Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 155. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
Do I lose any quality if I go back into a Psp file that I already edited and saved once to make a second edit and save it twice?
Thanks, I'm new to photoshop and photography.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Comment Screenshot Image Width 1242 Image Height 1000
>>2740598
if you're referring to photoshop, it uses .psd files
there isn't any quality loss when saving as .psd/.psp, as it doesn't perform any lossy compression
Hey /p/ I found this old macro lens in my dads closet, can you guys tell me how much it's worth? All I know about it is the brand is Tamron, and it's a macro lens, 70-210mm, idk what cameras it fits to
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2592 Image Height 1936
Here's another pic
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2592 Image Height 1936
>>2740574
Not much, maybe $50
Check ebay
>>2740576
i think thats canon fd mount
My new phone scans film better than my old camera. Just wanted to share so here's most of my film, missed focus and bad shots included.
>lets be real, almost all shots are bad shots
I just did a batch color correction for each set. Will probably go back and fix up the ones I actually like
I'll start with some provia
>my first rangefinder
>nothing's centered or level
Legitimately the first ever PENTACKS I've ever seen IRL. Have you ever spotted a PENTACKS in the wild /p/?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make samsung Camera Model SM-N910G Camera Software N910GDTU1COJ3 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 31 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5312 Image Height 2988 Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:01:09 10:39:50 Exposure Time 1/25 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 1.0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash Flash Focal Length 4.80 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5312 Image Height 2988 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID H16USHH04SA
A friend used to shoot pentax. Last one I saw was yesterday.. cute little asian girl who was waiting for the elevator next to me and my friends. Actually nice cameras.
>>2740168
I've never seen a Pentax, Fuji, or Oly/Panasonic in the wild. All Canon, Nikon, and the raaare Sony mirrorless.
Just mine...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX Camera Model PENTAX K-50 Camera Software paint.net 4.0.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 82 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:07 14:56:21 Exposure Time 1/1600 sec F-Number f/14.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4928 Image Height 3264 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Distant View
Film vs Digital / Video, Archive edition
Lets forget about quality for this thread and focus on archiving.
there is no doubt in my mind that the video out of my a6000 is vastly better than my canon 814 super8, and is a fraction of the cost per minute of footage.
I recently read an article stating that Hollywood is going back to film because it costs less in the long rung, storing film is cheap and the technology to play it back doesn't get obsolete like software. While archiving video requires constant transfer to newer and newer formats, with the possibility of quality loss in each recoding.
Is film worth looking at for the average joe for archiving, are all our digital pictures and HD video just as doomed to time as VHS and Zip-disks?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH Camera Model GXR MOUNT A12 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:08 10:07:33 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Daylight Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 714 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
Oh god no just when Bolex-Pailliard Super 8 stuff was getting affordable hipsters are going to drive the prices of them back up again.
Fuck my life I didn't want one anyway
>>2739755
I thought video formats were pretty stable by now?
For horrible examples of improper archiving you should look at early digital audio formats. Actually, even some later digital audio formats.
we are studying at home.
we need funny moments in the picture, can you help us? thanks a lot
pic related
>>2737481
what could you possibly expect to come of this
what goes through you people's minds whenever they post insipid "make a le funny me me" requests on a photography board
what do you want, a clown nose added? lactating nipples? meat falling from the ceiling? a lamprey mouth? would it really be all that better than going to some funny image website and looking?
>Cause this was a thing and I am amazed by it!!
Got a new book yesterday and this is just to great to not share.
>Pull pistol trigger to open shutter
A.K.A. taking the picture.
>Pull the hammer back to rotate cylinder
A.K.A. moving that negative to the back and bringing another forward.
The Photo Revolver is from 1882, printed on 20x20mm dry plates, had no viewfinder, held up to 10 dry plates at a time (earlier versions only held 4), and was exposed by opening the barrel which was a 70mm periscope with f/10 lense inside the barrel.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model SAMSUNG-SM-G900A Equipment Make samsung Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:01:05 13:12:11 Image Orientation Unknown Focal Length 4.80 mm White Balance Auto F-Number f/2.2
I. NEED. This.
...in my life...
>NOW!
