What are some good pics to practice clone stamping and colour correction on?
Pic related. There was an old man in the foreground and the colours were a bit washed before.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:01:24 20:48:47 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1024 Image Height 768
Basically any photo. On this one, remove all people and buildings.
I download my friends bad Facebook photos and color correct them.
>>2752825
Done
Also i'm not OP and i have no idea what im doing
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:25 19:27:47 Color Space Information sRGB
>>2753308
Not too bad. If you zoom all the way in & know what to look for you could tell stuff had been cloned. Kind of above the girl's head you can tell that the line of the sand isn't followed.
Keep on working at it!
Recent photo thread.
>>2757369 nearing 300.
Please remember to try and give thoughtful judgement and critique to the poster.
Thoughts on this?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-510 Camera Software VSCO Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 220 mm Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition RGB Horizontal Resolution 314 dpi Vertical Resolution 314 dpi Image Created 2015:09:11 01:01:41 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/5.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/5.2 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 110.00 mm Comment Processed with VSCOcam with m5 preset Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 612 Image Height 816 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Soft
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:02:02 00:48:46 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 985
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:02:02 00:52:42 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1015 Image Height 1000
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2079 Image Height 2048 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:02:02 00:53:29 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1015 Image Height 1000
I'm looking for a slim everyday "man bag" that I can also use to carry an a7s+lens and maybe another prime, nothing more,
Priority is small size, easy fast and kinda stealth access (fuck velcro) while still being relatively safe when closed and a look that doesn't scream "camera bag". Don't care about water-proof materials, not in my country.
I saw a shitload of bags on amazon but they're all like this:
a: big camera bags, they all obviously have "I have a camera inside, pls steal it" written on them. I may...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Also I fucked up the subject. Anyway this is the other bag, maybe the 100 version, smaller than the 150, is better for me.
Check out the Ona Bowery, looks a tad gay but it's really small while still having enough room for a camera and a couple of lenses.
>>2756738
>Ona Bowery
Yeah it looks less gay depending on the colour, I like it. Problem is it's definitely out of my budget, the bags I posted cost less than 50$.
I want to start taking photos with something that's not my phone, but I want it to be something that's easy to carry around.
I can't stop hearing about the Ricoh GR here. Do I take the plunge with this, or do I look into the Fujifilm X100S/T?
Which would you recommend for a beginner who doesn't want a DSLR and is probably not going to upgrade this camera for a while.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>2753880
gear thread you fucking cuck.
>>2753880
Get a fucking DSRL or keep using your phone.
the Ricoh doesn't even have a view finder.
also, gear thread.
>>2753884
>the Ricoh doesn't even have a view finder.
OH NO!
anyone mess with these types of lenses? they look interesting but are they worth getting
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2005:02:10 21:59:13 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 400 Image Height 334
>>2752397
Ask Eggy, he has a bunch
>>2752397
i audibly said WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT when i saw this image
seriously
what the fuck am i looking at?
>>2752445
A camera with a catadioptric lens.
/p/ is Facebook trier when it comes it criticism, but instead of a Like you'll get "your shit sucks" or "kill yourself". While both of these answers are valid for most of the pictures posted on here, because your pictures are Facebook trier as well, they don't really help the photographer improve.
We've had critique threads in the past and they didn't really work out as well, everybody just posted their stuff and very few people actually left a critique. Let's try something new:
I'll take my time to leave you an in depth critique of your work. I'll analyze the technical aspects as well as the picture language. I'll try my best to help you improve and become a better photographer if you follow my simple rules:
>board rules apply
I won't critique at any needlessly large pictures
>no snapshits
I won't critique your holiday pictures or similar stuff, chose a picture you think is worth it
>tell me about your picture
What was your intention of doing it, what did you try to convey? I'll spend my time with your work, so I'm expecting you to help me understand your point of view. A little background is enough, you don't need to write an essay.
That's it. If any of you would like to join in and start a discussion I'd appreciate it. Let's talk about pictures on here for once.
>picture sauce: Karl Peters, Otto Steinert bei der Korrektur, 1965
In case anyone is interested.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:20 11:21:52 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 800
>>2748538
while I like that people are willing to give critique, why not do in in the several photo threads still in the catalog?
(assuming you haven't already done so)
>>2747122
>>2736399
>>2747357
>>2745478
>>2747497
>>2746181
>>2746458Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
first of all, I'm happy (and a little impressed) to see a thread like this and I really hope it turns out well. You're helping making this board better.
I'm interested in your opinion on this shot I took at some busy shopping street at Rome. Already made a whole thread showing some of the shots, but it's gone now.. shot bw film at night and had to push it to 1600 to get some useable shutter speeds, hence the grain. Didn't do anything to the scan except for stamping out dust. Someone suggested straightening it, but as this means cropping out parts that were in the original frame, I chose not to.
thank you in advance and if you don't mind I can also give my opinion on the photos of others.
>>2748553
because only few people open threads for their photos due to the "critique" usually given in RPT. I guess especially beginners are less likely to open their own thread when single shots they took are already called "shit" in some RPT before.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:09 23:48:56
2 landscape shots stitched to make a square because I put a lot of images on insta. Been trying to experiment with pushing saturation in an eye pleasing way, tweaking the hue and altering saturation in relation to specific luminosities. There isn't much meaning to the image its more of a technical/asthetic attempt
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3983 Image Height 3342 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:20 12:13:39 Exposure Time 1/1000 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1600 Image Height 1343 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
Gear Thread - Anime Edition
If you have questions about a new camera, what lenses to buy and anything related to gear or wondering about getting into photography, post it in this thread.
