[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Reflex suggestion
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography

Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 4
File: IMG_0150.jpg (5 MB, 5472x3648) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0150.jpg
5 MB, 5472x3648
Just sent at Amazon my brand new Canon EOS 70D for back e front focus issues, basically not a single photo was focused (even close ups with the 18-135mm)...so disappointed because it's a good camera.

Since now I'm scared to get another defective 70D, what camera do you suggest me?

- 1200€ max included decent kit zoom lens

- Similar Dual pixel AF for videos (I have to use the camera for quality videos but the main use for the camera is still/animals/landscape photography)

I don't know what else to say...I'm so frustrated right now, just looking at my shots with my old Nikon D70...way better focused.

>pic related: a delightful example of the issue: AF point was on the writings

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 70D
Lens Size18.00 - 135.00 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.1
Lens NameEF-S18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:02:05 12:43:12
Exposure Time1/2000 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.7
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length97.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5472
Image Height3648
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModePartial
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeLarge
Focus ModeAI Focus
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed192
Color Matrix135
>>
File: IMG_0110.jpg (5 MB, 5472x3648) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0110.jpg
5 MB, 5472x3648
Bump with another sample

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 70D
Lens Size18.00 - 135.00 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.1
Lens NameEF-S18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:02:05 12:22:54
Exposure Time1/400 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.7
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length135.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5472
Image Height3648
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModePartial
SharpnessUnknown
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeLarge
Focus ModeAI Focus
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed192
Color Matrix135
>>
>>2761504
Looks like you just used a shit lens. Looks pretty close to in focus. Did you try any non-terrible lenses on it?
>>
>>2761504
Both samples look in-focus.... did you adjust the diopter? Do you use eyeglasses when shooting?

You did use AF though...
Based on the images, it seems fine, and nitpicky. If you used multiple AF points, of course it's gonna pick one you don't want sometimes, especially an object with multiple different surfaces.

If you use only thhe centre AF point, it will only focus on things directly in the centre, not the side points.
>>
>>2761519
They're all in focus dude, you're just using shitty lenses.
>>
File: IMG_0193.jpg (3 MB, 5472x3648) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0193.jpg
3 MB, 5472x3648
My lumia 1020 takes better images, sharper and better focused.

Seriously.

I was using shitty kit lenses on the Nikon D70 and again the results were better.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 70D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:02:05 22:31:49
Exposure Time1/800 sec
F-Numberf/11.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/11.3
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePartial
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length85.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width5472
Image Height3648
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>2761522
Anyways the camera is going to be returned to amazon.

Any suggestions for something similar? Thanks.
>>
>>2761525
Kit lenses aren't bad, they're just inexpensive because they're built with cheap materials, and because they make a trillion of them.

Super zooms and cheap pancakes, however, are usually pretty poor performers.

f/18 will give you a lot of diffraction which will also cause you to lose a lot of fine detail in your image.
>>
>>2761530
Well it's difficult to suggest a camera to solve the problem when the problem is you, not the camera. Look into Pentax, the Sony a6000, and fuji X-T10
>>
The focus looks spot on to me, the image shows characteristic signs of a bad case of shitlens. Just looking at the OP without reading what lens you used I saw it was something like a shitty superzoom or a plain Sigma.
The camera is a solid performer, get a better lens. Avoid superzooms like the 18-135 in the future, get a basic 18-55 IS II kit lens and a separate 55-250 IS for tele shots.
>>
File: DSC_1051.jpg (3 MB, 3008x2000) Image search: [Google]
DSC_1051.jpg
3 MB, 3008x2000
>>2761531
Ok, and this is a sample from the 2004 Nikon D70 taken with 18-135 mm equivalent lenses.

This is sharp and detailed, with the quality of a base lens obviously.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D70
Camera SoftwareVer.2.00
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.6
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern824
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)30 mm
Serial Number20025776
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2012:07:23 14:40:36
Exposure Time1/2500 sec
F-Numberf/3.8
Exposure ProgramManual
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length20.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3008
Image Height2000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastHard
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
ISO Speed Used200
Image QualityFINE
White BalanceAUTO
Image SharpeningMED.H
Focus ModeAF-S
Flash SettingNORMAL
Flash Compensation0.0 EV
ISO Speed Requested200
Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation0.0 EV
Tone CompensationMID.H
Lens TypeNikon D Series
Lens Range18.0 - 135.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/5.6
Auto FocusDynamic Area, Center Selected, Top Focused
Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/Off
Color ModePortrait sRGB
Lighting TypeNATURAL
Noise ReductionOFF
Camera Actuations5567
Image OptimizationCUSTOM
Saturation 2ENHANCED
>>
>>2761536
That image is neither sharp nor detailed. There are lots of aberrations and overall blurriness.

The OP image is completely different, but is sharper than this "sharp and detailed" image you've posted here.
Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 4

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.