Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 205. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
hello /p/! pot thread! send pics about weed and tell if there is legal. I took this picture in Milan
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3200 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 802 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:11:16 16:36:52 Exposure Time 1/4000 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>arguing for legalisation of anything by defacing a traffic light.
>>2704769
leave you child
>>2704784
>defacing
it's only a stiky
post some coll stuff!
Hello everyone.
I recently bought a panasonic dmc lz40, first of all im not a photographer nor do i have any knowledge of photography.
I bake for a living.
I make cakes cupcakes things like that, and its the pictures that sell mostly.
Ive been trying to take pics with this cam for a few days now and while pictures do look better than my previous cam food doesnt look as appetizing as i had hoped.
Now it doesnt have to look cool or flashy the food just needs to look appetizing, how do i go about doing this on this specific cam?
Any help...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
This is a picture i took a few days ago on a candy table i had to do.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-LZ40 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 22 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2576 Image Height 1932 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 180 dpi Vertical Resolution 180 dpi Image Created 2015:11:16 14:11:32 Exposure Time 1/25 sec F-Number f/3.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1263 Image Height 966 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Landscape Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
With this sort of cam you're going to need really, really good lighting. Try to take pics in daylight, not by lamplight.
Any chance of being able to return this unit for something else? I dunno if you were constrained by budget or whatever, but if as you say it's the pics that sell you might want to invest a little more on the photogear - it would make what you're trying to do easier as well as being able to achieve way better results.
/p/'s a slow board, so don't be disheartened if you don't get many immediate replies.
>>2704704
To learn where you're going wrong you'll need to understand the fundamentals of photography. Composition, exposure triangle etc. It also doesn't help that the camera you have isn't exactly suited to this. If you're going to use these images in a professional setting I would suggest splashing out a bit more and getting a decent mid-range DSLR. You're also going to need a tripod and some artificial light sources, as well as bounce cards and the ilk.
http://www.seriouseats.com/2015/03/beginners-guide-to-food-photography.html this is my favorite guide to food photography. It covers everything I just mentioned (bar photography basics). Worth a read
Enjoy this nifty infographic presented by your friend Mr.Koala
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:09:22 07:13:14 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 640 Image Height 6031
Hey, /p/. I have to make photo project about chaotic city noise, but i'm feeling so empty about this. Any ideas?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D5100 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 680 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:10:31 01:30:17 Exposure Time 1/400 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 12800 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2704514
show what you have
>Chaos
>City
>Noise
>Empty
Photograph the opposite of above
Do not grainy black and white
I hate noise. For me noise is unnecessary sound. Find a traquil place and take a bad photo.
>>2704521
*tranquil
all constructive criticism sought
1/5
2/5
3/5
4/5
>Is this the quality of Magnum Photographers nowadays?
directly from the normiebook comments section
MAGNUM BFTO
now, D'Agata is no photojournalist at all, but still, quite a crap photo for a Magnum pro
>>2704356
who
gives
a
shit
The photographer was pretty much in a war zone, in the dark. The photo was most likely immediately rushed to the editors for publication without any editing. It's a shit, rushed photo, but that's what you'd expect from an event like this.
>>2704359
i give a shit about photo quality. you keep giving it about latest canikon releases.
>>2704362
film era photos were way better. be it warzone, crime scene, accidents, guys were ruthless and bold. i have yet to see a current day event photo that isnt some forgettable crap that also looks shit.
also i expected some raw emotion from d'agata, thats his thing. not a literal snapshit a kid could do.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Photographer © HIROJI KUBOTA / MAGNUM PHOTOS Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:11:14 18:44:02 Exposure Time 1/180 sec F-Number f/3.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/3.2 Brightness 5.0 EV Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Photographer © HIROJI KUBOTA / MAGNUM PHOTOS Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:11:14 18:44:36 Exposure Time 1/210 sec F-Number f/3.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/3.2 Brightness 5.0 EV Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
as bad as I feel for them they are totally mindkeked and will defend shitskins until they are all dead
>that exif
i-is this real?
Guys the holiday season is here and I like taking pictures of Christmas lighting during this time but I can't keep my hands still during sub zero temperatures which causes my pictures to blur, other than wearing gloves people recommended me to increase the iso of my camera, I'm just wondering are there other options? Really appreciate if you can help
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model FinePix2600Zoom Camera Software Digital Camera FinePix2600Zoom Ver3.00 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Maker Note Version 0130 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2000:12:16 07:57:48 F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 100 Shutter Speed 1/21 sec Lens Aperture f/3.5 Brightness 3.1 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 6.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1280 Image Height 960 Sharpness Normal White Balance Auto Chroma Saturation Normal Flash Mode Off Macro Mode Off Focus Mode Auto Slow Synchro Mode Off Picture Mode Auto Continuous/Bracketing Mode Off Blur Status Blur Warning Focus Status OK Auto Exposure Status OK
>>2703929
my d750 says no
you just might have to under expose a little in order to raise your shutter
>>2703929
tripod
>>2703929
monopod
![1724875-focus[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/0ArPDe2.png "1724875-focus[1].png")
I'm kind of a poor fag so the cheapest DSLR camera I am considering on getting is the Rebel T5 by Canon.
But I'm curious, in the ads for Black Friday, there is an ad for this camera that comes with two lens 18-55mm and 75-300mm as well as a camera bag. Best Buy even throws in a free microSD card. The total price excluding taxes is $399.99.
https://blackfriday.com/stores/walmart/ads/black-friday/page-7
https://blackfriday.com/stores/best-buy/ads/black-friday/page-30
Now I found these bundles from eBay.
