![V600-(550-x-310)[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/NuyQlgO.png "V600-(550-x-310)[1].png")
just copped one of these for 35mm film scanning
did i goof?
inb4 dslr scanner butthole
>>2723354
Yeah, a little bit. You can't come close to getting all the detail out of film with a consumer level flatbed, and with 35mm, you sort of want as much detail as you can get, but you'll be okay if you don't expect magic.
You should have gotten a PlusTec 8100 for 35mm, but oh well.
>>2723368
word. thanks dawg
>>2723359
being inb4 does not make your scans any better.
>>2723390
u saying i goofed?
>>2723401
When you use phrases like "copped" and "goofed", it just makes me want to punch you in your face with a hammer until it looks like mince, rather than help you.
Look at any of the other film scanning threads currently active, you fucking retard.
>>2723410
holy fuck chill LOL
>>2723410
lol hommie i realize you prob got some presonal issues goin on but treyna call out some random dude on an anonymous image board aint halpin nothin
if you have a dslr, you could do much better buying a macro lens + slide duplicator. consumer flatbeds are not good for scanning anything smaller than 6x6.
hidden thread, downvote, sage
>>2723410
retard gtfo /p/ we don't need your cancer around here
