Lets say that i own a holy grail, and im willing to sell, what do you guys think i will be able to make off it?
'Bout tree fiddy.
>>2737305
google it you dense motherfucker
>>2737333
You sir are an arsehole, i couldn't find only exorbitant auction prices, nothing realistic. I really tought you guys were different from the guys on /b/ and would actually get an educated person give me a real answer, i guess not.
>>2737347
>I really tought you guys were different from the guys on /b/
You were wrong.
This place is a fucking toilet. Don't waste your time.
Good luck with the lens sale.
>If you find one today, expect to pay a minimum of $5,500 for a beater lens without its case or filters, $10,000 for one in OK shape complete with case, caps and filters, and $20,000 or more for one unused in the box complete with papers.
From Ken Rockwell
>>2737386
HAHAHAHA
fucKen Rockwell
He truly is the ultimate troll
>>2737394
Ken is based god.
>tfw no growing family of my own
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
Look up the price on eBay, OP...
There was one of that ultra wide angle prime lens in the photo school where I used to work as assistant, not sure if it was the same as yours. It was left with no use and all spotted with fungus. There was also one 300mm 2.8. Same condition , and no one gave a fuck about it. Fuck...
>>2737305
>Lets say that i own a holy grail
dude it is an impressive lens but it's no 6mm 2.8
>what do you guys think i will be able to make off it?
I don't know, a shitty 90s music video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_06W2zTh9ds
>>2737450
You understand why it's called the holy grail right? Pro-tip, it has nothing to do with the f-stop.
>>2737475
He doesn't. He wouldn't even get it if you mention words like 'rectilinear'.
>>2737394
he is making money doing photography and running a healthy family unit unlike degenerates here that will contribute nothing to society.
>>2737509
>healthy family
>healthy
>>2737475
>You understand why it's called the holy grail right?
I don't know, because it is out dated and out performed by modern glass?
> 'rectilinear'
the opposite of rectile disfunction
You are now aware that "highly desirable rare items" get "discussed" in /p/ at the same time as some douchebag wants to one for more than the "collectors price" they were stupid enough to buy it for in the first place, despite new glass being better in almost every way and cheaper.
>>2737450
This video shot on s35 film and this lens, which is 12,8 mm equivalent on FF. Shitty sigma 12-24 is wider and better than this and that >>2737305
piece of old shit.
Canon 11-24 is widest and best-performing wide-angle lens, so this is real grail now.
Pics or it doesn't exist.
>>2737479
Nobody in their right mind would consider the 13mm for practical use when there are so many modern alternatives that aren't as rare, valuable and cumbersome.
The 6mm fisheye is incredibly niche, but at least its optical parameters are unique.
>>2738364
>Nobody in their right mind
Careful now. We're talking about Nikon collectors here.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/80-200mm-Zoom-NIKKOR-f-4-AIS-serial-2-3-0-0-0-0-condition-99-8-/160953744698?hash=item2579973d3a:m:miSWUTC_jHejUQ0-rCbsciA
>>2737535
wtf is this?
>>2737509
Your status: Mad.
Please leave.
