please remember to take your aspirin
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
this threads narrative is narration and its critical theory is I like that
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
I also like small seedy towns at Christmas time.
I like clouds also they're cool
I found these clouds favorable at -7 ev
Redneck Renaissance
call me JJ
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
It's Great for Entertaining!
This dude with the cheesy pickup line
These are super bland.
This Civil War shipwreck that's just falling apart because no one cares.
>>2728503
thank you
This post that takes umbrage to being a monument to the lacking Freedom to Roam laws in the United States
This southern decaydence
THESE GODDAMN ASIAN LADY BEETLES THAT DESERVE THE REAPING
These sticks that are wet but not completely wet
This business run by Trump supporters
This bamboo forest that some farmer started on accident
>>2728511
i know that feel
This critically theoretical juxtasupposity meat suppliment
This thread is dripping with critical theory.
It's wet with it.
>>2728518
>old reposted shit
>now with borders
Those things are birds and the other things are housing for snow birds
>>2728520
>now
This friend of mine getting drunk in a waterfall
This tree that was marked to be cut but never got cut so now its just got an X on it
This dag
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
This injured deer
This is a different deer fyi.
I'm so glad I'm not a real deer.
>>2728495
more of this
less of all that other garbage.
isi I am disappoint you are better than this.
I'd expected better pics from someone already known on /p/. If you were more straightforward on your editing, I bet there's some good pics amidst this all...
At least this thread is good reminder for anyone should not stay for too long on /p/.
>>2728530
hey man i know it doesn't mean much on an anonymous board, but you've got my +1
These underage smokers loitering
>>2728528
you’re a sick freak
please be in london
>>2728530
>>2728531
You've both totally misunderstood the purpose of this thread. That's okay.
By more straightforward on my editing, I assume you mean on my selection. This is not meant to be a selection, this is a year-dump. Snapshits and all.
This highlight that I blew.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
This sand man getting his tan.
These backlit trees
>>2728535
L O N D O N
O
N
D
O
N
This motion blur.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2728535
A L A B A M A
L
A
B
A
M
A
This creepy playhouse.
This waterfall.
That waterfall.
>>2728540
Color pls
>>2728545
>oh no my blacks really are crushed but everyone knows
>oh i'll just raise the black point and add noise lol
>>2728544
Hey, man, I'm just "trying new things" as you put it to your own defense. :^)
>Think you The Roots?
>You ain't The Roots
>>2728547
That's smoke, not raised blacks. Fog would do the same.
Sorry you're visually inexperienced. :^)
This barn as dilapidated as your logical exclusion of the clear black points on the foreground rocks.
>>2728548
Is this film?
This field where I buried them.
These sea oats.
>>2728554
Easily your best photo.
>>2728554
Oops.
THESE sea oats.
>2728555
The rest of you could learn from this guy on how to deliver zingers.
This arch
These "mountains"
This thing that isnt rothko so stop calling it that
This white balance.
This saturation
This clearly reproduced cannon.
That processing.
This light
This potted plant aerial
This sorghum field
This trail
This photo again
This niece
This hoodlum
>>2728569
Too much free space.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Comment Edited with Afterlight Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1570 Image Height 1570 Scene Capture Type Standard
This staple of celebratory American casual dining
>>2728579
Not enough breathing room. Now the penis on that stump is threatening. gj.
This kindly old construction worker that asked me to snap him.
This silhouette
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
This beach house
That tire
These other sea oats over here also
This nose
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
These grasses in the foreground
This male cow
This primordial Alabamian geology
This revisitation
This swamp grass
>>2728490
lol look at dat fucken fatass pony mang
>>2728612
This hurtful comment hurled with precision
Cool thread.
Why are you reposting so many photos? None of them are good enough to warrant a reupload after the rpt they were originally in.
>>2728716
>RPT
isi doesn't post in RPTs that much
>>2728719
Replace 'rpt' with 'their own threads' then, because I've seen most of these before (and couldn't understand why they had been posted then, let alone again now).
