Hello,
Since I'm coming every day with a new picture to try to learn more from you guys, I'll just do this because I'm getting lost and my photography program starts in August.
pic is first picture I shot and posted with my D3300
The second one. I have learned about exposure here after this one.
Then there was this one, which made me realize that I have no sense of composition
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Google Color Efex Pro 4 4.3.24.10 Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 82 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:07 12:35:51 Exposure Time 25 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 55.00 mm Image Width 5105 Image Height 1942 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
And this one.
I just ordered my first flash, umbrella and softbox, it will arrive in two weeks.
5/5 last picture, took it yesterday.
I'm not fully ashamed this time.
>>2813608
I've already started reading about lighting and composition this morning.
>>2813574
you already shitposted in the critique thread and got enough advice. you don't need your own personal thread. your photos are shit. come back when you've actually finished reading.
>>2813621
Is there any particular recommended reading? Like, should I just google shit or is there a certain book
>>2813644
Read the fucking sticky/wiki like come on. There is literally a section called literature.
>>2813574
This is the Edgelordiest shit ive ever seen. I mean the ciggy isnt even lit! you perfectly captured a soft suburban white kid that hates his divorced parents exactly. Do emos get sweaty in leather jackets on hot sunny days in the burbs?
>>2813644
>should I just google shit or is there a certain book
Be a detective and find out! Look at websites about photography, blogs about it, articles, look up recommended books on amazon or photography sites.
I just did 3/4 of the detective work for you.
>>2813574
Lighting is harsh and makes your subject look gross. Framing is weak, everything that isn't the girl is distracting.
>>2813576
Underexposed. This is seriously a garbage photo and that other person was right, don't shitpost the same photos on two different threads.
>>2813578
There's 0 meaning or life to this, it's simply a photo that exists. To comment or critique it is implying that it could've been improved. There's nothing here, just delete this photo.
>>2813582
Cool colors I guess. Photo isn't good otherwise since it has no subject so there's nothing to talk about.
>>2813584
I think this could've been interesting. Try shooting an object from multiple angles/viewpoints. Also the framing is weak, but that's because youre a beginner. Just read about the rule of thirds and ideas of framing/composing.
Are you 16?