Need help!!
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
Ok so trying to sort out this image to go onto canvas, loses all detail, by any chance can some one do me a huge favor fix the pic resolution so it can go onto a decent 50cm wide canvas, have done all the editing from my phone.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 696 Image Height 387
Here's the original
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 953 Image Height 536
Let me see if I'm understanding you. You have a .5 megapixel original and want to print onto a large canvas?
Was taken from a 13mp phone, it's not hard to do, just don't have my computer here.
Just noticed I said 50cm.. Sorry no way I'm going that big, it's going On to a 30x20 cm at least as that's the smallest size I can go
uprezzed
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 696 Image Height 387 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:23 07:27:48 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1417 Image Height 788
>>2727522
Thank you very much
>>2727524
No problem. But in the future you really need to aim to have more native resolution. This really isn't enough for a quality print. Though it came from a native 13mp camera, it got cropped/resized to half a megapickle. Thats not even enough rez for a wallet sized photo.
>>2727513
this is literally not possible
It's like having enough dough for 5 good bread rolls, and saying "I want 50 bread rolls!". Either you get 50 extremely shit quality bread rolls or 5 good ones. Either way you're not getting what you want and you don't understand why.
What I'm saying is you need to post the original sized image, which should be around 4000x3000 or something. Resizing a very small image into a very big image doesn't mean it will instantly be better quality, it just means you blow it up larger and it will be very blurry and poor quality.
>>2727526
I'm assuming OP cropped the 13mp original, so likely having the original won't be of much use. Due to the smearing effect he applied to the crop, it will probably make someone a nice christmas present. If he makes someone happy with it, then so be it.
>>2727513
>have done all the editing from my phone
when did this trend start? It's everywhere
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 960 Image Height 536
>>2727525
It still looks like crap though, put a median filter on it if you wanna have a decent result
Took this pic on the same phone, they have been put on Facebook, guessing that's my problem? Facebook automatically resizes pics? I need to get onto my old phone if that's the case
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 528 Image Height 960
