Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 67. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
Hey I'm getting nearly perfect panoramas at around 10600px width and 5300px height. Need $$$ to cop a nodal ninja so it could be aligned easier.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T3i Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 10600 Image Height 3975 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:30 04:28:54 Comment -&\#xd;&\#xa;Projection Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3600 Image Height 2400 Scene Capture Type Standard
I honesty don't get this 360 fad
>>2828024
VR is becoming a thing
inside houses for real estate agencies
inside cars for car dealers
inside touristic attractions or tour companies
basically, anything that needs selling, you could help market
Some people say the AF is dead accurate, you just need to learn to use the right mode.
Others say the AF is crap.
Some say the DR is crap. Others say the DR is just fine.
Some say the high-iso is the same as Nikon D810.
Others say the high-iso is on another level.
What if Nikon's cargo got stolen, and this thief replaced all the D5's with D3 rebranded as D5?
>>2827815
Fanboys, crappy testing methods, etc. etc.
The D810 has really been the dynamic range king of D-SLRs precisely because it uses a native base ISO of 64. It's a Sony sensor, but not even the A7r with the same sensor does quite as well (it still does excellent though). I don't even think the new 5DSR has base ISO below 100.
The D810 also has exceptional detail, even more so than more expensive ultra pro bodies like the 1Dx and D5. This is possibly what gives people the impression that it has equivalent...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2827815
>accurate
lol this meme
Are people really still autofocusing in 2016? For real?
>>2827815
just buy an F5
stupid question
how do edit photos too look like this?
>>2827627
Shoot very bright scenes with light colored subject matter and overcast skies. Over expose slightly. Lower contrast drastically.
>>2827629
thank you, im having a hard time deciding how i like to edit my photos
Hint: This is not a good edit
Hint 2: This is not a good photo
Can you make me looks thinner on this one?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1200 Image Height 1600
Impossible, you're too fat and there arent any pixels left.
>>2827498
Learn to like yourself
1/6
2/6
3/6
4/6
Any other Concert Photographers out there? I've been shooting concerts (mostly raves) professionally for a little over 3 years now and love seeing other peoples work as well as getting feedback on my own. Let's see some photos!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows) Photographer Jeff Mankini Photography Image-Specific Properties:
>>2826771
>bumping a month old thread
carlo pls
Hey /p/ros
So I've recently been shooting for a small boutique in my city. When they asked me for a rate I did a flat fee of $470 for a half day.
We shot about 12 outfits for their website and I got paid promptly.
Once the "art director" start posting my images i noticed she did her own retouching on top of mine. She made a girls butt bigger, tried highlighting a models hair but just really turned it blue and did a horrible unsharp mask. I know all of this because she told me at our recent job. but still used my name as the photographer.
My edits are not that amateur looking.
just shot for them again on Saturday (the same day she told me how she edited over my work) and we managed to pull off 20 outfits for the same rate.
Keep in mind this is on location, outside with a ton of different lighting obstacles and by-standers. I was burning and turning and got some great shots.
I also got a long list of retouches to do (cleaning up windows, removing cars, and by-standers)
So I replied with an email saying the album I give comes retouched but if they want additional items removed it'll be $10 an image.
I also made it a point to ask that the art director leave my edits as they are.
Here's the response I got
"Np. Let's not worry about removing the extras.
And I don't mind running images I've played with.
Thanks."
any advice? I def. don't want to give an album out until I get paid this time. Got a feeling someone that thick will try to be sly
any advice please - feeling a little frustrated
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3969 Image Height 2547 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2012:01:31 10:47:54 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 600 Image Height 385
>>2826666
she just want dat ass brah.
do it for her.
>>2826666
Why would you work with these people again after they betrayed your trust?
If someone lied to me and said they didn't retouch my photos I would never speak to them again, especially if it was impacting my business.
"I do not mean to be rude or overbearing, but I am not entirely comfortable with the images I produce being displayed under my name after being altered by another individual other than myself.
Or something along those lines. And has she not paid you for the latest job? Idk, I don't even think I could work for/with someone who uses contractions and fucking "np" in an email. Fucking nobody has any professionalism anymore?
Why does Sony make such shit products? The A* are OK but every other camera and lens they have released (don't even get me started on this whole Zeiss meme partnership) has been total dogshit. Meanwhile, you look at any Canon or Nikon equipment and it's consistently praised for being a fair value or high performing purchase.
Is Sony just under more criticism than others? I haven't seen a single scenario where a Nikon or Canon couldn't do the same for less money, if not even better.
>>2825921
Mirrorless full frame?
compare canon's and Nikons's to the A7?
How about low light performance in a consumer camera?
How about high resolution in a consumer camera?
How about IBIS in a consumer camera?
Fuck man, I'm a fuji fag, but idiots gotta get got.
>>2825922
>compare canon's and Nikons's to the A7?
If you want the completely out of date A7, sure, compare them.
Otherwise you're comparing everything to the A7Rii which is as much or more than Canon or Nikon equivalents.
