hi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1570 Image Height 1066 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:41 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 543
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1570 Image Height 1070 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:23 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 545
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1570 Image Height 1070 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:00 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 545
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1070 Image Height 1570 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:04 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 545 Image Height 800
lmao
>>2804304
:~)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1070 Image Height 1570 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:02 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 545 Image Height 800
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1570 Image Height 1066 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:44 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 543
>>2804308
lmbo
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1070 Image Height 1570 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:06 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 545 Image Height 800
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1570 Image Height 1070 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:39:53 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 545
suh dud, fog
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1070 Image Height 1570 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:39:55 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 545 Image Height 800
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1570 Image Height 1070 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:39:58 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 545
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1570 Image Height 1070 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:39:56 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 545
>>2804302
>images actually under both parts of the resize requirement instead of like 1028 pixels or some sort
I don't think your isi...but this does look like deep south, so we'll see.
For whatever reason, I can't get over that bit of dead grass that's creeping around the rear of the left tree. Something bothersome about it to me...doesn't quite seem to fit.
>>2804303
>>2804305
I really like these two, but something is irking me about the depth of field. Dunno if I'd like to see more or less.
As an aside to these as a whole: are you playing with frame within a frame as a motif, mainly partial framing (well for the photos above the football one)?
>>2804313
This seems far too self aware.
>>2804314
>>2804317
>>2804318
Todd Hido is fucking awesome.
What's up with the toning of the early daylight ones? Were you going for kind of a creepiness deal with the killed whites/highlights?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1270 Image Height 1570 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:38 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 647 Image Height 800
>>2804320
>What's up with the toning of the early daylight ones? Were you going for kind of a creepiness deal with the killed whites/highlights?
More or less.
Sometimes right just looks wrong, y'know?
>As an aside to these as a whole: are you playing with frame within a frame as a motif, mainly partial framing
I'd say I play with frame-in-a-frame a lot in general. there's so much visual clutter in this environment that you kinda just have to embrace it lol
After this one (wew), they'll mostly be street shit
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1570 Image Height 1070 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:35 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 545
j u b i l e e
u
b
i
l
e
e
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1570 Image Height 1070 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:08 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 545
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1570 Image Height 1070 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:12 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 545
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1570 Image Height 1070 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:14 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 545
>>2804328
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1070 Image Height 1570 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:32 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 545 Image Height 800
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1570 Image Height 1070 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:29 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 545
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1570 Image Height 1070 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:17 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 545
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1070 Image Height 1570 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:26 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 545 Image Height 800
>>2804334
once you notice the window-asses you can never unnotice the window asses
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1070 Image Height 1570 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:29 18:40:20 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 545 Image Height 800
thats all, kittens
>>2804336
How often do people cover their faces or do similar things?
>>2804355
Not that often, usually only happens if I've taken multiple photos (this was the third I think of that guy, I approached from the right and kept shooting until he looked at me and started directing his freestyle gospel to me.
Personally, I love the covered face in this particular shot
>>2804358
It did work out well. What camera?
>>2804360
>what camera?
Literally does not matter. That picture could have been taken with almost every camera that has been released in around the last half decade.
>>2804362
I want to know how big the camera that OP is shoving in peoples faces.
>>2804364
That's not shoving in people's faces.
Gilden shoves in people's faces.
>>2804332
Hide all isi threads, bruh. Lowers the board drama quotient considerably.
Also, this thread is all but guaranteed to hit 300 replies.
Why did you just waste my time with a bunch of snapshit of abandoned houses and le street photography?
Why is most of the photography here street shit or architecture?
>>2804364
Not very
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SAMSUNG Camera Model SAMSUNG-SM-N900A Camera Software N900AUCUEOC2 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 31 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3264 Image Height 1836 Image Orientation Bottom, Right-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:21 13:43:02 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 125 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 1.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 4.13 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3264 Image Height 1836 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID C13QSGJ02SB
>>2804370
>architecture?
There's nothing architectural about any of these.
>>2804371
Now show anon a picture of who was standing there with the camera because we all know that has a lot more to do with these people's reactions than your camera.
>>2804373
"here" as in in /p/
what's the answer for the first question?
>>2804384
Homie, you gotta have some personal accountability here. You're the one that's responsible for wasting your time here. That's entirely on your head.
>>2804384
Deep Fried Peanuts
>>2804324
This picture. My brain. Please help. Really dig it.
