subject in.
For instance, how would the attached photo be improved with a narrower depth of field?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.2 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2013:05:20 14:05:08 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 70.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2820659
Please elaborate on why a photographer would "work really hard to create a scene" and fail to account for having enough light to get it all in?
Literal retard who has no fucking clue how their camera works.
>>2820661
"work really hard to create a scene" may mean scouting a location and putting a model there. Starting a shoot in the late afternoon to take golden hour into account, but then light starts falling and using strobes isn't going to match with the rest of the shoot.
Coming back another day means hiring assistants, hair, makeup, stylist, model for another day.
Are you just ignoring obvious possibilities in order to feel superior or something? Have you never been forced to open your aperture as an unexpectedly low light level happens to your subject?
>>2820664
I'm not the one that's claiming that working to create a scene doesn't include literally the exact most important facet of the scene to a photographer: the fucking light.
You know? Those little strange photon thingies that might be a wave or might be a particle and make people's heads explode when they try to comprehend the physics of them?
If you're not considering the light, you're not "working really hard to create a scene" for photography, period.
>>2820659
You do realize that's a composite image? No way the mountains would look that close with such a wide angle lens.
>>2820672
>70mm
>wide angle lens
Thanks for your input /p/
I was there. It isn't a composite.
>>2818190
no one likes my smorkeh borkeh
>>2817539
love how the fucking bird isnt even in focus in the first place
>>2820666
You sound really dumb dude.
>>2820917
>photography isn't about light!
>light is not a consideration of photography
>setting a scene/finding a scene to be photographed is entirely done irrespective of the light!
>fuck me, I built this giant beautiful bed but I can't fit it through any of the doors!
>>2820929
Nobody said any of those things except you. I kinda think you're just pretending to be retarded but I'm not too sure, if you are only pretending then you must do this a lot because you're doing a very good job.
>>2820972
>works really hard to set up scene
>but oh no! part of scene is out of focus because having to shoot at wide aperture
That's literally not considering the light when doing all that "hard work". If the hypothetical person were considering the light, that would be taken care of in all of the "hard work".
>>2820672
not a composite.
I was there too.
Scotland is magic.
>>2818660
looks like the old nikkor 50/1.8
>>2820872
lovely effect
>>2817444
Mcfucking kill yourself.
This is 4chan.
Where did you think you are?
Macro Bokeh
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D800 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Windows) Photographer Juan Pablo Valenzuela Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 854 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 105 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:22 01:42:46 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash Flash, Compulsory, Return Detected Focal Length 105.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2822089
Nice. I always try to shoot them like that in Summer but haven't got that well away with it yet.
>>2822108
you can do it with some tricks, like 36mp, 105mm macro manual and a lot of patience.
freakings hoverflys
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-GF3 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2014:04:25 09:09:52 Exposure Time 1/400 sec Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 160 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
What's about lensbaby? Tool of toy?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7M2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 427 Image Height 640 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:12 15:31:48 Image Created 2016:04:09 13:43:36 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 50 Brightness 4.0 EV Exposure Bias 0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 427 Image Height 640 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2823098
Mainly toy. Results aren't reproduced easily enough for it to be a tool in my opinion. The tool equivalent would be a tilt shift lens/camera with movements.
Everyone loves a flower snapshit with smooth bokeh.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model PENTAX K-3 Camera Software GIMP 2.8.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 82 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:23 16:11:34 Exposure Time 1/640 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Exposure Bias 5 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 665 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
I unironically like hexagons.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2823258
Beautiful
2 blades, 2 blades, Carl!
>>2823263
What lens has square borkeh?
>>2823270
you can get it on any lens by cutting a lil square cardboard filter ish thingie and put it on your lens. works with any shape too
>>2823281
Related
>>2823281
That was gonna be my second guess.
Most round bokeh coming in.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 20D Camera Software digiKam-4.12.0 Lens Size 1.00 - 65535.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware 2.0.3 Owner Name unknown Serial Number 0330121043 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:04:22 19:33:51 Exposure Time 1/800 sec F-Number f/1.4 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/1.4 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3504 Image Height 2336 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Large Focus Mode Manual Drive Mode Single Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Macro Mode Normal White Balance Auto Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 288 Image Number 847-4798 Color Matrix 0
>>2823281
Zenitar-ME1 50/1.7
>>2823531
>Zenitar-ME1 50/1.7
>>2823261
What pisses me off is I took that shot in my newbie days when I didn't even know how to use compensation and I still haven't been able to pull the same off. Nowadays every time I try to shoot Ektar it turns out utter shit with dead colors and blown highlights.
