using noise of really shitty digital cameras as an intentional aesthetic - has it been done in a quality way? pic not related
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Konica Minolta Camera, Inc. Camera Model DiMAGE X21 Camera Software DiMAGE X21 Ver1.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 37 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2004:01:01 00:00:00 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 200 Brightness 2.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash Flash, Auto Focal Length 4.80 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1600 Image Height 1200 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
I like grain in black and white night pictures, but only when it has a reason to be there (i.e. when you're shooting street pictures and need to use a small apperture like 7.1 or 8; or when you want to capture fast moving objects; or even both at the same time).
Black and white basically makes colour degradation and grain less obvious and ugly, and that allows you to get a shot at 1/160, f/8, iso 12800.
It's just like blurry objects in some of the low light shots, a side effect that in my opinion gives an authenticity hale to the picture. It's about getting the shot, so you do the besg out of what you have: should you need good colours and clean pictures, you sacrifice depth of field and or faster shutter speeds; should you need large dof and a fast shutter speed, you pump up the iso and sacrifice good colours and noise-free images.
Or just go full /p/ and buy a 4000$ body that can do 137816638192763 iso without losing quality.
>>2845042
Mind you the pic of OP is ISO 200.
>>2845048
Mind you op said pic not related
>>2845051
Mind you OP meant "in a quality way" with pic not related. The noise and "shitty digital camera" part were definitely related, although that was not made clear AT ALL.
Mind you I am OP, so sorry.
since no one bites I'm throwing it
>>2845261
5D II is not a shitty digital camera
>>2845261
>iposteditagain.cr2
I do this
