No one asked Hemingway what kind of typewriter he used.
itt: bad analogies to troll people
also itt: guaranteed replies
>>2806117
Listen up wade, its a good point. No one here even bothers constructing a photo or making a narrative out of an image, its all about isos, lens and bullshit no one but camera enthusiasts care about. This whole board doesn't see the forest for the trees
>>2806119
Good point, Julie. However a bad lens and camera is like a typewriter that smudges and misses letters. You can still get the book written but it'll be harder and more unpleasant to read.
>>2806122
Paulette have you looked at a list of the best photos of the 20th century? I have and guess what, none are technically amazing and many are just technically shit
>>2806126
If they could choose the option to better render their photos, they would have.
>>2806132
i think youre in the wrong, Audrey.
>rendering qualities
>3d pop
>color
>glow
>micro contrast
>clinical
>painterly
>>2806132
It's comments like these that shows /p/ is just a bunch of gear fags whose best works are lucky shots taken some cosplay event
>>2806117
I will find you. And I will destroy you.
>>2806114
Here's your (you)
>>2806139
you forgot dat
>3d nose
>cinematic
>drawing style
if hemingway used comics sans as his typeface his work would of been tossed into the trash
checkmate fags
>>2806114
I'm pretty sure people did ask Hemingway about his typewriter.
As well as about the brand of cigars he smoked while writing.
>>2806114
http://www.mytypewriter.com/authors/featured/hemingway.html
A corona n3 and n4.
>>2806132
>what is style and aesthetic?
>what can a lesser degree of quality be used to say or affect?
>what are semiotics?
Yet we do ask what kind of medium an artist works in, what paints are used
>>2806140
>/p/
>not gearfagging
Pick one.
Every argument on the board is about gear. People defending their platform/lens/camera to the death.
Is that Bondi?
>>2806140
>implying best photographs of 20th century were not lucky shots
>>2806521
This. 1/1000 hit rate if you're lucky
>>2806521
>being this new
Never change /p/
>>2806532
>being new
>never change
What does that even mean? That people don't stick around /p/? Step up your shitposting, sempai.
>>2806521
agreed
and yet he still had a preference
>>2806114
>No one asked Hemingway what kind of typewriter he used.
>302k results
>implying
Hemingway used to write standing up
>>2806140
Is this a jab at the Angry phatographer?
Fuck you, I'm going to hold a seance and ask him myself.
i agree with you, but it's a shit analogy. and they did ask him.
this place makes fun of people who use their phones to take pictures.
>>2807646
>this place makes fun of people who use their phones to take pictures.
No it doesn't. You must be new.
Has Hemingway ever typed a photograph in ASCII?
