Gear Thread
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
Gear Thread
If you have questions about a new camera, what lenses to buy and anything related to gear or wondering about getting into photography, post it in this thread.
Do not attempt to make a new thread for your new Rabal, broken glass and being new. You have been warned!
I repeat, ANYTHING GEAR RELATED goes in here!
And don't forget, be polite!
Previous thread: >>2750007
Running out of Pentacks pics aye boss?
Hokay: in need of a new compact body. Not overly familiar with them, so after some recs.
- I shoot live music in the local scene, so am often facing extremely poorly lit stages. A good night is gonna be a couple of red stage lights. A bad night is gonna be those new bright blue LEDs.
- I shoot with a d800 and change lenses based on venue/needs.
- The d800 is heavy and too much bullshit to deal with when I just wanna go snap some bands and am not working professionally.
- I want a new camera to shoot live music/events with that is easier to carry. Had some sweet payouts, so gonna spend about $1,500 or so. Can go higher.
- Looking for something compact and pocketable. Either a jacket pocket, or at least something to sling around that's not a DSLR. Bridge/hybrids/ILCs not really preferred.
- Wide-ass aperture and super good ISO at low light is a must. Fast shutter speed would also be good, as would a fast focus on low light.
- Less needed, but probably nice: a decent zoom without going past f/2.8. Cold or hot shoe with external mic would be cool. Decent movie specs would be nice. All these I can let go if I can't get them with the other things above.
Pic related: one of my many options I'm considering.
>>2752788
Ran out a couple months ago, you only noticed it now?
>>2752791
Yes
>>2752767
ill make you the most gorgeous photo of a P 6x7 ever, just wait.
k3 its good ?
>>2752804
It is an excellent camera for hobby/serious enthusiast use.
On par with a 7D with a much better sensor and in body stabilization.
>>2752790
Did you upload the wrong picture? Because the X100 range doesn't have any of the features that you listed.
>>2752790
You need at least the X-Pro line for this
I'm just wondering why the fuck no companies have brought out an AFFORDABLE APS-C compact camera that is 35mm equiv. Like yeh there is the ricoh and the new fuji x70, but both 28mm equiv. It is a big market gap
>>2752842
Just crop it in post you lazy douche
>>2752847
well thats clearly not the point is it you moron, you're losing a qaurter of the data from the image captured
>>2752767
Are Gear threads sponsored by Pentax or something
>>2752821
>Not interested in an ILC
>Fast shutter speed
>Good AF in low light
>Decent movie specs
And you say XPro1...
>>2752859
Well, then no camera for you. Stop being such a picky faggot!
>>2752857
>Are Gear threads sponsored by Pentax or something
if id have to chose an overlord, itd be Pentax for sure.
>>2752865
>Hey, I need a really nice shade of blue
>Yeah, no problem, here you go *Hands a shade of pink
>I'm sorry, I asked for a shade of blue?
>Don't be such a picky faggot
>>2752857
Yes and no. All gear threads are sponsored by
R I C O H
I
C
O
H
I M A G I N G
M
A
G
I
N
G
C O
O
L T D
T
D
>>2752876
You don't make much sense.
>>2752889
Suggesting an XPro to someone looking for a camera that doesn't have interchangeable lenses, has good low light AF, and good video, doesn't make much sense.
>>2752892
Not finding a camera with strict specs you listed and getting upset about it is outright childish. Either you get a GR and crop in post or get an ILC. Now fuck off!
>>2752898
Well, you could have suggested the X100 line, which has a 35mm field of view, and is pretty good in low light, and is not an ILC, and is pretty small, or talked about the a6000, which at least has good AF and good video, or you could have brought up any number of other cameras that fit SOME of the points. But you went full retard and suggested a camera that fit literally none of his criteria. And now you're mad about it.
>>2752901
You strictly said you don't want an ILC. Now you want an ILC. Fuck you, you don't make any sense, and fuck helping you in any other way!
You act like a spoiled child which you probably are.
>looking at 1D Mark III on ebay
>prices fluctuate between $450 - $600
>look at the same camera on other sites as new
>prices go upwards to $5k
Why is this?
>>2752925
>used cameras are cheaper than new ones
Why is this?
>>2752926
>$4,400 cheaper
Why is this?
>>2752929
>having camera with literally everything worn off on it including the shutter
>sell it so it still makes a few bucks
Why is this?
Will a ballhead with a safety payload weight of 2kg stand a camera and lens weighting 1.9kg total?
>>2752932
I wouldn't trust a point and shoot on such a thing. Always double the capacity to your real payload to minimize vibrations and wobbling, not to mention it spontaneously dropping your camera.
>>2752925
The 1D Mark III has been out of production for 7 years
Anyone have recommendations for a travel tripod?
Why use lens front caps if you can use a filter to store them? Just wondering since darkness is one of the suitable conditions for fungus to germinate.
>>2752940
I own the Sirui T-025X and it's great.
>>2752805
>It is an excellent camera
Not him, but how is the lens selection?
Isn't Sony's IS better?
Speaking of tripods, I've set me eyes on the MeFoto Roadtrip for my vagabonding through Asia and Europe. Thing is, is it worth going carbon fibre over the aluminium version?
Currently running with a Vanguard CX204 AGH and I want something a fair bit more sturdier (and with a built-in monopod).
I had a few questions about LF scan backs,
Better Light in particular.
Has anyone had any experience with them?
Are they the best manufacturer right now?
What's a good price?
