Ive decided to throw up some more, the colours look straight up wrong on my laptop so im using photoshops auto colour feature as a bit of a temporary crutch. They seem ok on my phone now.
New thread cos the last is about to 300
I woke up before sunrise to view a hindu pilgrimage and get out of the ridiculous contrast of the daylight. Some of the content aware fill needs doing properly, but a combination of weak laptop and touchpad just sucks.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 833 Image Height 1250 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:20 11:27:51 Exposure Time 1/320 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Brightness 2.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 833 Image Height 1250 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1250 Image Height 1250 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:20 11:28:17 Exposure Time 1/320 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Brightness 2.0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1250 Image Height 1250 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1250 Image Height 833 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:20 11:30:34 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 320 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Brightness 8.1 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1250 Image Height 833 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
Strong start!
Let's see where it goes.
india is wild, you been on one beach and seen 3 different colours of sand
Why the Hell did you spend time processing these just to put some Auto Colour on it?
>>2729762
Green Sand, and I'm pretty sure it wasn't green when it left Lightroom judging by how hard you desaturated green and blue while boosting red and orange.
>>2729777
The sun is green.
I can't tell if you started this thread with photos of peoples' backs just to troll, or not.
>>2729777
You might want to get that monitor of yours calibrated, it's clearly worse than my colour shifting pos screen AND my red/green colourblindness combined.
Or you're just the most visually illiterate person on the board. As you can see here, the sand is on the orange side of yellow and i actually pulled the reds and oranges.
>>2729776
Surely you meant to say i saw sand under 2 different light temperatures and some red clay ;)
>>2729786
There was indeed a mild element of troll. People seem to be more keen to jump on things that can be instantly dismissed with the colour inspector and basic knowledge of light though. Its like you guys dont even try any more :(
Muh tumblr
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 833 Image Height 1250 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:20 11:27:08 Exposure Time 1/320 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Brightness 1.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 833 Image Height 1250 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
Someone asked for more touristy snaps in 1st thread.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:20 11:14:00 Exposure Time 1 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Brightness -0.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
Guy on the right was keen for some spirituality
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1250 Image Height 703 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:20 11:54:54 Exposure Time 1/320 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Brightness 3.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1250 Image Height 703 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2729892
You use a potato/1.4 for this?
>>2729901
Samyang 85 1.4 @ 1.4
So yeah, a potato AND at 1.4
>>2729884
isi did it better
>>2729920
lel
>>2729892
what the heck lens is this? the rendering is interesitng. looks telephoto.
>>2729880
>Or you're just the most visually illiterate person on the board.
I'm not the one that fails to understand green vs magenta tone.
Here, I added even more green and it's still "on the orange side of yellow" so that should tell you, immediately, that there's more to colour balance than you know.
>>2729880
>As you can see here, the sand is on the orange side of yellow
Notice how one looks obviously greener than the other, yet none of them are actually near a green hue in the HSL colour space.
Isn't it amazing how colour relativity and white balance work?
It should be, because you've never seen it before.
>>2729936
You argue with feedback more than isi, and are usually more wrong.
Absolutely hilarious.
>>2729949
Are you trying to insult the OP? or... are you OP thinkng you've identified some anon?
>>2729926
Did what better?
>>2729934
Samyang 85 1.4 cropped in about 50%
>>2729936
>>2729940
>>2729949
When the circle jerk fails. Smh senpai
You can see that theres vegetation running through the sand there, right? And orange and green are pretty opposite on the spectrum. Oh well if you nerds want to argue between yourself about how green my oranges are, feel free :'D
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 833 Image Height 1250 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:20 11:30:07 Exposure Time 1 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 50 Brightness -3.1 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 833 Image Height 1250 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
More colours of sand for you guys
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1250 Image Height 833 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:20 11:51:40 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 320 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Brightness 6.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1250 Image Height 833 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2729759
Would've been stronger had you not cropped the weighty side of the clouds. Compositional issue. Figures could also stand to be either vertically or horizontally centered, or if you're going to offset, a further offset.
>>2729762
Obvious "squareness to avoid untoward elements" takes away a lot from this. Too many distractions for a central square composition. Could have probably gotten closer and more head-on, more compression would improve this because, frankly, no ones cares about anything in this scene other than dude and his utensils.
>>2729763
Terrible execution. Great missed opportunity for a central square, unlike the last show. If you'd gotten low, it looks like you could have even done a tricolor stripe. Shame, dag.
>>2729880
This is a computer monitor, a terrible photograph.
>>2729884
Another decent shot that could have been great if you weren't afraid of getting low or close to things. Another missed opportunity, geometrically.
>>2729887
Poorly processed, poorly handled potential foreground object with whatever the stick is in the sand. Killed the clouds with your crop again.
>>2729892
Lmao your Samyang is busted as fuck and so is this photo.
Just the four figures to the right, more breathing room next to dudes eat, and this could have been a powerful repetition. Shame.
>>2729975
Decent, another missed opportunity for a central square. Getting lower and cutting out some of that blank expanse of green would improve this, as would getting lower and closer to get rid of the sand that you shit in.
>>2730014
Strong-ish, but still hamfisted in your attention to headroom for the clouds. Getting a little lower, yet again, could have helped you get a little more sky in above them. Another benefit of doing so would be to get the beach as the horizon, rather than the far-off water with irrelevant waves. This would also allow your sky-mirror come closer to kissing the sky in the right-central point.
Tighten up your autism.
>>2730024
You might have worked out by now that i think central horizons look jank.
Also on a couple of the shots were you said i should be lower, they were on my tripod at its lowest. Setting of about 1'. Theres a steep drop from the sand to the sea as you approach it, if you had left flatabama at any point you might know more about the variables of coastal geography, Bigger Waves make for a steeper shore.
My main enemy was the rising sun though. From 30 second exposures to half a second took no more than 30 mins. And once the sun is up everythings back to janky contrast.
