Matterhorn
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography
Took this long exposure this past summer, but hadn't edited it until now. Thoughts?
Canon 5DS, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5DS Camera Software LRTimelapse 4.1 - licensed to CGPersia, private, Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015-11-22T01:27:51-05:00 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 85.00 mm Image Width 2048 Image Height 1365 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2708446
1/60 sec is a long exposure now?
That aside, this shot is amazing. Honestly would have probably been better slower so the clouds around the mountain have some texture. That's a personal preference though.
>>2708447
Dunno why it says that. Or why it says LRTimelapse 4.1..
>>2708447
http://i.imgur.com/5v5nQVQ.jpg
Just for you <3
>>2708446
What does the unedited photo look like?
>>2708474
Shite. I never strive for good OOC. It was a 7-shot bracketed Long Exposure.
>>2708478
Lets see it
looks ass.
like a playstation render. ass as fuck. post untouched file.
>>2708446
I like it. Well done.
Won't win any awards but you can hang that on your wall.
>>2708504
Well you are one salty little cunt now aren't you?
>>2708530
This. I think some people here wake up angry at their breakfast cereal in the morning time.
>>2708478
How did you bracketed, what did you bracket? Did you make the long exposure from stacking and averaging?
Please tell me everything! I must learn!
>>2708446
very nice, apart from the slight purple colour of the mountain
would be interesting to see an unedited photo like some other anons have suggested
>>2708446
so sharp that my eyes are bleeding
>>2708452
That actually is way nicer, but the crop is worse.
Thanks for my gift though, I loves it.
>>2708530
>/p/ - Whiteknight Central and Hugbox General
OP asked for opinions, gave mine. How about you dont feel threatened by words directed at people that arent you, you sensitive cum gargler.
Moar high res pls
>>2708452
>http://i.imgur.com/5v5nQVQ.jpg
>posting an imgur link
>on a fucking image board
>>2709022
probably because he actually read the sticky?
>>2708796
>/p/ - Where jealous, talentless shitcunts critique those with actual skill.
There's a difference between "feeling threatened", and responding to an autistic comment on a photo you know you will never have the talent to replicate.
>OP asked for opinions, gave mine.
>looks ass. ass as fuck
I imagine OP was wanting feedback from those without extra chromosomes, you fucking braindead downie.
>>2709025
where does the stick say to upload shit to imgur?
I found this:
>Sometimes there is a legitimate need to post a high resolution panorama, a request for a large image, or discussion of some technical aspect that may require full size, and/or uncompressed images.
also there seems to be some stupid shit on the pseudo sticky
>>2708446
Fuck, that's a nice one.
>>2708446
Fucking stunning.
Noob here, so this is a HDR of multiple long exposure shots?
nice...great job
C&C you your opinion are seem slightly misaligned.
Don't think OP wanted realistic and if you don't like it thats fine, just word it better.
>>2710276
the world is filled with legitimately stupid people that can't think for themselves so they love to mindlessly follow any rule you give them.
I like these shots.
You should crop them to monitor resolutions and post them on /wg/.
I bet you will see them then after a while somewhere again posted by someone else.
