What does /p/ think of this tool? Any experience?
Looks completely unsuitable for DSLR / MILC scanning, and pretty much any dedicated film scanner or flatbed worth using has its own tray.
I bought one because my university's scanners didn't have masks. It's a bit fiddley to use, but it works.
>>2764354
I've heard great things about the 120 version of this and I plan to get one for dslr scanning. But for 35mm, this:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/907200-REG/pacific_image_649899001691_film_holder_for_pf7200u_pf7200_pf120.html
It works perfectly. Unless you are a hipster faggot that wants sprocket holes.
>>2764742
dslr scanning?
>>2765047
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 450 Image Height 600
>>2767285
>reflections
>paper texture
>fucked up backlight
Maximum nigger tier.
An iPad and a fucking toilet paper tube would already improve that.
>>2767491
lol the gear in that pic is probably more than ur rent fuccboi
>>2767495
is this the ultimate gearfag post?
>>2767495
well, considering that I own my apartment, that is indeed the case
