Hello ,
My name is Marina & I am photographer in Spain . I want to post some picture that I know many ppl liked in the past . It is in "fantastic portraits" style if u might know it .
I am not looking for bad comment , okay ;)
Just give good advise , pls! Thx for the ppl on here who can just leave a small coment . x
P.S. Sorry , but I dont want u to ask for my mail or phone either , as I have a boy friend .
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D700 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Photographer GUILLERMO CASAS Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 1190 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 50 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4256 Image Height 2832 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2013:07:24 22:01:08 Exposure Time 1/45 sec F-Number f/1.4 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.4 Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information Unknown Image Width 621 Image Height 900 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
This is ... well , i guess it is just about freedom . And that is all . x
Tell me if u like it too !
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:12:31 16:58:06 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 736 Image Height 532 Scene Capture Type Standard
Heres a 3rd pic . yes yes , I am not blind& I can see many of u dont want to help me . I am sad , though . I saw us to be working together , and now it hasn't happened even a bit .
Please even just tell me why u dont want to tk to me . I thought u might like it to chat . I still rly want ur critiques & advices ... ️️
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1024 Image Height 765 Scene Capture Type Standard
I personally don't like it. It's more Photoshop than photography. Also, you are weird.
>>2700017
You have some fantastic work
>>2700025
This
-10/10 bait
>>2700025
Well , to make the "fantasía" seting of the picture of course u got to turn the normal world to something different . That is why i use such things like photoshop . but the subject in my photo is real . so truly it is not just a trick like u are sayig .
i think it is unfair to insult me when i only try to get good advice about my pictures . many ppl think they are the best.
>>2700028
its so nice of u to say .️ im embarassed .
but still , to be honest i am looking for ways to do better ...
so if u can say what part of it u liked, it can be so helpful . i can kno what i will try to improve . thx agan !!! xxx
>>2700032
im not trying to trick anyone !!
please stop - you are being a bully .
>>2700017
this one could be decent, but you overdid it with the floating lamps a bit. Would be a lot better if they were just on the ground
>>2700018
no this isn't doing anything to me, looks like a 14 year old tried photoshop for the first time
>>2700024
meh. The girl seems way to tall in proportions to the rest, the bouncing balls..no idea what they are doing in the picture desu
These are shit, if you know what I mean. Only plebeian subhumans with no taste could ever consider anything like this worthy of praise.
i think ppl are being a little too
mean . heres a picture thats more for fun then for arts . maybe that will make u feel better since jts cheerful & not serious
i made it to be a person blowing All the fears & worries of ur lives away, try looking at it carefull and see jf u see what i meant jt tk bey
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2013:09:08 11:40:39 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1402 Image Height 551 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2700024
I like this, how did you make it?
>>2700054
You came to an anonymous internet forum, and as such people tend to tell you exactly what they think of your photographs.
My criticism is that these aren't really photography, since you're fixing and combining through photoshop, rather than capturing a decisive moment. All the pictures you have posted are compositions of multiple photographs.
This doesn't mean they're not art, it just means they're not photography. It seems very generic to me, to be perfectly honest. I'm not trying to be mean, but I think it's better you hear what people actually think
are you hot?
i have this thing for spaniard girls. mostly because of porn dubs.
>>2700070
This.
>>2700070
>rather than capturing a decisive moment.
sorry m'sir, but while i think this spanish girl is utter shit and fell for le surreal photo trend (TM), i think the decisive moment is such bullshit that applies only to like 15% of actual photo
>>2700017
You are a proper cooked cunt. You only want people to praise you, and say how good your "photography" is, which means you are expecting us to lie seeing as the majority of us fucking hate this putrid shit.
>>2700035
>many ppl think they are the best
Get your head out your ass. I guarantee you think of yourself as the best, and not "many people".
>>2700054
>i think ppl are being a little too
You came to a place full of anonymity which is known for harsh criticism. Sorry that we won't tell you what you personally want to hear. Your images are fucking horrid, now go beg for attention somewhere else.
>>2700032
Probably right, in which case I fell for it.
Can I have your MySpace?
>>2700017
Isn't someone gonna lay into this weird ol bitch.
You're photos are decent but I think that you think that you are somewhere else.
Best leave with your dignity,you fuckin weirdo
>>2700164
>of
Oh nevermind, he layed in to this bitch.
Also, I think I fell for it too. Ha
>>2700017
Actually your photos are saying something for a certain audience, but this site and imageboard has far different users.
> • Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it.
Most of us, including me come here because we want to improve ourselves, and in this process a circlejerk can be very harmful, as these asshats you interact with here are providing the perfect environment to learn to improve yourself via the criticism you get. (Please exclude the typical faggots who can answer only "kill yourself".)
If you have the patience and opportunity to practice, the criticism you get here will help you develop a healthy self criticism. If and when this happens you have reached a new level.
This goes for all the newfags as well,
>>2700070
>these aren't really photography
>taken with D700
Now what the fuck are you talking about?
