So I just got into HDR. I am using a D40.
Fstop- 4.5 ISO-200 Exposure-1/250
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D40X Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 750 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:02:25 17:38:27 Exposure Time 2 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Cloudy Weather Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 668 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation High Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
Picture taken next to Folsom prison.
ayy lmao
this is what a properly executed HDR image looks like
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model PENTAX K-3 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 99999999 dpi Vertical Resolution 99999999 dpi Image Created 2016:02:04 20:00:18 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/16.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/16.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Close View
>>2778151
why even bother doing it when you aren't showing off the sky color anyway?
for all we know it's still white/blown out
Hello /p/
How do I achieve this look? I love the 70s on these. Do I need to buy a special old camera, or what?
>>2777785
shoot film or slap some fancy VSCO filters over your pictures
Gotta go back to 70's m8. It's the only way to do it
I really want to buy a high quality digital camera. I've always wanted a DSLR camera, but I've never had the funds.
If I could get an affordable/best bang for your buck camera thread that would be nice. Used/refurbed DSLRs are okay with me.
just fyi I'm a HS senior and looking for something at an affordable price around $200-400.
>>2776550
Nikon D3300 with 18-55mm Kit lens. Buy it used if you want to save some money.
>>2776550
sony a6000
I've seen the t5 for pretty cheap lately.
I'm in the market for a Leica, and it's come down to either an M8 now or save up more and get an M9. Is there really much of a difference between both of them aside from the extra 8MP the M9 has and and the full frame sensor compared to the M8's crop? How much of an increase in image quality/ color rendering is there from the M8 to the M9? And is the M8 too dated, or is it still a good camera to use?
Is there any specific reason you're looking to buy a digital Leica? I'm asking because you don't seem to be bothered by crop factor.
>>2781439
I'm looking to buy a digital Leica because I got a chance to use one of my photography teacher's M240 and I really enjoyed using it. I have a couple film rangefinders prefer them to my SLR's for the type of shooting I do.
I'm not really bothered by the crop factor. I started photography with a 60D and then got a 5D mkii and full frame was nice and everything but I ended up going back to crop when I went mirrorless with my current camera, a Fuji X-T1.
>>2781468
If you already have film rangefinders and you enjoyed the Leica digital then go for the M8 if crop factor really doesn't bother you. I'd personally save up for the M9.
If you get the M8 then make sure to pick up some IR filters too.
If you're looking for an M mount digital camera with an OVF then it may be worth considering a Fuji X-Pro/X-Pro2 with the M adapter. You'll also have the shutter speed dial and a higher ISO range if those meet your shooting requirements.
It all depends...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I was recently at a rodeo snapping some photos chatting it up with another guy who was also there, shooting just for fun or for his photography business or something.
When the event finished and I was heading out, concluding the conversation with the guy, some random woman swooped in and interrupted us and asked me for my card and if I could send her some of the photos. She asked the same of him.
I am not a professional photographer, I gave her one of my personal cards though, and told her to email me.
What is the appropriate response to tell this woman?...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Just send her a fucking photo
>>2779593
But why? What if this lady knits or makes model sailboats in bottles as a hobby,and I just happened to stumble upon her while she is engaging in said hobby. Should that entitle me to the fruits of the hobby,just because?
>live in UK
>buy a 70d as first dslr
>rained every day since I purchased it
JUST
shoulda bout a pentax
cheaper and weather sealed
>>2775080
That's not a photo it's a painting. Keep in mind you are on /p/ anon.
>live in UK
>medical condition that's worse in the cold
>it's cold and wet every day
>still take my camera with me when I go out
Maybe you should stop treating your rabel like something that needs care and protection.
Im wanting to upgrade to a decent camera for wildlife and nature photography, and was wondering if the T6i is worth the $749.00 price tag. If not should i just get a T5i?
>>2779135
>decent camera for wildlife and nature
>T6i
>or a T5i
Seriously, buy lenses instead.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
I doubt it, all the canon rabals from t2i to t6i have the same sensor.
It looks like they got the DIGIC 5 starting at T4i but I am dubious that matters for shit.
It seems mostly all that canon has added on this line in the last 6 years are gimmicks like wifi, articulated touchscreen (who cares) or video (which you could probably do with magiclatern anyway)
ok maybe there is some really rare niche use of an articulating screen but it's not worth an upgrade
>>2779160
This is also correct. It's...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
oh fuck me, the t6i has 24.2 MP, I didn't realize that.
Time to check DXOMark
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/cinestill-medium-large-format-film#/
This is really exciting. Cinestill has struck a deal with Kodak to let them spool Vision3 film in medium format rolls and sheets. If the campaign reaches 190k in 12 hours, 50D will be available from the very beginning.
This is a big day for medium format film.
>>2778641
>Cinestill has struck a deal with Kodak to let them spool Vision3 film in medium format rolls and sheets
that's not really true from my understanding.
from their faq:
>It is important to note that CineSill is NOT simply "repackaged" motion picture film. We utilize the same advanced technology in Motion Picture emulsion to create a still photography film which is modified for C-41 processing. This amazing material is converted to a different format and suitable for C-41 chemistry. Compared to the original motion picture stock, CineStill 800T C-41 responds with a slightly increased gamma yielding an 800 ISO Tungsten balanced negative, which is optimized for optical and hybrid still photography processes.
>>2778651
I assume it's true, due to this, also from their FAQ:
Q: Is cinestill 120 converted 70mm?
A: CineStill 120 will be manufactured from a large special order material and will not have perforations. We converted and slit down 65mm material for Beta Testing our prototype process. The rolls of film we produced this way are the Beta Test rolls we are giving away before fulfillment of the campaign.
Does this mean Nikon will stop gimping their cameras?
