I'll start since this place is filled with shitty photos.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
lol k
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>2721348
why did you focus on the one thats a man
you a fag son
>>2721348
resize your photos you stupid cunt
i wasted 4 megabytes loading this piece of shit nothing photo
>>2721353
keks for days
>>2721354
no u
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
why are you so into ugly women?? my fucking eyes
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
thread hidden, I'm disgusted at both your subjects and your photography.
Like some bad bath salts.
Your photos suck
>>2721344
Oh look it's capsoc again
I suggest you either edit better or take better photos. Preferably both.
Look at biff's photos for example
do you not know how to stop down your aperture?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>2721377
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model SLT-A99V Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:06:30 07:04:31 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Brightness -27/320 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Flash Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Soft Saturation Low Sharpness Hard
>>2721380
1) These are taken at the Hudson Terrace; one of NYC's hottest night clubs. Anyone here thinking these are "bad photos" obviously has no real life experience working in cramped, dangerous-for-cameras, high action and low light environments, the most difficult of all to shoot. Many of these shots require me having to perform them with people dancing and falling on you.
Compare to any other nightlife photographer and you'll see that they can't keep up.
I pick my crops based on how best to fuck with your head.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model SLT-A99V Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:06:30 07:03:22 Exposure Time 1/45 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Brightness -59/640 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Flash Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Soft Saturation Low Sharpness Hard
>>2721377
Kek m8 enjoy your softness in partial zero light
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
One of two floors, any spots with no people are either chairs or a table, filthy rich demographic
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>2721385
-This is not edited, just brightened to show size of crowd.
>>2721382
So you didn't fuck up the exposure in a shit environment. Great. Why does that make them good photos? Technique is step 1 of a LOT of steps towards a good photo. Your subject matter is boring and disconnected, your environments are not exciting, your shots are gross, pandering, poorly lit, and contain absolutely nothing of any interest to anyone. They're just people we don't know or care about, doing nothing interesting, in places we don't give a shit about.
it's super hard to paint a painting in the dark with your hands tied behind your back, but it doesn't mean that whatever you come up with at the end is a good painting.
>>2721385
There is nothing of any interest in that entire frame. At all. Nobody cares about any of this. Most of these wouldn't even be interesting on the website for this sleazy club itself, let alone stand on their own as artistic achievements.
You need to re-name your thread from "good photography" to "Sometimes I don't fuck up the exposure too bad" because while there may be no difference to you, there is, in fact, a difference.
>>2721382
> compare to any other nightlife photographers and you'll see they can't keep up.
Nigga it's good to have ego but this is retardation.
Read >>2721376
Biff is at least 7 to 8 billion times better than you.
> job in NYC hottest clubs
The fuck? You feel proud about that? You literally have no interest in photography do you? you just learnt how to use Lr on YouTube and shit that out every time you take these snapshits.
Mate improve. You take basic photos and it's not hard to improve club managers or whatever. You're proud of shite because the general folks do not because you think they look good; otherwise you'd be taking better photos.
Now take these snapshite and post em on Facebook and Instagram and the shit photography thread that some faggot made. Not here as a separate thread. And grow the fuck up cunt.
>>2721396
> it's not hard to improve.
Impress*
>>2721390
>Subject matter is boring and disconnected
Okay so I guess I'll just whip out my pocket studio and whistle for my oompa loompas to build me a set on the dancefloor why don't I?
> your shots are gross, pandering, poorly lit
My Kanye meter is off the charts!
>contain absolutely nothing of any interest to anyone
And yet the women can't seem to stop asking clubs to have me as the photographer since they all love seeing me at the club, knowing I'm as much fun as my photos are good
>You feel proud about that? You literally have no interest in photography do you? you just learnt how to use Lr on YouTube and shit that out every time you take these snapshits.
Nah, I just choose to shit on you in silence
There's no other way to say it, I'm a creative genius.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
Inside the F1 GTR; the only one in existence, taken out of McLaren about five times in it's history, according to their marketing director over dinner that night
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
Bowers and Wilkins provided an absolutely sublime sonic experience for McLaren's newer cars; after falling in love with their stereos, I made it a priority to experience what B&W could do in a car with no holds on engineering abilities, and they delivered.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
It was weird being given access to a car that celebrities couldn't even get the doors open to, and hearing the men who designed her describing the sensation of her sister cars on the track...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
Here she is in full glory
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
Unfortunately this beauty was nothing more than a perfect shell, made of balsa wood and dreams.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
...and suddenly, silence. AND HEEEEEERE WE GOOOOOOOOO!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 55 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4000 Image Height 6000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:12:14 19:45:58 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 8000 Lens Aperture f/1.8 Brightness -4.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 1500 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
Nissan GTR Nismo
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
capsoc, pls go
I was promised good photography and got absolute shit, I want my time back.
>>2721407
i cant fucking believe it. It's hard to be that bad at car photos.
have you tried landscapes? post your landscapes. I wanna see some.
>>2721407
why is that so noisy? you find that photo acceptable?
>>2721344
good lord youre a creep
Kek noobs, good night :D
Last minute bump before bed <3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
oh god, it's this guy again
You have reaffirmed my belief that people who go to car shows are vapid, tasteless, materialistic philistines.
Well done on making me dislike you through your terrible photos, I'm usually a very tolerant person.
