[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 67. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

File: image.jpg (1013 KB, 3600x2400) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
1013 KB,
Hey I'm getting nearly perfect panoramas at around 10600px width and 5300px height. Need $$$ to cop a nodal ninja so it could be aligned easier.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T3i
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width10600
Image Height3975
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2016:04:30 04:28:54
Comment-&\#xd;&\#xa;Projection
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3600
Image Height2400
Scene Capture TypeStandard
9 replies and 2 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
I honesty don't get this 360 fad
>>
>>2828024
VR is becoming a thing
>>
inside houses for real estate agencies
inside cars for car dealers
inside touristic attractions or tour companies
basically, anything that needs selling, you could help market

File: nikond51600.jpg (275 KB, 1656x1592) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
nikond51600.jpg
275 KB,
Some people say the AF is dead accurate, you just need to learn to use the right mode.
Others say the AF is crap.

Some say the DR is crap. Others say the DR is just fine.

Some say the high-iso is the same as Nikon D810.
Others say the high-iso is on another level.

What if Nikon's cargo got stolen, and this thief replaced all the D5's with D3 rebranded as D5?
11 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2827815
Fanboys, crappy testing methods, etc. etc.

The D810 has really been the dynamic range king of D-SLRs precisely because it uses a native base ISO of 64. It's a Sony sensor, but not even the A7r with the same sensor does quite as well (it still does excellent though). I don't even think the new 5DSR has base ISO below 100.

The D810 also has exceptional detail, even more so than more expensive ultra pro bodies like the 1Dx and D5. This is possibly what gives people the impression that it has equivalent...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
>>2827815
>accurate
lol this meme

Are people really still autofocusing in 2016? For real?
>>
>>2827815
just buy an F5

stupid question
how do edit photos too look like this?
10 replies and 4 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2827627
Shoot very bright scenes with light colored subject matter and overcast skies. Over expose slightly. Lower contrast drastically.
>>
>>2827629
thank you, im having a hard time deciding how i like to edit my photos
>>
Hint: This is not a good edit
Hint 2: This is not a good photo

File: IMG_5602.jpg (185 KB, 1200x1600) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
IMG_5602.jpg
185 KB,
Can you make me looks thinner on this one?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1200
Image Height1600
8 replies and 3 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
Impossible, you're too fat and there arent any pixels left.
>>
>>2827498
Learn to like yourself
>>
>>2827498
>>>/r/

1/6
7 replies and 6 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
2/6
>>
3/6
>>
4/6

File: Porter-31.jpg (495 KB, 1080x612) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Porter-31.jpg
495 KB,
Any other Concert Photographers out there? I've been shooting concerts (mostly raves) professionally for a little over 3 years now and love seeing other peoples work as well as getting feedback on my own. Let's see some photos!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows)
PhotographerJeff Mankini Photography
Image-Specific Properties:
9 replies and 3 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2811428
catalog
>>2811428
catalog
>>2811428
catalog
>>2811428
catalog
>>2811428
catalog
>>2811428
catalog
>>
>>2826771
Lol

Also >>2797598
>>
>>2826771

>bumping a month old thread

carlo pls

File: Skeleton1.jpg (251 KB, 600x385) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Skeleton1.jpg
251 KB,
Hey /p/ros

So I've recently been shooting for a small boutique in my city. When they asked me for a rate I did a flat fee of $470 for a half day.

We shot about 12 outfits for their website and I got paid promptly.

Once the "art director" start posting my images i noticed she did her own retouching on top of mine. She made a girls butt bigger, tried highlighting a models hair but just really turned it blue and did a horrible unsharp mask. I know all of this because she told me at our recent job. but still used my name as the photographer.
My edits are not that amateur looking.

just shot for them again on Saturday (the same day she told me how she edited over my work) and we managed to pull off 20 outfits for the same rate.

Keep in mind this is on location, outside with a ton of different lighting obstacles and by-standers. I was burning and turning and got some great shots.

I also got a long list of retouches to do (cleaning up windows, removing cars, and by-standers)

So I replied with an email saying the album I give comes retouched but if they want additional items removed it'll be $10 an image.

I also made it a point to ask that the art director leave my edits as they are.

Here's the response I got


"Np. Let's not worry about removing the extras.
And I don't mind running images I've played with.

Thanks."

any advice? I def. don't want to give an album out until I get paid this time. Got a feeling someone that thick will try to be sly

any advice please - feeling a little frustrated

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3969
Image Height2547
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2012:01:31 10:47:54
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width600
Image Height385
10 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2826666
she just want dat ass brah.
do it for her.
>>
>>2826666

Why would you work with these people again after they betrayed your trust?