>>2728722
Because this is a photography board. Not /g/.
>>2728716
It's pretty clearly a summary of isi's year in photos.
I found it a pretty comfy thread.
>>2728727
>only positive comment
>white knight irc faggot
Isi plz stop.
I really enjoyed this thread, not even kidding. I'm more of a fan of the landscape and intimate nature photos, but I think you really capture the feeling of the deep south along with that wonderful warm light that comes from hot summer sunsets in the humid climate. Overall, I'd say it looks like a great year.
I viewed, I chuckled, I enjoyed.
>>2728737
I'm not one of isi's «white knights», in fact I am on her shitlist, and I normally find her toxic to the board.
Doesn't mean I can't find the thread comfy.
Certainly better than another gear thread.
>>2728744
whats wrong with the processing of those? they look fine to me
I think a lot of the stuff you post is really boring but there are some really nice ones in between.
I guess you just didn't bother sorting them very harshly and that's fine.
Nice thread.
>>2728490
Did look.
Did lol at injured deer.
Did enjoy some pics.
Did appreciate the concept of photos being posted in /p/.
Would browse again.
+100 for photos.
>>2728498
I can't believe there aren't any comments on this one yet, this is wonderful. Those mirrored poses.
>>2728915
>Nah, you've probably made far more snapshots than the ones you posted. It ain't got to be a selective series, there can be a sense a wholeness in a year dump a well.
I was posting everything of the year that's made it to PC import, which is my second step for currating my stuff- a lot of stuff never leaves my SD card except as a jpeg through wifi to instagram. Those snapshits are excluded, the ones in this thread are ones I care to hold onto in a more tangible form, and care to back up.
Generally speaking, I'm at odds with the self-masturbatory over-curation that so many of you on this board tout these days, a misguided notion that stems from peoples ideals and aspirations to be artists. That's advice that's applicable when you're assembling a purpose-built portfolio, or when your *intent* is to draw full narrative connections. It's needless when the only intent of a showing is "this is what I've done this year, have a look-see"
I know what my strongest shots are. The fact that all of my shots are not to the same level does not shame me into hiding the rest of my work, through which common narratives and visual themes are in fact present, whether you recognize that without a hamfisted theological notation or not.
Snapshot is not a negation. Snapshot is an aesthetic. And your own photos tend to fall to it as well, from what I've seen, exoticism of the location and folks to the typical userbase of this site aside.
Is this thread assembled? Not in the slightest. Is everything here posted arbitrary? I'd say the repetition of certain visual cues says no.
I apologize for triggering you by posting a great deal of photos, rather than a single photo of natives repeatedly. :3
>>2728741
>but I think you really capture the feeling of the deep south along with that wonderful warm light that comes from hot summer sunsets in the humid climate
thanks, yo. particularly the first part.
The comfy weirdness of rural areas of states like mine is a huge part of what my "snapshots" are meant to portray.
I feel that approaching many of these subjects from a more clinical approach (i.e. the way I shoot most of the landscapes) would only take away from the colloquial charm (or creepiness :^)) of their subjects.
>>2728929
>I know what my strongest shots are.
When are you going to show us those?
Fun context to the waterfall shots earlier. Those huge boulders in the foreground are actually quite small.
Feat. hiking buddies, friend with freshly sprained ankle
>>2728933
You can view my website and analyze its (also highly non-structural) layouts to figure that out.
Or you can just fuck off. :^)
This abandoned mansion that once belonged to white slaveowners, later to be owned by a freedman doctor, abandoned in the early 20th century.
This body of water that is neither the East Coast or West Coast
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2728936
>Or you can just fuck off.
Jimmies confirmed rustled.