>this is a computer monitor, terrible photograph
Nowhere near as funny as the "this is your best photograph" comment in your thread.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Equipment Make SONY Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2015:12:27 12:01:54 Pixel Composition RGB Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Light Source Unknown Exposure Mode Manual Image Height 833 Rendering Normal Scene Capture Type Standard Saturation Normal Exposure Program Manual Sharpness Normal White Balance Auto Image Width 1250 Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Contrast Normal Exposure Bias 0 EV Brightness -2.4 EV ISO Speed Rating 50 Exposure Time 1/2 sec
>>2730038
Lmao, be a defensive little bitch about it then, dawg.
>>2730038
>Also on a couple of the shots were you said i should be lower, they were on my tripod at its lowest. Setting of about 1'.
what kind of shit tripod doesn't have unlocking legs?
Maybe if you bought a good tripod instead of carrying around 6 lenses everywhere you go.
>My main enemy was the rising sun though. From 30 second exposures to half a second took no more than 30 mins. And once the sun is up everythings back to janky contrast.
Do you think that's unique to India? Is this your first time outdoors?
>>2730038
You seem to be disregarding a lot of good advice because of who's giving it.
>>2730050
The whole point of tripcodes is to know who's worth listening to, and who just starts shit whenever possible.
isi should have taken off the trip if she wanted to be taken seriously.
>>2730046
>what kind of shit tripod
Apparently my carbon fibre giottos.
Well it does, but the 3 way head and central stem still have to go somewhere, thanks for the concern though.
>do you think thats unique to india.
No, but its unique to the equator. Ive spent most of my time in europe. In greenland you get a couple of months of sunrise. Congrats you now know a geography.
>>2730040
>why are you so defensive
>isi
The lack of self awareness is hilarious
>>2730050
What, like change my preference against centred horizons and dunk my camera in the sand?
K
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 833 Image Height 1250 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:20 11:53:12 Exposure Time 1/2 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Brightness 0.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 833 Image Height 1250 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2730024
Why are you so bitter and angry desu?
Is it because moopco took more, decent photos than you in one morning, than you managed all year?
>>2730063
Giving you sound advice with her trip on might be her way of trolling you, but it's sound advice nonetheless.
Incredibly ironic to see you respond to her in this way.
>>2730068
>Well it does, but the 3 way head and central stem still have to go somewhere, thanks for the concern though.
Those are reversible, you should be able to mount the camera upside down on the bottom of it.
Learn to use your gear.
Badly processed, poorly composed snapshots of subjects exotic to europeans
Any tourist with a camera and a subscription to National Geographic would think to take these.
The one exception to my eye is
>>2730014 but its too busy composed
>>2730073
That wasnt me. :^)
>>2730075
>learn to use your gear
As opposed to actually using gear, right? ;^)
Great comments guys, we've got people arguing how green, orange is. An angry isi. Irc fags white knighting for isi making non sequential conversation. People implying i should change my personal preferences without making any references, People whining about gear and people confusing anon for me.
Congratulations to Omi for staying on topic.
Sorry for rustling all your jimmies guys, its a sunday, chill out, have a nap. Ima enjoy this delicious fresh coconut smoothie with chia seeds and a dollop of organic pistachio ice cream. Shit its hot today.
>>2730088
>An angry isi.
I don't think she's the angry one f a m
>>2730091
You should check irc ;^)
>>2730092
Uhm, for what? I see her talking about cannabis, plushies, and nacho libre a while ago, but that's it?
>>2730091
>>2730092
>>2730095
Oh you guys.
>>2730112
Thanks for the language tip, everyone here is so keen to speak english it makes it easy to forget basic foreign pleasantries.
Im off to kollam to watch star wars and get some supplies, then heading up the western ghats. Have you been to kerala, is there anywhere a bit off the normal tourist path you would recommended?
And yeh, i have my 35mm shift lens with me, need an excuse to give it a go for a panorama! Im really looking forward to getting out of these tourist bubble towns.
The p irc is on rizon.net, also check the sticky for more info if you're not au fait with irc.
>>2730140
>Have you been to kerala, is there anywhere a bit off the normal tourist path you would recommended?
I haven't been to Kerala sorry. And no no no no no. Do not go anywhere alone that's not touristy. You don't speak Hindi or maliyali (Kerala language), you're white and you have a shiny camera. Although people are better in the south, there are lots and lots of thieves and potentially kidnappers. Make a friend and take him with if you want to go anywhere less populated. Honestly you could just hit up any village and talk to the locals, they'll most likely give you a feed and tell you places to go that you'd like. You can however pay for one of those dingy rides through the calm lakes in the forests/swamps, you'll be alone there, ask the fella to drop you off somewhere lone and not artificial. There are rather beautiful ponds and waterfalls in forests in Kerala.
But remember, do not go alone to anywhere that's too isolated, I can't emphasise this enough. Oh and carry some sort of anti-venom if you can for the jungle areas.
>>2730150
Yeah, villages is the kind of remote i want, not middle of fuck nowhere! Good to hear that just rocking up and talking to locals can be done.
I usually have my tripod with hefty 3 way mount slung over my shoulder, it feels fairly confident as a self defense tool, but I'm super down with finding locals and going on day trips with them. The tour guides here want crazy amounts of cash, i aint giving a standard months wages for some dude to show me a couple of boring temples in a day.
>>2730151
Definitely, villages are great. Villagers are great. Just have a translator (just in case they don't speak English. Google translate should do fine if you don't find a person to help (hopefully you have mobile data). Anyway, the rickshaw or taxi driver should be help out too actually. Ask if the driver speaks English first, be a little generous with the money, not too much, 100 rupees extra will do them good. Also, don't show how much money you have, keep how many notes you need for the ride and a bit for when they help out, be implicit with money.
• try get fixed fare rides not on meter.
• stay handy with all your belongings.
Are you going anywhere aside from South India? South India is famous for spicy food and forest areas. So try get some food photography in there too. Dosa, sambhar, idli and whatnot.
wont have internet for a day or two far from home and NZ roads are dangerous and I'm driving.