>>2804387
Absolutely, but surely someone who makes a thread about their photographs must have at least something worthy of my time, no? otherwise why would they post in a brand new thread just for themselves? I'm questioning the quality of these images both as series by questioning whether or not OP thinks they are worth of anyone's time including my own, and if so why. All I'm seeing is snapshit OP gathered in a day out or two, where OP is forcing "style" by adding needless borders, the images themselves are bland.
>>2804391
>not boiled
Yup, not isi
>>2804395
I'm from Alabama, man, I like peanuts any way.
Roasted.
Salted.
Boiled.
Fried.
Raw.
>>2804394
It's an episode not a feature film, kid
>>2804394
>Absolutely, but surely someone who makes a thread about their photographs must have at least something worthy of my time, no?
Woah...slow your roll mate. You're on 4chan. Your time isn't all that precious.
>otherwise why would they post in a brand new thread just for themselves?
It's the purpose of this board. Interestingly, the option to post a thread is open to people of *all* skill levels (note that in the sticky it just says to use the RPT if you're shy, nothing about skill).
>I'm questioning the quality of these images both as series by questioning whether or not OP thinks they are worth of anyone's time including my own, and if so why.
I actually can't necessarily disagree with this point except the answers to everything but "why" is self-evident from the fact that they were posted.
>All I'm seeing is snapshit OP gathered in a day out or two, where OP is forcing "style" by adding needless borders, the images themselves are bland.
And here you out yourself as knowing nothing. There's a lot of critiques you could level here, but "snapshits" really isn't one of them.
As if you think the style is being forced by the borders...you really are visually illiterate.
>>2804401
>And here you out yourself as knowing nothing. There's a lot of critiques you could level here, but "snapshits" really isn't one of them.
And here you out yourself as knowing nothing.
There's a lot of critiques you could level here, but responding to plebeians as omniscient is what you do instead.
>>2804335
>once you notice the window-asses you can never unnotice the window asses
Actually I find it pretty easy to un-notice everything about your photos.
>>2804405
>And here you out yourself as knowing nothing.
Sure thing friend.
>There's a lot of critiques you could level here, but responding to plebeians as omniscient is what you do instead.
You know "I know you are but what am I" stops working at like fourth grade, right?
>responding to plebeians
At the moment, my time is pretty damn worthless. I'm not the one putting on aires friend.
>as omniscient
No, I just know that snapshitting is thoughtless picture taking. Looking through these, you can clearly see that's not the case. There are clear motives in these images. Whether or not you like these, or how well they work is aside from the point. They are present. Consideration of treatment is present. These may well be bad photographs, but they are anything (well, barring the one with the football maybe) but snapshits.
If this is the eye you use for evaluating your own work, you have much studying to do. I recommend starting with whatever basic texts you can google up on composition.
>>2804324
My eyes hurt.
>>2804324
I usually don't like these mirror flip photos that you do, but this one is great. It all flows together perfectly and really fucks with my head.
Also what's up with all these abandoned houses? I'm guessing they're all from the same area, so is there a story behind them? I dig this one >>2804303
>>2804355
It's not uncommon for people to hide their faces or to turn their back to the camera. In this case it has the unintended, but rather pleasing, consequence at making her look ashamed of the preacher.
>>2804500
>ashamed of the preacher.
I think you're projecting
My cat
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Ver.1.01 Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.3 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 45 mm Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 Vertical Resolution 72 Image Created 2016:03:23 23:36:11 Exposure Time 1/4 sec F-Number f/4.2 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 1600 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 30.00 mm Image Width 1417 Image Height 945 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Portrait Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2804302
;);))
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:30 04:00:29 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 543
>>2804525
looks terrible
>>2804400
A bipolar episode maybe, with this being the crippling depression part.
When are you going to start posting any decent photos?
>>2804314
this one's alright
>>2804522
you have a hairy pussy
>>2804705
its a customized xpro1, digital
>>2804774
>customised
hardly, its just some got edgy lens on it
>>2804780
Yes, customized
>rubber grip removed
>different leather texture than stock xpro1
>logos are blacked out
>lever thing is silver and red instead of black
its probably the MOST customized xpro1 I've ever seen in fact.
>>2804783
>>2804783
and yet it still sucks, strange
as a wise man once told, a turd that is cannot be polished
>>2804398
>peanuts
penis more like
lmao
inb4 this post is reported by the IRC hugboxers
>>2804799
[13:13] <%Trim> Did we never identify the only asshole who would ever seriously use the word "hugbox"?
[13:14] <%torridgristle> Well I know Alabama uses it
Careful, IRC might accuse you of being me.
Hueheuhe.
>>2804848
whats the network/channel?
