Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 64. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
I love horror, show me your best horror photos. The ouija pic is mine.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.7 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpcm Vertical Resolution 240 dpcm Image Created 2016:05:03 22:58:23 Exposure Time 15 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
Don't mess with the spirit world Anon. No good will come of it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image Size Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 72 Image Height 72 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2831746
I played with the board a lot of times....and nothing happend
>>2831748
were you with another person? you need two to properly channel
![Mechanicsburg-Central-PA-senior-portrait-photographer-outdoor-tree-grass-pittsburgh-steelers-terrible-towel-dog-rs-2[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/WYrK5qU.jpg "Mechanicsburg-Central-PA-senior-portrait-photographer-outdoor-tree-grass-pittsburgh-steelers-terrible-towel-dog-rs-2[1].jpg")
How do I achieve this look?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:06:10 07:28:47 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 700 Image Height 500
>>2831436
Find ugly kid, snap shit to your heart content
>>2831437
Get a load of this guy
A little timelapse I made while in Louisville, Kentucky. I hope you like it!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqGfpqnH5AU
What did you shoot with? You could use some work with exposure and color balance.
>>2831307
It was shot with a Nikon D3200. Most shots with an 18-55 mm lens, but one of them with my 55-200 mm. I agree. I don't have much of an eye for balancing light and such.
waste of time
WHAT THE FUCK?
so this is a picture from the 1900€ camera I bought today.
Even my fucking phone makes better pictures.
is this normal?
going to return this piece of garbage and kick the sellers face in.
I mean WHAT THE FUCK MAN
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7M2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 52 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3936 Image Height 2624 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:05:03 23:15:32 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/1.8 Brightness -2.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3936 Image Height 2624 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
nice b8 m8
>>2830823
>exposure program: manual
>ISO speed rating: 800
stupid faggot
Where do you post your photos online and why? Facebook, Flickr, Tumblr, Instagram, elsewhere?
>>2830183
Facebook -> Reaches a broad range of normies
Instagram -> Reaches a broad range of normies + young talent
Don't post to:
Flickr -> Used to but it's just people spamming pointless shit on your photos. GR8 PHOTO 20/2312 AWARD. SHARE 5 SUCK DICK. Zero community. Surprised its still around.
500PX -> HDR Central/photoshop
>>2830183
Instagram - I got really (not THAT much) popular recently, so I use it more often
Tumblr - easy and good display of photos
How do i get the look of the picture on the top right. Im talking about the pale skin tone mixed with the cream white background.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2012:07:02 11:42:26 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 650 Image Height 650
>>2829628
Good lighting + pale model/makeup + white backdrop.
Also you're retarded.
>>2829644
No im saying like he has the same type of look to all of his photos like he puts a filter on all of them but im not sure how to go about doing that
>>2829649
Poor pleb does not understand the difference between creating a visual ecosystem with continuous themes that gives a broader sense of unity in a portfolio to using a "filter"
... I weep.
Are there any mounts available for full sized cameras that I can stick on the dashboard of my car?
I need to put the A6300 + 90mm sony macro aimed out the front windshield and not have it wobble back and forth or fall over. I can tape it down but it isn't that effective.
Do they have any devices that can do this? Maybe some kind of tripod I can mount in the car?
>dude 1500$ dashcam lmao
only a fucking sony faggot could come up with this shit
what the fuck are you memeing at
>>2829391
Why a 90mm macro? What purpose will that serve? A wide angle would do a much better job in that circumstance
>>2829411
I have both. I will use the Vario Tessar 16-35 instead sometimes. I prefer the picture quality of the macro though so I'd like to use that most of the time
>>2829392
I want to create car driving ASMR videos. I am not very good at photography but the video quality is decent so I will pursue that for now
pic unrelated, just a nice emotional shot I took in my kitchen. for your troubles.
so, any suggestions?
Thank you very much.
>>2829202
The lights came out great but there's no info in the sky. What type of lens did you use? how long was the exposure? and what's f/stop did you shot this in?
>>2829205
Here's the metadata senpai.
that metadata is virtually useless bro
the highlights on the wheel are actually blown, pitchblack sky, and you need to work on your composition. try to fill the frame more!
Well everybody knows that the bird is the word.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
Also initiating bird thread.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
How do I achieve this look? I mean those pastel like soft colors. I remember somebody mentioning that he usually shoots Porta on a MF and overexposes it by 1 stop or so, but what exactly can be/is done in terms of PP to achieve those results?
https://www.instagram.com/_nguan_/ for more examples
Another example
Okay found this in an interview
>I use Kodak Portra 400NC. After the film is processed I scan the negatives to my computer, but I don't have any special postproduction techniques.
So the question remains how to at least somewhat emulate those in LR or PS?
The real question is is this man a pedophile?
>Shoot EVERYTHING with a telephoto
Why is this allowed?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1200 Image Height 800 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:06:25 08:50:03 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 960 Image Height 640
Because it's better. Wide angle a gimmicky shit for plebs who can't compose and can't plan ahead.
Because it's easier. Telephoto a gimicky shit for plebs who can't compose and too pussy to get in there.
>>2828291
>>2828303
You guys are alright.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh) Photographer Martha Harnett Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2687 Image Height 3815 Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:04:19 17:25:02 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 970 Image Height 674
Let's get real here: if you are using any other brand than Fuji, you are a fucking idiot. Not only do their cameras consistently produce the best images, but they are also the only manufacturer that does not skip on genuinely innovative technologies like Velvia (no, its not the same as using a filter, because its already in the JPG the moment you take a photo). Once Fuji finally buys out Sony, which will be sooner rather than later considering how much money Sony is loosing, they will also be able to start producing consistently better sensors that they will not sell to...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>it's the fujifilm retard again
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 200 dpi Vertical Resolution 200 dpi Image Created 2013:08:01 13:51:58 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1250 Image Height 1250
>>2826431
>it's a sonyfag falseflagger trying to shift the shitposting against fuji
ftfy
What is with the current trend of accessorising the FUCK out of cameras?
Seems like everyone these days has some sort of soft release button, artisanal Leather wrist strap, got shoe cover made from rare hardwood, and taping over every logo?
Does this make their photography better or something? Seems like male jewellery to me.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M5 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 40 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2013:11:05 17:28:47 Exposure Time 1 sec F-Number f/16.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/16.0 Exposure Bias 1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Auto Focal Length 20.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1024 Image Height 768 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation High Sharpness Hard
>>2822548
If I'm going to have my camera on me while I'm out and about, why leave it ugly when I don't have to?
Gearfags gonna gearfag
>>2822548
is that an artisan and artist strap?
What kind of filter/effect is that?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 682 Image Height 1024
>>2830885
Shit is what it is
>>2830885
Its no an "effect". It looks like it was shot on film
Flash, high contrast without clipping in either end, grain.
how can i get this tripod to hold a studio light head? i looked on amazon and they all just have that small thread that'll fit the bottom of a camera or flash. Is there a simple adapter? Thanks!
gear thread, thanks!
manfrotto spigot adapter
I don't want to discourage you from experimenting, I just want to lay on some facts about this.
Unless your studio light is really underpowered, that tripod isn't going to hold these very well. Monoblocs are heavy and this thing will sway a lot.
Unless you want to use your monobloc as a kicker or backlight, this isn't going to be as useful as you might think. It's better to just buy a really cheap lightstand that can support the weight of your gear you intend to use. If it breaks, you can save up and buy a better one, if it doesn't break...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