Has Kodak's bankruptcy affected their supply and development of line CCDs?
Are they even still developing?
The most recent "breakthrough" on their website was the replacement of SCSI with USB 2.0
Hey /p/, I've been recently trying to find a decent camera to use just pretty casually. Mostly taking pictures of me and my friends, girlfriend, nature, stuff like that. Will probably be lots of indoor shots. I've done my research and have narrowed it down to 2 cameras in my tiny pricepoint of 200$ and under cameras. So my question is, which should I get? The 2 cameras are the Nikon Coolpix L840 and the Nikon S7000. I'm leaning towards the S7000, due to it being less bulky and better low light performance but I did a comparison and the L840 is a close match. So, any suggestions?
>>2752993
Indoor shooting = low light
For such a low-budget I'd go for a 2nd hand Sony NEX-5 or Canon EOS M. Not only do you get APS-C size sensors as well as DSLR image quality but you get it in a point-and-shoot size body.
>>2752957
The IS is effective on all focal ranges on the K-3, primarily optimized for stills. Sony's IS is optimized for video. Both fulfill their intended job.
The lens selection is good for covering most focal lengths on both consumer and pro/enthusiast level, some are serious pro level handcannons. Definitely bigger than Sony E and FE range and fits better in the average /p/ users budget.
>>2753004
Not sensor size, it is primarily dictated by pixel size, density and quantum efficiency.
Any cheap reccommendations for diy pano setups?
I've got L bracket + nodal slide. I just need a cheap pan head to go on top of my ball head
>>2752947
So you dont scratch your filters as well?
Fungus shouldnt ever be a problem if you arent retarded with how you store your shit
What's your gear history like?
2013
- Canon EOS 700D (SOLD)
- EF 50mm f/1.8 II
- EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM (SOLD)
- EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II (SOLD)
2014
- Canon EOS 60D (SOLD)
- Canon EOS M (SOLD)
- EF 50mm f/1.8
- EF-M 22mm f/2 STM
- EF-M 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
- EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM (SOLD)
- Speedlite 90EX
- Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 SP AF Di II (SOLD)
2015
- Canon EOS 6D
- Canon EOS M3
- EF 40mm f/2.8 STM
- EF 50mm f/1.8 STM
- Speedlite 430EX II
- Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 SP AF Di VC USD
Thinking about jumping into a Sony a7R II if Canon doesn't release a fool-frame MILCS.
>>2753026
Disgusting.
>>2753029
How so?
>>2752860
>x100t
>compact
shiggy diggy doo
>>2753026
Nice, with that type of gear history you probably take decent photos. flickr?
>>2753041
I don't use Flickr anymore. 99% of my photos are for my clients and I don't publish them publicly. I do have a few thousand photos from traveling around Europe and Asia but those are only only my Facebook.
>>2753035
>new camera every year
>700D, 60D, EOS M, EOS M3, 6D in 3 years
>2016, considering a new FF while having an already excellent low light capable camera and only using mediocre lenses.
You are the epitome of gearfaggotry, I bet you don't even use them.
This year try sticking to one for at least 2 more years, when you have enough excellent shots enough to fill up a decent book, then you can upgrade. A new body won't help you take better photos.
>>2753047
Well I do get paid work once every fortnight so yeah I do use them regularly. Kinda why I had to jump to FF because I wanted better low-light performance. Plus buying and selling gear is fun.
>>2753047
What mediocre lenses?
just got this gear off ebay for 10€
how bad did i fail?
Fujica AX-1 with 28-70 f3,5-4,5
ps: i am new to film fotography.
ps2: need a link (pref amazon) for the right battery. googled it but i am not sure wich one i actually need
>>2753053
50/1.8, Tampon shit
>>2753057
Those Tamrons are breddy gud. Plus the 50mm f/1.8 is a no-brainer. Compact fast normal prime at a good price.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Samsung Camera Model GT-I9100 Camera Software LMY48B Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.6 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3264 Image Height 2448 Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Image Created 2015:07:22 20:08:55 Exposure Time 1/25 sec F-Number f/2.7 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 50 Lens Aperture f/2.6 Brightness 3.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.03 mm Comment User comments Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3264 Image Height 2448 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2753065
Nice paperweight, I use a bigger pebble I got from a vacation.
I just got into medium format, and have been doing 35mm for a few years now, any scanner recommendations that can do both? Budget is around $500
>>2753071
A DSLR.
>>2753071
This baby
Bought a full frame Nikon 50mm 1.4 for my new d7100 dx.
I know the crop factor turns it into a 85mm but does it factor to the aperture as well?
>>2753079
fuck off
>>2753090
AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
KEKED!
>>2753098
Man, these filters are getting better
Is the Sony a6000 a good camera for a beginner? I'm thinking about getting it or wait until the new rumored model drops in late Feb
>>2753103
Yes.
>>2753045
That sucks. Would you mind posting a few on here? I'm curious.
>>2753117
>Hey I have thousands of photos but I can't show any of them, but trust me I have thousands of photos
Yeah, like I would believe some random guy on the internet
>>2753047
This screams poorfag
>>2753133
Not buying a new camera every year usually means well controlled spending habits.
Someone help a poorfag uni student out and buy me a wide angle lens. Pretty please..
Which of the following for a newbie that wants a very portable camera to have in a bag:
Ricoh GR, X100S, spring for an X100T
>>2753175
Get a job, lazy faggot
>>2753179
In uni, have a job that pays for rent. If I got another job I would have no time to shoot.