>>2804852
rizon
#/p/
>>2804848
>timestamp is from before the post
what
>>2804861
what
>>2804862
they're talking about the post before it was posted
>>2804873
They were busy scouring deleted posts looking for drama and who to blame it on.
Only one person on 4chan uses the phrase hugbox, I guess. Iunno, man.
>>2804881
I was going to flood it with bots for fun because rizon is shitty
bump :)
>>2804302
The borders ruin every single shot here.
>>2804321
underrated
>>2804324
What is this
>>2807702
An Alabaman samefagging in her own thread.
Some of your worst snapshits so far, amazingly you've somehow regressed in skill. Some of the processing is down right ugly and your composition is lazy and uninteresting.
>>2807862
I think she's been attempting irony
>>2807866
No, its lead in the water, not iron.
>>2804305
This processing
Thankyou isi for giving me and my girlfriend a good laugh this morning.
>>2804302
Oh you and your neon HDR greens.
>>2807942
Well it's obvious you don't leave the house often
>>2807943
What's funny though is that I DO leave the house often. Unless grass and leaves in Alabama are usually bio-luminescent and also very cyan tinted, which I suppose is possible.
>>2807954
Just color blind
>>2807942
>>2807954
If you've been around long enough to recognize isi and her consistently unnatural color work, then you've also been around long enough to know not to bother trying to point out her flaws, and not to bother engaging with her when she drops her trip to defend herself by attacking you.
>>2808000
There's nothing unnatural about these greens
Is everyone on /p/ from yellowgrass cities?
>>2808005
Those all look a lot more yellow than isi's stuff.
>>2808008
All of these look overcast ie cooler wb
>>2808008
>what is bluegrass
>>2808029
Bluegrass is yellow grass made to look sort of blue from far away because of the blue seeds/buds that grow from parts of it when it's seeding. The grass itself is not blue.
>>2808035
OK and?
>>2808079
And? it's not universally blue, like isi's foliage usually is. What's the confusion there?
>>2808085
Yo monitor shit, son
>>2807954
>Unless grass and leaves in Alabama are usually bio-luminescent and also very cyan tinted
Alabamian that's not isi here. I've seen grass look fairly similar to that, especially on overcast days.
sup dust spot lol
Latest lot are all pointless shots of nothing with a gimmick thrown in.
>>2808540
I feel sorry for you anon
>>2807862
This. How is it even to possibly get worse.
>>2804302
No
>>2804303
Yes
>>2804305
Wait for appropriate light
>>2804307
I don't know if the underexposure thing is achieving a desirable aesthetic, now that I see the pattern. No.
>>2804310
Close. Might care to see either more or less of the tree on left. Probably works better to have more, going with the layered framing thing happening in the set
>>2804311
Ok. Probably want horizon fixed. Straight on the others. Choose sloppy or neat but don't mix the two
>>2804312
No
>>2804324
>>2804321
>>2804336
>>2808499
>>2808506
>>2808509
Remaining possible yes/maybe stuff
There's some spectacularly bad stuff, too. But perhaps that's part of the shtick?
>>2804370
I sure hope you're going to link us to your own thread of 20+ photos you've taken in the last month that aren't generic portraits of women, cars or birds.
>>2808760
Why would you exclude interesting subjects like portraits, automotive, or wildlife, when isi's thread of "outside" is fine?
>>2808761
I just wanted to rule out the other /p/ and average photographer trappings.
>Interesting
Interesting is completely subjective.
It's not like I'm a huge fan of Isi, but at least it's not another gear thread or a stupid question.
>>2808763
So what you're saying is you wanted to make the guy show his work, but realized that it would make you look stupid if he linked to any of the threads that have work in them...? Why not say no landscapes, in case he was Alex? And nothing from the state of Michigan, in case he's that Detroit guy?
>>2808764
I don't know what anon was saying, but I'm saying you're mentally ill.
>>2808764
xD
You're right. I already assumed landscapes were a no go since the poster complained about abandoned houses.
Why would I care if the poster already had a thread there? There's not many threads alive right now that fit that criteria anyway.
Why do you assume it's a male?
>>2808761
>portraits, automotive, or wildlife
2 of those 3 are in this thread
Did you even look at it before you started shitposting?
>>2808752
Understood - but the viewer doesn't know that. There's not a good point of reference for a real horizon in this image. Maybe it's borderline, but just keep in mind that the viewer doesn't know the house is crooked- if there isn't a good point of reference for what "horizon" is, it just looks like a crooked photo.
>>2808797
Trees are generally a strong point of reference. Also the only possible one when you're talking about places that don't exactly have level foundations to begin with.
Approaching rural decay from a strict geometric mindset is doomed to failure.