OP posts photos that are technically superior, taken with gear 90% of the group envies and cannot afford because starving artist, and show more artistic merit then 99% of the shit posted on this board.
>these photos are shit
/p/ confirmed for madfags who disparage others as a means of compensation of their own lack of skill.
>>2700452
Are you retarded?
>>2700454
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that this is OP trying to teach us a life lesson?
If so, you're too insightful and wise. I mustn't speak to you.
hola marina
yo tambien soy fotografo de españa
hay un grupo de telegram donde estamos bastante fotografos. no hace falta que des tu numero de telefono. solo necesitas una cuenta de telegram y tu nombre de usuario
si estas interesado ponlo por aqui y te paso los datos
are you the woman in red?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0VVCXIiXyo
Tacky is the only word that comes to mind.
There is some skill level involved here, but lack of taste.
>>2700070
>le decisive moment
I like them
wow those are some disgusting photos.
don't mind me though i just hate life itself
>>2700454
Stupid rant of unmeasurable autism levels.
>>2700164
Agreement
>>2700017
>EXIF data
>Photographer GUILLERMO CASAS
wow nice bait OP
>>2700054
>i think ppl are being a little too mean .
Marina, please don't be offended by the mean people here. You are a beautiful person, inside and out so just remember that when you ask for help there will be some negative comments from some people. Don't let it spoil your time on this site because there are also many helpful people.
ugh....I hate watermarks
>>2700593
Lol gtfo
>I am not looking for bad comment , okay ;)
What do you want then? Just praise? Then /p/ is not the place for you.
It looks like you're trying to copy Rosie Hardy and not doing a very good job.
Also:
> watermark in stupid places.
Why?
>>2700593
kill yourself whiteknight
>>2700454
>artistic merit
Kek. BRB, just going to decorate all my images like a fucking christmas tree to give them some 'artistic merit'
These are really cool man, obviously theres a fair bit of photoshop involved but who cares, you're being creative! and it looks awesome!
Not a huge fan of watermarks but that's nothing major
>>2700708
>my images
my sides.
God, you /p/haggots are easily baited.
I don't get it.
These photos are appealing in some artistic perspective. I don't quite get it for some of the images but whatever it's just my taste.
Some of /p/ is criticizing these images in ways that are unfair because I'm sure the general public would lap this shit up quick.
The OP, whether they're pretending to be the person or not, is putting on the act of wanting to be coddled.
Yet this thread is still ticking? Why? It's clearly photoshop, the photos are reasonably nice. The discussion is about something completely irrelevant to what cou-
oh right, we're on /p/.
>>2700747
we like to argue and to get angry.
oh like all the rest of 4chin? whoa
>>2700018
Bad. No. Whatever it is you did in photoshop, don't do it.
>>2700024
Way too much shit in the foreground, takes away from the subject. I'd go for a minimalist approach and have only the one ball she's standing on and that's it.
>>2700054
Too much shit in the foreground. Model's face looks like she's making chimp noises.
I know you just took those photoshop classes and are eager to use your skills but if you want people to like your images please ease up on it. The only image that is decent is the first one you posted.
>>2700747
Yes, we're all super-seriously offended guise.
It's not a one-way street senpai.
>>2700454
>NIKON D700
>90% of the group envies
topkek
>>2700018
ayy lmao
lol absolutely terrible
https://500px.com/marinagondra
hola marina.
veras como te lo digo
tus fotos son BASURA
photoshop y efectos chorra saturando colores
en facebook te pondran muchos likes pero no esperes nada mas.
a lo mejor alguna agencia publicitaria de dudoso gusto te contrate para anunciar colonias para revistas de moda de marujas sin gusto artistico
pero no te creas que eres artista ni nada parecido.
si te da para comer adelante. sigue con ello.
pero no te consideres a ti mismo fotografa
digamos que un fotografo es un cantante de opera y tu eres la que sale en un cabaret con las plumas.
no te lo tomes a mal pero cada cosa en su lugar.
si te gusta sigue con ello. todos tenemos que buscarnos la vida y empezar como sea. pero algun dia maduraras y querras hacer cosas mas serias y esto sera un lastre como un pasado infame
ahh y se me olvidaba añadir que he visto que sales en algun video con Desire Delgado
jajaja. te has ido a juntar con lo peor de youtube en temas de fotografia.
Las dos vais por el mismo camino.
Ella va de youtuber. Tu al menos aun no te has degradado tanto.
Aun estas a tiempo de cambiar
Haz fotos autenticas. Deja el photoshop.
Intenta captar el momento.
Ya se que es dificil pero con el tiempo se consigue
Esas fotos enlatadas y prefabricadas que haces no valen un duro
Fuck off. We don't like people who are talented and making money here. We are jealous poorfags or jealous rich fags with no talent.
>>2700967
Some of the stuff is alright desu. The stuff posted here is the worst examples.
desu baka senpai
>>2700747
this
some people need to learn how not to care
>>2700024
laughing so fucking hard at this photo
>>2702163
>talent
look at this photo >>2700018
>talent
Photographs are supposed to convey something or prompt emotions - emotions prohibiting shear laughter and in most cases those of a 6 year old girl.
