[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 208. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

File: image.jpg (2 MB, 3264x2448) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
2 MB,
I picked this up for 75$. How'd I do?

Nikon FG20
Nikon 50mm E
Nikkor 43-86mm
Nikkor 105mm
Albinar 80-200mm
Nikon speed light sb-22
5 Lens filters.
6 Rolls of film.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3264
Image Height2448
13 replies and 3 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
You did nicely.
Now go use it. This place doesn't need more snapshots of gear.
>>
That 105 is nice.
And the strap.

Does the meter work?
>>
>>2701921
It does! Surprisingly.

>>2701920
Apologies mate. excited.

Did the FG20 use a Fmount like some of the Dslrs do today?

File: IMG_1119-529x600.jpg (60 KB, 529x600) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
IMG_1119-529x600.jpg
60 KB,
Realistically.. How much smaller could a 70-200 f/2.8 lens be for mirrorless?

The Sony 70-200 f/4 for the a7 camera seems to be on par size wise to the Canon 70-200 f/4...

I am really interested by this so if anyone has one or has tried one can you let me know? I am just not sure why people want such small camera bodies (a7 series) if the lenses are still so fucking huge.. Who would want an a7 with Canon/Nikon size 70-200 on the front???
21 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>Who would want an a7 with Canon/Nikon size 70-200 on the front?

People who fell like they must have the latest and greatest of everything no matter how menial the advantage. Besides some guy on a camera blog said Sony was a game changer and another guy on Reddit agreed so it MUST be true.
>>
Optically theoretically no less than 20cm and 7cm thick. And quite bigger than that in real life

Probably within the decade, mirrorless systems will deprecate DSLRs, but it won't actually make a physical difference

The current mirrorless style cameras will then continue to live as the "ultrabooks of cameras". I.e. bad performance and shitty battery life shipped in a small pretty package for normies to eat up raw

Luckily the latter won't completely choke out consumer-level DLSRS, as +300$ cameras will continue to be a market dominated...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
>>2701498
>mirrorless systems will deprecate DSLRs
And this is where you are wrong. EVFs are not magic, it is a simple substitute for a missing optical system. Also sensor integrated PDAF is nowhere near and cannot be as accurate as a complete optical PDAF system. The mirrorbox is here to stay, no matter how deep are your delusions and your superiority complex. But to see all this you need to be educated in engineering and university level of physics. It simply cannot be expected from an average...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: Sigma_20mm_f1.4_Art.jpg (319 KB, 2000x1429) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Sigma_20mm_f1.4_Art.jpg
319 KB,
What's your opinion on the new Sigma lens?

I'm considering getting it as a landscape / astrophotography lens since my 24-70mm f2.8 isn't as wide or as open as I'd like it to be. I was also looking at some of the Samyang / Rokinon primes which were a lot cheaper, but I fear 14mm is too wide, and I don't see much point in getting a 24mm f1.4 since I have that angle already (and I'm going to be doing landscape more than astrophotography so I doubt it's worth it). So, do you think the 20mm f1.4 meets the bill? What do you lenses does /p/...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
15 replies and 4 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: img-thing.png (54 KB, 300x300) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
img-thing.png
54 KB, 300x300
they don't even make one for pentacks
>>
Nikon 16-35mm f4 landscape master race
>>
>>2701271
Who makes anything for pentax other than pentax?
>>2701274
What focal length do you find yourself using most on the 16-35?

File: DSC_9746.jpg (3 MB, 4928x3264) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
DSC_9746.jpg
3 MB,
I recently tried my had and perspective photography? Did I do well? Left car is mine, right car is a toy.

any tips would be appreciated. also, perspective photography general

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D7000
Camera SoftwarePhotos 1.0.1
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)48 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:11:09 17:58:24
Exposure Time1/30 sec
F-Numberf/4.2
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating900
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length32.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4928
Image Height3264
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
22 replies and 3 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
It just looks like an out of focus toy car in front of an out of focus real car. What exactly were you trying to do?
>>
>>2701179
more or less make both look like they were side by side, without any real editing or photoshop.
>>
>>2701179
yeah you suck at this.
read a book maybe?

File: frontview.jpg (105 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
frontview.jpg
105 KB,
I mostly shoot film, and I also have an OM-D EM-5 with an ok but not great 45mm prime, but I want to get a DSLR to pick up some basic portrait jobs. I was thinking about getting a Canon 5D and a nice 50 1.8 as that seems to be the most affordable way into quality FF. I could also probably swing an 85 1.8.