If someone lied to me and said they didn't retouch my photos I would never speak to them again, especially if it was impacting my business.
>>
"I do not mean to be rude or overbearing, but I am not entirely comfortable with the images I produce being displayed under my name after being altered by another individual other than myself.


Or something along those lines. And has she not paid you for the latest job? Idk, I don't even think I could work for/with someone who uses contractions and fucking "np" in an email. Fucking nobody has any professionalism anymore?

File: ujvvde.png (1 MB, 1589x1600) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
ujvvde.png
1 MB,
Why does Sony make such shit products? The A* are OK but every other camera and lens they have released (don't even get me started on this whole Zeiss meme partnership) has been total dogshit. Meanwhile, you look at any Canon or Nikon equipment and it's consistently praised for being a fair value or high performing purchase.

Is Sony just under more criticism than others? I haven't seen a single scenario where a Nikon or Canon couldn't do the same for less money, if not even better.
10 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2825921
Mirrorless full frame?
compare canon's and Nikons's to the A7?

How about low light performance in a consumer camera?

How about high resolution in a consumer camera?

How about IBIS in a consumer camera?

Fuck man, I'm a fuji fag, but idiots gotta get got.
>>
>>2825922
>compare canon's and Nikons's to the A7?
If you want the completely out of date A7, sure, compare them.

Otherwise you're comparing everything to the A7Rii which is as much or more than Canon or Nikon equivalents.
>>
>>2825933
>battery life
>evf
>shit menus
>terrible ergonomics
>shit customer support
>absolute trash lens ecosystem
>low light af is trash
>not much smaller than an FF dslr

fuckin who cares about slightly better iso performance and megapickels when the camera itself...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: images.jpg (5 KB, 259x194) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
images.jpg
5 KB,
I guess I'm an idiot with an idiot question. I had a Canon 7D for about 6 months, shot photos and video with it and never really had a problem. I'm somewhat new to photography but I always shot in manual and was able to get my photos properly exposed. I picked up another used Canon 7D recently and all my photos are way underexposed and I don't know why. Sometimes they're even black. I can try changing the ISO, the aperture, the shutter speed, and still they're way too underexposed. What am I missing?
8 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2825754
Firstly, there's a stupid questions thread.
Secondly, there's no where near enough info here. Generally, if you have a question like this you should post examples with exif and not fucking stock info.
Thirdly, my guess is you have no clue how the meter works.
>>
a) what's the metering mode?
b) don't use manual if you don't need to, aperture priority is fine.
>>
>>2825759
also yeah, this.
Post two photos, same settings same lens same camera same composition, light, etc everything. If one is dark and the other isn't, then there's something up.

File: IMG_0975-1.jpg (559 KB, 1000x837) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
IMG_0975-1.jpg
559 KB,
I'd like to get some opinions about the way you guys go out and shoot (I'm talking about personal practice, not professional assignements).

Here's the thing : until now, my shootings were planned, and I would have as much time as needed to get at least one satisfying shot out of it, which was fine by me.

But now my job takes a huge part of my time and I can't just go out for hours whenever I like. However, during my job, I get to travel a lot around the country, I go on location to meet clients and follow construction sites. In both urban and rural environments.

So I decided to take my camera with me everywhere, and use these few minutes I have outside to shoot as much as I can. Which proved to be very hard. Not only am I very limited in terms of time, but also space.

I was thinking that by adding those constraints I could train my eyes to catch and compose my shots in a more effective way. So far it's a bit frustrating but I'm just getting started, so I wanted some opinions on this, and also on the way you approach your shootings.

Do you think that could work, or does it seem like too much to be able to be creative in any way? Are you a quick shot, or do you need time and trials to get what you want ?

I'll post 2 or 3 shots from today morning, you've been warned, pointless stuff incoming. But feel free to be harsh, I don't mind.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 760D
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Exposure Time1/800 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Exposure Bias-1 EV
Metering ModePattern
Focal Length24.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Exposure ModeAuto
6 replies and 4 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: IMG_0968-1.jpg (639 KB, 1000x910) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
IMG_0968-1.jpg
639 KB, 1000x910


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 760D
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Focal Length24.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Exposure ModeAuto
>>
>>2824596
Step 1) Stay alert for interesting/unique subjects/colors/light
Step 2) Find them
Step 3) Get camera out and start looking for a way to emphasize what I found while minimizing distractions and useless information
Step 4) Decide whether it's best to take the photo now, in the current condition/light or better to come back later at a better time.
Step 5) Take the photo
Step 6) Go process the photo to support my intent.


In your photos, I have no idea what motivated you to take the shots,...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
File: IMG_0984-1.jpg (230 KB, 1000x667) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
IMG_0984-1.jpg
230 KB, 1000x667
>>2824603
I shoot raw with every NR and color filter off, so the only process I always do is to solve a little bit of that if needed.

