Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 5. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
I've decided to shoot on some extremely old film. The rolls I have are from about 1989. Does anyone have any good shots from similar experiments.
Even better what is your best guess as to how much I should derate it /p/?
That film is expired bro, it's useless.
That is unless it was stored 150ft under solid bedrock in a cryogenic chamber.
I shot some Kodak Gold from 1997 (as a test film on a Minolta Dynax 9xi, I usually use HP5). When processed it ended up black and white, but with no contrast, or detail.
>>2880306
Don't listen to this guy. You won't likely get any kind of "good" result. But it's fun to play around with. Maybe the fucked up results are what you are looking for.
Try overexposing about two stops and developing normally, expect color shifts and grain.
Enjoy!
Here is some Konica centura 400 expired who the hell knows when
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:14 21:19:05
Hey, /p/.
An older and more expirienced photographer told me to do a series of photos so I decided to do some photo series of my home and my family. I feel like this short series captures the current situation pretty well. I tried to have fun while making it and also put some thought into the images and why I took them the way I did.
You can view it on this website:
http://homee.96.lt
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2480 Image Height 3507 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:07:08 21:30:03 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1484 Image Height 1038
those are shit, are you shot it on some expired fujicolor with plastic lens camera? cos it looks like that.
first of all, you have to make your subjects appealing, and with zero composition, outoffocus snapshits you actually achieve exact opposite.
you didn't even take an effort to straighten the photos, you lazy dipshit
read more about photography, buy more gear, shoot less.
Welcome to /p/, newfag
>>2879369
>Zero composition
Where are you even seeing this? These images clearly have common features in how they are composed. I don't care about the rest of your critique because of how mad it made me but you have to admit the images are composed in a certain way. I had a clear idea in mind when shooting.
cool idea, and it's always nice to see someone on /p/ actually working on their own project, but this lacking so much, OP. technically speaking execution is poor, and there is too little depth - it's too short and random of a series to give the viewer any interesting information about your home and your family, to me this just looks like a few random snapshots you took at home and put together to be honest. try to add more to it man.
also, did you have any intention whatsoever when you pair images together in sets of twos?
How do I take photos like this? Can I use my entry-level D3300 and photoshop?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1600 Image Height 1000
I want to remove my eyes with rusty spoons after seeing that picture.
In theory, but you shouldn't
fucking shadows, how do they work?
>shaggy2dope.png
Hasselblad X1D:
https://c5.staticflickr.com/8/7457/27834001340_2aa9db0cf0_o.jpg
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Hasselblad Camera Model Hasselblad X1D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Photographer Ming Thein | mingthein.com Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 8272 Image Height 6076 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:07:07 00:50:20 Exposure Time 13 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Focal Length 45.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 735 Unique Image ID 0000000000005551018CBA9400000067
Woah.
I was thunderstruck the first time I worked with the Pentax 645D files. Can't imagine what this must feel like.
What is she thinking about?
If you have questions about a new camera, what lenses to buy and anything related to gear or wondering about getting into photography, post it in this thread.
Do not attempt to make a new thread for your new Rabal, broken glass and being new.
No pointless (brand) arguments and dickwaving allowed! You have been warned!
I repeat, ANYTHING GEAR RELATED goes in here!
And don't forget, be polite!
Previous thread: >>2874276
>>2876408
A Diana Mini for $35?
I always wanted to try a square format cam but the normal Diana that uses 120 film seems a bit pricier and 120 film cost more.
Beside the sony a7 line, what would be the best mirrorless camera? Their nex/non FF alphas?
Is it worth to get the a6000 instead of the nex-6?
>>2876496
Fuji, Olympus, Panasonic
Why mirrorless only? I assume you are the same guy asking around for a few days now, if you are such a beginner why not save your money, get a used entry level DSLR with kit lens and abuse it for a year, then you will be able to decide what system to get into.