>>2728941
good post anon you sure showed le me.me
This African American confederate
This eye level shot of a bird thats 1 meter tall according to poopco
These doors that just drive autists bonkers with their lack of perfect geometry
This smokey national forest, one of four that Alabama is home to
This /p/otato
This bike trail and that tree
This American feeling all alone in a world full of Asian immigrants
These unpaved county roads
>>2728945
>good post anon you sure showed le me.me
Now do you realize how worthless all of your own smugface putdowns are?
>>2728929
Not triggered, no need to apologize. It was more like a suggestion than a critique, t b h.
Selecting some pics and deleting is a part of any process, and even some purpose-buit portfolio, like you said; what I meant by being is straightforward, tho, is much more close to act of photographing, while you're doing it.
I think when you're out taking pics, there's the first approach, the acclimatization, then the apex (best shots), and then the settling (usually it is the first editing). Sometimes this all has to happen on same day, sometimes this done over a year. The sense of wholeness is to present this in a way that the viewer catches this motion, and more importantly, the breath of the apex.
For instance, there's a set of pics you posted here that's fairly decent, but there's one pic that is outstanding better than the other. So, in this case, some sense can be contrived just by ordering those presented pics. Same could be done, I guess, about the well colored pics such as the sorgus, the beaches...
I've noticed that this kind of notion helps me getting it clear when taking pics of places that I'm somewhat used to. To notice something that is outstanding on a place, how it appears on my pics on review, it helps me maintain a mental record of what I've shot; and to develop a better spatial notion of the place. Anyways, guess this happens to anyone, to some degree. I hope made myself clear, it's not about being artsy nor imputing some narration, but a practical means I found to get better when technical/aesthetics questions are getting tiresome.
> And your own photos tend to fall to it as well, from what I've seen, exoticism of the location and folks to the typical userbase of this site aside.
Snapshots are not really my aesthetics. I draw much from Miguel Rio Branco; that is, more on sequences than on single pics. Anyway, even Salgado and local photogs have pointed out the exoticism. So I guess it's not unexpected that /p/s also points this out.
>>2728945
I remember the last time you posted this one.
I told you I really liked it and you told me that was because I'm stupid. I still like the pic even if my opinion of the guy who took it has changed.
:^)
>>2728956
Why would anyone decide to photograph this? Were you testing the settings of your camera and just point it in a random direction?
>Selecting some pics and deleting is a part of any process, and even some purpose-buit portfolio, like you said
Sharing your contact sheets with your friends and fellow photographers, or even the public in many cases, is also a part of any process. I don't shoot film these days, though. ;)
>what I meant by being is straightforward, tho, is much more close to act of photographing, while you're doing it.
I'm an incredibly slow shooter, I'm 100% aware of what I'm doing dawg. I'm also 100% against the "pick a style and stick with it" advice that's so often doled out. That's marketing advice, not advice for personal artistic development. If you don't have phases, and go back and revisit ideas, you're most likely stagnant.
>I think when you're out taking pics, there's the first approach, the acclimatization, then the apex (best shots), and then the settling (usually it is the first editing). Sometimes this all has to happen on same day, sometimes this done over a year. The sense of wholeness is to present this in a way that the viewer catches this motion, and more importantly, the breath of the apex.
I think you've drowned in the deep-end of the over-intellectualization of the arts, a stance that will, in times future, be looked upon much the same as we now view the incredible pretense of many early pictorialists. It's incredibly "like what I like or leave." The truth is, the contrivance of art is a modern development, and one that is likely to change drastically with the democratization of technology and appelation to new ideals. You're pandering to an audience from the past, and idealizing their pretenses.
>So, in this case, some sense can be contrived just by ordering those presented pics. Same could be done, I guess, about the well colored pics such as the sorgus, the beaches...
But that's not the purpose of this thread. This is a dump. Stand-out shots go to my website's homepage, larger, looser selections are divided simply between black and white and color.
1/2
>>2728961
2/2
That's not to say I don't work in sets ever, I simply choose not to show them that way. The way I work is not typically about shot to shot narrative (except when I'm simply documenting something, like that structure fire) and so there's little need to organize them into sets, except by loose proximity association within a greater grid. When I shoot sets, they're typically for a person, and that person is getting them in a physical form.