Bu just to be sure, what do you mean exactly by "unprocessed"? Because I don't think any kind of processing would make these any better.

To answer your question, I was looking for some kind of structure, symetry in which I could frame a subject, in that case, one or two trains. But yeah, it was a bad day, the light was horrible, rain, wind. And I only got to go in industrial areas, but not the cool kind.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 760D
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Exposure Time1/2500 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Focal Length24.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Exposure ModeAuto

File: AI6A9524.jpg (429 KB, 1600x1080) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
AI6A9524.jpg
429 KB,
I am going to print it though.
8 replies and 2 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: AI6A9555.jpg (479 KB, 1600x1067) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
AI6A9555.jpg
479 KB, 1600x1067
ah no wait there is a worse second one and here it is. Location: City of Utopia somewhere in southern Italy (these guys do not look very happy though, if you ask me)
>>
>>2824575
I like this
>>
>>2824575
nice pics

File: 20160424-IMG_5219.jpg (336 KB, 598x1000) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
20160424-IMG_5219.jpg
336 KB,
Continued from >>2821353 which hit the image limit.

Resize to 1000 pixels on the longest side please :)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 60D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution120 dpi
Vertical Resolution120 dpi
Image Created2016:04:24 20:48:07
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
255 replies and 151 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: image.jpg (380 KB, 1250x840) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
380 KB, 1250x840
Whoops, forgot one.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1250
Image Height840
>>
File: IMGP01012 - .jpg (219 KB, 960x653) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
IMGP01012 - .jpg
219 KB, 960x653


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePENTAX
Camera ModelPENTAX K-50
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)36 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:04:24 21:40:45
Exposure Time30 sec
F-Numberf/6.3
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/6.3
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length24.38 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationNormal
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeDistant View
>>
File: DSC_0056.jpg (409 KB, 1000x563) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
DSC_0056.jpg
409 KB, 1000x563


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D610
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern802
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:04:24 19:11:01
Exposure Time20 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown

File: eds.jpg (399 KB, 975x699) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
eds.jpg
399 KB,
How to edit like this ? Some presets or maybe tutorial ?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/bellakotak/
7 replies and 2 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2823892
idk about the editing, but it looks like they focused a little bit short of the subject and had her move a little, or maybe another shot was blended in?
also, it looks like all the colours were shifted towards red and blue, there is vignetting, the blacks were crushed obviously, maybe some subtle split toning as well? blue shadows and pink highlights
>>
>presets
kek
>>
File: ye.jpg (289 KB, 960x456) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
ye.jpg
289 KB, 960x456
git gud with a d j u s t m e n t layers

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:04:25 02:15:35
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width960
Image Height456

File: whatisthiscalled.jpg (79 KB, 800x450) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
whatisthiscalled.jpg
79 KB,
What is this "style" called? How do I do that in photoshop? Is it just several pictures overlayed with different opacity, hue and blur?
6 replies and 2 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2823586
>What is this "style" called?
Shit
>>
rgb
>>
File: p87-5006.jpg (133 KB, 704x623) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
p87-5006.jpg
133 KB, 704x623
On the subject, could taking a 3 shot burst and usnig a channel from each photo be used to emulate a Prokudin-Gorsky? I love the effect his technique had on movement but can't test it out at the moment since I'm not near any fast moving streams.

File: Lightroom.jpg (548 KB, 1600x900) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Lightroom.jpg
548 KB,
I'm trying to install Adobe Lightroom CC on my EOS Rebel T6 EF-S 18-55mm IS II Kit but I keep getting an Err 70 message. I have a 64 gig SD card, that should be large enough??
Any help is most appreciated.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2014:01:28 14:19:08
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1600
Image Height900
6 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2823248
Did you format before you tried install?
>>
Lightroom is only supported on the 1D series, sorry.
>>
Casey Anthony, pls leave.

Pages: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160] [161] [162] [163] [164] [165] [166] [167] [168] [169] [170] [171] [172] [173] [174] [175] [176] [177] [178] [179] [180] [181] [182] [183] [184] [185] [186] [187] [188] [189] [190] [191] [192] [193] [194] [195] [196] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206] [207] [208] [209] [210] [211] [212] [213] [214] [215] [216]
Pages: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160] [161] [162] [163] [164] [165] [166] [167] [168] [169] [170] [171] [172] [173] [174] [175] [176] [177] [178] [179] [180] [181] [182] [183] [184] [185] [186] [187] [188] [189] [190] [191] [192] [193] [194] [195] [196] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206] [207] [208] [209] [210] [211] [212] [213] [214] [215] [216]
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at imagescucc@gmail.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.