Do not attempt to make a new thread for your new Rabal, broken glass and being new. You have been warned!
I repeat, ANYTHING GEAR RELATED goes in here!
And don't forget, be polite!
Previous thread: >>2755923
Let's see those compacts /p/
Scored this on sale a couple months ago, normally I don't do low light with compacts but I can handhold 1/5th second at 200 ISO and the flippy screen lets me shoot it like a Hassy or Mamiya RB
For a waterproof and shockproof around 200 it can't be beat. There's an upgraded version with an F2 lens but this one seems to work well. My only complaint is no manual exposure or Av modes but if you're careful you can cheat the program mode into doing what you want. It even does ISO 6400 and the grain doesn't look...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2757788
>>2757788
I have a Pana LX-5 and I love its manual controls and the 1:1 crop ratio. But yeah I wish it has a flippy screen as well for street photography.
From a photoshoot I did recently.
I want to know what the /p/ros think.
1/5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D610 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Elements 12.0 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 938 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 50 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3949 Image Height 5528 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:01:23 20:20:56 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 714 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
2/5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D610 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Elements 12.0 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 938 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 85 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4016 Image Height 6016 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:01:25 21:11:37 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 85.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 668 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
3/5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D610 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Elements 12.0 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 938 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 85 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5525 Image Height 3688 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:01:25 21:47:12 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 85.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 668 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
4/5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D610 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Elements 12.0 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 938 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 85 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3586 Image Height 5020 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:01:27 22:13:38 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 85.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 714 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
http://www.dpreview.com/news/3240829197/sony-announces-24mp-a6300-mirrorless-camera
>a6300
>24Megapickle
>not even bsi
>a-at least we got copper wiring, right?
>same old body
>could have made the screen swivel
>same old 16-50
Where were you when apsc is kill?
cucked.
sony probably didn't want to cannibalize their a7 by making...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2759724
>http://www.dpreview.com/news/3240829197/sony-announces-24mp-a6300-mirrorless-camera
Awesome, finally!
the a6000 will get a price drop and i can BUY ONE
>>2759724
I'm pretty excited about the better EVF, that was the main thing holding me off. And if the AF is even marginally better, that'll be a big win as well. Shame it's so similar to the a6k tho.
>sony probably didn't want to cannibalize their a7 by making the apsc really good.
and they also didn't want to waste a fuckton of R&D money when they can just camp on the A6000 specs because there's still nothing that can directly compete with it. Plus it's...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2759724
What happened to the 6100 and 6200?
ITT: General film thread.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 70 dpi Vertical Resolution 70 dpi
my question, anybody knows this brand of film in thread picture?
>>2751468
Prymax Color
>>2751469
Are you serious, aren;t you? Go be funny somewhere else!
Behold the 1dx-II killer
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:02:03 21:49:02 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1068 Image Height 492
>>2759761
nifty.
>Nex 6: 2.3m dot EVF
>a6000: 1.4m dot EVF
2016
>a6300: 2.3m dot EVF
>NEW NEW NEW
>>2759761
I have an a6000 and this new camera is definitely not worth the upgrade
>>2759773
Since you don't film
I posted up 3 months ago or so and you guys helped a painfully new noob with the basics and since then I've gotten bit pretty good with the photography bug. I've run a couple rolls of black and white through my camera and called up my developer and they don't do black and white anymore, so I called another place, they pointed me to a place in TX, and they pointed me to a place in CA neither of which do it anymore.
I'm sure I could find a place on Google, but if I'm going to send them off, I would rather go to a place that I know others have had...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I do it in my bathroom, it's very simple and cheap
>>2758847
Real hardcore motherfuckers like me do it themselves, but you could try indie film lab, the darkroom, dwaynes, old school photolab etc
>mfw I order expensive Canon lenses from amazon for 4-5 days trips
>snap wonderful pictures then return them
>portfolio ranges from wide-angle to telezoom
>always get full refund in 14 days no question asked
ayy
>>2758706
well jew'd, congratulations
>>2758709
14 day limit is basic euro law but what op is doing is basically what canon pro service already does for free (joining req is owning a cine camera or 3 L lenses idk) so I dont really see the point
>>2758706
>Im a poorfag
coolstorybro.nef
went to a wedding recently and the "professional photographer" was using a 10d and a kit lens. why the fuck is this allowed?
>inb4 it's not the camera it's the photographer
>>2758673
He still seems to get booked. Either is pictures are good enough or the couple tried to save money, you get what you pay for.
Shut your bitchass up lmao.
>>2758673
If he takes good photos, why the fuck does it matter? If he gets booked a lot, why the fuck does it matter? If the clients are happy, why the fuck does it matter?
Why should someone's gear be a barrier to entry? Terry Richardson almost exclusively (or used to, anyway) used cheap point and shoots for his work, and he's been in just about every magazine there is to be in
How can I use Photoshop to make the face he is making in the reflection on the right his reflection on the pic on the left
>>2758580
Careful selecting and transparency I guess. I suppose you'd have to somehow remove the original reflection. Maybe you could just burn it out because of the black background.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Wq-ku3AwTA
pls no bully