Is the 5D still a respectable camera or would that just be a waste of money at this point, it being 10 years old and all?
12 replies and 2 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2701172
go to the gear thread, you fucking poon, REEEEEEE
>>
>>2701172
It's as good as it was when it was first released.

Unless you're doing long-exposure star trails, it surpasses 35mm in every way except maybe dynamic range. Think of a a 3-FPS motor-drive SLR with AE and a never-ending roll of film.

Read the sticky and use the gear thread next time.
>>
make sure you get one where the mirror's been fixed - Canon won't fix them for free anymore...

File: San Francisco Compressed 1.jpg (3 MB, 6000x4000) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
San Francisco Compressed 1.jpg
3 MB,
Hey /p/, I recently went to San Francisco and decided it would be fun to mess around with my friend's camera. This is my first time ever using a camera other than my phone, so I know i didn't use everything correctly, but I feel I took some alright shots. Any feedback; positive or negative, would be greatly appriciated.

Camera: Nikon D7100
Lens: Nikon DX AF-S NIKKOR
11 replies and 7 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
I'm sorry they're so big, I must not have compressed them enough.
>>
Also I was told that centering your object can make the photo boring, I'll try to stay away from that.
>>
All of these photos were unprepared, I just walked up and took the shot.

File: 1.jpg (343 KB, 999x999) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1.jpg
343 KB,
Shot a second test roll with my Hasselblad. Portra 400.

I'll post the whole roll (minus 3 family portraits).

Please give me constructive criticism.
49 replies and 14 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 2.jpg (289 KB, 1050x1050) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
2.jpg
289 KB, 1050x1050
>>
>>2700551
Boring who cares?
>>2700556
You got some shit in the way of your mediocre sunset there.
>>
File: 3.jpg (328 KB, 956x956) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
3.jpg
328 KB, 956x956

File: image.jpg (546 KB, 960x711) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
546 KB,
Why does a dslr need a screen? Why not just have a switch for off, M, A, S, or P, and dials for iso, shutter, aperture, and ev comp? I'd use that camera.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2013:11:04 21:25:52
Color Space InformationUnknown
Image Width960
Image Height711
Scene Capture TypeStandard
50 replies and 6 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
Because instant review is one of the greatest revolutions in the history of photography.

Why don't you just turn the screen off?
>>
>>2699696
and a car doesn't need windows, roof, seatbelt, or radio, but that's really hard to find because people still like or need various features.
>>
>>2699698
>one of the greatest revolutions in the history of photography
>le chimping face

File: R0131821.jpg (266 KB, 1000x662) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
R0131821.jpg
266 KB,
resize ur snapshit to 1000px pls
read the sticky before toasting

last bread >>2697257

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:11:04 20:07:42
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating9000
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Brightness-1.3 EV
Exposure Bias-0.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
255 replies and 151 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: IMG_1542.jpg (743 KB, 1003x669) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
IMG_1542.jpg
743 KB, 1003x669
I kinda have mixed feelings about this photo.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 500D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:11:08 00:09:41
Exposure Time1/60 sec
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating3200
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePartial
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>2699646
>iso 9000

what the fuck
>>
>>2699646
>bread
*thread

File: 50199.jpg (146 KB, 1000x754) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
50199.jpg
146 KB,
Who else here always shoot on ISO 100 (or respectively the lowest ISO possible)?

Under no circumstances I go higher.

Just wondering how (un)common this attitude is.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeLeica Camera AG
Camera ModelS 007 Digital Camera
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/2.0
ISO Speed Rating100
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Unique Image ID0000000000000000000000000000000000023516
28 replies and 8 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2699503
well its hard for example if your doing low light street witch is what i mainly do to have an ISO lower than 800 with any lens past 2f.

but for landscapes and what have you yes i lower the ISO.

its pretty uncommon as a high shutter speed might capture a moment and result in a nicer pic than a lower ISO slow shutter would.
>>
>>2699503
...WHY?
>>
File: image.jpg (111 KB, 500x629) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
111 KB, 500x629
With early digital cameras I always tried to optimize my ISO usage religiously, as pushing a stop higher usually meant terrible things, but with today's modern sensors it's no problem to shoot at 400-1600 and expect little to no degradation.