You stay safe, good luck, have fun. Keep posting and try get those panoramas in too
>>2729777
Not op,but how can you tell that he used auto colors? I Dont see the green sand you're talking about either. I want to be more analytical about colors/post processing of others.
>>2730071
>Is it because moopco took more, decent photos than you in one morning, than you managed all year?
Kekked hard
>>2730024
I love how quick you are to judge other peoples photos with your poor attempt at sounding superior or knowledgeable, yet you go and post a whole thread full with some of the worst garbage I have ever seen on /p/.
>>2730038
Just because you didn't find a way to get lower doesn't mean the photo wouldn't have been better if you were lower. You can also take your camera OFF the tripod...
>>2730237
Judge? I'm just giving advice on how I think some of these could be improved or where he went wrong.
Salted nuts yo.
>>2730192
He says he used auto colour in the OP. White balance is a skill you learn over time, and calibrating your monitor will help a lot. There are things that you remember the colour of, like a banana or a red apple, or sand, and can use that to judge when something's temperature or tone is off.
Until that happens you can Google images of something in a photo and compare.
>>2730038
>You might have worked out by now that i think central horizons look jank.
reads as
>I don't know when not to follow the rule of thirds lol
Being against centered horizons, or centered subjects, is a "I just started photography and think I know what I'm talking about" move.
>>2730249
deez nuts!
>>2730264
Not the anon on question. These bullshit rules of thumb need to be forgotten, context is just too important. Killer photos can be had no matter where the horizon is; "central horizons are janky eeeugh"and the rule of thirds serves only to constrict.
>>2730237
>poor attempt at sounding superior or knowledgeable
I think she genuinely believes that she is superior and more knowledgeable than everybody here. If that is the case it would go some ways to explaining her incredibly shitty attitude, but it certainly doesn't excuse it.
>>2730272
I think you're genuinely upset that the most useful feedback in the thread is from your least favorite person on the board.
>>2730258
>colour of sand
Please tell me more about how all rocks are the same colour in every light. Lol.
>compare to things off google
You mean, learn how to set white balance based on what the dominant light source you want to use is falling on.
Like the white linen clothing they are wearing...
Dude just stop, its embarrassing.
>>2730264
If you knew my photos you would know that i quite often have central compositions. But to me a central horizon makes an image lack weight. I have a couple in my collection that use it to emphasize the symmetry in reflections, but they are very rare for me
Isi even suggested that if i went lower and had a central horizon that i could get a tricolor effect with the sky, sea and ground. Low to the ground, pointed straight out, off the top of a cliff, how much sea would you see? I even have a version of that shot with a central horizon, i felt it was much weaker.
Being an experienced photographer is about knowing when to break the rules, not to force it. Thanks for your comments though.
Y'all need as much chill as this doggo.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:20 11:14:31 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness 7.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2730276
>Isi even suggested that if i went lower and had a central horizon that i could get a tricolor effect with the sky, sea and ground. Low to the ground, pointed straight out, off the top of a cliff, how much sea would you see?
You make it sound like there are only 3 positions a tripod can be in; on the ground, in the middle, or up top.
>>2730276
>Y'all need as much chill as this doggo.
You're doing that thing where you imply everyone else is upset whenever you're upset.
>>2729887
This looks comfy, I hope you're enjoying your trip :)
>>2730302
>Because she fails to grasp physics and you fail at reading. :^)
How does that indicate she fails to grasp physics?
Because your tripod is shit and can't shoot low?
I don't like either of you, but isi gives you much more tangible and relatable advice than you give her.
>>2730311
Isi's problem is that she can't _take_ advice.
>>2730311
>isi gives you much more tangible and relatable advice than you give her
Yeah, the only difference being moopco can actually take decent shots, whereas isi posts 100+ photos in a thread and not a single fucking one is any good. Her advice doesn't mean shit if she can't even execute it herself.
>>2730328
I wouldn't say there's really much difference between the quality of their shots, but at least moop doesn't act like his are masterpieces.
>>2730328
>whereas isi posts 100+ photos in a thread and not a single fucking one is any good
lol, your bias and samefaggotry could not be any more obvious moop
>>2730334
>but at least moop doesn't act like his are masterpieces
Are we talking about the same two people? isi refers to half of what she posts as snapshits, while moop argues with people about white balance.
You went to India and brought a shit Samyang lens with you.
What the fuck man.
>>2729763
oh look more backs of people's heads, great job here
>>2729884
these are waves
>>2729887
this is a building, processing at least looks decent
>>2729975
This is a rock
>>2730014
This is water, not too bad should have shot more to the right to get the rest of that cloud in the reflection
>>2730068
level your fucking horizon
You don't ever get to trash my threads ever again these images are snaps at best
These are shit. 0/10 reshoot if this is a troll then 10/10
Still butt jelly you got to go to India. I just finished some curry and vegetables, Indian food is awesome I'd give my left testicle for some Indian street food right now. I don't know what the Indian word for them is but Indian potato balls, they are made with all kinds of spices and stuff, they are fried balls of awesome loaded with curry and garam masala. Fuck yea
>>2730342
>isi refers to half of what she posts as snapshits
>falling for this level of humblebrag
>>2730353
so YOU'RE saying that her photos are good, not her?
Lol.
That said, yeah dude, some of her photos are objectively good, and some are clearly snapshits.
>>2730347
Fuck off, gearfag.
Nobody here cares about you or your shitty taste.
We're all seen what kind of woman you like to fuck after all.
>>2730376
>so YOU'RE saying that her photos are good, not her?
How did you get to that conclusion? I'm saying that she calls them snapshits, but it's obvious she's humblebragging under her misguided belief that they're good.
