[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Who else here always shoot on ISO 100 (or respectively the lowest
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /p/ - Photography

Thread replies: 28
Thread images: 8
File: 50199.jpg (146 KB, 1000x754) Image search: [Google]
50199.jpg
146 KB, 1000x754
Who else here always shoot on ISO 100 (or respectively the lowest ISO possible)?

Under no circumstances I go higher.

Just wondering how (un)common this attitude is.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeLeica Camera AG
Camera ModelS 007 Digital Camera
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
ISO Speed Rating100
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Unique Image ID0000000000000000000000000000000000023516
>>
>>2699503
well its hard for example if your doing low light street witch is what i mainly do to have an ISO lower than 800 with any lens past 2f.

but for landscapes and what have you yes i lower the ISO.

its pretty uncommon as a high shutter speed might capture a moment and result in a nicer pic than a lower ISO slow shutter would.
>>
>>2699503
...WHY?
>>
File: image.jpg (111 KB, 500x629) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
111 KB, 500x629
With early digital cameras I always tried to optimize my ISO usage religiously, as pushing a stop higher usually meant terrible things, but with today's modern sensors it's no problem to shoot at 400-1600 and expect little to no degradation.
>>
>>2699503

It's not an uncommon attitude among pleb beginners.

It becomes very uncommon as you get more experience and you realize that sharp and noisy is always better than blurry and clean.
>>
>>2699537
>1600
just mentioning my fooji with clean iso 6400.
>>
I don't always shoot ISO 100.

But I certainly always TRY to stay at ISO 100.
For example by seeking/creating enough light.
Or by creating enough stability to shoot at slower shutter speeds.

And I don't even mind the noise. - that's easy to get rid of in post.
What I hate is how the colors look at higher ISO's, and the lack of dynamic range.
>>
>>2699503
I have a 350D and never go above ISO 400 due to noise
usually shoot at 200 or 400, rarely at 100
>>
>>2699503
I use auto iso with a limit of 3200
>>
>>2699582

You're just mentioning your Fuji because you've never shot full frame.

Also, Fuji ISO 6400 is really ISO 3200 on most other cameras, so keep that in mind.

(Saying this as a guy with both a Fujifilm camera and a Nikon FF DSLR)
>>
File: IMGP8126.jpg (152 KB, 1000x662) Image search: [Google]
IMGP8126.jpg
152 KB, 1000x662
I do most of my togging at night as such 100ISO is pretty much impossible. in rare circumstances I can run 100 in Bulb mode but only for rare still life stuff (even stars move too fast for that shit).

This was a 2-minute exposure and damned near underexposed with ISO 400.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX
Camera ModelPENTAX K-50
Camera SoftwareArcSoft PhotoStudio
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionUnknown
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:11:07 18:02:57
Exposure Time120.7 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2048
Image Height1355
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeDistant View
>>
>>2699686

>togging

Leave and never come back.
>>
File: 1366158616455_cam.png (56 KB, 329x455) Image search: [Google]
1366158616455_cam.png
56 KB, 329x455
>>2699689
well sheesh i wouldn't have expect this shoddy treatment from fellow toggers
>>
>>2699692

:D :D :D wuddafugg are u toggin bout XD XD
>>
File: toggin_bout.png (160 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]
toggin_bout.png
160 KB, 480x360
>>2699697
i'm toggin'bout how i tog about
>>
I didn't buy a D750 to shoot at ISO 100.

100 is ideal, I leave it on 800 usually, and I work up to 6400 as needed.

Post processing NR tools are very strong.
>>
>>2699697
kek
>>
>>2699723
why ƒ8 specifically? is that the point where diffraction starts to become a problem? i have hard time choosing my apitcha setting... it's always like the lowest possible or ƒ11.
>>
If it's bright out, I try to keep it as low as possible, but will raise ISO well before I will move from f/8.

>The quality difference between f/8 and f/4 is massive compared to ISO 100 to ISO 640.

On dim days, I stay at max aperture and crank ISO as needed. I have no problem going right up to 6400 at the end of the day.

>It's that or go home

The only time I really worry about ISO is if I'm shooting a very small or distant animal that takes up a small percentage of the sensor; too much noise can eat up too much of its appearance.
>>
>>2699726
ahem
>>2699725
>>
>>2699725

Sorry, I changed my post for clarity.

For me, it's just because it is the best balance of sharpness, speed, and DOF for wildlife with 600mm.

Any slower and I can't get action shots, and much faster and I risk missing focus in certain situations (bird flying fast head-on, or shooting down the length of a moose's face)

If I'm shooting something side-on or over 100 feet away though, f/4 is great. I shot a fox hunting for voles in the snow last year, and stayed at f/4 and ISO 100 the entire time.
>>
File: Heyrememberthisphoto.jpg (313 KB, 1016x640) Image search: [Google]
Heyrememberthisphoto.jpg
313 KB, 1016x640
I used to have that attitude. Then I saw my friend doing it with a 400D in the evening and going into a ragefit when he was having trouble taking photos.

I print my work every now and then but it never goes larger than 12x12. I have autism, but I really worry for my friend. He seems to think that everyone of his shots needs to be as clean as a studio shot pic.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution3200 dpi
Vertical Resolution3200 dpi
Image Created2015-10-15T19:42:04+01:00
>>
File: IMG_2927.jpg (243 KB, 1600x1200) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2927.jpg
243 KB, 1600x1200
>>2699503

I feel you, bro.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon PowerShot A60
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Lens Size5.41 - 16.22 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware Version 2.00
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution180 dpi
Vertical Resolution180 dpi
Image Created2015:10:31 17:40:12
Exposure Time1/4 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length5.41 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1600
Image Height1200
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeEvaluative
ISO Speed Rating50
SharpnessNormal
SaturationNormal
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeLarge
Focus ModeSingle
Drive ModeSingle
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
Subject Distance0.320 m
White BalanceCustom
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed128
Image Number129-2927
>>
>>2699680
>Nikon FF DSLR

Why did you buy a Nikon?
>>
>>2699726
this, I'd prioritize aperture long before iso. I see your point OP, but you should test out your camera and see where your ISO limits are, I assure you even an older DSLR can go to at least 800 before you hit problems, and I think even then you'll hit noise problems before you hit color problems.
>>
>>2699697
tsssss fawkin homerun cocksucka

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwarePaint.NET v3.5.10
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution37 dpcm
Vertical Resolution37 dpcm
>>
>>2699800
That has to be a shoop.
>no junkies sitting on the grass
>sun
>>
>>2701528
https://youtu.be/4vaN01VLYSQ
Thread replies: 28
Thread images: 8

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.