[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 127. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

File: video general 42.png (299 KB, 650x800) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
video general 42.png
299 KB,
Sticky: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gh-fomKSuIEZ-GJo2tere4YMjsDvmmsuyiJKzQ-1ZRk/edit

Archived Threads: https://fgts.jp/p/search/subject/video%20general/
255 replies and 28 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
Looking for advice on a broadcast camcorder.

I have a reasonable budget to choose cameras for my college's new studio. The studio will be used for talking-head interviews, and smalltime broadcast style news done by students. This will include green screen work.

what's a good broadcast camera i can get around $5,000? I'm interested in the Sony pxw-x180, but after using the HXR-NX5 for the last couple of years, 3X 1/3" sensors just don't seem good enough. Maybe they have improved since then though?

The "cinema" cameras...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
>>2741193
For around 5k? You could go all out and get the Panasonic dvx200, has a 4/3 sensor, wile most others still use iPhone or point-and-shit sized sensors
>>
>>2741205
Just looked it up, not a bad camera. The 3G-SDI and 4K option are great pluses in my book.
Only negative thing I heard is that people are having issues with color grading on it.

File: howdoia7s.jpg (73 KB, 728x551) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
howdoia7s.jpg
73 KB,
So I just bought an a7s to shoot videos, I always used my cheap t2i and good prime lenses, never felt the need of a better camera for videos until the last year, had the money and decided to do the next step. I'm a noob with this new stuff so pls don't kill me.

I was fucking around with picture profiles to see how they looked and pp4 seems to behave in a different way than the others. Even with the smallest amount of overexposure, colors become really weird. They kinda shift to a brighter/washed out version, some just become white but others seem to stay there...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
21 replies and 4 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
Ok I just checked the actual files on my computer monitor and they don't look "weird", it seems like the monitor/viewfinder of the camera made them look a lot more saturated/vivid.
It happens when I select "ITU709". I don't know what the fuck i'm doing, yeah
>>
>>2762040
Learn to do your color grading in post first.

Plus simply do not use the profiles that don't work for you, if you don't need to.

> is my a7s having some problems
How would we know, we can't even see samples. But rather than making us do the work, how about you compare your stuff yourself to gazillions of pieces of published materials from other A7S & find out.
>>
>>2762046
The problem is this happens only on camera. It's ok on my computer monitor.

I may have been a bit too modest in my post, I know how to use raw files and I always do my color grading, the color just seem really fucked up only on my a7s.

File: _MG_5152.jpg (2 MB, 3504x2336) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
_MG_5152.jpg
2 MB,
Long exposure thread?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 20D
Lens Size18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware VersionFirmware 2.0.3
Owner Nameunknown
Serial Number0520320434
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:02:05 08:45:29
White Point Chromaticity0.3
Exposure Time15 sec
F-Numberf/11.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/11.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length24.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width3504
Image Height2336
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Exposure ModeManual
Focus TypeAuto
Metering ModeEvaluative
SharpnessHigh
SaturationHigh
ContrastNormal
Shooting ModeManual
Image SizeLarge
Focus ModeManual
Drive ModeContinuous
Flash ModeOff
Compression SettingFine
Macro ModeNormal
White BalanceAuto
Exposure Compensation3
Sensor ISO Speed160
Image Number751-5152
Color Matrix0
8 replies and 3 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2761625
worthless
>>
>>2761625
Oh my god

This is the most high school board on 4chan

Can we start an adult /p/?
>>
>>2761625
please stop

File: ThisHandIsOnFiiree.jpg (3 MB, 5223x2616) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
ThisHandIsOnFiiree.jpg
3 MB,
Do I have to be not proud of my work because I followed an entire tutorial to make it ? Is it a good thing to do as a beginner ? Is it consider to have no creativity ?

