>>2736091
Not enough fill. Your dark shadows are adding a tone to the image that doesn't match what it seems like you're going for.

Also, ugly face lighting.

>>2736091
Background seems a little weird to me. It's all pink and red hues on the left but then transitions to a faded khaki on the right, with this big old patch of dark on the bottom right. I think if it was uniformly either red/pink it'd work better and be a decent backdrop.

>>2736094
Seeing the image in a smaller size really has highlighted to me how bad the face lighting is, thanks for the direction.

>>2736106
Looks to me like the pink is coming from a gelled flash in the back.

File: 2 (1 of 1)-2.jpg (234 KB, 467x700) Image search: [Google]

234 KB, 467x700

>>2736108
Yes it's from gelled flash, sometimes I can kind of get it to work like I think I did in this shot from the same shoot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 6D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:04 18:23:56
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2736091
Looks like you smashed the luminance slider with a brick. Careful with that shit. Otherwise its decent.

>>2736116
love this one. great tones and color.

>>2736091
like this one as well until people started mentioning shit. Now I can't unsee the rectangle shadow in the background.

her face looks fine though. These are good magazine shots.