>>2729975
>And orange and green are pretty opposite on the spectrum.
waaaaaat
>>2729975
>orange and green are pretty opposite on the spectrum
1. That makes no God damn sense.
2. Blue and yellow / orange are actually opposite colours and yet, we use them to tell if an image is too cold or too warm in white balance. So what's your point? Colour is more than a one-dimensional transition, hue is just one metric in one model, which is currently doing you absolutely no good.
>>2730380
I've seen her admit to posting extremely varying qualities of work many times.
She knows how to take a technically excellent photo, she just doesn't seem to care about always doing it.
I'm not sure why people struggle to wrap their head around "mid-20s girl shoots artistic landscapes, and snapshoots her lifestyle"
It's like expecting a chef to never eat fast food.
>>2729975
Green's opposite is magenta...
>>2729975
>And orange and green are pretty opposite on the spectrum.
CR-CR-CR-CRITICAL THEORY
>>2730237
You don't have to be a pro to critique. That's a fallacious if you think so. Judges can be shit at whatever they judge but their tips can be 10/10.
Not in this case though. isi was just being retarded there
>>2730237
I just realized isi is the new carlos.
>>2730395
>She knows how to take a technically excellent photo
That's just the thing. When she thinks she's taken a good photo but people don't like it, instead of actually listening to what they have to say she tries to prove their taste wrong with technical knowledge she's googled.
>>2730426
I've never seen this happen, just you saying this over and over.
I do remember her using a histogram to prove she didn't block her shadows or blow her highlights when someone claimed she did. She was obviously right.
She obviously doesn't come to /p/ for feedback, because she's one of the best at giving it out. What's she supposed to learn from some newfag that thinks centering the horizon is the devil?
>>2730426
Your opinion about the photos she takes does not come close to mattering how she should take her photos. Saying "I don't like what you've done" is not a court mandate for her to change or acknowledge what you've said. If you point out a detail that is factually sound, or relevant, she takes it into account, and works to correct it. The problem that people seem to have with isi is that she is taking the photos that she wants to take, and she's taking them to the exact level that she wants to be taking them. Telling her how you think she should do them differently doesn't affect her. She wants the subjects she takes, she is thoughtful in her approach to her scene, she has reasons for doing the things she does, and she's capable of backing her photos up.
She isn't listening to what you have to say because you're not saying anything worth hearing.
>>2730430
>If you point out a detail that is factually sound, or relevant, she takes it into account, and works to correct it
Is that why she has 100 pictures of the same piece of wood in the ocean?
>>2730421
You don't have to be a pro to critique. Judges for diving or gymnastics may not be better than the people they're judging. but they are, undeniably, experts in the field, knowing what to watch for, how to judge, and how to grade people based on a clearly stated goal.
Someone willing to give critique should, for instance, know that a photo can have far too much green in it, without it being green.
Someone who is looking to receive critique should, for instance, acknowledge that, if there is a whole spectrum of color he has never ever seen in his live, and if he is looking at his photos on a self professed poorly calibrated display, maybe the dozen or so people who CAN see color, on their properly calibrated screens, may be saying something correct, and go "oh, thanks for the heads up guys. I can't see those colors, so it's useful to hear. How is this version? Any better?"
But that's not how it goes with moop. If he did a thing, it is the best thing, and anyone who doesn't like it is "visually illiterate" despite the fact that, in stead of having reasons for doing what he did, he in stead has excuses for why it isn't better, assuming that those excuses improve the photo and that we should all like his mediocre tourist shots more, knowing that he purposefully didn't put any effort in.
>>2730434
Isn't Moopco color blind irl?
LOL
>>2730434
moopco is Color blind man
A do was talking about isi being a cunt.
look at omi, he seems chill. They should be talking about moopco's trip not c&c'ng the pics. He's taking travel photo not on photography shoot
>>2730444
1) You're wrong. One of those is me, so at least two people see what's going on here.
2) I bet you're not "out"
3) I wish you were "out"
The world isn't a conspiracy. You're just a moron.
>>2730450
> a do
I, I was talking about...
>>2730450
>They should be talking about moopco's trip not c&c'ng the pics.
this is /p/, not /trv/
We don't give a shit about his trip. We care about the photos.
>>2730024
I wish you would just stay out of photo threads. You know you're a toxic presence and I guess you enjoy that.
>>2730483
we'd have one less person giving critique
>>2730483
>feedback is toxic
Lol
>>2730483
Is that a joke? The post you just linked to is the most relevant thing in the thread, besides the photos themselves. Why not post to the fucking trolls and retards who chase her around like mosquitos, and tell them to stay out of threads? Or suggest that anyone who doesn't like her, filter her, and improve their board experience.
>>2730477
No I agree but it shouldn't be treated as a photo shoot. Isi and other anon are going at it like he's joeyL. A bit too serious. A bit too obsessive.
>>2730492
All that matters is the photos. If he wants to blog about it, he should do it on reddit, or facebook. His photos are okay. There is room for improvement. /p/ is now, and has always been, a place to get told why your photos suck, so that you can either improve, or get mad and leave.
Nobody is interested in paying LESS attention to photos around here.
this is mine
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaN1mA7avXQ
>>2730488
Of course not. Your trip is and you know it. You know exactly what it does to every thread it shows up in and you love to watch it happen. It's a shame.
Would have happened in this one anyway, though, since moopco's own name is just as bad.
>>2730622
>Excuses and gear?
don't forget technique, and theory, without any representation.
it's like playing football, vs playing fantasy football.
>>2730625
Who are you trying to refer to?
>>2730311
No, Because she thinks if the camera was lower, there would be more sea in the shot...
>>2730339
This is the third time now in this thread that i have to remind you nerds that when i post, i pretty much always refer to myself.
>>2730342
So you think the linen needs more purple in it? I just like pointing out butthurt faggots failing.
>>2730347
Lol, I'll trashtalk whatever photos i want thanks, You're a truck driver mate, dont be surprised if no one listens to a word you say ever again.
>>2730391
Hue, which is whats being discussed is literally a one dimensional transition. Also, can you not read a colour picker? Lol.
