Allowing a self admitted 16 year old to stay, despite being underage and trolling.
Deleting a thread about Matt Grangers hips that had healthy discussion about the direction of youtube photography celebrities.
IS MATT GRANGER A MOD?
IS HE A WHITE KNIGHT PEDO?
STAY TUNED FOR MORE!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:11:12 16:28:57 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1129 Image Height 1004
The IRC thread got 370 replies.
When someone made a new one it was deleted.
There's no logic to 4chan mods. Ask yourself what kind of person would volunteer for this.
They got rid of the girlfriend vs photography thread. Why?
Guys it's 2015
All mods on 4chan are SJWs
So what, there was a terrible thread or two by a terrible poster(s) in a terrible board at a terrible place on the internet.
Who fucking cares about anything.
>>2702997
Because the mods are evidently aware of both threads, one was within the rules and on topic, the other is against the rules and bringing out the worst in the board.
Guess which one stayed.
>>2703003
The right ones?
The 16 year olds thread is a photo thread.
Matt Granger's thread is not
>>2703003
Oh so what anon.
>>2703007
Just wondering why the mods are a bunch of spastics :)
>>2703006
>The 16 year olds thread is a photo thread.
In which the 16 year old refuses to take criticism and post sassy replies.
She even admits in the thread she didn't want C&C. Literally a waste of a thread.
>>2703190
Then hide it you 11 year old faggot.
>>2703190
>A girl refuses to shut up and listen to me. She won't do what I say, and she doesn't accept that my opinion is more valid than hers. She doesn't act like a woman should at all, and she needs to be punished for it.
-Translated by Bing!
>>2703190
Anon you sound a little mad that a 16 year old girl won't listen to you. That's pretty cringey, dude.
The whole shitstorm with the 16 yo began because:
>She made a thread for each of her "edits".
>The autists freaked out because of "muh breads" and 404.
>She misinterpreted "shitting up the board" as a personal attack.
>/p/ ensues...
Matt Granger is a wide hipped egg.
I for one welcome our new mod overlords.
>>2703190
what is your opinion of isi?
for research
>>2703353
Shitty photographer with an even shittier attitude. That's pretty much all you need to know about Isi.
>>2703598
seems pretty decent to me
are you this moopco fella?
>>2703608
Nop, not that "moopco" fella.
>>2703353
attentionwhore.
like all of 4chin.
link to the thread?
t-t-t-there's a rule about some arbitrary made up number. better make sure it's followed blindly with no logic or reason. i just like to be a rules lawyer to push people around online because i'm irrelevant irl. hurr. hurr.
durr.
>>2705694
thanks for the link niggers
>>2705720
Thanks for bumping this bullshit after five fucking days, nigger.
>>2705720
It got deleted. But only after it had pretty much already died.
>>2705752
thanks for the explanation man god bless
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2013:03:20 12:17:31 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/14.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 125 Lens Aperture f/14.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 70.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 1161 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2705757
good thread,