>I've noticed that this kind of notion helps me getting it clear when taking pics of places that I'm somewhat used to. To notice something that is outstanding on a place, how it appears on my pics on review, it helps me maintain a mental record of what I've shot; and to develop a better spatial notion of the place. Anyways, guess this happens to anyone, to some degree. I hope made myself clear, it's not about being artsy nor imputing some narration, but a practical means I found to get better when technical/aesthetics questions are getting tiresome.
I can't recall ever having tired from technical/aesthetic questions when shooting.
I do not, however, always shoot from a technical, or traditional aesthetic mindset. The dichotomy between the two is almost assuredly why you're getting the impression you are; snapshot aesthetic, wabi-sabi bullshit, whatever you want to call it, is equal in my heart to technical and geometric exercise.
>Snapshots are not really my aesthetics. I draw much from Miguel Rio Branco; that is, more on sequences than on single pics.
Snapshots and sequential order aren't exclusive of one another. Your intent might not be a snapshot aesthetic, but my perception (and I'm certain I'm not alone in this) is very "guy in a photogenic location points a camera at things", particularly in shots such as the one of the young boys where you've struggled with focus.
That's not a bad thing. But I assume your focus struggles are much less intentional than, say, this crop. Not particularly technical.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2728968
golly this ones mad
>>2728983
He's got a point. Of the entire thread, that one is clearly the worst. What exactly what did you think you were shooting here?
This time when an old drug dealer's children invaded my car.
His shirt says "Just give me the snacks and no one gets hurt", btw.
>>2728988
Oops x2
This intensely vintage game of Life
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
These pomeranians
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
This surprised raccoon
>>2728971
> I think you've drowned in the deep-end of the over-intellectualization of the arts, a stance that will, in times future, be looked upon much the same as we now view the incredible pretense of many early pictorialists.
What I described is simply a summarization of what Salgado has told of his way of working, in constrast to l'instant décisif of Bresson. It' a very practical approach. If you had taken some thought instead of arguing, you'd notice it. But sure, I'm drowned in the deep end...
I've thought of transcribing and translating to english Salgado's comments on the matter, for which they're very insightful; I'll do it when I'm vacant.
>The dichotomy between the two is almost assuredly why you're getting the impression you are; snapshot aesthetic, wabi-sabi bullshit, whatever you want to call it, is equal in my heart to technical and geometric exercise.
You're reading too much into it, never said a word on dichotomy, and if the backslash points out anything, is that is close to the same thing.
>I'm an incredibly slow shooter, I'm 100% aware of what I'm doing dawg. I'm also 100% against the "pick a style and stick with it" advice that's so often doled out. That's marketing advice, not advice for personal artistic development. If you don't have phases, and go back and revisit ideas, you're most likely stagnant.
>Snapshots and sequential order aren't exclusive of one another.
You're preaching on something nobody asked...
> "guy in a photogenic location points a camera at things"
Kek
I've took two friends there once, and one of them said - "This look much like an old backyard..."
This dinosaur
>>2729007
>I've thought of transcribing and translating to english Salgado's comments on the matter, for which they're very insightful; I'll do it when I'm vacant.
>But sure, I'm drowned in the deep end...
:^)
>You're reading too much into it
Nah, I'm just preempting certain common mentalities in this community. :)
I like to talk about art. I don't like to masturbate to the names of the artists I've personally deified in a rarified bid to convince people I'm an artiste and that my learning represents any true merit.
I also like to talk shit. :^)
These snowbirds discussing topics like the weather with disillusion.
This retired self-professed writer who randomly struck up a conversation about Bernie Sanders and DemocracyNow.org
>>2729015
>I also like to talk shit. :^)
I had been warned, still I fell for the bait...