>>2730395
She can shoot whatever she likes, what she shouldnt do is get pissy when someone rips on them, stalk them down on facebook and proceed to send hundreds of messages a day about why her photos are fantastic, why america is fantastic and how natives are actually hard working amazing people with no predisposition to being saggy boobed drunks. Lets not forget how she failed her art degree before finishing.
>>2730697
She's telling you to cut the sea out
>>2730408
My point was that you have to go through yellow to reach green, the original comment said the sand was green (not 'too green'). Tard.
>>2730428
>just you saying this over and over...
Ive said similar, and the person you ref wasnt me. So is that the collective 'you'? As in its a common thought? Oh ok. ;^)
>newfag
Your new is showing
>>2730430
>point out a detail thats factually sound
>isi, your blacks are crushed and they pull the eye in a bad way
>no they're not
>just because you raised the black point doesnt stop them being crushed
>yes it does
>>2730432
Fucking lelled
>>2730434
Another person that doesnt know how to analyse colour through the tools lr has.
>>2730488
The feedback is fine, the level of samefagging and implied superiority is what people mainly take exception to. Never forget youre a neet art school drop out who lives in one of the poorest, most deprived neighbourhoods in america, and you still live with your parents, in a state thats notorious for poor, dumb niggers and sister fisting bumblefucks.
>>2730622
>excuses and gear
Ive made no excuses, and i make no excuse for not wanting to put my a7 in wet, salty sand.
>>2730697
Respond to isi's gif pls
>>2730699
>The feedback is fine, the level of samefagging and implied superiority is what people mainly take exception to. Never forget youre a neet art school drop out who lives in one of the poorest, most deprived neighbourhoods in america, and you still live with your parents, in a state thats notorious for poor, dumb niggers and sister fisting bumblefucks.
Calm your salt you bad-toothed failed imperial pedophile with a failing economy
>>2730703
She means if you pointed your camera lower dumbass.
I'm afraid I'll disagree with some of isi's statements.
>>2729763
I don't think OP lost any opportunity here. The photograph looks well composed for me. The "tricolor stripe" scheme seems disposable for the sake of what OP achieved here: the large space occupied by the sky makes the scene somewhat synthetic, which works well with the strong shapes that those guys gave him -- specially the guy in the middle. There's a quality in the fact that these strong shapes, being in the bottom portion of the scene, give the image some kind of stability. I'm not telling isi's idea is bad. I just think it would be a different, not necessarily better photograph.
>>2729884
Same thing here, to some degree.
The sky only seems "unnecessary" here: >>2729975
But here... >>2730014
I think I'd do exactly as OP did. If I'm understanding the ground in this scene correctly, getting lower, as isi says, would break the almost straight line between the sand and the sea. The ground doesn't seems to be as plain as it looks in this photograph; it has some little hills, I think. By getting lower, OP would have these hills agains the sky, which would be somewhat distractive from what matters -- the shape of the water between the sand. I see no problem with the sea in the distance. I think the sea merges well with the sky...
The only critic I'd have for OP is that his work seems a bit inconsistent for me sometimes.
>>2729762
This isn't as good as the photos I quoted above. Get closer!
>>2729892
Same here... etc.
Sorry for bad english.
>>2729763
Very slick shot dude love the simplicity.
>>2730706
So much better than anything isi has ever said
>>2730815
I hate to agree.
>>2730805
It's just verbose compliments from one person, to himself. praising yourself on your compliments to yourself isn't exactly doing anybody any good...
>>2730815
Hey look she pointed her camera down like the advice she gave
Quaint
>>2730815
>isi did it better
fuck no nigger
they're both imbalanced with shitty subjects, moopcos one at least has a more engaging sitting style. isi just goes over all her photos with a border and vsco.
>>2730899
>vsco
I've literally never used vsco. Do you even know what that looks like? :)
>>2730906
i hoenstly dont care, you either then try give it a film look. Which desu doesnt work at all. Sometimes the borders look nice though, I'll give you that. But inthat specific comparision of photos, moopco wins. If only the cunt framed it right
>>2730909
Film-like is not a descriptor usually used for my color photos, but hey, you're the expert. :^)
>>2730909
>But inthat specific comparision of photos, moopco wins.
nice try moopco
>>2730924
>Implying anyone who prefers moop over that lizard isi, must be moop himself.
lol k
>>2730926
Who else could it be, you're clearly a talentless prick.
I'm at a loss to understand how anyone could go to a country like India and produce such garbage. You show no interest in your surroundings or the people you share it with.
>>2730926
It only happens when isi is on at the same time.
>maybe if i imply anyone that disagrees with me is just one person, that will make people like me more
Its one hell of a depressing coping mechanism.
>>2730906
You're right isi, its not vsco; Its the fuji film sims in your camera, because your simpleton brain makes you unable to use real image editing software.
>>2730930
Such salt, this screenshots for you isi.
>>2730935
>Its the fuji film sims in your camera, because your simpleton brain makes you unable to use real image editing software.
Your autistic brain can't handle the notion that I only bother with raw files when I truly care about the image.
p.s. check the exif data :^)
http://m4.22slides.com/jamiewilliams/beach-chairs-1138640.jpg
Be sure to mind your sodium intake, lil fella.
>>2730915
right okay
shit film-like. You're right that does suit it more. Take better photos. What's your website/insta/etc?
>>2730930
that photo may be garbage, true. How does that relate to anything I mentioned? Isi's photo is still shit in comparision. Worse than moopco. You cant argue and presumably are a little bitch, maybe just isi samefagging like always
>>2730942
>signed in from 2 different devices on irc
>hurrrrr here muh proof
Whereas im sitting in a cafe, in a remote corner of the world.
And i cant check the exif on my phone without getting another app, and I'm down to the last couple of hundred mb on my phone and plan to talk to my gf today. Regardless, nothing stopping you from editing on camera and resizing in pn so you can hide your shame.