>>2753183
tough luck, friend
>>2753187
Will trade knowledge for lens money
>>2753190
What can you tell to an engineer specializing in spectrometry?
>>2753181
Just because you had a bad experience once doesn't mean that these threads aren't generally helpful. Look at the rest of this thread alone, and take the majority of the posts. Stop holding grudges.
>>2753193
Not much about spectrometry, unless you do gamma/alpha spectroscopty
i'm thinking about getting a bit more srs about my photography and want to by some manual lenses for my t3 to practice with
thinking about getting a jupiter 11
does that sound like a good fit yes/no fuck you?
>>2753203
Mostly doing optical emission in the 7000-1000Å range with metals, not really there with energy dispersion spectroscopy in the roentgen range but planning to get into that as well. Depends on my boss.
>>2753205
I'd suggest getting a standard focal length lens instead like the Helios 44M (not the 44-2, it is rubbish) or Pentacon 50. Much more forgiving to play around and perfect portrait angles on crop sensor.
>>2753082
No. Only the FoV is changed. Still the same focal lenght and aperture.
>>2753205
>t3
make sure it will work good. some cameras cant focus to infinity with them
>X-pro2 has framelines for the upcoming 33mm f/1.0
>>2752982
Get a Dic&Mic E302C if you want carbon. And yes, carbon in my opinion is worth it on big trips.
Note the Dic&Mic doesn't have the lightest head possible by default.
>>2753205
You don't really need much practice, you just need focus peaking... can you install CHDK or Magic Lantern to get it, and is it quick and responsive on that camera?
If not, replace the body before you use manual lenses. Make it as easy, eh.
Is the X100T too much camera for a beginner?
>>2753305
>too much camera for a beginner
this meme makes no sense. what's the point of buying a subpar body only to outgrow it and be forced to upgrade? why not just buy the camera you want? I almost made the mistake of buying a d3300, but I ended up getting a K-3 and I'm glad I did. Perfect camera for me. Just buy a camera you'll use. Nobody can complain that a camera has too many features, but the opposite is not true.
>>2753306
I guess I mean to say, would getting a used X100 or X100S be fine for a beginner, would I be missing anything I could notice by not getting the T?
>>2753310
Well you wouldn't have the features that the X100t has that the s or the X100 don't have... obviously.
>>2753305
No, you can hand a kid an A7R II and they'll do fine. Even on manual focus as long as they have focus peaking. Good digital cameras are easy.
I think you should at least consider if you don't like the idea of having an IL camera, maybe a higher-end one.
Though if you picked this camera for compactness, it's pretty good at that.
>>2753310
dont know anything about fuji so i couldnt tell you
>mfw Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM Macro
this thing is fucking awesome
now i just need a ring flash to compensate for my bodys not so great high iso performance
Hey /p/, I'm looking to buy a new camera and cant decide which is best, help me out here.
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony NEX-C3
>>2753377
Neither, either a6000, nex7 or nex 6
>>2753379
Would be good advice if I wasnt broke af, these 2 are the best in my price range.
>>2753380
wait, save more.
How do these things perform compared to large softboxes? Are they worth getting if you don't have the space to set up a lot of equipment?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2011:07:26 15:43:50 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/20.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/20.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 33.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 600 Image Height 450 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2753405
Much much worse. Eight inches is not a substitute for 50 inches. go figure.
>>2753026
>Fuji S5700 (sold)
>gap period
>Canon EOS 1200
>Canon EOS M
>Canon EOS M3
>Fujifilm X-E1
>Fujifilm X-T10
>Fujifilm X-Pro 2 (hopefully)
There's lenses and film bodies in between those but I've pretty much shed myself from Canon Digital to film/Fuji over the last 5-6 months.
It would have been nice if Canon had released a MILC but they simply took too long and Fuji beat them at their own game. Hell. Fuji beat everyone at the APS-C game.
currently have a t5 and I'm looking at other cameras to upgrade from
what the hell do you guys do with your old camera when you get a new one? sell it for a quick buck? keep it and take it out and use it every once and a while?
>>2753405
They're not the same, but yes, they are a good option when you don't have a lot of space.
>>2753026
Over the last 8 or 9 years,
>Bodies
Nikon D60 (SOLD)
Nikon FM10 (GIFTED)
Nikon D90 (SOLD)
Nikon D2h (SOLD)
Nikon F100 (SOLD)
Nikon D3 (SOLD)
Nikon S2 (SOLD)
Leica M4-P
Nikon D800 (SOLD)
Nikon V1 (SOLD)
Sony a7ii
>Lenses
18-55 & 55-200 VR (SOLD)
50mm 1.8D (SOLD)
35mm 1.8G (GIFTED)
85mm 1.8D (SOLD)
60mm 2.8D macro (SOLD)
70-200mm 2.8 VR1 (SOLD)
50mm 1.2 AIS (SELLING)
35mm 2.5 Skopar PII (SELLING)
40mm 1.4 Nokton
28mm 2 Ultron
If I was starting out completely from scratch, I'd just get:
X-Pro 2, 18mm 2, & 56mm 1.2 APD
and call it a day. I'm just too lazy to piece everything out and sell each bit and start over (can't even sell my a7ii for another 11 months).
I recently picked up a canon t5i with the two kit lenses (18-55mm and 55-250mm) but the narrow aperture isn't doing it for me. I've heard good/mixed reviews on the Canon EF 50mm II and at ~$100 it seems like it would be worth a shot.