>>2737137
>be american
>go out to take photos with photo revolver
>get shot
>>2737137
>go to the cop
>hey can I shoot a photo out of you
>"Sure"
>Take out revolver de poche
>Get shot
Old thread >>2734779
This is my first post and I'm sure you'll be able to tell from the photo itself, so please C&C and destroy my interest in the hobby.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 910 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 33 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:04 21:43:11 Exposure Time 1/640 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 22.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1400 Image Height 933 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2736610
I kinda like it. It's nothing special and you've got a fuckton of negative space at the bottom, but the little cabin light is giving me cozy feelings
>>2736595
bumping for an answer
I dont know why the fame file looks different depending on where i'm viewing it, or what it actually looks like to others/if it changes based on what theyre using to view it
Where do you share your photos and interact with followers?
I tried Flickr, but I wasn't really feeling it. Should I try Instagram? I feel like Instagram has a much wider audience.
What do you guys use?
>>2735637
Also, is 500px or any of the other Flickr alternatives worth using? Do they have a worthwhile userbase?
Yeah, 500px has a dedicated community
>>2735637
I use Flickr and Instagram. I find it's easier to get followers on Flickr but more people use Instagram. I think it depends on your kind of photography. Flickr users tend to go for more generic beautiful photos where Instagram loves fashion and more unorthodox photos with filters (raised and crushed blacks in your tone curve for 20% more likes!). 500px tends to be where the best stuff that everyone will like goes.
Post your Instagram accounts below, make sure to include sample image/s and a link.
www.instagram.com/mctomch
Cars, personal life, and Japan right now.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2448 Image Height 2448 Scene Capture Type Standard
https://www.instagram.com/the_conditioned_human/
Trying to find my style. Half and half digital and film. Critique very welcome
https://www.instagram.com/alexburkephoto/
Landscapes and whatnot.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Photographer Alex Burke Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2014:11:23 19:15:32 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1024 Image Height 808
Archived Threads: https://fgts.jp/p/search/subject/video%20general/
Google.
>>2713785
a7s ii + sigma 20mm f1.4
not exactly video but anyone shoot 35mm? looking for lab recommendations in london
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4619 Image Height 3394 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:02 12:07:57 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 6400 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1500 Image Height 1102 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
whats the best budget video camera other than the A6000
Photoshop me this bastard faggots
This thread was moved to >>>/wsr/32483
Why does all my JPG's look so disgusting? Everything I export that contains lots of oranges and other warm colors turn out cold and green. Orange becomes yellow and yellow becomes green, and then I have to edit the JPG's using Windows 10's editing system so that they don't look god-awful.
That is a color profiling problem. sRGB, which is usually the color profile jpegs are exported with, way narrower than adobeRGB, so a lot of compression is going on. On pro editing tools, such as Photoshop, you can "track" the compression to a point there's generally no visual distinction between the before and after (use the save for web... command). On the other hand, more casual programs such Paint or (sometimes) Lightroom won't do the proper tracking of the color when converting from working color space to sRGB, but rather just apply the sRGB profile...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2740471
I use Lightroom 5.4, so how do I fix the problem?
>>2740485
I do not use LR, so I can't say. Make sure you exporting the sRGB, not saving it as adobeRGB jpegs. Also, google
eh /p/ this is my first time on this page,I wanna start getting into photography. I want to get a budget dslr to take landscape pics with and maybe some night sky pictures aswell. Ive been looking at the nikon d3000 or the rebel t3, any suggestions? and ik i wont get great quality star shots with these cameras but would i get a decent pic if I set a high ISO, an aperture of f3.5 and a 20 sec exposure time?
buy a cheap aps-c body and a samyang/rokinon 12mm f2.0
>>2740324
My budget is probably 300$ or less
![IMG_4858[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/pXAieD5.jpg "IMG_4858[1].jpg")
so /p/ what to do ?
i have Canon T3i btw.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 600D Lens Size 18.00 - 55.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.2 Lens Name EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:01:09 02:09:42 Exposure Time 30 sec F-Number f/13.0 Exposure Program Manual Lens Aperture f/12.9 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5184 Image Height 2912 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Evaluative ISO Speed Rating Auto Sharpness Unknown Saturation High Contrast Unknown Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Large Focus Mode Manual Drive Mode Single Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Macro Mode Normal White Balance Auto Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 236 Color Matrix 135
>>2740111
You go outside and take photos.
>>2740111
>don't take 30 second exposures of shit on your desk
>kill yourself
A Canon DSLR updates dead pixel removal data every time manual sensor cleaning is activated. Warm sensor shows more almost dead pixels.
1. Leave camera to shoot video for few minutes to heat up the sensor.
2. Activate sensor cleaning / manual cleaning from menu. (Mirror goes up.)
3. Wait half a minute and turn the power off.
You should see less dead pixels. If that does not help, delete System32.
