File: statue-11.jpg (1 MB, 5426x3898) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 5426x3898

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3200
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	804
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	30 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:05 20:04:19
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	20.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

this doesn't deserve its own thread but i think the rule of thirds one is 5% better

I think both could be much better. The second one is better out of the two though.

>>2740142
Other guy was right about how this doesn't deserve it own thread, but I would say both could be improved...but to pick one I would go with the first one.

here's a few things I'd consider to make the decision. next time, please make the decision yourself, and curate your own shit.
1
+ poles out of frame
+ rule of third gives more importance to the environnment
= zooming in makes the trees look relatively bigger
- statue out of focus

2
+ centered composition gives enphasis to the statue
+ proper focus strenghtens it
= poles can give some symmetry element, fitting with the centered compo
- wider angle gives more room for uninteresting space

>>2742057
this is actually decent