went to a wedding recently and the "professional photographer" was using a 10d and a kit lens. why the fuck is this allowed?
>inb4 it's not the camera it's the photographer
>>2758673
He still seems to get booked. Either is pictures are good enough or the couple tried to save money, you get what you pay for.
Shut your bitchass up lmao.
>>2758673
If he takes good photos, why the fuck does it matter? If he gets booked a lot, why the fuck does it matter? If the clients are happy, why the fuck does it matter?
Why should someone's gear be a barrier to entry? Terry Richardson almost exclusively (or used to, anyway) used cheap point and shoots for his work, and he's been in just about every magazine there is to be in
>>2758673
>I bought a 5DS and 3 L lenses and my pictures suck
sucks to be you OP
>>2758673
>being this jelly
>>2758734
>30 seconds
>literally
I dont believe that.
>>2758734
Yet he has a job and you spend your time shitposting on a Scandinavian woodcarving image board.
>>2758734
Literally 30 seconds.
>OP confirmed for shitter who spams the shutter in continuous so he can fap to timelapses of his stationary anime dolls when he ragequits /p/ for not agreeing with him and has never heard of shooting one frame at a time, deliberately.
>>2758764
Kek
So, were the photos good or not?
>>2758810
finally someone asks. fuck.
>>2758673
>pic related