>>2825933
>battery life
>evf
>shit menus
>terrible ergonomics
>shit customer support
>absolute trash lens ecosystem
>low light af is trash
>not much smaller than an FF dslr
fuckin who cares about slightly better iso performance and megapickels when the camera itself...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I guess I'm an idiot with an idiot question. I had a Canon 7D for about 6 months, shot photos and video with it and never really had a problem. I'm somewhat new to photography but I always shot in manual and was able to get my photos properly exposed. I picked up another used Canon 7D recently and all my photos are way underexposed and I don't know why. Sometimes they're even black. I can try changing the ISO, the aperture, the shutter speed, and still they're way too underexposed. What am I missing?
>>2825754
Firstly, there's a stupid questions thread.
Secondly, there's no where near enough info here. Generally, if you have a question like this you should post examples with exif and not fucking stock info.
Thirdly, my guess is you have no clue how the meter works.
a) what's the metering mode?
b) don't use manual if you don't need to, aperture priority is fine.
>>2825759
also yeah, this.
Post two photos, same settings same lens same camera same composition, light, etc everything. If one is dark and the other isn't, then there's something up.
I'd like to get some opinions about the way you guys go out and shoot (I'm talking about personal practice, not professional assignements).
Here's the thing : until now, my shootings were planned, and I would have as much time as needed to get at least one satisfying shot out of it, which was fine by me.
But now my job takes a huge part of my time and I can't just go out for hours whenever I like. However, during my job, I get to travel a lot around the country, I go on location to meet clients and follow construction sites. In both urban and rural environments.
So I decided to take my camera with me everywhere, and use these few minutes I have outside to shoot as much as I can. Which proved to be very hard. Not only am I very limited in terms of time, but also space.
I was thinking that by adding those constraints I could train my eyes to catch and compose my shots in a more effective way. So far it's a bit frustrating but I'm just getting started, so I wanted some opinions on this, and also on the way you approach your shootings.
Do you think that could work, or does it seem like too much to be able to be creative in any way? Are you a quick shot, or do you need time and trials to get what you want ?
I'll post 2 or 3 shots from today morning, you've been warned, pointless stuff incoming. But feel free to be harsh, I don't mind.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 760D Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Exposure Time 1/800 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Focal Length 24.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Exposure Mode Auto
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 760D Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Focal Length 24.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Exposure Mode Auto
>>2824596
Step 1) Stay alert for interesting/unique subjects/colors/light
Step 2) Find them
Step 3) Get camera out and start looking for a way to emphasize what I found while minimizing distractions and useless information
Step 4) Decide whether it's best to take the photo now, in the current condition/light or better to come back later at a better time.
Step 5) Take the photo
Step 6) Go process the photo to support my intent.
In your photos, I have no idea what motivated you to take the shots,...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2824603
I shoot raw with every NR and color filter off, so the only process I always do is to solve a little bit of that if needed.
Bu just to be sure, what do you mean exactly by "unprocessed"? Because I don't think any kind of processing would make these any better.
To answer your question, I was looking for some kind of structure, symetry in which I could frame a subject, in that case, one or two trains. But yeah, it was a bad day, the light was horrible, rain, wind. And I only got to go in industrial areas, but not the cool kind.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 760D Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Exposure Time 1/2500 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Focal Length 24.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Exposure Mode Auto
I am going to print it though.
ah no wait there is a worse second one and here it is. Location: City of Utopia somewhere in southern Italy (these guys do not look very happy though, if you ask me)
>>2824575
I like this
>>2824575
nice pics
Continued from >>2821353 which hit the image limit.
Resize to 1000 pixels on the longest side please :)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 120 dpi Vertical Resolution 120 dpi Image Created 2016:04:24 20:48:07 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
Whoops, forgot one.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1250 Image Height 840
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX Camera Model PENTAX K-50 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 36 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:24 21:40:45 Exposure Time 30 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 24.38 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Hard Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Distant View
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D610 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 802 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 50 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:04:24 19:11:01 Exposure Time 20 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
How to edit like this ? Some presets or maybe tutorial ?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bellakotak/
>>2823892
idk about the editing, but it looks like they focused a little bit short of the subject and had her move a little, or maybe another shot was blended in?
also, it looks like all the colours were shifted towards red and blue, there is vignetting, the blacks were crushed obviously, maybe some subtle split toning as well? blue shadows and pink highlights
>presets
kek
git gud with a d j u s t m e n t layers
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:04:25 02:15:35 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 960 Image Height 456
What is this "style" called? How do I do that in photoshop? Is it just several pictures overlayed with different opacity, hue and blur?
>>2823586
>What is this "style" called?
Shit
rgb
On the subject, could taking a 3 shot burst and usnig a channel from each photo be used to emulate a Prokudin-Gorsky? I love the effect his technique had on movement but can't test it out at the moment since I'm not near any fast moving streams.
I'm trying to install Adobe Lightroom CC on my EOS Rebel T6 EF-S 18-55mm IS II Kit but I keep getting an Err 70 message. I have a 64 gig SD card, that should be large enough??
Any help is most appreciated.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:01:28 14:19:08 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1600 Image Height 900
>>2823248
Did you format before you tried install?
Lightroom is only supported on the 1D series, sorry.
Casey Anthony, pls leave.