Holy fucking shit resize your photos you dong
I know you think you're super edgy for annoying a grand total of maybe 10 people, but you aren't. We are laughing, but not because you're funny or trolling us, a lot of these plain suck.
We're glad you get entry into all these nice clubs and have all these friends to take photos of. Just take actually good photos so you won't have to manufacture visual interest in post.
For what it's worth, I've never been one of the anons to hate on you, I actually like some of your shots
>>2721404
>that hand
Would be a good image for a anti-smoking commercial.
>good photography
>CapSoc
>this place is filled with shitty photos
>posts nothing but shitty photos
You're delusional, m8. Listen to the peeps here when they say your stuff is nothing worth looking at.
>>2721483
>6000x4000px
>chrome abs out of the ass
>those aps-c, high ISO, 24 MEGA PICKLES!!1!11?! details
This D3200 sure makes you a pro photographer.
Can someone please delete this shitty thread and ban the idiot who made it.
>>2721353
>one
they're all men imo
so this faggot besides being a degenerate that faps to literal old busted traps, is a shitty as fuck photog. holy fuck.
nigga ur photos suck
I don't lurk here much so haven't seen this guy before, is he a troll?
Capsoc, both your photos and your attitude are tragic.
>>2721565
It's either him(he DOES think he's much better than he actually is) or a troll caricaturing him.
>>2721348
Is there some theme other than "look at these bimbos and a tranny"?
>>2721411
I'm just not into nightclubs and cars but at least you are better than that autist, isi
>>2721404
>Okay so I guess I'll just whip out my pocket studio and whistle for my oompa loompas to build me a set on the dancefloor why don't I?
Where did someone tell you that the only place to take good photography was inside a shitty club? Go outside during nice hours with a nice looking model. Learn to compose, learn to pose, and create an actually nice photo, THEN, feel confident enough to start a "Is this good photography?" thread.
"GOOD FOOD CONVENTION!!"
go inside
nothing to eat but dry rasin bran and pickles
WELL WHAT THE FUCK IT'S ALL I HAD YOU MORONS LET ME JUST GROW A WHOLE BUNCH OF OTHER FOOD WHAT DO YOU FUCKING EXPECT.
We expected good food, because you told us there would be good food.
>>2721405
completely fucking shit wasted photo of an amazing car. Why would you even take this photo, and then why would you even post it in a "good photos" thread? It's one of the most interesting cars in the world, and you took a HORRIBLY lit HORRIBLY framed HORRIBLY exposed photo of a tiny part of the dashboard, leaving EVERYTHING else blurry and shitty, and then slapped a FAT ASS watermark on it.
>>2721406
What is this photo even of. Nearly half the entire frame is blocked, and the other half is bits of other things that aren't in the frame.
>>2721538
A99 24MP full frame peasant.
Get it right.
Winning so hard you guys literally got me a date today :) We were laughing at Starbucks at this thread you guys played right into my hands.
Thanks /p/ :3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>2721796
Literally every girl in your photos looks like a tranny. Don't feel proud to date a ladyboy lad.
welp, this is what this guy looks like
>>2721796
We don't care bro. What is this to an anon with a girlfriend, wife, or sex slave? All we care about is your photos, which are mediocre at best. If the girl is halfway attractive, have her model for you. Then maybe you can get a decent pic. And we can judge her too since apparently she's relevant to the thread.
>>2721817
>>2721824
Even she looks like a transsexual prostitute.
Capsoc post more of pic related
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3601 Image Height 6000 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2721344
op non ur images r sharp redo plz
>>2721348
what are their instagram names?
>obviously has no real life experience working in cramped, dangerous-for-cameras, high action and low light environments, the most difficult of all to shoot.
I have experience in this and these photos are still bad.
night club photography is by far the easiest to do.
>women literally beg you to take their photo
>angle dslr with hotshoe mounted flash directed at said women
>blast away
>>2721404
Seriously, Biff is a lot better than you. Grow up, you're a kid. Take better photos
>>2721382
your watermark makes me want to shoot up a school.
>>2721795
>A99
I feel sorry for that camera.
>Tripfag
>Inflated ego
>Full res pics
>Extremely ugly women
>Watermark on snapshits
This whole thread has got to be bait. I refuse to believe someone this fucking bad at photography has this big of an ego. Do us all a huge favour and fucking kill yourself, please.
>>2721600
No, isi is way better than this trash.
>>2722343
I agree. As much as I hate the cunt, isi does have some decent shots on her website.
>>2722348
you know she stole all the decent shots from tumblr right?
>>2722352
Yes of course she did ;)
How can you fags all fall for such an obvious troll
>>2721404
400 year old dragon hands. cigar blocking face. hairy breasts. large colored watermark.
>Based
>>2721344
I seriously hope this is a troll.
>>2721349
>>2721381
>>2721404
These are the only ones that have ANY merit to them. The rest is complete and utter trash. Snapshits the lot of them. My mum could have taken those. And I mean that quite literally.
Of course, if you're hired as a party photog, the client demands photos like >>2721348 or >>2721369. That doesn't make them in any form or sense good though.
Oh and the pp is not really good either.
>>2721600
No. Absolutely not. She's posted photos that have print quality. Not in the slightest comparable.
>>2721404
>MRW I'm brand new to photography and wasn't prepared to see someone defend work this bad.
>>2722509
> MRW
Never ever use that here. Imgur, tumblr, reddit and 9fag, are not welcome.
>>2722574
>caring this hard