This tiny love
>>2729023
c'est la vie en infamie :^)
>can chewing intensifies
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2728493
huh, my town looks exactly like that at night except the road isn't as wide. don't have any pics though.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2729027
quit photography desu
>>2729032
start taking photographs, like...
This star flare and those saw palmettos
This bamboo swamp
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2729035
>star flare
Based 25mm Voigtlander?
>>2729037
Almost all of these are that lens.
That bamboo swamp again
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
This MossyOak
Realtree is for fags
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
This monument to poor taste that has every right to exist because this is America.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
This authentic Alabama driving simulator
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
This picture of just sticks
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
This cotton field
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
This ominously lit hotel
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
These pleasant colors
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
This mountain face
This Leica glow
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
And last but not least, one of the first photos I took this year. My grandmother watching the gravediggers arrive the day before my grandfather's funeral.
>>2729056
>And last
Thank fuck.
>>2729061
You've taken so many lovely photos this year, anon. :)
>>2729069
Thanks babe :)
I really like your shots isi. Out of curiosity, what's your setup?
here's a snapshit I took of a basketball game. sports photography is apparently fucking hard, especially in dim light with a kit lens that was not made for instant focusing
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D7100 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Photographer Alon Shechter Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 788 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 210 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:25 22:51:49 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Fine Weather Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 140.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2729076
Fuji X-Pro1 (many shots are actually an X-E1, which I used to use, these cameras are 90% the same, 100% the same IQ)
Lenses are:
Fuji 18-55 f2.8-4
Voigtlander 25mm f4 (vast majority are this)
Industar 69 28mm f2.8
Yashica ML 50mm f1.9
Leitz Elmar 90mm f4 (these are the obvious tele shots)
Bower 8mm f2.8 (the extremely wide shots)
Modern sports photography aesthetics are definitely a bit gear-based and hard. You're at a real disadvantage without good tracking and reach, but there's a lot that can be done with the most limited of equipment with the right technique. Focusing ahead of the action and such.
That's not a bad shot all things considered. It might not be a technical showcase, but it's a good moment, good expression. A higher crop would have helped, but that's not too important. The red player is clearly the principle subject.
>>2729061
>filter
Flashing my nieces is fun.
You're a fucking pervert.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2729181
This mad creepy doll
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2729182
No, seriously, I don't know how they're not terrified of it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2729183
You think you seen cute?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2729184
Wait, stop...you ain't. You ain't seen cute.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2729187
This.
This's cute.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2729188
checked.
you still sporting your X-E1 dressed as a Leica? What'd you think of the X-Pro 2 specs/rumors?
This is worse than sugars thread.
Isi confirmed for worst trip on board.
>>2729352
Naw, I snagged an xpro1 a few months ago, sold a friend my xe1
>>2729358
>that vented lens hood
hnnnggg
What lens is that / what lenses do you use?
>>2729365
That's a Voigtlander 25mm f4
other than that I use a Bower 8mm, a Leica 90mm, and a Yashica 50mm. All manual glass atm, prolly gonna pick up a 35 f2 some time next year though.
>>2729358
>removed the grip
lol.
what a hipster.
tacky as always, unartistic and themeless. keep on failing.
>>2729358
>artificially ageing a camera
>posting this photo over and over again
You're possibly the worst gearfag on /p/.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1417 Image Height 987 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:03:10 10:19:18 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 640 Image Height 446
This is all fucking awful.
And you give other people shit? You're a joke.
>>2729577
>You're possibly the worst gearfag on /p/.
>calling someone a gearfag in a thread with over 100 photos
lol thats not how it works
>>2729623
>Lol and I thought my Leica was fake :^)
And that went riiiight over your head.
>>2729629
Maybe your delivery was awful, like the desirability of a Leica M6.
>>2729630
As I thought, you haven't got a clue.
Don't stop, we're over half way to the bump limit.
>>2729633
Derailing a photo thread with hatred... You are the problem.
>filter
>>2729577
Have you any pictures with it, m8, or are you waiting for the film to be developed?
