Guys, how to make this? I get it's a long expo but what else?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer Julieanne Kost Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 533
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 533
>>2722578
have you tried panning the camera?
Looks like Photoshop to me
>>2722580
I did, but what direction? Is it around the tree? It looks like the central point is somewhere on the left but also the the tree in the middle is not moving...
Just a guess but put a boom arm on your tripod like pic related.
Then maybe a long exposure, but my guess is burst fire as your pan and image stack using the non moving tree for alignment.
I'm gonna go fucks around with it and see what I come up with.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2722594
look at the leaves on the ground in the first picture. I think thats the direction he panned the camera (backwards clockwise)
>>2722610
Butt the three in the middle, it looks spinning
>>2722578
If this photo were done in camera (it isn't) the camera would be stationary, while the entire scene rotated quickly around a fixed point off the left side of the frame, and as far away as the white tree. This is 100% photoshop. Not done in camera.
If the camera were moving to cause this look, you wouldn't see the "close half" of the blur, because it would be behind the POV of the camera.
Or better yet, as you are driving past, hold one tree center frame while having a longish shutter speed, as you rotate and move horizontally it will give a turning look to your shot.
Some other nice stuff on her? website.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
That's not really a long exposure in conventional way. I think it's a large stack of short exposures merged together. Chris Friel got ahead in this technique.
My friend Dan was doing something similar. I never did bother to ask him about it though...
http://www.danvojtech.cz/#/en/personal/personal41
>>2722623
Yes, panning with the center tree as you go by would work.
Just tried this technique.
C&C?
Photo straight OOC
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D600 Camera Software GIMP 2.6.10 Photographer James Dannelly Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 14292 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 50 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:15 13:16:16 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/2 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Shutter Priority Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 0 Image Height 0 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown Image Quality FINE White Balance AUTO1 Focus Mode AF-A Flash Compensation 0.0 EV Flash Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV AE Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV Lens Type Nikon D Series Lens Range 50.0 mm; f/1.4 Shooting/Bracketing Mode Single Frame/Off Noise Reduction OFF Camera Actuations 6331
>>2722637
except his photos are much better
multiple exposures/layers in photoshop /thread
>>2722641
James Dannelly, you are faggot
>>2722650
I'm not Czech bro, sorry. I worked a few RB events with him is all. Dude has the most ideas of anyone i've ever met!
