Hi, I'm sorry but I couldn't see a stupid question thread.
Does a lens with image stabilisation work on a camera that doesn't have it?
Does the camera stabilisation refer to the sensor's stability?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop 7.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2010:06:05 23:34:08 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 550 Image Height 553
camera good stabilized
hands
>Does a lens with image stabilisation work on a camera that doesn't have it?
Yes. That's the point of having it in the first place.
>Does the camera stabilisation refer to the sensor's stability?
Yes. It's easier to shift the sensor that, say, the whole body.
>>2719494
You can also manually stabilize a camera by holding it steady.
>>2719935
you needed a flash here
why is "format" written on the camera body ?
>>2719945
no, he needed to over expose the shot you spaz. anyone who actually thinks outdoor portraits with a flash look good are retarded, i have never seen one good result.
>>2722389
>I have never noticed the flash used on the good ones I've seen where they used one, so I think it hasn't been used
Translated by a 4chan user
>>2722392
yeah it looks fucking amazing doesn't it.
it completely isolates the person from the rest of the image making it look like they've been shopped in, far better to just use exposure compensation then a slight shadow repair on the person if needed.
show me a single result you would consider good, i can't even find one. can find hundreds of decent normal portraits, that's because they're better.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 7D Photographer Mike Criss Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2011:07:17 07:36:49 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/9.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/9.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 3.74 m Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2722365
So you can format you card. Hold it down together with the other format button (the bin or play button).
>>2722394
You realise you can control your flashes output so you can light them as little or as much as you want?
You aren't limited to what your ettl flash automatically sets with your camera in auto
>>2722394
Every outdoor fashion photo you've literally ever seen...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.3 (Macintosh) Photographer Hooton Images Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2013:02:14 13:01:15 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 160 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 5.80 m Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 135.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2722396
whats the advantage of having that instead of just an option on the menu?
>>2722402
>fashion photo
>advertising clothes
Yes, but the picture itself looks fucking stupid. Do you think the light in her eye here is a flash or not?
>>2722407
>Yes, but the picture itself looks fucking stupid.
Great nebulous opinion you have there. The point is, fill flash looks completely natural when used even half competently, and posting a few photos where someone didn't do it well isn't going to do anything to change that.
No, that catchlight looks like a reflector, but it's serving the exact same purpose.
>>2722409
How is it serving the exact same purpose? This was taken with no flash and around +1.7 EV. The other problem you have using even a remotely strong is going to hugely affect your white balance, especially if it's warm/cold rather than balanced.
Another anon here; I do fashion photography and I personally avoid using flash outdoors, it's just not natural and you can see it.
That being said I've seen it done before, it's ultimately a preference and there's not right or wrong way of doing it. It tells the story differently (if you do it right and don't fucking suck).
>>2722411
go be retarded somewhere else.
>>2722423
Post examples
>>2722411
A fill flash provides a second light source to fill in shadows. A reflector provides a second light source to fill in shadows. A fill flash is literally just a reflector you can place anywhere.
A flash will only affect your white balance if you don't know how to use it. Most flashes are daylight balanced, so you won't have issues, but if you have warmer light, you put a CTO gel on it. If cooler, you put a blue gel on it... It's not hard.
You're just proving that you don't know what you're talking about. Remember what thread you're posting this in and find a bit of humility.
https://youtu.be/3G0iZKeFtH4
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows) Photographer Clay Cook Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 1 dp Vertical Resolution 1 dp Image Created 2015:11:19 16:21:18 Exposure Time 1/800 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1000 Lens Aperture f/7.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 65.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows) Photographer Clay Cook Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 1 dp Vertical Resolution 1 dp Image Created 2015:11:19 16:21:18 Exposure Time 1/800 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1000 Lens Aperture f/7.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 65.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2722426
I don't need to post anything, you've seen it all before, you just have to understand the context of which it is needed.
Speaking from experience you normally don't want flash outdoors for Fashion unless if it's for some lame high end campaign where you need more control of the light to better show off clothes, assesories, etc for commercial work. It'll look fake but the purpose is the clothing and thus it is justified. In a more story/editorial situation you wouldn't want flash because with those it's more about the models/subjects and so you would want to keep the shadows and tones of their faces for more dramatic effect.
You see flash used all the time in wedding photos, even the editorial kind - it depends primarily on content. I hope this helps.
>>2722389
In bad lighting, you put the model in the shade. Now she's dark, and the background is light. So now you get a light, and you do pleasing lighting on your model, and now she matches the brightness of the background, and is also lit as she should be. It's a completely standard procedure, and a lot of photos you've seen and liked use this technique, and you never knew it.
>>2722389
>anyone who actually thinks outdoor portraits with a flash look good are retarded
oh boy
>>2722429
kek @ this photo
>>2722456
kek all you want
>>2722394
>it completely isolates the person from the rest of the image
Unlike shooting at f/1.4 which makes the person look like they're in a studio standing in front of a backdrop, or using color which makes them look like they're on another planet...
Really we shouldn't do anything to make our subject stand out, because who wants that?
You ever think that maybe your opinion isn't fact or law, and that something that triggers you is actually part of the goal, to make the viewer focus on the main content of the photo? Or that maybe you're just trying to denigrate something that you personally don't know how to do, so that you can excuse your lack of knowledge regarding it?
You can find bad examples of literally every aspect of photography and use them as a reason to not do anything at all. Oh wait, do you actually take photos? Something suggests not...
>>2722429
>lens aperture f/7.1
>exposure program: manual
>flash, compulsory
>ISO 1000
>you don't know what you're talking about
And this is exactly why all of your photos look like the kind of shit you see in a Next magazine. We're not talking about fashion photography you mong - point being, fill flash takes away from the verisimilitude and atmosphere of the photo - which it absolutely does.
That photo is laughable and the background is extremely distracting, imo.
>>2722465
is this photo supposed to be your backup argument?
>>2722474
Unlike shooting at f/1.4
I stopped reading there; you're retarded and completely misinterpreted the other anon. To put it plain ambient light outdoor background + artificially lite subject = objectively shit portraits
It's personal preference really regarding flash outdoors for portrait. Fine if you want to purposely expose the person and for whatever reason keep the background at a regular exposure for instance clothes, jewellry, footwear advertisement. Those dreamy portraits though are my favourite though, the kind you see on a youtube house or trance track or something with an over exposed and bokeh background with warm colors and regular exposed face. but idk
>>2722495
Boxy?
natural light is far better
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 55 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:15 17:18:54 Exposure Time 1/400 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/1.8 Brightness 1.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Daylight Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1500 Image Height 1010 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2722406
So that you can quickly delete your shit if you get caught taking creeper shots.
>>2722550
"natural light" is making her look like shit. Look at those enormous eye bags and distracting unflattering facial shadows. Nothing says "flattering" like under exposing the eyes by a stop and a half, no catch lights in the eyes, and a flat gray coloring.
>>2726147osed face and background
facial shadows? maybe that's just what she looks like you retard. i doubt he was trying to make her look like a princess or a model or smth. her face looks realistic and it has made for an interesting portrait.