Even if I were to see this exact scene in real life I would not be concerned by the flying woman or toy aeroplanes flying around because it is so fucking hilarious I would be too busy laughing like a crazed lunatic. In that respect, this photograph has done a very good job. It's a rare one.
cringe thread?
>>2700024
I know you all don't want to admit it, but this is actually really good.
Would make for a great commercial poster for perfume or some shit.
>>2702280
No it wouldn't. Any perfume commercial would use a photographer who isn't a complete retard.
Look, nice. But 2 years from now you will cringe remembering those photos if you keep photographing.
If I had a dick made of cheese, I would be more content than if I made these photos.
You are out of your fucking mind. There are like 2 that I would give an A for Effort.
Es bueno. ¿Cuál es tu número de teléfono? Su novio es pequeño.
>>2700750
>critizism is unfair because it's not congruent with general public opinion
Is that what you're saying?
>>2700054
>i think ppl are being a little too mean
Providing this isn't some new elaborate troll,
do you know where you are?
Seriously.
Finding this place is one thing, but all the heinous porn a milimeter mouse move away wasn't a red flag?
Plz be trell
I refuse to believe anyone is that dumb.
shit is actually pretty good.
better than 90% of /p/
>>2703096
0/10 bait
>>2702321
No. Close, and I realize how it came off. I'm actually saying that SOME of the criticism is unfair... to an extent.
It's like being given food to try but you say it sucks because of its portions or excessive glamour. It's just not your cup of tea. There are some flaws but for the audience that has a greater appreciation for this kind of shit it's probably up their alley.
There are some flaws, technically speaking, like some weird planes flying close or some shit, but there's lambasting of the style.
If I told you you're a shitty street photographer but I hate street photography the opinion wouldn't serve much of a purpose unless I tell you your composition is fucked.
>>2703262
Try using the phrase in the right context next time, you bloody nignog
>>2700024
This is actually great, niggers.
Much better than everything currently on the /p/ front page, at any rate.
Have a fucking look at the "Photographers! Post the picture(s) that you're most proud of!"-thread. Makes it look like you are all complete shit.
>ITT a bunch of butthurt anons try to make an interesting photographer feel bad
>>2703348
I'm married and generally dislike spanish people.
I'm just saying that yeah, some of those shots a re a bit over the top (the one with the planes look like complete shit, bordering on being parody material), but generally her work is much better than most of the shit you guys can come up with.
You just come across as bitter failures.
OP's work is not what I'd call art, but it has commercial value, unlike most of your trash.
>>2703357
So the new standard of excellence is being better than a bunch of teenagers that just picked up a camera and just managed to aim it away from their genitals? Neat.
>>2703399
>excellence
Where did you read that word, faggot?
>a bunch of teenagers that just picked up a camera and just managed to aim it away from their genitals?
Is that a description you're applying to yourself, or are you somehow exempt for this category, some lone photography prodigy skulking in the shadows of a teenage imageboard?
The point here is simply that you all shit on stuff which is above the level of 95% of you.
It seems like jealousy and bitterness, and it's embarrassing.
Look at this filth. Look at it.
>>2701084 (OP)
>>2703403
so just because her shit is slightly better (which I personally disagree with) that somehow means that people can't say it's shit?
>>2703404
No, no, you can say it's shit.
But all the comments here are angry in tone and almost all are negative, whilst in that thread about "pictures you're most proud of", most of the comments are "Nice", "Great!" and "I love it", which just makes you all look like delusional hypocrites.
Also,
>slightly better
It's miles better. I'm sorry.
She can sell some of her stuff, you guys can't. You're simply not skilled enough.
Mind, she's not extremely skilled either, but she's not complete and utter shit like you apparently are.
>>2703406
why are you putting yourself above this board if you're generalizing anyways? You should say "we" instead of "you" if you throw everybody in the same boat
>>2703407
I'm not frequenting this board, I just came by because I like photography.
The shit you put up is cringeworthy as fuck, though.
>>2703408
well then why should I trust you to say what's good and what's not?
Also again, your generalizing the whole board on the limited exposure you got so far, since you said you don't frequent this board
>>2703410
It's not about trust, retard. It's objectively better, and you know it.
Time to face your delusions and get good.
>>2703403
So you're going to sit here and compare OP's photoshopped creations to actual photography? That's fucking retarded. These images are so heavily edited that it's impossible to tell what is real and what has been added in. OP's shit would fall more under the category of digital art, and sure she has some skill in this area, but this board is not the place for her to be posting. The /p/ stands for photography, not photoshop.
>>2703411
wow you sure convinced me with those hot arguments of yours anon :^)
>>2703411
>being angry on the internet
>>2703412
This is the dumbest argument, composite photography is still photography, numbnuts. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it less of a photograph.
That'd be like saying it's not a photograph if it's digital, because "real" photography involves film.
>>2702165
This. Some are decent, dunno why OP or whoever is pretending to be that girl would post such crap. The watermarks thought...