Tutorial I used: http://10steps.sg/tutorials/photoshop/combine-fire-glow-and-crack-effect-in-photoshop-to-create-a-realistic-burning-image/

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX30
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4000
Image Height3000
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:02:04 20:50:38
Exposure Time1/2 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Brightness0.7 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length7.10 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width5223
Image Height2616
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
6 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2761088
>Do I have to be not proud of my work because I followed an entire tutorial to make it ?
of course not
>Is it a good thing to do as a beginner ?
yes
>Is it consider to have no creativity ?
no. You're still learning


its natural to follow tutorials and even imitate other photographers when you're starting. don't worry about it senpai.
>>
This tutorial is worthless
>>
>>2761088
well, if you could've wasted months getting there on your own then it was a smart decision...

File: eyeem-79952556.jpg (402 KB, 1800x1193) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
eyeem-79952556.jpg
402 KB,
The GR is a toy, they say.
This motherfucker of a picture was shot on a GR.

>Best picture of 2016 so far

Post your GR shots in here, faggots.
98 replies and 16 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2754711
http://petapixel.com/2016/01/27/this-photo-of-the-nyc-blizzard-looks-like-a-painting/
>>
File: 1441148435592.jpg (80 KB, 758x759) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1441148435592.jpg
80 KB, 758x759
>teal snow

into the garbage it goes.
>>
So, is it a good first camera for beginners?

File: P2010911.jpg (1 MB, 1713x1167) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
P2010911.jpg
1 MB,
Hey, /p/. I'm very new to photography, and if I ask anybody to critique what I've gotten so far, they just say "Yeah, that looks real good" because either they just want to be nice or they really don't know, so I have no idea if I'm total shit or actually decent.
I'm gonna post a few of my more favorite shots so far, and any criticism or feedback would be much appreciated. Be as brutal as you want, I'm really trying to learn here.
If anybody else new wants to see if their work is decent, I guess this would be a good place.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-PL6
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Color Filter Array Pattern800
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:02:06 06:57:28
Exposure Time4 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length14.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationHigh
SharpnessHard
10 replies and 5 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: P2020981.jpg (2 MB, 1632x1224) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
P2020981.jpg
2 MB, 1632x1224
(2/5)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-PL6
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Color Filter Array Pattern800
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)32 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:02:06 06:58:00
Exposure Time1/400 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length16.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlLow Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationHigh
SharpnessHard
>>
File: P1160212.jpg (2 MB, 1632x1224) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
P1160212.jpg
2 MB, 1632x1224
(3/5)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-PL6
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)30 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:02:06 06:56:49
Exposure Time1.6 sec
F-Numberf/22.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/22.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length15.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: P2041117.jpg (811 KB, 1632x1224) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
P2041117.jpg
811 KB, 1632x1224
(4/5)
This was shot with a 50mm Canon FD lens held off the body. The tilt effect is genuine, not an Instagram effect.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeOLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera ModelE-PL6
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0
Color Filter Array Pattern692
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:02:06 06:58:09
Exposure Time1/160 sec
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating800
Exposure Bias-0.3 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationHigh
SharpnessHard

File: digitalizar0012.jpg (222 KB, 1171x794) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
digitalizar0012.jpg
222 KB,
Hey there.

I've started trying film fotography a few weeks ago, and this is one from my first color roll. It was a Kodak Gold 200, shot with a Nikon F60. Can someone explain to me what those stripes are? I'm not sure if the problem was in the shooting or if it was the lab.