Are these worth the money?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Canon-Rebel-T5-DSLR-Camera-w-18-55mm-3-Lens-Kit-16GB-Flash-Battery-Case-/291606442909...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
for a this feature has been disabled in this model a rabal t5 is shit tier bottom of the barrel entry level.
enjoy your one dial menu diving and missing a shot because you have to look away from the viewfinder to switch a setting.
also goto best buy and hold one of those cheap ass plastic pieces of canon shit in your hand and see for yourself.
>>2703789
What is wrong with Canon? I had a photography instructor who loves Canon and he works for magazines so the brand cannot be that bad, can it?
>>2703793
ask your photography instructor how much his canon cost and how much the lens on his camera cost.
canon entry level is shit tier. plastic crap. try pawn shops and college bulletin boards with for sale ads pinned to the cork. there should be tons of people unloading their slightly used plastic crap at the end of each semester. try the one right outside your photography instructors office.
What's up /p/, this is my first post, dont be hard with me.
So I need some help, I own a Pentax K-50 (highly recomended as first dslr) and I have problems, when I shoot in raw, which I always used in my old Nikon d40x, the colors seem to be faded and totally gone (see pic) and I do not know what this must be. And honestly I love raw, but I hate to have to make all the adjustements that the camera is suposed to do, as my Nikon did, it makes me feel too lazy to edit one by one more than 200 pics.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX Camera Model PENTAX K-50 Camera Software SILKYPIX(R) Developer Studio 3.0.0.11 LE Photographer Elias Laredo Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:11:13 19:49:10 Exposure Time 1/20 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 1600 Exposure Bias -0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4928 Image Height 3264 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Subject Distance Range Close View
>>2703701
>but I hate to have to make all the adjustements that the camera is suposed to do
...You do not understand raw. The camera is doing exactly what it should be doing.
Well I did not choose my words very good, but what I'm trying to say, how come is so different? do you mean it has no processing? meaning then that .nef files are actually processed but in a raw format?
>>2703701
>4.66 MB
first off please resize your pics i realize you want us to see the pics in detail but 9000px is excessive.
Ok, I own the K-50 and love it to death, but go through the menu and shut off all the post-production features. They take up time, battery power, and they don't do anything you can't do later in post.
>no highlight correction
>no shadow correction
>neither of...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I need to convert a TON of digital files into slides. How would I go about doing this? I don't want to pay someone to do it for me because I have too many photo's and the price would be high. Is there a machine that will do this for me?
self bump
Couldn't you just print onto transparency film with a standard printer, then cut them out and fit them into slides?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2008:07:02 09:51:01 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 314 Image Height 275
>>2703685
- buy film camera
- buy shitloads of slide film
- put all photo's in a slideshow.
- photograph your computer screen.
Found some old gear dad never used, like the lens is in great condition and those flashes have probably been fired a dozen times...
Have I scored much?
(Pic uploaded from phone - no resize)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3264 Image Height 2448
Isn't this the 2nd or 3rd time you have "found" this same gear, I remember the picture, keep looking around you might "find" it again.
camera good flash okay lens great
Camera solid but ancient
Lens excellent
flashes excellent
Excellent start into photography. Just need some light stands and umbrellas.
Can we, for once, agree that the most important thing in photography, is what you photograph?
I mean, you can spend hundreds of dollars on fancy cameras and gear, but what it really comes down to, is what's in the picture.
Subjective.
>>2703480
Nope. Good gear can make any mundane little shit object look nice or interesting.
I got my D800 for free, with three gold-ring Nikkor lenses, and I mostly just snapshot random crap in auto mode, so I should know.
My pictures can look really nice despite me not knowing shit or even putting any real effort into the shot.
Lightroom also helps.
Well. You could also have the best gear available, the most perfect motive and you still could screw it big time.
No.
The most important thing in photography is your eye. Your skill. Your experience .
Haven't seen one of these in a while
post a RAW and other anons will try to process it the best that they can
>https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ye86v9te8qrufl/R0002664.DNG?dl=0
>https://www.dropbox.com/s/hf5p2u62vif99xg/R0002509.DNG?dl=0
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:11:13 10:01:15 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 900 Image Height 900
Here's mine. I'll post OP's processed shots in a few minutes.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/37298985/DSCF2233.RAF
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:11:13 17:55:09 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/9.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/9.0 Brightness 9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 563 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
>>2703495
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-E2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 35 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:11:13 11:47:48 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 500 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 2.7 EV Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
What line would you not cross in photography?
What shot would you not take, print, or show because of a moral code or personal taste, even though it would be perfectly legal?
or do photographers even have a responsibility to self censor based on some abstract ethical code?
If a scene or subject is way too cliche, and I mean so overdone that every shitsnap flickr page by a nerd with a 50mm+rabal who thinks he's the next HCB has a picture just like it, I probably wouldn't even lift the camera up to my face.
I also generally avoid pictures of the homeless because exploitation but I make an exception if a homeless person comes up to me or does something interesting, since that way I'm photographing the person, not his homelessness.
Other than that, pretty much everyone is fair game.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:05:17 19:01:39 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Brightness 5.7 EV Exposure Bias -0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
Shit like this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/lilyvampwolf
https://www.flickr.com/photos/voron-a
Fucking wierd cunts
>>2703268
ceepee thread?