Anyone own one and can vouch for it on a crop sensor? or is there something better within the low price range?
Does anyone else shoot multiple rolls of (35mm) film simultaneously. If I see a scene and I think 'this would look good on velvia' but I've got superia loaded in the camera, I rewind the superia, noting how many shots I've taken and load the half used velvia in. I make a mark on the film leader in which sprocket hole I put on the center sprocket, and take blank exposures using a light tight lens cap (yes, I checked) until I reach the next free exposure on the roll.
Does anyone else do this? I had no idea it was weird until someone told me yesterday. My dad taught me how to do it when I was a kid and I assumed most people did it. I don't do it often, only if I absolutely have to
>>2753450
I /could/ do it, but I don't bother to. Few people go through the bother of doing so.
Most people just switch to MF if they think their emulsion can't handle everything. Or they deal with it.
>>2753449
A 35mm would be a better first prime since it is the standard focal length for APS-C, it will be close to a 50mm on FF.
50mm on APS-C is more suitable for portraits with it's 80mm equivalent focal length.
>>2753450
And this is why film is dead.
Accept the fact that digital is far superior.
>>2753475
I use digital as much as I use film. Two sides of the same coin, as long as your taking photos then I don't see why it matters.
You can't replicate the feeling of getting your prints back from the lab or seeing your slides on a lightbox for the first time. Digital is photography for the instant gratification age, not that that's a bad thing. I exclusively use digital for professional work
Just bought a m42 50mm f1.4, will be shiping soon. I'm using a K-5II and have never used m42 before. Any advice? Should I remove the pin or anything?
Also, are there any recommended cheap adapters? I'm hoping to buy more m42 lenses and I'd like to focus at infinity but I guess it's not a NEED. I heard some people buy adapters and keep it on their lenses so it acts like a K mount.
>>2753491
Remove the spring from the M42 adapter, it will make your life much easier and 90% less stressful.
>>2753491
You don't have to remove the pin from the lens, but be careful of any protruding parts that goes further than the pin, it can get in the way of the mirror and break it. It's not very common, mostly some russian military adapted lenses have this, but anything designed for an SLR can be used without any trouble.
The M42 adapter is a cheap metal ring, any chinese part can be used without the spring. The original Pentax made is much better in quality and fit but throwing out the spring and the screw it will just werk. You put it on the lens, mount the lens and the camera will automatically switch to Av mode and meter everything. Don't forget to switch the lens from Auto to Manual aperture, focus with wide open, stop it down, meter with Green button if necessary (on my K-3 it is not needed), recompose and shoot, Kind of old school shooting but it's slow nature will help you think a lot more about your shot.
Which version of Lightroom can I use without a subscription? What makes it worth the money as opposed to a free software like RawTherapee?
>>2753502
>Which version of Lightroom can I use without a subscription?
Literally any version if you aren't a moralfag. Pirate that shit nigga
>>2753501
I have the small ring adapter that keeps the original flange distance. I tried it out first on a teleconverter and it got stuck, I had to take the TC apart to get it off. Spring went off the next second and it was perfectly usable.
Auto aperture won't work on DSLRs since there is no coupler that pushes the pin, you need a K-mount Pentax-A series compatible lens for that with the aperture lever.
>>2753504
Can you link the adapter you got?
And thanks for the info.
>>2753507
Just search "Pentax M42 adapter" on ebay and get the first one that comes up.
I'm thinking of getting a secondhand 5D mkII, for the body im looking around $900 AUD. Is this a good idea or should I be looking for something new?
>>2753560
Do you like the FF novelty or do you have an actual need for it?
If you really need FF, get an A7II or something from that bunch with an adapter.
If just novelty/hobbyist you are better off with a more recent APS-C. The modern crop sensors shit on the older FF ones and much more capable in low light and high ISO. There is no real reason to get the 5DII just so you can say you have a FF camera.
With that said you can still make good photos with it, also you can make money with it to pay off a new one.
>>2753569
I would say it's for decent hobby use.
I guess i was looking at it as it seems to be relatively common and easy to find as well as lenses etc.
>>2753574
I was asking because for hobby you can get much better performance for that money in the APS-C line. If you are not tied down with Canon in lenses then you can look at the Sony a6000, Nikon D7200, D7100 or Pentax K-3. All these have similar performance and has good options for most focal ranges needed for hobby.
I know the Pentax system, for the others someone else has to fill in.
Where to start with videography/filmography/cinematography?
>>2753784
lol, i knew someone was going to refer him to the video thread.
(and as they should. it's just funny because homeboy started his own thread and was then told to post in the gear thread)
Is this camera any good?
I just want to do quick snapshots and my phone camera is shit, like all phone cameras are.
Nikon Coolpix L31
>>2753780
Get a camera that's good enough for what you want to do. GH4, or T3i, or a6000 are Great/pretty okay/and good, respectively. Then get some prime lenses without aperture clicks, a tripod with a fluid head, a shoulder mount, a good mic, and some lighting that works well with the stuff you're looking to film. Focus very little on camera and lens. Focus some on audio. Focus a LOT on lighting, minor details in your shots (wardrobe, set, props, etc) and focus the most on pacing, writing, acting, and natural emotion/life. Practice editing, and start paying attention to every technical and procedural detail in the films you like. Get out of the story, and get into the set, the blocking, what the focus is doing, camera perspective, how it's lit, and WHY you like it.
>>2753793
Unless you're paying about $200 USD, you're not going to get better images than what your cell phone is making.