I am just wondering familie to be quite honest
>>2729639
>not getting the reference
This is fucking pitiful.
>>2729647
...where exactly was I trying to deny that? Moron.
>>2729649
I think you forgot to read the OP post
A thread with more photo posts than non-photo posts.
Are you the prophet?
This fence while I was driving
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2728490
Thoughts?
>>2729729
I was shooting for flat as hell, but yours is great as well. Also closer to the original. :D
>>2728490
That pony has the derpiest eyes.
>>2729734
Yeah I went for realistic lighting as far as guessing what someone else saw can work.
I've noticed you tend to go for low contrast in bw, how come?
Love the entire thread in any case, you've an eye for good subjects, colour composition and image composition in general, really gud stuff 2 look @ m8 etc.
>>2729785
I'd say it's more accurate that I always go either really high or really low contrast, haha. Some stuff might as well be just blacks and whites, too.
In a lot of the cases I assume you're talking about (waterfall for example), its actually high contrast editing on a low contrast scene due to particulates in the air.
Thanks for the comments!
>>2729753
grab you an XE1 for $150-200, if you're not a lil bitch about a lil low light EVF lag, they're fantastic :D
>>2729772
Yeah ever since someone first pointed out his derp, my eyes go straight to it
>>2729734
Why do you like flat? It doesn't look attractive at all for b&w imo
>>2729815
I like the way uber-flat shots respond to pearl paper sometimes.
I fucked around with a new 35mm lens I got for Christmas , no keepers but whatever.
First time using a not zoom lens, I suck with it and I had to crop half of these
1/5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 914 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 52 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5443 Image Height 3298 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:26 20:50:48 Exposure Time 1/5 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 1/3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 606 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2729899
2/5
Extreme crop but a 35mm isnt for animals I guess
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 914 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 52 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3928 Image Height 2619 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:26 20:52:28 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 6400 Lens Aperture f/1.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2729900
3/5
Only one I rather like
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 914 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 52 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:26 20:52:07 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/3.2 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/3.2 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2729902
4/5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 914 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 52 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4505 Image Height 3003 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:26 20:51:12 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/9.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/9.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2729903
5/5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 914 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 52 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4000 Image Height 6000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:26 20:51:48 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/7.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 667 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7M2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 70 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:12:27 08:18:52 Exposure Time 1/90 sec F-Number f/19.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/19.0 Brightness 9.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 70.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2728540
Oh shit , someone else from /p/ is in the orange beach area ?
spoopy
>>2729914
Are you the reason I always have to get my phone unbanned before I can post from down there? :^)
Yeah, haha. I'm actually from the Blackbelt, but we've got a house in Fort Morgan and I spend a lot of time down there.
>>2729921
Cool, I recognized a lot of your shit
Used to live in Gulf Shores but moved away for Uni, so Im just here for holidays and summer now
>>2729933
This look familiar? :D
(I spy the same structure in one of your shots)
>>2729942
Goddamn, third time this thread.
>>2728583
looks like a guy I used to ride a trash truck with
>>2730379
Y'know that might actually be what he was. I was trying to find a spot for a deadpan shot of some buildings when he approached me, didn't see where exactly he came from, just assumed construction from the vest. It was around garbage pick-up time though, in retrospect.
Super friendly dude, and he approached me because my shiny old X-E1 caught his eye and he wanted to 'break my camera with his good looks,' pretty sure he thought it was film.
Old people love some Fujis desu.
>>2728570
>tfw plant has inbuilt unsharp mask
>>2728998
bls convince taytay 2 pose 4 artful nudes
>>2728971
>The truth is, the contrivance of art is a modern development, and one that is likely to change drastically with the democratization of technology and appelation to new ideals.
You seem to hint at some kind of point about a post-postmodern notion on art. Care to say more words?
I'm genuinely interested.
>>2730537
she's a high school dropout who smokes weed like i suck dick. don't expect an academic treatise.