>>2730946
If its not isi, its agno, every time. Hes been mad at me for calling him a forever alone chink cuck, because isi gives me more attention than him, much to his anger.
Love the selfie "beauty" mode on my new camera, i feel so pretty with giant eyes and smackhead cheeks.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2730961
>>signed in from 2 different devices on irc
>>hurrrrr here muh proof
what are you talking about? there's just one isi on IRC
>>2730961
>Regardless, nothing stopping you from editing on camera and resizing in pn so you can hide your shame.
Nothing stopping me from pulling your pants over your head either :^) https://www.instagram.com/p/uo_AGoLnVc
^that's your jpeg, senpai
>>2730965
Lol, hi agno
>>2730969
Whats most depressing about this is that its in your "best photos this year" thread and its 61 weeks old.
That thread is your lifes work, from 11 years of trying, how depressing.
>>2730973
My thread's not titled "best photos this year", it's "assorted snapshits 2015."
And you're incredibly irate, lmao.
>>2730974
Pedantry doesnt stop that photo not being taken this year. As usual you refuse to take criticism and deflect it with banal bullshit.
Everyone sees through you, apart from agno who just wants to see inside you.
>>2730976
"you didn't take that photo this year" isn't exactly criticism.
I *did* process it this year. ;)
damn wow you people need to chill out.
isi and sugar are a tad harsh but thats what c&c is.
just let the man post photos, I wanna see some south indian food moopco, get the food and the panoramas in
>>2730981
>just let the man post photos
As simple as this should be, it's just never going to happen. For as long as these tripcunts post on /p/, there will forever be pathetic drama to follow.
>>2731027
>At least moopco stays in his own threads and keeps on topic
LOL
O
LAUGHING
O
U
D
L
Y
>>2730622
>Hint, it's not the trip. It's the shitty anons who need to leave.
If I put out a plate of cat food every day I will attract cats.
They will shit on my lawn.
The cats are the problem but only an idiot would try to actually blame them rather than the fool who was feeding them.
All she has to do is take off her trip, but she won't because she loves the shitstorm she causes.
Don't mistake anti-isi for pro-moop, though. Between them these two have pretty much killed the board all by themselves and they actually seem proud of it.
>>2731057
Anons aren't cats; they're functioning, thinking, people who aren't free from blame.
>>2731057
>Don't mistake anti-isi for pro-moop, though. Between them these two have pretty much killed the board all by themselves and they actually seem proud of it.
>2 biggest contributors of photos
>board is kill
>>2731027
>At least moopco stays in his own threads and keeps on topic.
1) No he doesn't
2) How would you know? he's too much of a coward to use his trip any time he's shit posting.
>>2731057
isi is not a bowl of cat food designed to attract you. When there is a person walking through the dog park, and they are bitten by a dog, you put the dog down, not the person.
>>2731086
I never use my trip any more dildo baggins.
Look how asspained you nerds get over it.
>>2731089
Because you're a retard spreading terrible information, whether you're tripped up or not, and without it, we can't filter you out. isi wins the "slightly less bad trip" award by virtue of she's always tripped, and easily filterable.
>>2731090
>isi wins the "slightly less bad trip" award by virtue of she's always tripped, and easily filterable.
Bull-fucking-shit.
>>2731114
By virtue of the fact that, if you hate her, you can filter her out, she wins. Anyone who doesn't like isi doens't ever have to read a single word she says, or look at a single photo she takes. You can completely erase her from your life if you want. But the issue with people who hate isi isn't isi. It's the fact that she won't do what you tell her, and so you can't filter her, because then she'd be free to do what makes her happy, rather than what you want.
Then we have Moop, who spreads terrible suggestions, straight up wrong information, and a vomit on turtle shit attitude, and there's nothing you can do about it. He also likes to same-fag and then pretend he has supporters. It's toxic, and unavoidable. If you come to /p/, you have to read his vitriol. It's worse.
>>2731120
I was calling bullshit on her always being tripped, you fucking retard.
>>2730961
Hi moopco
This is the first I've ever posted in one of your threads (and by grace of the gods, the last time I will ever do that).
The reason that you were banned is not just because you're a cunt asshole to me specifically, but that you behave that way to almost everyone. Furthermore, even though I strive to avoid drama-stoking by never posting in any of your threads for any reason, you seem to thrive on drama and seek it out. The evidence is in your own actions: you always bring me up, spread a truckload of false information, even if it has nothing to with what's presently being discussed.
Now normally, we would tolerate that shit for an eternity before taking any action, but in yours, I lost my temper and my patience. Still, except in a few exceptional cases, these bans are temporary and you are in fact unbanned. Welcome back!
Your continued acceptance is not without conditions: we ask you to stop doing a couple of things.
1. Don't stoke drama
2. Don't spread falsehoods
3. Don't accuse people of things that you have no evidence for
4. Don't use sockpuppets
5. Don't present demonstrably wrong information as factual
6. And this is not a strict requirement, but how about ending your practise about lying to make yourself look better? We can see right through that shit.
Otherwise you'll find yourself quickly re-banned for reasons that I hope you can understand.
Yours sincerely,
agno
>>2731130
Is Blayner unbanned to? or...
>>2731139
blayner is moopco......
>>2731141
The whole IRC is actually just moopco's multiple personalities meta shitposting.
Gossiping little high school girls. How fucking far can this board fall?
>>2731143
Thanks for doing something to help. Oh wait.
>>2731130
loooooool
>im so important guyse, im IRC channel mod! im big guy!
get a life chink cuck
>>2731144
Thanks for doing something to help. Oh wait.
>>2731148
At least I saged.
>>2731151
>saged
He saged too, fuking piece of shit. just kidding, we are good.
>>2731143
>How fucking far can this board fall?
the IRC team already called the cops on some guy because whiteknights. all this for an attention whore redneck with daddy issues.
>>2731130
Sorry, got a gf now, so i have someone else to fuck with ;^)
Enjoy your 5 person circle jerk of failure, don't forget to wash your anime body pillow on a regular basis.