Check out a powershot s110
Should I buy a second hand GX7?
>>2752767
Huh. That pic was taken around the battery at the St. John's narrows.
Fellow Newfie?
>>2753871
Image from google search, mate
Hey peeps, I'm off for a 6 week trip around the US in a few months.
I'm having trouble deciding which DSLR to take with me. It's between a D800 and a DF.
Obviously they have their strengths and weaknesses but I'm looking for some solid objective opinions.
D800:
- High resolution
- Weather sealing
- Tough as nails
DF:
- Great in low light
- Fun and easy to use
- Looks interesting
Anyone care to share their thoughts?
>>2753912
DF hands down.
>>2753914
Mind if I ask why?
I love it to bits, but the lack of proper weather sealing bothers me. That's the only thing putting me off desu
>>2753917
It's much newer, is designed properly, it's more like families in the park where the D800 is hiding in the bushes.
It will get you into interesting conversations and will help you meet new people. And if your phone dies you can also use it as a camera.
For my first camera I have quite a lot of dosh to spend. (1200$).
I am considering hopping straight to full frame, the Nikon D610 in particular. Though some have suggested something cheaper for my first DSLR because it'll be easier to learn for someone at my skill level. Though after learning the difference between crop and full frame sensors....I don't know if I will ever be satisfied with the former.
Thoughts?
>>2753950
Start with APS-C, get the D7200 instead. The D610 while having a FF sensor is a beginner body with limited features and weaker shutter compared to the D7200 which is the top enthusiast body with full feature set. Only the D500 will be higher class but it's not out yet.
You will be much better off with a top shelf APS-C and will make you learn to use the full camera features so when later you will feel the actual need to upgrade to FF you can go for a much better body like the D750 or D810.
>>2753950
Getting a smaller system is not a good idea for the sake of learning, but it is a good idea for the sake of price. Your "quite a lot of dosh" is actually not very much "dosh" at all.
That amount wouldn't even get you a new D3300 with a high quality zoom lens, let alone something suitable for a D610.
Check out an a6000 or Fuji X-E2 with a good lens.
>get new tripod
>can't get head off of old tripod
such is life
Posted my own thread but got redirected here.
Hi /p/ can you help me out. I don't know all that much about cameras. I'm looking for a DSLR that I'll be able to use while traveling to take pictures but also use to record good quality videos.
I've got a budget of $500 AUD max.
All I've found that appear to meet my needs are below but as I said before I don't know all that much about cameras.
http://www.oo.com.au/Sony-ILCE5000LB-Body-with-SEL1_P382676C6350.cfm?lnk=Cat:6350:GOSONYILCE5000LB-R
http://www.oo.com.au/Sony-ILCE3500J-Body-with-SEL18_P382675C6350.cfm?lnk=Cat:6350:GOSONYILCE3500J-R
>>2753983
Pentax K-50 with 18-55mm WR kit lens.
Not sure if this goes into gear thread but how long does diafine last ? I have jugs from 2012 and it's still developing stuff.
best ball head under 100 bucks?
>>2754127
XSource ball head off of amazon
>>2754140
I should mention I have a $52 coupon on Adorama
Anyone here scan film with a Ricoh GR? I tried it today using my phone as a lightbox with a DVD case over it to mask the pixels. Here's a comparison of my quick 'n' dirty scan vs a Noritsu minilab scan. Any tips would be appreciated, lab scans are fucking expensive. I have access to a DSLR, but not a macro lens or tube
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:27 18:13:56 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2382 Image Height 1533
>>2754273
The Noritsu looks like garbage.
>>2754281
good input, doesn't help me at all
what mirrorless has best jpegs? Unrelated, dat Olympus Pen-F
>>2754293
>best jpegs
>jpegs
>best
Get out.
Got 100 neet bux, what entry level camera can I buy with it, any recommendations?
>>2754309
You need to practice more on your trolling. Get out.
>>2754312
>mfw I am not trolling
I am serious bro, tell me.
>>2754314
No. Use your phone like any other philistine.
>>2754315
But I don't look cool using my phone. Can I become professional using my polaroid snap?
>>2754316
Fuck off.
>>2754273
This might help:
https://luminous-landscape.com/articleImages/CameraScanning.pdf
>>2754127
Sirui G series should be good, if you're lucky you can also find a KX series (which usually are just over $100) on Aliexpress.
No clue if it is the best. Probably not the best deal for most, a Dic&Mic or something ball head usually also does the job fine.
>>2753983
> $350 USD
You are way below the price range at which you get good quality videos.
If you don't want to save up until you can afford something actually decent, that A5000 (linkage isn't working, just going by ILCE5000) is probably about as good as you can get.
>>2753983
links no longer work because the cameras have sold.
TFW I got an adapter and tried out my film lenses, the Olympus OM 50mm f1.4 is fucking soft until f8, the 50mm f1.8 is better at all apertures pretty much...
I think I should just sell it and get another Zuiko. Any other OM shooters, what's your favorites? The 28mm f3.5 I already have, tried it out adapted as well and it's pretty damn good although slow. No wonder I've enjoyed shooting film with it so much.
>>2754346
I've had an OM20 for ages now, only put half a test roll through it, but that 50/1.8 is a gem. This is at f/2.8, but it's got great contrast wide open too.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2015:11:05 18:55:11 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 559 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Daylight Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
Looking to get 2 lenses to round out my collection. I want a wide angle and an every day zoom. I have a Canon 7D.
Would the Tokina 11-16mm be the best choice for a wide angle? Is the Canon 10-18mm any good?
I don't want to spend a fortune on an every day zoom, what are some of the best bang-for-your-buck options?
>>2754357
I had the 11-16 back when I still had canon stuff. I thought it was great for the price.
>>2753983
With that budget, I'd consider seeing if you can get a used higher end P&S.
>>2754541
It can be out of alignment though, look up a specialist and send it over to take a look at it.
>>2754354
Yeah for a kit lens, it definitely is brilliant. Kind of disappointing really as I hunted for a good condition & well priced f1.4 version for months, and it seems the free f1.8 that I got with the OM-40 I got from my mom is optically superior. Maybe it's true that the >1million s/n f1.4's are where it's at, mine is ~800,000.
I've gotten good shots with it, and I did feel like it was better than the f1.8. I had pretty much just started with photography when I got it, and the f1.4 does make the viewfinder noticeably brighter, so together with the OM-1's great viewfinder it's pretty damn easy and nice to focus.
I gotta make some more tests but I think the f1.4 will go and I'll replace it with a 24mm or 21mm, or perhaps the 35mm f2.
>>2754547
It's possible, but I don't think I'll bother. I have a nice fifty already anyway, I just didn't realize it before doing a comparison yesterday. As a beginner I just thought faster = obviously better.
Nowadays I don't even tend to shoot wide open much anyway, at least if I can avoid it.
>>2754556
Yeah, faster lens only means more light, it doesn't have any connection to optical performance. Same for the first version of Canons 70-200/2.8 L, it is very sharp if you stop it down a bit, but wide open it often results in a soft image.
Some of the sharpest zooms are f/4 or primes at f/2.8 or even f/3.5 with some ultra wides.
You should compare real world images to decide between lenses, but after Flickr is kill I don't know where to find such a big database.
>>2754559
I'm not sure what you mean, you want to shoot film with the OM-4? Get the basic multicoated 50mm f1.8. IIRC the ones regarded as best say Made in Japan in the front.
Pretty much all the Zuikos are good.
>>2752767
Hey.
I have a 5d mark ii and I'm not super happy with the lowlight or the autofocus on it.
i'm not sure if i can afford to trade up to a mark iii or 5DS.
Would it be worth it to trade for a 7d mkii or a 6d?
Reposting from my not knowing about gear threads:
First time on /p/ and I come to you all for a little advice.
Please don't tear down my choice in camera too much I literally can't afford to get in too much deeper with a gift I got for my gf.
I bought her a Sony a5000, but am considering exchanging for a Sony a5100.
Is there any reason I should not do the exchange? Would you recommend the exchange?
I'm really not looking to delve into a whole other line or manufacturer as she really loves the camera as is, but from what I gather (tell me if I'm wrong please) the 5100 seems to have a leg up in a few areas, would be grateful for any advice.
>>2754609
there literally the same camear.
just save the monies and get a lens from the price difference.
>>2754613
like all thats different is the megapickle count and the screen and gps. all of witch isnt that important imho.
>>2753056
that lens is soft as fuck other than that pretty jellos
>>2754613
>>2754616
Ok yeah from what I know and have learned I kind of gathered that but I was kind of intruiged by the touch screen and all, I think I'll go look and if I'm feeling saucy I'll do the exchange but I appreciate the confidence boost in the camera I already own.
Is there any lens you would recommend? Mostly for family photoing and shit like that or the kids sports
>>2754564
I've already got that. I am shooting film with the 50mm 1.8 now. Just wondering if there are any lenses I should specifically work towards getting down the line and an adapter or if I should pick up some cheap eBay lenses.
>tfw no money for a venus optics 15mm macro
>tfw no money for a rokinon 14mm f2.8
>tfw no money for pentax 16-85mm WR
>tfw no money for any of the pentax limited lenses
What's a good price for a used X100S? KEH has 700 or so as the going rate. Could I find it cheaper?
>>2754763
Get the 16-45, it has the same macro ability as the Venus without the tilt-shift and is the sharpest lens this side of the budget fence, actually a lot sharper than the DA* 16-50 and the DA 17-70.
Don't worry about the limited lenses, get the DA 35/2.4 and DA 50/1.8 and have fun.
>>2754767
I copped mine for $500 off craigslist.
What are some cheap anamorphic lenses?
>>2754839
No such thing, bud
>>2754844
I heard projector lenses are much cheaper than camera lenses for anamorphic.
>>2754775
Since when does the 16-45mm do 1:1 macro?
>>2754856
It's close enough. You were the one whining about no money for it in the first place.
About to buy my first DSLRish camera. I'm between Sony's A58K and Nikon's D3300. Sony is 140 quid cheaper, but I don't want to end up having a crappy piece of shit for saving a bit of money.
Help me out, gods of /p/
>Reasons why I shouldn't buy a SONY A58K
or if you prefer
>Reasons why I should buy a NIKON D3300
Also how good is a 1.44 million dots EVF compared to today's standards? Will I notice a crappier quality than an OVF?
>>2754880
>Reasons why I should buy a NIKON D3300
Sony A-mount is dead. Nikon D3300 is an excellent camera for a beginner, has great resolution, no AA filter.
The lens options are much more established, plenty of aftermarket lenses.
Get the Nikon D3300. OVF is the best quality, no lag, you see what the lens see.
Along the Nikon D3300 the Pentax K-50 is a much better alternative option than the Sony.