>>2730601
She's not a high school drop out. She's an art college dropout.
Which perfectly correlates to what she expressed.
isi remember when you pretended to buy a new leica because someone called you out on being unemployed and spending all your time on /p/?
>>2730879
Hahahaha, classic isi.
I had almost forgot.
She still bleats about her leitz lens, the 90mm elmar, which can be found for about $100, because its awful.
Pretty sure she has some sort of narcissistic mental health issues that she refuses to address.
>>2730614
*high school and art school dropout
>>2730881
what's even funnier is how she pretends like it was a joke all along. mommy probably told her she was going to get it eventually and now that it's been like 6 months isi has stopped trying to convince us that was real. oh scrubs when will you learn :^)
>>2730881
>the 90mm elmar, which can be found for about $100, because its awful.
By what measures? I have one of these and, though slow, it's a very good lens.
Its low price is attributed to the fact that it's a rangefinder tele. Supply outweighs demand.
>friends
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2015:12:28 12:29:29 Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
>>2730911
Someone's upset she's smart enough to hide her friends list from creeps.
>>2730911
would smash and take photos with
>>2730911
Damn, isi is far uglier than I imagined. I guess that face suits her personality well.
>>2730947
Shes only done that since rickygate.
Such guilt issues.
>>2730911
shes a grill ?
>>2730967
What are YOU talking about? I've had my friends list hidden on Facebook since like 2010.
It's called "I don't like being friended by random friend of a friend dudes who wanna ask me whats up every morning at 3am."
>>2730967
"rickygate" as you call it? That's only a thing, to exactly 2 people. The rest of us are just sitting here laughing at you. Everyone knows what really happened, everybody moved on a year ago, and nobody cares. Nobody is living in fear. Nobody is holding judgement, or grudges, except for one insane guy, and his psychotic friend.
>>2731186
That's true.
The people who drove him to live like that just moved on after patting each other on the back. I wonder who's next.
>>2731230
Hopefully Moopco.
May all the hjira of India stab and rob him to death forever.
>>2731230
>drove him to live like that
Hahaha Haha hahah!
>>2729790
I noticed the EVF also just stops working in really bright daylight. Did you have the same problem sometimes?
>>2731273
It's most likely stray light stopping the eye-detect from registering if you're not using it in evf-only mode.
I do find EVFs hard to use in bright daylight though simply because of my eyes being adjusted to incredibly different light sources.
>>2731239
Ricky not moopco
isi how are you spending hours of christmas eve and christmas day arguing with strangers on here? dont you have family or friends or anything more important than this?
>>2731585
She's Jewish.
this rain
This fakery
>>2731591
that doesnt really explain having days off of work and using them to argue with idiots on here.
>>2732369
She's wealthy and doesn't work
>>2732410
Her daddy is wealthy.
>>2732481
I think it's her mums side
>>2732625
Prostitution doesn't pay that well anon
>>2731318
Yes. Ricky. Not Moopco.
Ricky was an attention whore piece of shit looking to play the sad victim. his friends who cared about him bit the bait too hard and believed him in his "woe is me I should kill myself" act, and tried to save his life. And just like any child called out on their bluff, he got mad, and go figure, played the victim. Everyone else saw what was happening, and moved on, because it's very embarrassing for him, but he's SO embarrassed by it that he can't let it go or move on. The story changes and grows, and has gone from "Police knocked on the door to make sure I hadn't killed myself" to "My door got kicked in by an armed S.W.A.T. unit and I was thrown to the floor. I couldn't go home, and have spent the rest of my life on the run from the law"
If you don't want your friends to try to stop you from killing yourself, then don't tell people your'e killing yourself. It's very simple. And moop, and "anon" bringing it up all the time as a reason to hate the people from irc, or isi specifically (who wasn't involved) is fucking hysterical.
>>2732629
Post the logs.
>>2728490
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer J Image-Specific Properties:
>>2732629
Hi cc_ito