Anyway, i'm not a pro, i just take photos as a hobby, so don't judge too harshly please

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelHP Scanjet djf2200
Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution200 dpi
Vertical Resolution200 dpi
Image Created2016:01:24 00:53:48
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1171
Image Height794
SaturationLow
SharpnessSoft
5 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
It could be the lab using a dirty machine to process your photos. Tell them to clean their equipment and see if they'll give you a refund/newfilm/process etc.
>>
>>2759912
>digitalizar
>fotography
>kodak gold 200
you BR senpai? I suggest quitting film unless you're loaded
it's a niche market in a severely under-demanding market
that means no fair price on new products i.e. film and paraphernalia, due to no production and little to no importation
also no maintenance on equipment since they're getting discontinued and not being replaced due to no demand whatsoever,...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
>>2759912
Looks like a bad scan to me. I'd try to get a better scan of this picture if possible

and ignore this faggot>>2761587

File: image.jpg (80 KB, 1136x853) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
80 KB,
Let's see some of your best recent pictures
255 replies and 151 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1435103377292.jpg (141 KB, 543x405) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1435103377292.jpg
141 KB, 543x405
>>2755096
Really like that but I feel like some of the lines are not quite straight and it sorta fucks with me but then I realize I like that more than if they were all actually straight

>mfw all my most recent are literally snapshits I took on the way to the drug store to test a camera I bought at a thrift store and I just got the scans back

I'm the worst
>>
File: IMG_0314.jpg (464 KB, 1012x996) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
IMG_0314.jpg
464 KB, 1012x996
Anyone reckon it would be worth using the built-in digital camera unit on some of the petrographic microscopes I use in the lab to get nicer pictures of rock thin sections? Not entirely sure how good the camera actually is, but it's good enough to project an image on a board and still look decent. Would anyone find that interesting enough to warrant me bothering to post it? Maybe I'm just being overly enthusiastic, but what you can see with microscopy is fascinating to me

Pic related is snapshit taken today looking down the eyepiece with the crosshair to give an idea of what you usually see of a rock thin section (this section specifically is shap granite under crossed polars with biotite intergrown into chlorite, titanite and significantly altered pagioclase visible)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 5s
Camera Software9.2.1
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationRight-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:01:28 11:48:33
Exposure Time1/100 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating64
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Brightness4.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length4.15 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3264
Image Height2448
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>2755124
This looks very interesting

File: PENFbeauty[1].jpg (40 KB, 590x442) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
PENFbeauty[1].jpg
40 KB,
So, what does /p/ think of Lolympus Pen-F
First impressions:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/history-repeating-olympus-pen-f-first-impressions-review

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 40D
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Exposure Time2 sec
F-Numberf/22.0
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/22.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length16.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
89 replies and 9 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: PenFbody11[1].jpg (256 KB, 1200x736) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
PenFbody11[1].jpg
256 KB, 1200x736


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 40D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:01:26 12:19:44
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/11.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/11.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length100.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>2754393
>and sleek rangefinder-style looks (reminiscent of Fujifilm’s X100 series cameras)

it looks exactly like the old Pen FT, NOT like le x100 memecamera. im gonna gut that faggot with a dessert spoon, fucking hell.
>>
eh.

File: A1QbF98wK4L.jpg (1 MB, 1649x2560) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
A1QbF98wK4L.jpg
1 MB,
I'm a beginner photographer and I've been going out and taking pictures of things to get a sense for the controls of my camera. I've also been getting a grasp on the exposure triangle and messing around to see what happens when I set the camera in different ways.

The issue is that I've just gone out and taken pictures of... whatever. Sometimes I'm just out in my backyard at different times of day to see how light affects my exposure. So I'm getting the technical aspect down, but it's everything else that I'm lacking.

I know that it's a good idea to go somewhere with purpose and to have an idea of what you want to photograph ahead of time. This is a dumb question but, what's a good 'assignment' for a beginner photographer? What should I be concentrating on as my subjects? I don't think I have a complete grasp on everything to the point where I'd feel comfortable shooting street photography, but I think I need something more concrete than "just go out and take pictures".

What are some of the things you started off taking pictures of?
8 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
I think at this point you really should just be taking pictures of anything. Play around with composition. Pick a subject and see how many different ways you can capture it.
>>
Pretend you're shooting for a tour book for your town or some shit.
>>
>>2761592
I think your ready to develop a watermark, put an ad on Craigslist and take pictures of halfnaked girls so they can post the pictures on Facebook and pretend they are models.