>>2754609
the a5100 has autofocus that isn't ass. it's an a6000 without a viewfinder. i'd get it.
>>2754577
I dont know about Canon, but current APSC does a pretty decent ISO6400. combined with the 7DII's top spec AF system, I dont think you'd be disappointed. the 6D will feel like a compromise.
>>2754880
>mirrorless battery life
>sony's mediocre subject tracking
>ded mount
or
>entry level body menu diving
>just received a price drop
>top of the line Sony APSC sensor
pick your poison mate
>>2754888
Sony is killing A-mount, all the good lenses are made for E and FE mount.
You can have a good sensor but what is it without a good lens? Both Nikon and Pentax has great budget lenses and excellent high quality lenses if you move further up. Sony either has the not so decent kit lenses and the mighty expensive ones. No middle ground for a beginner like you.
>>2754880
The Sony is better but on a semi-dead lens mount (maybe they'll still make more SLT cameras, but no one really expects many lenses now).
Because of that, it's very budget-friendly for how good the camera is. And there are adapters that work well that let you go to the E-mount later on (just costs extra).
The question probably is if you can't directly just get an A6000 and skip this transition...
>>2754888
> Why do you all say A mount is dead?
Probably because the E mount is what Sony focuses on now? It got far more releases.
And they're apparently very successful with it; so few would expect them to change this strategy and invest very much into the A-mount now.
After extensive research, I still cannot decide if I want to save up for a Canon 70-200mm 2.8 or get a Tamron instead. Will the Canon still be a good resale value in the coming years as now?
Hey /p/
I am looking for a DSLR camera under $500 that needs to be very rugged and must have a strong weather seal. Would the Pentax K5, (non II model), be a good choice?
>>2754936
Probably yes.
>>2754861
Actually I wasn't, I was pointing out that the Venus 15mm does 1:1 life-size reproduction natively
>>2754861
Also
>1:4 being "close enough" to 1:1
>>2754936
yes. I speak from experience, you have to do something stupid like leave your card slot open to ruin one of these in even the nastiest of conditions.
I'm thinking about getting a tamron 24-70 f2.8 vc
what do you guys think about this lens
is it heavy? is it sharp? how does it compare to my 18-135 kit lens?
canon 60d. i take all genres of pictures
>>2753801
>Focus some on audio
>some on audio
>some
Nigga, audio will make or break anything but abstract bullshit. If you don't get good audio you may as well throw that shit in the trash or seek a deaf audience.
source:did film and video for days before I got into marketing.
Im looking to get a budget 35mm lens, any reccomendations?
>>2755021
Yes
>>2755027
Thanks, helpful as always, /p/
>>2755030
Same as you, mate
>>2753560
I have one. It's an amazing camera for a lot of things but the autofocus and the lowlight performance on it are very dated.
But it's definitely a nice enough camera to use at various jobs, assuming you can work it properly.
So, I just picked up a 110 camera to play with, and I'm wondering if the focus is forgiving on these? I'm not able to see the focus in the viewfinder, obviously. Also, am I supposed to just keep the focus for shots between full body and bust shots on that dot, or is that whole area meant to be fully utilized?
>>2755016
The mark ii with is and all. It's just so expensive. The tamron can do 95% of what it can and it even scores better at some reviews.
>>2755076
The Tamron doesn't have weather sealing. Not that the Canon has a prticularly good weather sealing, but it is something if you wish to use it on long trips in the forest or shooting sports in non-ideal weather.
If weather sealing is not a necessity then get the Tamron.
>>2755016
The mark ii version with is and all that. It's just so expensive. But the tamron got good reviews, dxo mark rates it even higher.
>>2755078
It seems to have weather sealing according to information about the product and from reviews. But if it doesnt then thats going to be a problem here in greenland.
>>2755081
>greenland
Get the Canon mate, accept no less. The Tamron is a great lens but it is useless if it breaks on your first trip outside, and just be a waste of money.
Or alternatively sell your gear and get a Pentax K-3 and a DA* 60-250 or a HD DA 55-300. Both have serious weather sealing.
>>2755083
Okay, thank you for the help. I have a 5d mark iii, i'm keeping it.
>greenland
We're holding Arctic Winter Games in march, i hope i can get the canon by then.
>>2755087
Sorry, most people having trouble buying L lenses have much lower class bodies so I assumed you have a 60/70D tops. If it involves larger distances, it would be better to get a 100-400L, you should find the older pump zoom for a good price. Maybe a Sigma 150-600 Contemporary with a cover since it has limited sealing.
got a pentax k-x but no portrait lens yet. thinking about getting something old cause i won't need AF anyways and it's cheaper.
is it worth it though? too risky to have scratches or dust from ebay? or usually shit anyways?
>>2755101
The DA 50/1.8 is cheap as dirt and an excellent portrait lens, Look for a used one.
>>2755102
yeah i know but if i could get a decent 1.4 to play around with for as cheap as some ebay sellers go down to .. i'm honestly considering it.
DA50 obviously safest bet. just trying to find out more about using old lenses like that, cause i have not a clue.
>>2755104
f/1.4 doesn't mean it is sharp. It only means it lets more light in. The DA 50 is a modern lens, modern optical formula and well corrected for the thicker stack of a digital sensor. It also has better coating, better contrast and better sharpness than film lenses.
Having an AF is just an extra on top of the above.
>>2755105
you damn logical people always convincing me of the things that make more sense compared to the cool hipster solutions.
thanks though. probably gonna order the DA.