No, the pentax is less or on par with nikon's offerings and nikon has a bigger hold on the market.
>>2777100
k-1 > d750
>>2777092
No...it is the Canikon way.
I'm going to be going to a family wedding soon and don't know if I should bring my camera or not. I know there will be a paid pro there. I don't plan on moving and shit to get the shot. Just casual photos of family and what not. What would be proper in this situation?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D700 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Photographer VIKTAR BAIKOUSKI Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 210 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2011:12:19 13:43:34 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/4.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 5000 Lens Aperture f/4.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 210.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 600 Image Height 399 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2776842
I'd say contact the relatives organising it and ask if it's alright to grab a few shots and offer to email them a few choice ones or upload them to facebook, just say you're doing it for practice.
They'll inevitably just be like "shit yeah, free photos" anyway. Doubt it'll be an issue.
>>2776842
>What would be proper in this situation?
Rent a 1D/D4, 200-400/4, spray and pray.
>>2776850
Fucking this lol. Then ask the wedding photographer about his gear and make him feel inferior.
i dont mean to be a gearfaggot or anything but why would you buy a memecoh GR when you can buy this little chumble crumble? it's literally better in every way for a little over a hundo more
yeah that looks pretty dang neato
was thinking about getting a gr but I'll put this on the compare list
yeah that looks really nice
it's because no one knows what a lumix is and you can't go 4 threads without someone shilling ricoh
>>2774140
probably due to the gr having great usability, small size, larger sensor
(compared to the memecro 4/3 sensor), and great files
lumix looks great though, but just because something is better on paper doesnt mean its better irl, like how the canon c series were shit on paper but people love them now
Just ordered this bad boy.
Did I fuck up? I thought it was a pretty good deal for what it comes with.
For $200 + free shipping I got the Metered prism finder, 120 back, 90mm lens, fancy little camera strap and of course the body that's all in decent shape.
Will I regret this decision on purchasing my first medium format camera? Or will I enjoy it for years to come?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:02:14 21:13:39 Image Height 1896 Image Width 1440
>>2768987
yeah its a good deal, they're heavy as fuck and youll probably use it less than you hope but thats pretty common in MF
If you already have a good tripod you're set, just get some cheap cable releases and you've got a great studio setup.
It will probably be much bigger and heavier than you thought it would be especially with the prism finder. I got a tlr after using the rb67 a lot, I only use the rb67 in the studio now.
>>2769001
Yeah I heard they weigh in at around 7 pounds.. That's fucking heavy. But I already have a decent tripod and plan on using it for landscape / architectural along with some studio use now that I have access to one. The only thing I'll really have to learn is the flash. Is it possible to sync this camera up to any studio flash?
Does anybody have any experience with the Minlta SRT 101? I can pick it up with a 50mm 1.7 for around $60. Complete noob to film, but am curious.
>>2768864
Also, just found a Pentax k1000 for around the same price with a 50mm f/2, would that be a better buy?
I have experience with the gear thread, which is where you should be posting.
>>2766194
If you're a complete noob to film, any camera will do. If it's got a working meter, it'll help you out. If it doesn't, you'll have a good opportunity to learn about metering with your eyes.
Assuming both cameras you have here are in good shape, you'll probably be better off with the Minolta since it's coming with a faster lens, giving you more room to stop down for sharper pictures.
Would you guys recommend it?
Would it work?
One of my 1.8 lenses (bought new) started to have fungus. I opened and cleaned it. But now again there is a little starting to grow.
Would shoving this thing over the lenses help to kill all this shit?
i though about this
it should, in theory, kill the fungus in the glass, but not anything that's not on the glass unless you shove the lens with a shit ton of light that gets everywhere inside.
personally i just keep lenses near a bunch of silica bags I've collected over the years and only have fungus on one which came from ebay with the fungus so yeah
as I said fungus is usually not only on the glass so if you open it up again to clean it get some good ol' IPA and wash everything properly, afterwards, silica bags do wonders.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 40D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh) Photographer @donotnoot Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.6 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:31 23:38:03 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/9.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/9.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 84.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 2716 Image Height 1909 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2778836
>(bought new) started to have fungus
Do you live in a ditch?
The glass will block a lot of UV, but leaving the glasses out in the sun would do the same thing. You don't have to buy a UV light source. If fungus is a problem, store gear inside waterproof/ziploc bags with desiccants.
Hello /p/, I was asked the other day to create a list of all the essential things when it comes to making a time lapse.
I thought this would be a easy job, it turns out I underestimated this challenge.
What I started out with in my planning:
- GoPro Hero 4 silver
- 128GB SD card
But I just received a mail with the total time:
- 115 days
Form what I've read the gopro will take picture ranging from 5 MB to 7 MB(estimated) so I calculated and I got this:
60*24*115=165600 pictures
and if we say that every picture is 6 MB then...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2777042
Think about it for a second.
Where on earth would you present 165600 frames?
At 24 fps it's 6900 seconds, a.k.a. almost a two hour movie of your amazing timelapse.
Question is, is this what you want to create? I honestly doubt it, so in case you want a steady timelapse over 115 days (with day and night flicker included) for a more reasonable timeframe, say 2 minutes you need to take 60 times fewer pictures = one an hour.
I doubt a Gopro is the right tool for that job - especially keeping in mind the...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>2777046
You have some good points.
I guess that I should've added more information to my initial question. We're going to film a house being built so if it would be possible to make something that took pictures from 8am to 4pm that would be the best.
By doing so I would have roughly 55000 pictures.
the power wouldn't be a problem as it could be connected to a power outlet throughout the project.
>>2777059
That's still 40 minutes, but if that's what you guys watch at family gatherings then you know, why not.