Hey /p/ I've already bought a Nikon DSLR but now I need to get myself one big hunky telephoto lens so I'll look like a real pro. Whats a cheap option?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Pixelmator 2.1 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2013:01:14 11:01:36 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667
>>2749897
Get one of those 70-200mm f/2.8 lens mugs and hold it in front of the body.
Sigma 50-500mm for creeping on your neighbors wife.
Seriously.. get a 35mm or 50mm.
>>2749900
dub dubs
Every time I see a massive camera like that it makes me glad I prefer rangefinders. Such a pain in the ass to carry dSLR and big lenses around.
OP, the Sigma 70-200 2.8 without IS is a good value secondhand lens
>>2749931
Except there is no lens that mimics a 70-200 on a rangefinder, so you wouldn't be using one anyways. You can fit small primes on a small DSLR.
55-200 would be the cheapest
>>2749931
Really?! Thanks for letting me know!
>makes me glad I prefer rangefinders
>glad I prefer rangefinders
>glad I prefer
>glad I prefer
>glad I prefer
>I
>>2749897
if you buy cheap the autofocus and lens stabilization will drive you nuts.
Sigma 150-500 DG OS LMNOP
Have one for my Canon. Good stabilization and fast enough AF to work with. Daylight only, though, because of the aperture.
