Anyone else read Aperture Magazine by the Aperture Foundation?
No.
>>2738151
ive thought on buying an specific issue of aperture because it featured i guy i like. have you, OP?
>>2738639
I bought the Tokyo issue
its pretty good, want to see pics?
>>2738773
of coursh. pls do it.
>>2738779
>>2738961
Not gonna upload complete articles cause the magazine is a little over A4 and I dont wanna debind it, just to give you the gist of what kind of stuff is inside
this here is the introductory article to this issue's overarching Tokyo/Japan theme
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Width 2550 Image Height 3509
>>2738964
>>2738151
I haven't really looked at it, but at the library near my house they have dozens of back issues. Worth checking out?
>>2738965
25USD or 20-23EUR on Amazon Prime
Circulation is shit cause aperture magazine is from a non profit foundation so online is really the only option which is good and bad if you think about it, more good I think tho
Its not really filled to the brim with interesting articles and visual content but I like it cause its so far away from the hobbyist part of the photographer spectrum so its really relaxing.
Gonna pick up the fashion issue this month as well, maybe will come back with more scans
>>2738971
totally
>>2738980
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Width 2550 Image Height 3509
aperture is the best. if you are pro you can find the overstock issues on the bay for just a few bucks rach intead of paying the 25 upfront or you can just get the online version instead. that has the archive included as well.
>>2739000
holy shit looking for that overstock as we speak
thanks dude
>>2739083
You do realize we're talking about magazines right
>>2739083
What the fuck are you going on about?
>>2739085
>>2739086
I am legitimately baffled that you two could be so fucking ignorant as to not see the parallel I'm making with that comment.
>great magazine, shame its circulation is so shit
>fuck paying $25 for it though when you can buy these ones dug out of the bin for $1
I'm saying that you poor cunts destroy the things you care about by refusing to pay at least cost price for them.
Just bought the Tokyo one on Amazon, looks worth the price. Any standout issues I should get?
>>2739145
Oh I was more than willing to pay and the comment on circulation was merely stating that this way the money ends at aperture not some middleman
Just checked out the two latest issue at the library. Very slick magazine. Not very /p/, though.
>>2739000
>online version
any free downloads?
>>2739145
ive been having a subscription. nice try at projecting fuccboi.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Width 2550 Image Height 3509