>>2731120
>moopco samefags
Might want to reign in the projection isi
>i'm filterable
See the above point
>>2731145
Kekked
>>2731156
The best bit is the 5 or so people that idle 24/7 and never say a word. So weird, so desperate for a human connection. Or how isi has removed all the contact details from her website and changed her facebook so its harder to find her and her family, I'm glad i dont fuck people off to the point of living in fear and jeopardising any chance of a business website.
>>2731156
Is this what the world looks like through your psychosis? I don't think anyone's believing you man... Do they not have your meds at pharmacies in India? You should have brought some with you.
>>2731145
I've had isi on facebook for abt 2 years and I've never been able to see her friends list.
>>2731163
>Is this what the world looks like through your psychosis?
lmaooooo you fucking cuck, look at you, shooting in the dark, also i dont think you know what "psychosis" means, so maybe first educate yourself before spouting shit around like an ignorant retard
also put your trip on
>>2731167
Not that guy, but:
>i dont think you know what "psychosis" means, so maybe first educate yourself before spouting shit around like an ignorant retard
Psychosis refers to an abnormal condition of the mind described as involving a "loss of contact with reality"
Seems pretty dead on accurate to me.
>>2729926
Shut the fuck up isi, you unachieving, worthless, redneck cunt.
>>2731160
>I'm glad i dont fuck people off to the point of living in fear and jeopardising any chance of a business website.
What?
>>2731177
Who knows, man.
My contact info is in my footer, his glasses just aren't high enough magnification to read it I guess.
First post I've made in here today btw Moop, I've been sleeping through a tornado warning. :)
>>2731173
It's like watching a guy locked in a room with himself arguing with his own shadow. What the fuck is wrong with you dude?
>>2731160
>I'm glad i dont fuck people off to the point of living in fear and jeopardising any chance of a business website.
If that did indeed happen, it would be you that did it, (especially after a comment like: "isi has removed all the contact details from her website and changed her facebook so its harder to find her and her family") then it would be exactly the opposite... if she were taking that down, it would be because of you "fucking people off to the point of living in fear" no?
this thread is fucked. Sorry moopco, less photos and more argument about random shit kills the mood. Good luck, have fun and stay safe. I'm out.
lol holy fuck moopco you are legit crazy
isi was right about you
>>2731122
She trips. What you seem incapable of understanding is that it is entirely possible that with your abrasive attitude and shitty personal skills, there is far more than one person who dislikes you. You can pretend that every single person in this thread is one girl you seem pretty obsessed with, but it's very obviously not true. I'm sorry if your ego cannot take that fact, but it does not change the truth.
>>2731160
>Might want to reign in the projection isi
The irony is intentional here, right? It has to be intentional...
>>2731242
It's pretty obviously both, mongoloid.
>>2731296
Both what?
>>2731296
There are almost 40 people posting in this thread. Chances are good a great deal of them are not isi.
Holy shit dude...
>>2731180
>I've been sleeping through a tornado warning. :)
Don't worry love, we are all praying for your death
>>2731327
148 replies between a max of 37 posters, chances are at least one of you is borderline obsessed. ;^)
>>2731183
I would have no idea of anything about her if she didnt stalk me down and harass me on facebook continually. I find it most hilarious when i take the piss out of her back, she blocks me and then 2 weeks later i'm unblocked again so she can look at my profile. Such a weirdo.
>>2731167
>>2731173
This guy isnt me btw, I dont have this level of vitriol.
>>2731181
>>2731242
And these guys, lol. Ive got 29 posts in here before this one, what's your count im up to?
>>2731204
>>2731569
Apologies guys, this is why i dropped my trip originally. The irc nerds couldnt take any banter and have gone full retard for a good couple of years now. Irc is where all the people that p reject go to form a hugbox and to coordinate bullying attacks, hence why ricky got swatted, between isi and agno they've written more words than war and peace in a year.
Its good to see theyre still so bitter.
>>2731180
>first post ive made in here today
>posted at half past midnight here.
Well no shit.
>sleeping all day
Well it wasn't like you were gonna do anything productive, was it. Lel.
>>2731208
Put your trip back on isi ;^)
>>2729759
masterpiece photo
>>2731589
>The irc nerds couldnt take any banter and have gone full retard for a good couple of years now.
This is historically inaccurate and everyone knows it.
>>2731607
>forgot to count your own posts
I also "forgot" to count all but 1 posters. I'll leave the maths to you.
>>2731608
>>>2731589 (You)
>>The irc nerds couldnt take any banter and have gone full retard for a good couple of years now.
>This is historically inaccurate and everyone knows it.
>sincerely, a butthurt irc nerd
Or are you saying that isi, agno and ayya isn't a team of butthurt nerds?
Lel.
>>2731610
>ayya
hasn't been on the board or IRC in like 6 months
another demonstration of your lacking grasp on reality
The only clear butthurt I see is yours, masked behind forced laughter and fake lels. The pain of life is visible in your selfie.
Why didn't you take any pictures today?
>>2731607
>why did you post two times in 10 minutes moopco
>still implying only one person on this board hates isi
kek, quit being a delusional faggot
>>2731611
Why no photos today?
Well its 9am and im on my way on to the next place, i did take some of the sunset and fishing boats last night, but i havent edited them yet.
Why didnt you take any photos today anon?
>>2731617
Isi's level of delusion has no bounds.
She thinks living with her parents with no sign of leaving, at the age of 25, is normal in the west.
>>2731618
why do you think every anon is isi, moopco?
are you projecting samefaggotry?
>People would rather talk about #p than look at your photos
kek
>>2730699
>the original comment said the sand was green (not 'too green')
oh my god
>41 posters
>MoopCo thinks 40 are isi
asdfghahahahahahahaha
>>2731913
No, they're just all from irc hating because it's funny to hate, not anything related to actual photos, or behavior. (Ignore the fact that IRC only has about 10 active posters, many of which are also anti isi)
>>2731619
To be fair, that goes the other way too.
