Some pothead who goes to my school
This nigga watering pants
fix your fucking aspect ratio
>>2741101
How? Its 1000x1000
There's two types of photographers
Where can I improve?
On my dadio shit
>>2741110
to imply that there are two types of photographers would indirectly imply that there are only two types of photography
try again
>>2741164
I was more trying to show one is a gearfag. Tbqh they are pretty vapid cunts
>>2741105
Would be cooler if he wasn't trying to mind meld with himself
>>2741561
How is one a gear fag, because she actually has a camera. At least she's out using it. She's better than most of /p/. Still a shitty photo though
>>27415>>2741576
>How is one a gear fag, because she actually has a camera. At least she's out using it. She's better than most of /p/. Still a shitty photo though
I'm talking about the girl taking a selfie of the bitch behind her with the camera.
>>2741599
You should work on your storytelling, it wasn't really clear to me that you intended to portray the girl with a smartphone as a gearfag because she took a selfie of the girl behind her with a dslr.
>>2741600
OK thanks. How's the rest of my photos?
What you think?
(It's a screen shot of the image because the actual one is 15MB)
>>2741104
They're all stretched out you fucking retard.
>>2742371
you couldn't just turn the phone 90 degrees in any direction and THEN screenshot it?
>>2743103
>>2743103
Happy?
>>2742371
foreground is a tad dark,
you could fix the white balance too
the pastel color of the light is nice though
>>2743111
yes
much better
Is my bokeh shit
My phones focus is broken so i'm probably going to be taking only these kinds of photos now (lg g3).
>embedded file in image (????), cant upload it here
http://imgur.com/nEUfRMY
Good subjects, but your framing is a little crowded, especially in the portraits.
>>2741111
By never coming here again. Goodbye
jesus fucking christ are you missing some chromosomes?
>>2741098
op photo is cozy af
>>2743123
cancer snapshit
"OH HAPPY DAYS" said Susan in a sassy black voice
What does /p/ think about traperture s work ?
https://www.instagram.com/traperture/?hl=en
>>2743562
dog shit
>>2743563
Why?
>>2743571
It's nothing but boring mundane shit made to look sort of pretty/trendy with processing. It's processed well, and lit interestingly, but there's still nothing in the photos but manhole covers, and shoes, and empty streets. They're desktop background images made for 15 year old boys to be EPIC. But there's nothing there.
>>2743603
Couldn't you also consider it its own style? I know its nothing like fine art and all but I still find some of his images striking and intriguing. (Side question: who do you think is the best photographer with a similar aesthetic?)
>>2743614
>Couldn't you also consider it its own style?
Moody photos of nothing? Sure, it can be its own style, but calling something "its own style" doesn't somehow make it better. There's nothing to take from any of those photos. They aren't places you want to visit, you gain no information about anything in the scenes, etc. It's just visual pandering for the sake of visual pandering. The contents of the photos don't matter at all. They're completely interchangeable, and have no relation to the processing or mood.
>>2743618
I think there is something to be said for a photograph having a cool aesthetic. Of course he won't be winning any awards with his photography,but work like his is in a way more marketable. Photos that look cool people want on calenders and as screen savers. Also work like his almost universalises photography it shows that someone can pick up a camera and make boring shit athletically pleasing and all you need is some editing skills. I totally agree that his work is nothing technically special, but his ability to make boring photos interesting has its own appeal.
>>2743405
>jesus fucking christ are you missing some chromosomes?
Fuck you
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
1/5
2/5
3/5
4/5
5/5
Been going for pastel colors. Also a little blue tint. (I like how it looks, but it could be shite.)
>>2743752
Exposure seems off. Also highlights are blown out.
>>2743772
Kek.
They are screen caps. Don't think /p/ would appreciate the 20mb jpegs the screenshots are of.
Repost from another thread but fuck it.
Went out for my first shoot today. I have a newfound respect for good street photography. Plenty of ISO 3200 1/640 shots because I'm an idiot.
1/2
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 70D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:15 23:35:11 Exposure Time 1/400 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2745489
2/2
Anyone nice enough to take a look at my shoot today and tear me apart? I'm sure I'm making tons of composition mistakes.
http://imgur.com/a/aXOjL
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 70D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5372 Image Height 3581 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:15 23:41:33 Exposure Time 1/125 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard