Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 147. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
I am as noob as it gets around deez shit.
Come at me
>>2746131
brighten up the sky just a smidge
>>2746131
I see resizing properly is too hard for you
>>2746233
LET HIM BE ANNON SHES NEW
>also read the fucking sticky OP
I just got a roll of Kodachrome 40. After some research the conclusion is that there is not a single lab in this world that will develop it. I don't get it. Kodak won't do it and they're not producing any developer for the K14 process any more. So why won't they just make the process public so anyone can use it? I really can't understand the reasoning.
>>2745888
Son, shit just ain't that easy.
>>2745890
I know it's complicated as fuck. But they're not producing it and there are more than enough capable chemists out there.
http://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/yahoopresentation.pdf
press F to pay respects
shit sorry about thumbnail
will use my ello account then :^)
>Bring Back: The Old Logo
At least somebody realized there are other routes besides the minimalistic approach to logos. Good for Yahoo.
Anyone have any experience with the Tokina 24-70 2.8, and how it performs vs. the tamron 24-70 2.8 ?
I'm deciding between these 2 lenses.
>>2745312
fuck you.
:'(
>>2745312
Both are objectives which you may use with great success.
Both are objectives which are outperformed by modern models.
BTFO
Got a decent telescope for Christmas and want to try my hand at some astrophotography, been using the moon for practice, I have some night time shots, but took this one today in the day time and it's probably my favourite so far.
Can I have some honest opinions and maybe some input on how I can do it better?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:01:15 14:58:38 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/inf Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2745015
1) People have seen the moon, so just a photo of the moon, while being a personal accomplishment for you, doesn't really have a whole lot to offer your viewer, unless it's really special, which this isn't.
2) You need to work on your composition. You're only using about 1/3rd of your frame, and the rest isn't doing much to support the scene
3) You need to work on your post processing. This looks really soft and muddy, which can be polished up quite a bit in post if you know what you're...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2745019
Yeah I know the moon isn't the most impressive or rare thing in the sky lol, but as I said I'm just using it as practice until I get my technique better.
The only using 1/3rd of the frame issue could be solved by cropping, right?
What's good software to use post? I have GIMP, but I'm still learning the basics really. The corners being dark is because of the scope, but that's easily cropped out I guess,.
The fine detail seems to depend a lot on the clouds and atmosphere. I see a lot more details with my 2X Barlow lens, but with the moon only being in crescent phase, the magnification doesn't leave me much to focus on. I'm hoping to get some better shots using it at half or full moon.
Here's one of the night time pics I took, they all came out quite blurry, but I realised it was my fault, the hot air from my houses heating system kept blowing in front of the scope -_-
So basically, crop more, learn post processing technique?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:01:15 15:24:16 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/inf Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1556 Image Height 1037 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:15 10:57:30 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/inf Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 666 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
Hello /p/
I want to shoot live bands, any advice, gear, etc that you can give me so I dont die on the attempt will be appreciated.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2743414
Depends on the band
>Arcade Fire, Bon Iver, Arctic Monkeys, Black Keys, The Decemberists, Belle & Sebastian and other like bands
Holga preferably beaten up and full of light leaks, Diana, Nikon Df, any camera than is 120mm or medium format
>Radiohead, Neutral Milk Hotel, My Bloody Valentine, Merriweather Post Pavilion, The Antlers, The Microphones
Potato camera
Get a fast prime lens (f1.2 - f2.8) so you can open it up and have as much light come in because more than likely there's going to be shitty production.
Don't be afraid to push ISO to 1600 - 3200 so you can get shutter speeds of 1/200 - 1/250 (you can fix the grain in post)
Two bodies, one wide zoom (16-35 2.8 is good), one short tele prime (85 1.4 or 1.8, 100 2) if in local bar type concerts, or a tele zoom (70-200 2.8) for stadium concerts in the photo pit.
Music and sports are two genres that you absolutely cannot skimp on fast pro glass, so if you're on a budget, it's going to really hurt trying to get the right gear to be able to take the best photos.
You can get by with a single body and nifty fifty, but you will be very limited in what you can take.
What camera should I get if I want to go on week long journeys in the wilderness?
I'm just getting into everything so either way I'd either learn photography or videography
I assume most ones would be digital but if not I would consider it
It's sad how transparent it is when people like >>2740387 start false-flagging dumb gear question threads, as though it's not immediately obvious what they're doing. Maybe in their heads, they think that this will change the collective opinion of the board in their favor again, but to the rest of us, they just come off as emotional, obnoxious sacks of shit.
>>2742704
That really still depends on how much photography you want to do, of what, and so on.
I'd default to a GoPro, Yicam or smartphone camera for a low weight setup. Also has a pretty good combo with solar chargers and 18650 batteries for power.
But if you care more about photos or videos in good quality, you might take a more heavy / expensive DSLR / MILC setup with you. I really don't know where your preferences lie...
R I C O H G R
I
C
O
H
G
R
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:17 11:29:35 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 640 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
ok /p/ i need some help.
My birthday and christmas are within 3 days of each other and my mom's boyfriend, who is an Italian, decided to get me a camera.
The Camera he chose was a Calumet C1 8x10 camera, complete with 8ft studio railing system.
I just got a medium format camera to play around with, but now I am trying to figure out how I am going to incorporate a camera that makes a negative as big as my face. So i have a couple questions:
1. How unwieldy is something like this to carry around? It is still being shipped so I haven't seen it yet.
2. Best place to get 8x10 film and are there any emulsions that are different from the 120 format offerings?
3. How the fuck do i develop this film, or is there a recommended place to do so?
I would prefer to not let this sit in my house unused and to make the best of it, im just not quite sure how.
Pic related, the C1 next to a 4x5 and a 35mm SLR
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1600 Image Height 1133
>>2740771
>1. How unwieldy is something like this to carry around?
It is feasible if you drive. You don't want to carry it on your back all the time, tho it is possible.
>2. Best place to get 8x10 film and are there any emulsions that are different from the 120 format offerings?
This depends on where you live. You can get some ortho films that are not available to smaller formats. Sheets will be expensive, considerably more than 4x5 sheets. (here...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
They make a Tri-X 320 that I hear good things about.
>>2740771
>1. How unwieldy is something like this to carry around? It is still being shipped so I haven't seen it yet.
Extremely unwieldy. You would be surprised by just how big and heavy large format is until you have to carry it around. You see it in photos like the one you posted and you think, "damn, that's big." You are in no way prepared for the reality of the situation.
>2. Best place to get 8x10 film and are there any emulsions that are different...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Hello everyone! I was using Android, since few days ago i bought Nokia Lumia 535 and I'm very interested in photography, so, could you guys recommend me some apps, free if possible, for photo editing and stuff. I would appriciate if you guys know some app which could help me in getting my photos edited on trippy way, like pic i posted.
*sorry for my english :(
You might have more luck posting in;
>>>/g/52437551
weve had some decent snow days this season
shots from various parks around the city
feel free to share critique/opinion
Hey /P/ My School Is Hosting A Photography Contest And I Am Going To Enter This
Its Called "My Warped Worldview" And Its My Best Photo Ive Taken So Far.
I Think Ive Edited It About As Best I Can But If You Guys Know Any Good Filters Or Presets I Could Maybe Use I Would Like Some Of Your Help.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 914 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 292 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:16 22:47:08 Exposure Time 10 sec F-Number f/29.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/29.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 195.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2000 Image Height 1333 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
Maybe you should get back to English class if you think that's the correct way to write a sentence.
Your photo is utter garbage. Please fuck off.
>photography contest
>my best photo I've taken so far
>picture of a fucking camera
>asking about post process as if it's going to save you
>capitalizing every word
yeah try going outside dude, this is lame and cringy
A winter photo session?
Hey there /p/. I've shot few rolls of film now and enjoyed it tremendously. I've decided to buy a somewhat big supply of film so I don't have to buy few rolls at a time from the local shop.
Prices however in Finland are somewhat expensive. For example one roll of HP5 costs 7,20€ and ten rolls of HP5 is 62€. I found this one German shop (fotoimpex) selling HP5 for under 5€. Their shipping was a little expensive but on the other hand big order might justify the cost.
Are there any other options (Germany, Estonia?) or should I just bite the bullet...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Amazon and ebay for any kinds I can't find on Amazon
>>2744270
>Finland
>expensive
You live in one of the richest countries in the world yet you still complain of the prices? Being poor in a rich country ain't so bad compared to being poor in a third world country.
I live in a 3rd world country but I work my ass off so I can afford all the luxuries I have. Stop complaining. #firstworldproblems
>>2744275
Well German Amazon is selling HP5 for over 8€ per roll which is really bananas. And ten rolls of the same stuff in UK Amazon is around 62€ (the same price as in Finland). So I don't think Amazon is the way to go.
Thoughts on this pic
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3000 Image Height 2008
Way to dark
>>2742461
this edit is marvelous
I have GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome) /p/.
Ever since I bought my first DSLR, a second hand Nikon D90 around a year ago, I have been acquiring gear and have already bought a bunch of lenses, flashes, camera accessories and a film camera.
I probably have spent around $1000+ on all my gear on 1 year alone. Now I'm on the hunt again for another lens because it's kind of cheap.
I hope to get the payment back when I become a pro but there are a few photography jobs here and I still suck.
Anyhow, how can I just stop myself from watching gear...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
For me it happened when I got sick of luggig around 2 camera, 4+ lenses, 3 flashes, triggers, and light stands. Shooting became a chore and I slowly started cutting back on what I took out with me. Eventually I started selling off what I no longer used and kept the bare essentials. Now I have a digital camera with 2 primes and a medium format camera with 2 primes. I never take either out at the same time and rarely take more than 1 lens with me.
A simple setup allows me to spend more time seeing and looking and less time figuring out which pieces of gear will yield the...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
This is me too, but with film cameras. It doesn't help that I'm particularly good at finding used stuff for cheap.
>>2742108
>I probably have spent around $1000+ on all my gear on 1 year alone
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO
you dont have GAS, youre just a poorfag. photo is kinda expensive if you want to take the serious route.
now, think of this: every buy of gear should have a functional reason behind it. you dont buy a wide angle for the fuck of it, or because "everyone should have at least one". buy it because your type of photos need it.