They're both as bad as each other.
>>2731950
I like to give the board the benefit of the doubt, to assume that there is only one person as disconnected from reality as moopco. He's also slipped up in his samefagging enough times to make it a valid assumption.
>>2731950
moopco actively admits to spamming several of her threads until lock
not this shit again. Last time I saw this happen I recommended that mentally disabled guy to go fcking out and do something. So he went to india and decided to call her crazy ex on /p/.
>>2731951
True but isi assumes anybody who doesn't fawn over her both as a person and a photographer must be him and that's almost as crazy.
I think I speak for most of the board when I say I would prefer them to keep their bitching in the IRC channel and just post pics here but that's not going to happen.
>>2732007
>True but isi assumes anybody who doesn't fawn over her both as a person and a photographer must be him and that's almost as crazy.
This is untrue. Moop is pretty easily identifiable, because he brings up shit from the past that you can spot if you've been subjected to his insanity for long enough. He has a very particular way of talking, which is pretty easy to pick up on too. He stays calm, in a way that is supposed to make you feel and look stupid for disagreeing with him. She may miss the mark here and there, but the people who follow her around the most viciously are very small in number, and are generally easy to pick out of the lot.
Also, if you give her thoughtful critique related to art, or photography, she'll happily converse with you, and discuss technique, or intent. If you attack her for being isi, she trolls you. It happens all the time, and it's fun to watch.
>>2732012
My only interaction with her has been telling her I liked some of her pics and being called an idiot by her in return.
She loves conflict and will do anything to stoke it. I don't care if you agree though.
Nice thread.
>>2732069
That definitely sounds true. Link to the interaction Feel free to look into the archives.
>>2732071
I really don't care enough about this to go through the last several isi threads to find a comment saying something like "I really like this one"
Feel free to think I made it up, though.
>>2732146
Thought so.
Fuckers are still arguing lmao
>>2732418
It never ends
Shanked by Hjiras yet?
>>2733011
No, everyone is excited to see me and can't wait to speak to me in english.
I only had one problem with someone and it was a misunderstanding over my camera. She yelled at me to "take out her photo" so i ran away.
itt moop runs away from little indian women
> come back to this thread in 2016
> still no new photos
> moopco and anons are still bitching
> moopco runs away from Indian woman
ffs lad it's 2016 in 3 hours, take some fucking photos.
Happy New Years cunts, I'll be drunk at eve.
What are you doing / did you do to avoid getting sick? What focal length lens are you finding most useful? Thinking about an India trip.
>>2733048
babby's first street photography
>>2733093
>What focal length lens are you finding most useful?
lmao
>>2733307
>moopco updates us on his amazing trip
>recants and blames isi after 3 insults
typical moopco
>>2733307
>being this delusional
>>2733384
whatever you say moopco
>>2733384
He does all the same fagging in satire too, right?
>>2733398
Its been asked before, but where do you think i've samefagged?
>>2733471
What happened to your Spanish banker roomie
>>2733473
He's still living in the same house :)
Not everyones housemates are direct relatives isi.
>>2733475
Not all of the people that witnessed that shit show of samefaggotry are isi
>>2733480
Isi is posting family nye photos on instagram
>>2733488
You're such a fucking creep.
>>2733490
Underrated
>>2733488
Better than shitty snapshits from India on 4chan
:^)
>>2733506
>shitty snapshits
You're one to fucking talk isi
>>2733506
These are better than the vast majority of shitty photos that pass through here, all these posts scream of envy.
>>2733570
Keep on spewing shit, you dumb cunt
>>2733576
>implying you're not posting from 2 computers
>>2733581
>Implying someone is that desperate to samefag
You can take off your tinfoil hat now friendo
The two comments aren't even remotely the same you fucking moron, all I said was isi is one to talk seeing as she posts threads with hundreds of literal snapshits, I never said moops weren't shit.
Just got back from a trip to the forest. Was pretty chill.
My new friend Kevin took this snapshit of me. It's over exposed by at least 7 stops.
>>2733672
Just jumped a taxi to Agra as I wanted to check out the Taj Mahal. It didn't disappoint.
The brilliant white marble against the azure of the sky was breathtaking.
Kevin complained the whole time. He got Delhi belly from drinking cow urine.
>>2733729
>isi colour corrected her own image post
>colour corrected
>colour
>alabama
>colour
we moopco now
>>2733729
Am I isi too now?
>>2733734
fuck off i'm isi now
pbbt pbbt bama bama
suck my fuji :&)
>>2733737
I am isi and so is my wife!
>>2733588
>Implying you're still not samefagging
Go back to /b Chinafag
>>2733757
agno didn't even wake up until noon
you've literally never been right about him being in your threads
isi sometimes though
>>2733767
*on to
;&)
>>2733765
Thats clearly not me, i know agno would never badmouth isi, in his world that might ruin his chances of getting to see her floppy, lifeless boobs.
Kevin wanted to visit his cousins so I tagged along.
We took a picnic to the Ganges River. Kevin and the lads went skinny dipping but kept my top on because I've got sunburn.
itt moop gets rawed
>>2733770
Onto*
Learn to english friendo
:^)
>>2733771
why do you constantly jump on opportunities to talk about isi's breasts
sure you've dug your hole too far down so you have no chance, but it's still creepy to see you continue to try
>>2733775
>breasts
>girlslaughing.jpeg
This is why you have an anime sex pillow.
>>2733774
i'll have to disagree. "onto" is for moving on top of things or for describing being aware of something, such as "i moved onto the steps" or "i'm onto your scheme". "on to" is for when "on" is part of the verb, like in "move on".
http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/definitions/on-to-vs-onto/
moopco was just plain wrong, unfortunately. the sooner we accept it, the sooner he can get used to the idea.
>>2733776
It's not much of a sex pillow but I can see why you would think that.
>>2733782
wtf is that thing
>>2733782
what the fuck man
Why are you?
