HDR
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
So I just got into HDR. I am using a D40.
Fstop- 4.5 ISO-200 Exposure-1/250
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D40X Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 750 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:02:25 17:38:27 Exposure Time 2 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Cloudy Weather Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 668 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation High Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
Picture taken next to Folsom prison.
ayy lmao
this is what a properly executed HDR image looks like
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model PENTAX K-3 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 99999999 dpi Vertical Resolution 99999999 dpi Image Created 2016:02:04 20:00:18 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/16.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/16.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Close View
>>2778151
why even bother doing it when you aren't showing off the sky color anyway?
for all we know it's still white/blown out
Your HDR example is pretty flat.. Shouldn't hdr be high contrast?
>>2778152
>sky color
i think it was overcast, but either way, i didnt want a happy, colorful image.
Well in that case i think you hit a home run.
>>2778148
>HDR in colour
good or bad hdr ?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 700D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:02:23 19:51:05 F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Exposure Mode Auto Bracket White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
the rule of thumb is that if you can tell immediately that it's HDR, it's bad HDR.
>>2778148
>>2779554
The RX-78 looks fine, almost hand drawn, but the sky is a tad too contrast-y.
6/10, would probably like on deviantArt.
>>2778149
>Picture taken next to Folsom prison.
Sowhat edgelord
>>2779554
Leave that poor sky alone
>>2779554
Bad. Anytime you can see halo-ing on the edges, it's bad.
i find haitch-dee-are to be pretty good for snow. except i still get damned jedi halos around the trees and junk. this was just a test shot. i never took a real one
>>2780381
for-fucking-got the pitcher
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX Camera Model PENTAX K-50 Camera Software ArcSoft PhotoStudio Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:02:28 19:32:59 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 2 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.00 mm Comment HDRtistPro:key=201505:D08FF8FD-1CBA-458C-8921-B4D25E7314B6 Image Width 2362 Image Height 1563 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Bracket White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Distant View
>>2780384
I actually like it. Barely even noticed the halos
>>2779554
It's fine, given the subject matter.
>>2780376
what is up with the haloing?
I grew up combining different exposures in gimp and whatever prog before that, when i finally got Ps I was extremely disappointed with the HDR, I thought it was going to make things faster except it always looks like shit
>>2780549
teach me how you do it in GIMP pls
>>2778148
>i just got into hdr
get out, immediately
>>2778154
Not overcast, there's a shadow.
Don't tell someone what a properly executed HDR looks like when you don't even post a properly executed one. That image could have been done in one exposure easily. It even just looks like you did a BW conversion straight out of the camera
>>2780384
This is terrible too. Why do you need HDR for this? There's not a massive dynamic range in this photo. I can promise you this is doable with one exposure
>>2778148
Just some advice. Don't fall for the HDR meme. 90% of the time, it's useless, especially how you're using it here. HDR should be used to get shadows and highlights properly exposed, not to make the image look like a shit show. I'm not saying to stop doing HDR, because you're new obviously, just play around. But look into doing real HDR, thats much more useful. Try this as a starting point
I haven't watched this video. But it looks like its a good source of info, and some good examples here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeG9Wm0-yXw
>>2779566
This