This seems like to be the way things work nowadays.

File: 209455_b51636.jpg (51 KB, 640x480) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
209455_b51636.jpg
51 KB,
i have no idea where to find any good photography
suggest some sites to cure this
17 replies and 4 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2760943
>>>/p/
>>
Photography sites or blogs selling gear?
>>
>>2760977
photography sites

>>2760975
should've clarified with professional

File: rekt.jpg (136 KB, 1868x1868) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
rekt.jpg
136 KB,
jealous poorfags?
31 replies and 4 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2755806
You realize for all the money you spent on filters, which you could re-create in PS or LR yourself, that you could've bought a new lens instead?
>>
its fucking nothing
>>
>>2755806
no I shoot actual film, which is a tenth of the cost you've spent on some digital effects that I could of made myself

File: olympus-e-510_6A.jpg (36 KB, 400x300) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
olympus-e-510_6A.jpg
36 KB,
Does anyone else shoot Olympus?

I have an e-510 and for some reason the picture always comes out with more room on the right and bottom side than the viewfinder shows. It's not too big of a deal because it gives me a little extra space that I can crop out of if necessary, but it's just a bit strange.
7 replies and 2 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
Optical viewfinders sometimes don't cover the entire frame that the sensor sees. That camera has a 95% coverage viewfinder, so about 5% of your photo isn't visible in the finder. I guess it's also not perfectly centered which is why you get extra on just the right and bottom instead of a little extra all the way around.
>>
Best way you can ensure complete frame coverage with the 510 is to use the live view, although AF will be shit (had a 410, still have a 520).
>>
I was recently given some FT lenses with no body. What is a FT body that is still relevant today?

Hey /p/
I don't often post here but here goes,
I make short films and need to make one over the weekend, i have all the equiptment but theres one problem. i need a steadicam/glidecam/camera stabilizer. anyone live in Leeds, UK that would be willing to help out? i know its alot to ask but ill only need it for a few hours, plus it would be cool to meet some of you guys!
7 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2760582

I don't know if you're a fucking psycho or not.

I have a Glidecam HD4000 and I fucking hate it.
>>
>>2760582
I'm on the other side of the planet so obviously can't help, But you might want to offer up some info about the shot.

What camera do you hope to put on it?
What kind of shot? Is there running involved. Is it just following people while they walk. is it an action sequence, etc.
>>
>>2760604
running, walking, i have a sony a7 mk ii

File: image.png (670 KB, 750x1334) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.png
670 KB,
Looks like shit
58 replies and 2 images submitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>2757837

Looks better than the D5, those 3 front function buttons piss me off everytime I look at the piece of shit.

If you need more than 2 do it like Canon has done it.
>>
>wew GPS
>wew dual pixel AF
>same FPS limits
>same AF sensor
>reworked algorithms
>muh touchscreen AF for video
Fucking dead on arrival m8, literally brings nothing new for 1Dx users.
>>
>>2757843
>14 fps / 16 fps in liveview
>touchscreen
>4k video
>"nothing new"

Pages: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160] [161] [162] [163] [164] [165] [166] [167] [168] [169] [170] [171] [172] [173] [174] [175] [176] [177] [178] [179] [180] [181] [182] [183] [184] [185] [186] [187] [188] [189] [190] [191] [192] [193] [194] [195] [196] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206] [207] [208] [209] [210] [211] [212] [213] [214] [215] [216]
Pages: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160] [161] [162] [163] [164] [165] [166] [167] [168] [169] [170] [171] [172] [173] [174] [175] [176] [177] [178] [179] [180] [181] [182] [183] [184] [185] [186] [187] [188] [189] [190] [191] [192] [193] [194] [195] [196] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203] [204] [205] [206] [207] [208] [209] [210] [211] [212] [213] [214] [215] [216]
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at imagescucc@gmail.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.