Hey /p/,I recently visited my local YMCA to talk to and shoot some of the residents, I believe some of them had autism which made posing them quite awkward so I went for more candid portraits. Which one from this gentlemen do you think is better? I'm not sure which to use.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 144 dpi Vertical Resolution 144 dpi Image Created 2016:01:31 19:33:57 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1966 Image Height 1400
>>2757432
Damn you didn't actually shoot them. With a gun. I had high expectations of gore on here from a local YMCA massacre...
Second is probably better as the head is level and that hair, but I think the facial expression from the first was more interesting.
General focus on the subject and background bokeh was consistent in both.
Can't say I thought either photos was great given the subject is less than appealing and would be better off taking photos themselves or maybe lose some weight.
>>2757461
Was my terminology inappropriate or unprofessional?
I also think I'm going to go for the second one, I just feel that the closed eye makes the photograph look very armature.
>>2757465
Terminology is not an issue.
For the photos I would say the closed eyes would work well if there is was some appeal to the subject, but this is my opinion.
1st by far. shoop his mantits and belly.
>>2757432
What was his name? Robert Paulson?
>>2757465
>armature
(I'm not a robot)