>>2755108
It is the wise decision, but don't give up on manual lenses, they are fun to play around, all have different characteristics.
When you are comfortable with the DA 50 look up a few cheap manual primes and experiment with them.
Hey Anon, newfag on /p/ here.
I'm a big Youtuber in my country and I purchased T5I with 50mm f/1.8 II without much knowledge on DSLR or lens. My question for you is what kind of lenses can I use to make facecam videos with camera infront of me? the 50mm f/1.8 are not very wide and I have to stand really far to just capture part of the face, I want to have the camera stand on my table not too far from me. My second question are lenses for small products, when I get too close with the camera to small products they get blurry, what kind of lenses work good for those products?
>>2755162
Get a 24-70L zoom lens.
>>2755166
They don't seem that wide to be used as webcams
>>2755162
A 40mm pancake or the 28(i think?)mm f2 should be good for video.
>>2752767
this is a picture from the upcooming D500 at ISO 51200
FIFTY-ONE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED and it's acceptable even if the sample is low resolution
that's quite impressive
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D500 Camera Software ViewNX-i 1.2 W Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.9 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 934 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 90 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:27 10:48:37 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 51200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 60.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1280 Image Height 853 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2755180
> FIFTY-ONE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED and it's acceptable even if the sample is low resolution
So, basically like the A7S, just two years later?
Actually, what are the odds that Sony sold such an A7S sensor to Nikon at a premium, but didn't sell IBIS from the A7S II along with it...?
>>2755183
it's a DX sensor you idiot
>>2755183
it's a crop sensor and it's outperforming the likes of the 5Dmk3.
everyone knows Nikon cameras use Sony sensors and Nikon's image processors usually get better results out of them. The D5's high ISO performance will probably look like witchcraft.
>>2755188
Nikon cameras use Toshiba sensors. Sony designed, but not those Sony uses in their cameras. And manufactured by Toshiba.
>>2755180
This, at worst, looks like Hi2 on my D3100.
Fuck.
>>2752767
Hey /p/, I have a Nikon D7100 and i'm searching for a lens with a focal length with less than 35 mm for street photography and landscapes, I'm thinking about a 300 euros price range, any suggestions?
>>2755190
Stop stating your delusion as facts.
What tripod should I buy, 200€ budget, I will probably travel with it.
>>2752767
50mm STM
canon t5
WHY IS DIGITAL MEDIUM FORMAT SO BLOODY EXPENSIVE
WHAT THE FUCK
>>2755243
niche product
Yo /p/, got a question.
Currently, my opinions so far are:
Megapixels = doesn't really matter unless you're printing billboards.
Dynamic Range = gives better quality to a photo, and post-processing capability.
Body size/weight = can be very useful to have compact. I had a 15 inch, 4 lbs laptop once, now I have a 12 inch, 0.7 lbs laptop I love, I think portability is VERY useful if its primary function remains the same.
So that makes me wonder, should I get an a7s to maximize my wants? It's small as fuck, just get a pancake and blam, it's a digicam. It's so small, it's discrete as fuck, I wouldn't look like some kind of professional photographer if I put some small lens on it. 12 mp is something I could work with. Dynamic range is said to be one of the best.
I like doing night/astro/landscape photography, where dynamic range applies. My only concern would be the lenses.
What I liked with my K-5 was that I could buy cheap manuals for it and be pretty satisfied with it. I guess I could invest in more expensive glass now, only at a slower pace.
>>2755259
I went with nikon instead of the A7 to make sure i had enough lens choices
I now only own and use 2 different lenses.
> night/astro/
From what i know, the A7 has amazing low-light , iso features, one of the main reasons I wanted it
>>2755264
Lens choices won't be a problem. Adapters exist, Sony is getting fairly popular, and I'm good with any lens that fits my focal length and aperture needs.
>From what i know, the A7 has amazing low-light , iso features, one of the main reasons I wanted it
Well thanks for the insightful answer.
>>2755243
Economies of scale, and production challenges.
>>2755259
>Dynamic Range = gives better quality to a photo, and post-processing capability.
Mostly correct except this. Dynamic range provides more INFORMATION in a photo, not necessarily more quality. It will let you edit more dramatically. But if you don't know how to use that dynamic range in post processing, it will do nothing to add quality to the image.
>>2755278
Sky should have less highlights, ground should have less shitty shadows. I know it's technically more information, but that's better control of quality in my book.
>>2755285
That's not how it works. SOOC jpeg, the photos between a canon 40D and an a7rmk2 will look more or less the same, dynamic range wise, if the exposures are equivalent. What the extra dynamic range means is that, in editing, you can go in and bring up the shadows a lot more dramatically. It won't just automatically look better.
>>2755292
Yeah, that's what I meant. Not automatically-should, but ideally-should.
I want to get a fuji because the nobs and dials for manual adjustments. Should I?
>>2755243
if you had a 120-sized silicon wafer and it had a big crack down the middle you could still make a few APS-C sensors with it or a fuckload of tiny phone camera sensors. You couldn't make any medium-format sensors with it though. Stuff like that makes cost of production increase exponentially with increased sensor size. Also other stuff like the mirror and prism have to be huge
>>2755232
Dic&Mic E302C. Aliexpress, $120.
Or a travel Sirui, perhaps.
Yo guys. I was the photography student a couple days back wondering what to buy. Reporting back because the K-3 you guys rec'd me is amazing and Im uber happy with my purchase. Thank you.