File: gauge.jpg (262 KB, 2048x1365) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
gauge.jpg
262 KB,
post em
37 replies and 23 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: FUJI7186_v1.jpg (1 MB, 1066x1570) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
FUJI7186_v1.jpg
1 MB, 1066x1570
>>
>>
File: FUJI7484_v1.jpg (822 KB, 1570x1066) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
FUJI7484_v1.jpg
822 KB, 1570x1066
>>2699450

File: 32250_1_l.jpg (21 KB, 440x293) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
32250_1_l.jpg
21 KB,
My girlfriend wants a camera for Christmas and I'm looking for help/suggestions on what to get her as I'm clueless on the subject.

Right now she uses her Galaxy S5 to take photos on. She's not got a lot of experience at using proper cameras so preferably doesn't want anything too complicated to use.

However, I don't want to get her something that's going to be obsolete a year after buying it. So preferably looking for something that's got potential should she want to pursue photography more seriously.

The budget I have...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
30 replies and 3 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2699375
Nikon D3000
>>
get her a cheap film camera (something full manual. a Pentax K1000 is a great beginner camera and quite cheap) and a variety of different film she can experiment with. then with the leftover money pay for her to attend some brief local course on beginner photography (& darkroom work maybe).

she'd probably really appreciate that and it's a lot more thoughtful and romantic than buying a cheap dslr that will absolutely be obsolete very quickly. you could even attend the course together and make it a date thing.
>>
>>2699391
What a fucking retarded suggestion.

File: PENTAX-ALL.jpg (326 KB, 1340x894) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
PENTAX-ALL.jpg
326 KB,
How silly would it be to invest in a new Pentax setup when the K1 gets released?

Currently I shoot Nikon, I have been having some issues with Nikon for the last few months (D810 having to go back for repair 7 times in 2 months) I am seriously contemplating a switch to CANON.. But am also thinking about giving Pentax a shot.. But am worried that giving Pentax a shot is basically throwing money into an already dead system..

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution96 dpi
Vertical Resolution96 dpi
Image Created2015:02:05 20:23:27
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1340
Image Height894
22 replies and 4 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
Pentax has been said dead for some years and yet they are making money. I think they are stepping up their game with the 645Z and the K1. There will be better service options too. I heard the full frame is delayed because they have to fix some flaws and really want to deliver a good product. I would only change system if the price was right and it fulfills your needs.
>>
Are you shooting professionally, and make use of NPS/CPS? If so, no.
>>
>an already dead system.
You are retarded and this thread is just bait for other retards to tell you how right you are so you can all be blissfully retarded together.

How does one edit like this? Obviously increase exposure but I cannot understand how the colours are still kept from getting too washed out and the contrast is still there. Inb4 hipster
30 replies and 5 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
More examples
>>
>>2699014
It's not the editing. It's the light. You need bright soft white light. That's about it.
>>
>>2699017

its literally the editing baka

OP, just pick the RGB curve upwards at middle/upper point and then pick the top down to prevent clipping, and thats it

File: Rgb-compose-Alim_Khan_small.jpg (140 KB, 1000x661) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Rgb-compose-Alim_Khan_small.jpg
140 KB,
I want to make some color photographs with black and white RGB filters like pic related. What's the best/cheapest option for color filters? I was going to try colored cellophane but it looks blurry as shit. Is it really worth spending $20 a peice for screw-on filters or is there a better way?
21 replies and 4 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2697748
idunno how this works really but i want to know. also, you can't just scan the B&W pics and do it in software? like i said idunno how it works so i might be missing stuff
>>
>>2697748
TianYa square filters off eBay, make sure its the TianYa ones, the ones that look like them, also from China, but are not are unevenly layered and terrible, TianYa are not bad.

They slot into Cokin P holder (which you can also get cheaply from ebay).

>>2697753
You still need to filter each shot prior to exposure.
>>
>>2697754
not for digital
which this fag is probably using

Pages: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160] [161] [162] [163] [164] [165] [166] [167] [168] [169] [170] [171] [172] [173] [174] [175] [176] [177] [178] [179] [180] [181] [182] [183] [184] [185] [186] [187] [188] [189] [190] [191] [192] [193] [194] [195] [196] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206] [207] [208] [209] [210] [211] [212] [213] [214] [215] [216]
Pages: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160] [161] [162] [163] [164] [165] [166] [167] [168] [169] [170] [171] [172] [173] [174] [175] [176] [177] [178] [179] [180] [181] [182] [183] [184] [185] [186] [187] [188] [189] [190] [191] [192] [193] [194] [195] [196] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206] [207] [208] [209] [210] [211] [212] [213] [214] [215] [216]
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at imagescucc@gmail.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.